Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1409.2120 · Foundations of Physics

Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics

Alexia Auffèves, Philippe Grangier

Published Sep 21, 2015• 101 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-015-9952-z

Related papers

Contexts, Systems and Modalities: A New Ontology for Quantum Mechanics

Philippe Grangier

•Nov 6, 2017•0 citations

Contexts, Systems and Modalities : a new ontology for Quantum Mechanics (Orale)

Philippe Grangier

•Jun 1, 2014•0 citations

A modal ontology of properties for quantum mechanics

Newton C. A. da Costa, Olímpia Lombardi, Mariano Lastiri

Synthese•Nov 14, 2012•66 citations

Revisiting the Interpretations of Quantum Mechanics: From FAPP Solutions to Contextual Ontologies

Philippe Grangier

This note presents a concise and non-polemical comparison of several major interpretations of quantum mechanics, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between FAPP-solutions ("For All Practical Purposes'') versus ontological solutions to the measurement problem. Building on this distinction, we argue that the Contexts-Systems-Modalities (CSM) framework, supplemented by the operator-algebraic description of macroscopic contexts, provides a conceptually complete, non-FAPP ontology that naturally incorporates irreversibility and the physical structure of measurement devices. This approach differs significantly from other ontological interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, spontaneous collapse, or many-worlds, and highlights the major role of contextual quantization in shaping quantum theory.

quant-pharXiv:2601.20488•Jan 29, 2026•0 citations

Contexts, systems and modalities in Quantum physics

Philippe Grangier

•Apr 1, 2022•0 citations

Quantum worlds : perspectives on the ontology of quantum mechanics

Federico Holik

•Jan 1, 2019•20 citations
This note presents a concise and non-polemical comparison of several major interpretations of quantum mechanics, with a particular emphasis on the distinction between FAPP-solutions ("For All Practical Purposes'') versus ontological solutions to the measurement problem. Building on this distinction, we argue that the Contexts-Systems-Modalities (CSM) framework, supplemented by the operator-algebraic description of macroscopic contexts, provides a conceptually complete, non-FAPP ontology that naturally incorporates irreversibility and the physical structure of measurement devices. This approach differs significantly from other ontological interpretations such as Bohmian mechanics, spontaneous collapse, or many-worlds, and highlights the major role of contextual quantization in shaping quantum theory.