Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1207.6896 · Physics Letters A

Reciprocity and unitarity in scattering from a non-Hermitian complex PT-symmetric potential

Zafar Ahmed

Published Feb 20, 2013• 30 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2013.02.031

Related papers

Various scattering properties of a new PT-symmetric non-Hermitian potential

Ananya Ghatak, Raka Dona Ray Mandal, Bhabani Prasad Mandal

arXiv:1310.7752•Annals of Physics•Jun 20, 2013•23 citations

Green’s Function of a General PT-Symmetric Non-Hermitian Non-central Potential

Brijesh Kumar Mourya, Bhabani Prasad Mandal

arXiv:1606.09569•Springer proceedings in physics•Jan 1, 2016•2 citations

Anti- PT transformations and complex non-Hermitian PT -symmetric superpartners

Taha Koohrokhi, S. Kartal, Ali Mohammadi

Annals of Physics•Oct 21, 2023•1 citation

Biorthogonal scattering and generalized unitarity in non-Hermitian systems

Jung-Wan Ryu, Henning Schomerus, Hee Chul Park

We investigate the two-port scattering process in non-Hermitian dimer models via quantum measurements using external leads. We focus on two exemplary dimer models that preserve parity-time symmetry via spatial gain-loss balance and exhibit non-reciprocity due to directional hopping. The scattering matrix is constructed using the biorthogonality of the left and right scattering states of the Hamiltonian, allowing us to calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities. Our analysis compares the reflection and transmission coefficients derived from the left, right, and combined scattering states, revealing that, unlike in Hermitian systems, the non-Hermitian scattering process does not adhere to unitarity when considering only the right scattering states. Furthermore, non-Hermitian scattering can enhance the reflection and transmission probabilities, with distinct physical contributions arising independently from complex eigenvalues and the non-orthogonality of eigenstates. Our results clarify how biorthogonality restores generalized unitarity and identify distinct physical origins of enhanced transport in PT-symmetric and non-reciprocal dimers, providing new insights into quantum transport in non-Hermitian systems.

cond-mat.mes-hallCross-listedarXiv:2602.06349•Feb 9, 2026•0 citations

An update on coherent scattering from complex non-PT-symmetric Scarf II potential with new analytic forms

Sachin Kumar, Zafar Ahmed

arXiv:1912.12876•Pramana•Apr 16, 2021•1 citation

New features of scattering from a one-dimensional non-Hermitian (complex) potential

Zafar Ahmed

For complex one-dimensional potentials, we propose the asymmetry of both reflectivity and transmitivity under time reversal: R ( − k ) ≠ R ( k ) and T ( − k ) ≠ T ( k ), unless the potentials are real or PT-symmetric. For complex PT-symmetric scattering potentials, we propose that R left ( − k ) = R right ( k ) and T ( − k ) = T ( k ). So far, the spectral singularities (SS) of a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering potential are witnessed/conjectured to be at most 1. We present a new non-Hermitian parametrization of the Scarf II potential to reveal its four new features. Firstly, it displays the just acclaimed (in)variances. Secondly, it can support two spectral singularities at two pre-assigned real energies ( E * = α 2 , β 2 ) either in T ( k ) or in T ( − k ), when αβ > 0. Thirdly, when αβ < 0 it possesses one SS in T ( k ) and the other in T ( − k ). Fourthly, when the potential becomes PT-symmetric [(α + β) = 0], we obtain T ( k ) = T ( − k ), it possesses a unique SS at E = α 2 in both T ( − k ) and T ( k ). Lastly, for completeness, when α = iγ and β = iδ there are no SS, instead we get two real energies −γ 2 and −δ 2 of the complex PT-symmetric Scarf II belonging to the two well-known branches of discrete bound-state eigenvalues. We find them as E + M = −(γ − M ) 2 and E − N = −(δ − N ) 2 ; M ( N ) = 0, 1, 2, ... with 0 ⩽ M ( N ) < γ(δ).

arXiv:1110.4485•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Dec 19, 2011•49 citations
We investigate the two-port scattering process in non-Hermitian dimer models via quantum measurements using external leads. We focus on two exemplary dimer models that preserve parity-time symmetry via spatial gain-loss balance and exhibit non-reciprocity due to directional hopping. The scattering matrix is constructed using the biorthogonality of the left and right scattering states of the Hamiltonian, allowing us to calculate the reflection and transmission probabilities. Our analysis compares the reflection and transmission coefficients derived from the left, right, and combined scattering states, revealing that, unlike in Hermitian systems, the non-Hermitian scattering process does not adhere to unitarity when considering only the right scattering states. Furthermore, non-Hermitian scattering can enhance the reflection and transmission probabilities, with distinct physical contributions arising independently from complex eigenvalues and the non-orthogonality of eigenstates. Our results clarify how biorthogonality restores generalized unitarity and identify distinct physical origins of enhanced transport in PT-symmetric and non-reciprocal dimers, providing new insights into quantum transport in non-Hermitian systems.
For complex one-dimensional potentials, we propose the asymmetry of both reflectivity and transmitivity under time reversal: R ( − k ) ≠ R ( k ) and T ( − k ) ≠ T ( k ), unless the potentials are real or PT-symmetric. For complex PT-symmetric scattering potentials, we propose that R left ( − k ) = R right ( k ) and T ( − k ) = T ( k ). So far, the spectral singularities (SS) of a one-dimensional non-Hermitian scattering potential are witnessed/conjectured to be at most 1. We present a new non-Hermitian parametrization of the Scarf II potential to reveal its four new features. Firstly, it displays the just acclaimed (in)variances. Secondly, it can support two spectral singularities at two pre-assigned real energies ( E * = α 2 , β 2 ) either in T ( k ) or in T ( − k ), when αβ > 0. Thirdly, when αβ < 0 it possesses one SS in T ( k ) and the other in T ( − k ). Fourthly, when the potential becomes PT-symmetric [(α + β) = 0], we obtain T ( k ) = T ( − k ), it possesses a unique SS at E = α 2 in both T ( − k ) and T ( k ). Lastly, for completeness, when α = iγ and β = iδ there are no SS, instead we get two real energies −γ 2 and −δ 2 of the complex PT-symmetric Scarf II belonging to the two well-known branches of discrete bound-state eigenvalues. We find them as E + M = −(γ − M ) 2 and E − N = −(δ − N ) 2 ; M ( N ) = 0, 1, 2, ... with 0 ⩽ M ( N ) < γ(δ).