This paper begins by reviewing the general form of the Glauber-Sudarshan P mapping, a cornerstone of coherence theory in quantum optics, which defines a two-way mapping between ensembles of states S of any classical Hamiltonian field theory and a subset of the allowed density matrices ρ in the corresponding canonical bosonic quantum field theory (QFT). It has been proven that Tr(Hρ)=E(S), where E is the classical energy and H is the normal form Hamiltonian. The new result of this paper is that ensembles of S of definite energy E map into density matrices which are mixes of eigenstates of eigenvalue zero of N(H-E,H-E) where N represents the normal product. This raises interesting questions and opportunities for future research, including questions about the relation between canonical QFT and QFT in the Feynman path formulation. In the Appendix, a corresponding Boltzmann distribution is shown, using a dual version of the P mapping, for the case of statistically compressible dynamical systems.
This paper begins by reviewing the general form of the Glauber-Sudarshan P mapping, a cornerstone of coherence theory in quantum optics, which defines a two-way mapping between ensembles of states S of any classical Hamiltonian field theory and a subset of the allowed density matrices ρ in the corresponding canonical bosonic quantum field theory (QFT). It has been proven that Tr(Hρ)=E(S), where E is the classical energy and H is the normal form Hamiltonian. The new result of this paper is that ensembles of S of definite energy E map into density matrices which are mixes of eigenstates of eigenvalue zero of N(H-E,H-E) where N represents the normal product. This raises interesting questions and opportunities for future research, including questions about the relation between canonical QFT and QFT in the Feynman path formulation. In the Appendix, a corresponding Boltzmann distribution is shown, using a dual version of the P mapping, for the case of statistically compressible dynamical systems.
Quantum Field Theory (QFT) makes predictions by combining two sets of assumptions: (1) quantum dynamics, such as a Schrodinger or Liouville equation; (2) quantum measurement, such as stochastic collapse to an eigenfunction of a measurement operator. A previous paper defined a classical density matrix R encoding the statistical moments of an ensemble of states of classical second-order Hamiltonian field theory. It proved Tr(RQ)=E(Q), etc., for the usual field operators as defined by Weinberg, and it proved that those observables of the classical system obey the usual Heisenberg dynamic equation. However, R itself obeys dynamics different from the usual Liouville equation! This paper derives those dynamics and the discrepancy between CFT and normal form QFT in predicting any observables g(Q,P). There is some preliminary evidence for the conjecture that the discrepancies disappear in equilibrium states (bound states and scattering states) for finite bosonic field theories. Even if not, they appear small enough to warrant reconsideration of CFT as a theory of dynamics. Appendix proposes alternative closure of turbulence based on modified Bogliubov transforms, an application where ordinary ones become undefined.
As we have seen in the previous chapters, there are quantum fluctuations associated with the states corresponding to classically welldefined electromagnetic fields. The general description of fluctuation phenomena requires the density operator. However, it is possible to give an alternative but equivalent description in terms of distribution functions. In the present chapter, we extend our treatment of quantum statistical phenomena by developing the theory of quasi-classical distributions. This is of interest for several reasons. First of all, the extension of the quantum theory of radiation to involve nonquantum stochastic effects such as thermal fluctuations is needed. This is an important ingredient in the theory of partial coherence. Furthermore, the interface between classical and quantum physics is elucidated by the use of such distributions. The arch type example being the Wigner distribution. In this chapter, we introduce various distribution functions. These include the coherent state representation or the Glauber–Sudarshan Prepresentation. The P -representation is used to evaluate the normally ordered correlation functions of the field operators. As we shall see in the next chapter, the P -representation forms a correspondence between the quantum and the classical coherence theory. This distribution function does not have all of the properties of the classical distribution functions for certain states of the field, e.g., it can be negative. We also discuss the so-called Q -representation associated with the antinormally ordered correlation functions. Other distribution functions and their properties are also presented.
A class of normal ordering representations of quantum operators is introduced, that generalises the Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation by using nondiagonal coherent state projection operators. These are shown to have practical application to the solution of quantum mechanical master equations. Different representations have different domains of integration, on a complex extension of the usual canonical phase-space. The 'complex P-representation' is the case in which analytic P-functions are defined and normalised on contours in the complex plane. In this case, exact steady-state solutions can often be obtained, even when this is not possible using the Glauber-Sudarshan P-representation. The 'positive P-representation' is the case in which the domain is the whole complex phase-space. In this case the P-function may always be chosen positive, and any Fokker-Planck equation arising can be chosen to have a positive-semidefinite diffusion array. Thus the 'positive P-representation' is a genuine probability distribution. The new representations are especially useful in cases of nonclassical statistics.
