The scattering of quantum particles by non-Hermitian (generally non-local) potentials in one dimension may result in asymmetric transmission and/or reflection from left and right incidence. After extending the concept of symmetry for non-Hermitian potentials, eight generalized symmetries based on the discrete Klein's four-group (formed by parity, time reversal, their product, and unity) are found. Together with generalized unitarity relations they determine selection rules for the possible and/or forbidden scattering asymmetries. Six basic device types are identified when the scattering coefficients (squared moduli of scattering amplitudes) adopt zero/one values, and transmission and/or reflection are asymmetric. They can pictorically be described as a one-way mirror, a one-way barrier (a Maxwell pressure demon), one-way (transmission or reflection) filters, a mirror with unidirectional transmission, and a transparent, one-way reflector. We design potentials for these devices and also demonstrate that the behavior of the scattering coefficients can be extended to a broad range of incident momenta.
In the propagation of an electron through a one-dimensional asymmetric complex potential, it is known that while the conventional Green function reciprocity symmetry will ensure transmission to be symmetric between a “left-incident” and a “right-incident” beam, no such symmetry exists for the case of reflection. Here we derive generalized reciprocity relations for both the amplitude and phase of the reflected waves as constraints on the left- and right-incident beams, in complete analogy to what was established in optics. We further provide illustrations of these relations via direct analytical calculations in the case of a real potential, and via numerical studies in the case of a complex potential.
For complex one-dimensional potentials, we propose the asymmetry of both reflectivity and transmitivity under time reversal: R ( − k ) ≠ R ( k ) and T ( − k ) ≠ T ( k ), unless the potentials are real or PT-symmetric. For complex PT-symmetric scattering potentials, we propose that R left ( − k ) = R right ( k ) and T ( − k ) = T ( k ). So far, the spectral singularities (SS) of a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering potential are witnessed/conjectured to be at most 1. We present a new non-Hermitian parametrization of the Scarf II potential to reveal its four new features. Firstly, it displays the just acclaimed (in)variances. Secondly, it can support two spectral singularities at two pre-assigned real energies ( E * = α 2 , β 2 ) either in T ( k ) or in T ( − k ), when αβ > 0. Thirdly, when αβ < 0 it possesses one SS in T ( k ) and the other in T ( − k ). Fourthly, when the potential becomes PT-symmetric [(α + β) = 0], we obtain T ( k ) = T ( − k ), it possesses a unique SS at E = α 2 in both T ( − k ) and T ( k ). Lastly, for completeness, when α = iγ and β = iδ there are no SS, instead we get two real energies −γ 2 and −δ 2 of the complex PT-symmetric Scarf II belonging to the two well-known branches of discrete bound-state eigenvalues. We find them as E + M = −(γ − M ) 2 and E − N = −(δ − N ) 2 ; M ( N ) = 0, 1, 2, ... with 0 ⩽ M ( N ) < γ(δ).
For complex
PT-symmetric scattering potentials (CPTSSPs) $V(x)={V}_{1}{f}_{\mathrm{even}}(x)+i{V}_{2}{f}_{\mathrm{odd}}(x),\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{f}_{\mathrm{even}}(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\infty})=0={f}_{\mathrm{odd}}(\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}\ensuremath{\infty}),\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{V}_{1},\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{V}_{2}\ensuremath{\in}\mathrm{Re}$, we show that complex
k poles of transmission amplitude
t(k) or zeros of
1/t(k) of the type $\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}{k}_{1}+i{k}_{2},\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}{k}_{2}\ensuremath{\ge}0$ are physical which yield three types of discrete energy eigenvalues of the potential. These discrete energies are real negative, complex-conjugate pair(s) of eigenvalues (CCPEs: ${\mathcal{E}}_{n}\ifmmode\pm\else\textpm\fi{}i{\ensuremath{\gamma}}_{n}$) and real positive energy called spectral singularity (SS) at
E=E∗ where the transmission and reflection coefficient of
V(x) become infinite for a special critical value of
V2=V∗. Based on four analytically solvable and other numerically solved models, we conjecture that a parametrically fixed CPTSSP has at most one SS. When
V1 is fixed and
V2 is varied there may exist Kato's exceptional point(s)
(VEP) and critical values ${V}_{*m},\phantom{\rule{0.28em}{0ex}}m=0,1,2,\ensuremath{\cdots}$, so when
V2 crosses one of these special values a new CCPE is created. When
V2 equals a critical value
V∗m there exists one SS at
E=E∗ along with
m or more number of CCPEs. Hence, this single positive energy
E∗ is the upper (or rough upper) bound to the CCPEs:
El⪅E∗, here
El corresponds to the last of CCPEs. If
V(x) has Kato's exceptional points (EPs: ${V}_{\mathrm{EP}1}<{V}_{\mathrm{EP}2}<{V}_{\mathrm{EP}3}<\ensuremath{\cdots}<{V}_{\mathrm{EPl}}$), the smallest of critical values
V∗m is always larger than
VEPl. Hence, in a CPTSSP, real discrete eigenvalue(s) and the SS are mutually exclusive whereas CCPEs and the SS can coexist.