Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1401.7410 · Physical Review A

Measurement errors in entanglement-assisted electron microscopy

Hiroshi Okamoto

Published Jun 30, 2014• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The major resolution-limiting factor in cryoelectron microscopy of unstained biological specimens is radiation damage by the very electrons that are used to probe the specimen structure. To address this problem, an electron microscopy scheme that employs quantum entanglement to enable phase measurement precision beyond the standard quantum limit has recently been proposed [H. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043810 (2012)]. Here we identify and examine in detail measurement errors that will arise in the scheme. Emphasis is given to considerations concerning inelastic scattering events because, in general, schemes assisted with quantum entanglement are known to be highly vulnerable to lossy processes. We find that the amount of error due to both elastic and inelastic scattering processes is acceptable provided that the electron beam geometry is properly designed and the specimen is sufficiently thin.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.89.063828

Related papers

Resilient quantum electron microscopy

Hiroshi Okamoto

We investigate the fundamental limit of biological quantum electron microscopy, which is designed to go beyond the shot noise limit. Inelastic scattering is expected to be the main obstacle in this setting, especially for thick specimens of actual biological interest. Here we describe a measurement procedure that, in principle, significantly neutralizes the effect of inelastic scattering.

arXiv:2001.05603•Physical Review A•Aug 5, 2022•3 citations

Spin Squeezing in Electron Microscopy

Shiran Even-Haim, Ethan Nussinson, Roni Ben-Maimon +5 more

Quantum metrology experiments in atomic physics and quantum optics have demonstrated measurement accuracy beyond the shot-noise limit via multi-particle entanglement. At the same time, electron microscopy, an essential tool for high-resolution imaging of biological systems, is severely constrained in its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by shot noise, due to the dose limit imposed by electron beam-induced damage. Here, we show theoretically that spin squeezing, a form of quantum metrology based on entanglement, is a natural fit for improving the SNR in electron microscopy. We investigate the generation of the necessary entangled states through electron-electron Coulomb interactions and quantum non-demolition measurements. Our results connect the fields of quantum metrology and electron interferometry, paving the way toward electron microscopy with SNR beyond the shot-noise limit.

arXiv:2507.09243•Jul 12, 2025•0 citations

Designs for a quantum electron microscope

P. Kruit, Richard G. Hobbs, Chung-Soo Kim +11 more

One of the astounding consequences of quantum mechanics is that it allows the detection of a target using an incident probe, with only a low probability of interaction of the probe and the target. This 'quantum weirdness' could be applied in the field of electron microscopy to generate images of beam-sensitive specimens with substantially reduced damage to the specimen. A reduction of beam-induced damage to specimens is especially of great importance if it can enable imaging of biological specimens with atomic resolution. Following a recent suggestion that interaction-free measurements are possible with electrons, we now analyze the difficulties of actually building an atomic resolution interaction-free electron microscope, or "quantum electron microscope". A quantum electron microscope would require a number of unique components not found in conventional transmission electron microscopes. These components include a coherent electron beam-splitter or two-state-coupler, and a resonator structure to allow each electron to interrogate the specimen multiple times, thus supporting high success probabilities for interaction-free detection of the specimen. Different system designs are presented here, which are based on four different choices of two-state-couplers: a thin crystal, a grating mirror, a standing light wave and an electro-dynamical pseudopotential. Challenges for the detailed electron optical design are identified as future directions for development. While it is concluded that it should be possible to build an atomic resolution quantum electron microscope, we have also identified a number of hurdles to the development of such a microscope and further theoretical investigations that will be required to enable a complete interpretation of the images produced by such a microscope.

arXiv:1510.05946•Ultramicroscopy•Mar 9, 2016•161 citations

Entanglement and decoherence in electron microscopy

P. Schattschneider, Stefan Löffler

Interaction of the probe with the specimen in an electron microscope inevitably leads to entanglement between the probe and the scatterer. In spite of the importance of entanglement in many areas of modern physics, this subject has not been touched in the literature. Here, we develop some ideas about entanglement in electron microscopy for a number of scattering mechanisms. The relationship between entropy, density matrices, and coherence is discussed. In addition, we explore the questions “Why is Bragg scattering coherent and energy loss incoherent?” and “When does decoherence play a role?” It seems to be possible to measure decoherence on extremely short timescales of ∼10−8s. This is especially important in view of recent developments in ultrafast electron microscopy.