Abstract The fundamentals of the theory of density matrices are reviewed. The density matrix is introduced first in terms of state vectors for pure states over which a probability distribution is given. It is then shown that the applications of the density matrix do not require knowledge of the particular probability distribution over pure states that may have been used for its original determination. It is stressed that density matrices, like state vectors, describe ensembles rather than single systems, as determinism in quantum theory (except for some conservation laws) is of a statistical character only. The entropy of a quantum‐mechanical system is defined as the average per system of the entropy of an ensemble of systems described by the quantum‐mechanical (pure or mixed) state. For pure states this entropy is zero, in agreement with the fact that state vectors constitute the maximal information that can be given about a quantum‐mechanical system. As the entropy should be independent of the particular probability distribution over pure states that may have been used to form the mixed state, it is calculated from statistical considerations about an imaginary ensemble in which the eigenvalues of the density matrix are probabilities over pure states given by the eigenfunctions of the density matrix. The entropy is calculated for a mixture of two nonorthogonal states. The time evolution of the density matrix, in general, is not a unitary transformation, as observable systems are not closed and therefore in the Hamiltonian contain unknown external parameters that are not the same for the entire mixture. Therefore transitions between pure states and mixed states take place. Those from pure to mixed states take place spontaneously and irreversibly under increase of entropy. Transitions from mixed states to pure states can be fabricated; an example is given. As Wigner's thought experiment of mixing coherently the two beams from a Stern‐Gerlach apparatus according to estimates of Bohm should be impossible by loss of coherence in the gradient magnetic field, it is indicated how Wigner's ideas may be realized by using, instead, polarized light beams from birefringent crystals. After a brief review of the quantum theory of measurements and the various arguments usually given for the reducibility of state after the measurement, Wigner's argument against blind use of these arguments is interpreted as a limit of validity of the familiar probability rule of quantum theory, which should not be applied after an unsuccessful measurement. By splitting light beams coherently by glass plates, one can by the same apparatus have measurements both of the relative intensities of two coherent beams, and of interference effects between the two beams. This shows that complementarity applies to the individual systems in the beam, as they reach the glass plate where a choice must be made between two complementary possibilities of future measurement. Finally, by describing Schrödinger's cat by a density matrix and asking about its time dependence, it is shown that, if it were possible to measure the interference effects between living and dead cats used by some people as a justification for writing down a state vector for the cat, then this measurement could be used to revive some dead cats.
The phase space formulation of quantum statistical mechanics using the Feynman path centroid density offers an alternative perspective to the standard Wigner prescription for the classical-like evaluation of equilibrium and/or dynamical quantities of statistical systems. The use of this formulation has been implicit in recent work on quantum rate theories, for example, in which the centroid density distribution replaces the classical Boltzmann distribution. In order to further understand the approximations involved in this and similar transcriptions, the present work elaborates and clarifies the issue of operator ordering in a rigorous centroid-based formulation. In particular, through the use of the Weyl correspondence, a precise definition of the centroid symbol of operators and their products is presented. Though we fall short of finding the algebraic structure tantamount to that found in the Weyl symbols—of which the Wigner distribution is an example— the resulting expressions have internal consistency and are amenable to approximate evaluation through cumulant expansions.
This chapter focuses on Quantum Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory in a euclidean formulation. This means that, in general, it discusses the matrix elements of the quantum statistical operator eβH (the density matrix at thermal equilibrium), where H is the hamiltonian and β is the inverse temperature. The chapter begins by first deriving the path integral representation of matrix elements of the quantum statistical operator for hamiltonians of the simple form p 2/2m + V (q). Comparing classical statistical physics in one space dimension and quantum statistical physics of the particle, it introduces statistical correlation functions and discusses their quantum interpretation. It then explicitly calculates the path integral corresponding to a harmonic oscillator in a time-dependent external force. This result can be used to reduce the evaluation of path integrals in the case of analytic potentials to perturbation theory. The chapter shows on a first example that path integrals are especially well suited to the study of the classical limit, by relating a quantum and classical partition function. The appendix explains some general properties of the two-point function, and use the semi-classical approximation of the partition function to derive Bohr–Sommerfeld's quantization condition.