Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1408.6268 · Physical Review B

Energy density of variational states

Leon Balents

Published Dec 8, 2014• 13 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

For a given many-body Hamiltonian, can a wavefunction in the wrong phase yield an arbitrarily good variational approximation to the true ground state energy density? The author discusses systems for which the answer is positive and outlines other cases where the Hamiltonian is expected to be variationally robust.
DOI
10.1103/physrevb.90.245116

Related papers

Functionals in many-particle physics

Richard M. Martin, Lucia Reining, David M. Ceperley

To avoid confusion, it is necessary to be quite explicit about what is assumed and what is to be proved. A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 121, 950 (1961) Summary The topic of this chapter is functionals that provide a concise formulation for thermodynamic quantities and Green's function methods in interacting many-body systems. Building upon the instructive examples of density functional theory and the Hartree– Fock approximation, functionals of the Green's function are developed to provide a framework for practical methods used extensively in many-body perturbation theory (Chs. 9–15), dynamical mean-field theory (Chs. 16–20), and their combination in Ch. 21. Functional concepts give a firm foundation for those methods, for example, they give the conditions for approximations to obey conservation laws. Additional background and specific aspects are in App. H. Many physical quantities can be expressed as functionals , i.e., they depend on an entire function.1 For example, in the quantum variational method to determine a wavefunction, the total energy of a system of many electrons is a functional of a many-body trial wavefunction ( r 1 , r 2 , …): it is the expectation value of the hamiltonian. At the variational minimum, assuming the trial wavefunction is completely flexible, one finds the many-body Schrödinger equation for the ground state. Many of the properties we are interested in are, formally, simple functionals of the ground- or excited-state wavefunctions. In the search for feasible ways to calculate properties such as excitation spectra, we are led to different types of functional. The idea is to deal only with a physical, measurable quantity Q of interest and a variational functional E [ Q ] of this quantity. The variational character of E allows one to derive equations that determine Q 0 , the value of Q for the system in a desired state, typically the ground state or equilibrium state at T ≠ 0. Other properties should be different functionals F m [ Q ] that can then be evaluated at Q = Q 0 . This strategy is outlined in Fig. 8.1. To appreciate the power of such approaches, one can consider the impact of density functional theory, which is formulated as a functional of the density n ( r ) of electrons; it is defined for a range of densities and the variational minimum for the energy functional E [ n ] leads to equations to determine the actual ground-state density n 0 ( r ) and total energy E 0 .

Cambridge University Press eBooks•May 31, 2016•0 citations

Comments on variational ground states for lattice hamiltonians

Ramesh Anishetty, Anton Bovier

Physics Letters B•Feb 1, 1984•1 citation

Variational-Correlations Approach to Quantum Many-body Problems

Arbel Haim, Richard Kueng, Gil Refael

We investigate an approach for studying the ground state of a quantum many-body Hamiltonian that is based on treating the correlation functions as variational parameters. In this approach, the challenge set by the exponentially-large Hilbert space is circumvented by approximating the positivity of the density matrix, order-by-order, in a way that keeps track of a limited set of correlation functions. In particular, the density-matrix description is replaced by a correlation matrix whose dimension is kept linear in system size, to all orders of the approximation. Unlike the conventional variational principle which provides an upper bound on the ground-state energy, in this approach one obtains a lower bound instead. By treating several one-dimensional spin $1/2$ Hamiltonians, we demonstrate the ability of this approach to produce long-range correlations, and a ground-state energy that converges to the exact result. Possible extensions, including to higher-excited states are discussed.

arXiv:2001.06510•Jan 17, 2020•4 citations

Variational Method for the Ground State Energy of a Quantum Many-Particle System

Hiroshi Takizawa, Akihide Oguchi

Journal of the Physical Society of Japan•Jul 15, 2000•0 citations

A Simple Variational Formula in Quantum

David Park

If one assumes that the change in a ground-state wave function produced by a perturbing potential V is proportional to V, a general and very simple formula for the perturbation in energy results. The formula is illustrated with two examples.