Ultramicroscopy•Apr 13, 2018•28 citations

Entanglement-assisted electron microscopy based on a flux qubit

Hiroshi Okamoto, Yukinori Nagatani

A notorious problem in high-resolution biological electron microscopy is radiation damage caused by probe electrons. Hence, acquisition of data with minimal number of electrons is of critical importance. Quantum approaches may represent the only way to improve the resolution in this context, but all proposed schemes to date demand delicate control of the electron beam in highly unconventional electron optics. Here we propose a scheme that involves a flux qubit based on a radio-frequency superconducting quantum interference device, inserted in a transmission electron microscope. The scheme significantly improves the prospect of realizing a quantum-enhanced electron microscope for radiation-sensitive specimens.

arXiv:1311.2377•Applied Physics Letters•Feb 10, 2014•26 citations

Measurement of Self-coherence in the Transmission Electron Microscope for Detecting Time-dependent Coherent-inelastic Electron Scattering in the Heisenberg Limit

Christian F. Kisielowski, Peta Specht, Joerg Ralf Jinschek +1 more

Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].

Microscopy and Microanalysis•Jul 1, 2025•0 citations
The major resolution-limiting factor in cryoelectron microscopy of unstained biological specimens is radiation damage by the very electrons that are used to probe the specimen structure. To address this problem, an electron microscopy scheme that employs quantum entanglement to enable phase measurement precision beyond the standard quantum limit has recently been proposed [H. Okamoto, Phys. Rev. A 85, 043810 (2012)]. Here we identify and examine in detail measurement errors that will arise in the scheme. Emphasis is given to considerations concerning inelastic scattering events because, in general, schemes assisted with quantum entanglement are known to be highly vulnerable to lossy processes. We find that the amount of error due to both elastic and inelastic scattering processes is acceptable provided that the electron beam geometry is properly designed and the specimen is sufficiently thin.
Quantum metrology experiments in atomic physics and quantum optics have demonstrated measurement accuracy beyond the shot-noise limit via multi-particle entanglement. At the same time, electron microscopy, an essential tool for high-resolution imaging of biological systems, is severely constrained in its signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) by shot noise, due to the dose limit imposed by electron beam-induced damage. Here, we show theoretically that spin squeezing, a form of quantum metrology based on entanglement, is a natural fit for improving the SNR in electron microscopy. We investigate the generation of the necessary entangled states through electron-electron Coulomb interactions and quantum non-demolition measurements. Our results connect the fields of quantum metrology and electron interferometry, paving the way toward electron microscopy with SNR beyond the shot-noise limit.
One of the astounding consequences of quantum mechanics is that it allows the detection of a target using an incident probe, with only a low probability of interaction of the probe and the target. This 'quantum weirdness' could be applied in the field of electron microscopy to generate images of beam-sensitive specimens with substantially reduced damage to the specimen. A reduction of beam-induced damage to specimens is especially of great importance if it can enable imaging of biological specimens with atomic resolution. Following a recent suggestion that interaction-free measurements are possible with electrons, we now analyze the difficulties of actually building an atomic resolution interaction-free electron microscope, or "quantum electron microscope". A quantum electron microscope would require a number of unique components not found in conventional transmission electron microscopes. These components include a coherent electron beam-splitter or two-state-coupler, and a resonator structure to allow each electron to interrogate the specimen multiple times, thus supporting high success probabilities for interaction-free detection of the specimen. Different system designs are presented here, which are based on four different choices of two-state-couplers: a thin crystal, a grating mirror, a standing light wave and an electro-dynamical pseudopotential. Challenges for the detailed electron optical design are identified as future directions for development. While it is concluded that it should be possible to build an atomic resolution quantum electron microscope, we have also identified a number of hurdles to the development of such a microscope and further theoretical investigations that will be required to enable a complete interpretation of the images produced by such a microscope.
Interaction of the probe with the specimen in an electron microscope inevitably leads to entanglement between the probe and the scatterer. In spite of the importance of entanglement in many areas of modern physics, this subject has not been touched in the literature. Here, we develop some ideas about entanglement in electron microscopy for a number of scattering mechanisms. The relationship between entropy, density matrices, and coherence is discussed. In addition, we explore the questions “Why is Bragg scattering coherent and energy loss incoherent?” and “When does decoherence play a role?” It seems to be possible to measure decoherence on extremely short timescales of ∼10−8s. This is especially important in view of recent developments in ultrafast electron microscopy.