American Journal of Physics•Sep 1, 1973•1 citation

Many-Body Point Transforms. II. An Exact Noncluster Approach to the Hard-Core Many-Body Problem

Norman M. Witriol

The method of many-body point transforms previously developed by the author is modified to eliminate the interacting particle cluster formalism. The cutoff terms in the transformation, and thus in the Hamiltonian, are therefore removed. For the hard-core many-body problem, as in the previous work, a Hamiltonian is obtained which is Fourier analyzable, Hermitian and amenable to ordinary perturbation and variational techniques while still being equivalent to the original Hamiltonian. No approximations are made. It is demonstrated that the use of the standard zeroth-order approximation of the ground state Bose system, i.e., a constant, for the transformed wavefunction gives a negative expectation value of the energy for the hard core system. This discrepancy arises from the extended range of the new potential generated by the transformation, which necessitates explicit consideration of boundary conditions not satisfied by the above wavefunction.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 1971•3 citations
To avoid confusion, it is necessary to be quite explicit about what is assumed and what is to be proved. A. Klein, Phys. Rev. 121, 950 (1961) Summary The topic of this chapter is functionals that provide a concise formulation for thermodynamic quantities and Green's function methods in interacting many-body systems. Building upon the instructive examples of density functional theory and the Hartree– Fock approximation, functionals of the Green's function are developed to provide a framework for practical methods used extensively in many-body perturbation theory (Chs. 9–15), dynamical mean-field theory (Chs. 16–20), and their combination in Ch. 21. Functional concepts give a firm foundation for those methods, for example, they give the conditions for approximations to obey conservation laws. Additional background and specific aspects are in App. H. Many physical quantities can be expressed as functionals , i.e., they depend on an entire function.1 For example, in the quantum variational method to determine a wavefunction, the total energy of a system of many electrons is a functional of a many-body trial wavefunction ( r 1 , r 2 , …): it is the expectation value of the hamiltonian. At the variational minimum, assuming the trial wavefunction is completely flexible, one finds the many-body Schrödinger equation for the ground state. Many of the properties we are interested in are, formally, simple functionals of the ground- or excited-state wavefunctions. In the search for feasible ways to calculate properties such as excitation spectra, we are led to different types of functional. The idea is to deal only with a physical, measurable quantity Q of interest and a variational functional E [ Q ] of this quantity. The variational character of E allows one to derive equations that determine Q 0 , the value of Q for the system in a desired state, typically the ground state or equilibrium state at T ≠ 0. Other properties should be different functionals F m [ Q ] that can then be evaluated at Q = Q 0 . This strategy is outlined in Fig. 8.1. To appreciate the power of such approaches, one can consider the impact of density functional theory, which is formulated as a functional of the density n ( r ) of electrons; it is defined for a range of densities and the variational minimum for the energy functional E [ n ] leads to equations to determine the actual ground-state density n 0 ( r ) and total energy E 0 .
We investigate an approach for studying the ground state of a quantum many-body Hamiltonian that is based on treating the correlation functions as variational parameters. In this approach, the challenge set by the exponentially-large Hilbert space is circumvented by approximating the positivity of the density matrix, order-by-order, in a way that keeps track of a limited set of correlation functions. In particular, the density-matrix description is replaced by a correlation matrix whose dimension is kept linear in system size, to all orders of the approximation. Unlike the conventional variational principle which provides an upper bound on the ground-state energy, in this approach one obtains a lower bound instead. By treating several one-dimensional spin 1/21/21/2 Hamiltonians, we demonstrate the ability of this approach to produce long-range correlations, and a ground-state energy that converges to the exact result. Possible extensions, including to higher-excited states are discussed.
The method of many-body point transforms previously developed by the author is modified to eliminate the interacting particle cluster formalism. The cutoff terms in the transformation, and thus in the Hamiltonian, are therefore removed. For the hard-core many-body problem, as in the previous work, a Hamiltonian is obtained which is Fourier analyzable, Hermitian and amenable to ordinary perturbation and variational techniques while still being equivalent to the original Hamiltonian. No approximations are made. It is demonstrated that the use of the standard zeroth-order approximation of the ground state Bose system, i.e., a constant, for the transformed wavefunction gives a negative expectation value of the energy for the hard core system. This discrepancy arises from the extended range of the new potential generated by the transformation, which necessitates explicit consideration of boundary conditions not satisfied by the above wavefunction.