A notorious problem in high-resolution biological electron microscopy is radiation damage caused by probe electrons. Hence, acquisition of data with minimal number of electrons is of critical importance. Quantum approaches may represent the only way to improve the resolution in this context, but all proposed schemes to date demand delicate control of the electron beam in highly unconventional electron optics. Here we propose a scheme that involves a flux qubit based on a radio-frequency superconducting quantum interference device, inserted in a transmission electron microscope. The scheme significantly improves the prospect of realizing a quantum-enhanced electron microscope for radiation-sensitive specimens.
Atomic resolution transmission electron microscopy (TEM) is an indispensable tool for interdisciplinary investigations of radiation soft or hard materials that evolves rapidly because emerging technologies enable remarkable new experiments [1, 2]. Nowadays, many of them embrace the time domain [2-4]. Beyond materials research, electron microscopy is uniquely suited to study fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects. In fact, it remains concerning that aspects addressing the wave-particle duality, time-dependent measurements, or the entanglement of wave functions and their collapse at a detector still require detailed investigations to guide progress. Certainly, this is no academic matter because such aspects become the bottleneck for the deployment of microscopes that enable studying dynamic processes at high spatiotemporal resolution. It is established practice to describe the scattering of electron ensembles by either a particle picture (Figure 1a) or a wave picture (Figure 1b). Sometimes both pictures are mixed. In spite of calls for solving Schrödinger’s time dependent equation [5], the static Schrödinger equation of wave functions is almost exclusively used to reliably simulate the image formation process using multislice calculations for coherent-elastically scattered electron ensembles [6, 7]. Moreover, the Copenhagen convention of quantum mechanics [8] is adopted, which emphasizes the importance of an observation for the collapse of wave functions (Figure 1b). In order to foster further insight into fundamental quantum-mechanical aspects we pursue a series of experiments with low electron dose rates that guarantee the presence of single electrons in the microscope column at any given time [9]. Consequently, we address the scattering of single electrons (Figure 1c) and build up intensities from electron ensembles over time. In such conditions energy filtered TEM recently revealed the presence of image intensity at sample/vacuum interfaces that cannot be simulated using the established (static) calculation tools even if frozen phonon excitations are considered [10]. In contrast, these intensities can be explained by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation assuming that an energy exchange ΔE occurs during any interaction of the electron with the sample in the Heisenberg limit ΔE = ℏ/2 Δt−1 (coherent-inelastic scattering). In this process a wave package is formed by the superposition of partial waves and a decoherence phase of 0.5-1 radian [10]. The time-dependent Schrödinger equation yields two parameters that characterize the static and the dynamic behavior of any wave function ψ(r, t) = ψ(r) ϕ(t), namely xstatic = ℏ/(2mΔE)1/2 and xdynamic = ℏc/ΔE [11]. The former is the de Broglie wavelength if ΔE is a kinetic energy and the latter becomes an expression for self-coherence if the scattering process is coherent-inelastic in the Heisenberg limit. In these circumstances, the product of Planck’s constant and the speed of light hc is given by the product of the expression for temporal coherence λ2/Δλ and the energy loss ΔE (hc = (λ2/Δλ) ΔE). The validity of the relation is shown in Figure 2 [11]. Thus, the temporal part of Schrödinger’s equation adds contributions of a finite self-coherence length (or time if the electron velocity is considered) to any scattering process, which is neglected if only the static expression is exploited. Further, the formation of wave packages rationalizes the wave-particle duality. The width of wave packages is described by a self-coherence length ls that can vary by over 40 orders of magnitude depending on the strength of interactions [11]. For Coulomb interactions, ls explains the vanishing phase contrast from EF-HRTEM images when the energy loss exceeds values of ΔE > 200 eV [11]. A procedure to experimentally determine the self-coherence length was established earlier by measuring the energy dependent localization of scattered matter waves in surface proximity [10]. Therefore, electron microscopy can be used as a general tool to measure the self-coherence length in real space images on a scale of nanometers and relate this these values to a self-coherence time that reaches attoseconds [12]. Particle and wave descriptions of electron scattering. a) Scattering of electron ensembles in a particle picture. The process is often described by Feynman diagrams, which involves the emission of a virtual photon of lifetime given by Heisenbergs Uncertainty Principle. b) Scattering of electron ensembles in a wave picture that underlies the multi-slice calculations. Infinite wave functions entangle source, sample and detector. The Copenhagen convention requires a wave function collapse upon observation. c) Proposed scattering process of a single electron wave function. The energy exchange occurs in the Heisenberg limit ΔEloss = E2-E1= ℏ/2 (t2-t1)−1= ℏ/2 Δt−1 when a wave package is formed during Δt because of existing energy (wavelength) differences ΔEloss of partial waves [11]. Measurements of self-coherence length and the related self-coherence time at the calculated Heisenberg limit. The colored background marks the quantum realm. The solid lines represent the Heisenberg limit in space and time, which includes the constant ℏc [11].