Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1312.4191 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Quantum ${{\mathbb{F}}_{{\rm un}}}$: theq= 1 limit of Galois field quantum mechanics, projective geometry and the field with one element

Lay Nam Chang, Zachary Lewis, Djordje Minić, Tatsu Takeuchi

Published Sep 23, 2014• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We argue that the q=1 limit of Galois Field Quantum Mechanics, which was constructed on a vector space over the Galois Field F_q=GF(q), corresponds to its `classical limit,' where superposition of states is disallowed. The limit preserves the projective geometry nature of the state space, and can be understood as being constructed on an appropriately defined analogue of a `vector' space over the `field with one element' F_1.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/47/40/405304

Related papers

GALOIS FIELD QUANTUM MECHANICS

Lay Nam Chang, Zachary Lewis, Djordje Minić +1 more

We construct a discrete quantum mechanics (QM) using a vector space over the Galois field GF(q). We find that the correlations in our model do not violate the Clauser–Horne–Shimony–Holt (CHSH) version of Bell's inequality, despite the fact that the predictions of this discrete QM cannot be reproduced with any hidden variable theory.

arXiv:1205.4800•Modern Physics Letters B•Feb 27, 2013•14 citations

Spin and rotations in Galois field quantum mechanics

Lay Nam Chang, Zachary Lewis, Djordje Minić +1 more

We discuss the properties of Galois field quantum mechanics constructed on a vector space over the finite Galois field GF ( q ). In particular, we look at two-level systems analogous to spin, and discuss how SO (3) rotations could be embodied in such a system. We also consider two-particle 'spin' correlations and show that the Clauser–Horne-Shimony–Holt inequality is nonetheless not violated in this model.

arXiv:1206.0064•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Jan 29, 2013•10 citations

Problem of constructing discrete and finite quantum theory

Felix M. Lev

We consider in detail an approach (proposed by the author earlier) where quantum states are described by elements of a linear space over a Galois field, and operators of physical quantities - by linear operators in this space. The notion of Galois fields (which is extremely simple and elegant) is discussed in detail and we also discuss the conditions when our description gives the same predictions as the conventional one. In quantum theory based on a Galois field, all operators are well defined and divergencies cannot not exist in principle. A particle and its antiparticle are described by the same modular irreducible representation of the symmetry algebra. This automatically explains the existence of antiparticles and shows that a particle and its antiparticle are the different states of the same object. As a consequence, a new symmetry arises, and the structure of the theory is considerably simplified. In particular, one can work with only creation operators or only annihilation ones since they are no more independent. In our approach the problem arises whether the existence of neutral elementary particles (e.g. the photon) is compatible with the usual relation between spin and statistics, or in other words whether neutral particles can be elementary or only composite.

arXiv:hep-th/0206078•Jun 10, 2002•2 citations

FINITE GEOMETRIES IN QUANTUM THEORY: FROM GALOIS (FIELDS) TO HJELMSLEV (RINGS)

Метод Санига, Michel R. P. Planat

Geometries over Galois fields (and related finite combinatorial structures/algebras) have recently been recognized to play an ever-increasing role in quantum theory, especially when addressing properties of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs). The purpose of this contribution is to show that completely new vistas open up if we consider a generalized class of finite (projective) geometries, viz. those defined over Galois rings and/or other finite Hjelmslev rings. The case is illustrated by demonstrating that the basic combinatorial properties of a complete set of MUBs of a q-dimensional Hilbert space [Formula: see text], q = prwith p being a prime and r a positive integer, are qualitatively mimicked by the configuration of points lying on a proper conic in a projective Hjelmslev plane defined over a Galois ring of characteristic p2and rank r. The q vectors of a basis of [Formula: see text] correspond to the q points of a (so-called) neighbour class and the q + 1 MUBs answer to the total number of (pairwise disjoint) neighbour classes on the conic. Although this remarkable analogy is still established at the level of cardinalities only, we currently work on constructing an explicit mapping by associating a MUB to each neighbour class of the points of the conic and a state vector of this MUB to a particular point of the class. Further research in this direction may prove to be of great relevance for many areas of quantum information theory, in particular for quantum information processing.

International Journal of Modern Physics B•May 20, 2006•14 citations

Quantum Mechanics as the Arithmetic of A Single Polynomial

Stephanie Alexander

Dirac called the imaginary unit in the Schrödinger equation the deepest thing in quantum mechanics, and admitted he did not understand it. This note offers a candidate: i is the complex place of a single number — Q, the real root of x⁴ − x − 1 — and the strangeness of quantum mechanics is the strangeness of that one number's arithmetic, seen from the inside. For a century quantum theory has been taught as a list of postulates — complex amplitudes, a Born rule, unitary evolution, a dagger — accepted because they work and never because they are understood. Grant a single identification, that the state space of a quantum system is the complex place of Q's field, and those postulates stop being assumptions. They become theorems. The imaginary unit is the field's complex structure; the dagger is Galois conjugation; observables are real because they are Galois-fixed; unitary evolution is the field's unit circle; and the Born rule — the squared modulus, long the least-explained law in physics — is the field's own norm, made unique by Gleason's theorem. Time reversal and charge conjugation appear as named elements of the Galois group S₄, the Weyl group of su(4). And a proved theorem locates the classical/quantum boundary precisely: in the family xⁿ − x − 1 the root is Pisot — its powers settle, its world definite — only through three dimensions, and at the fourth that settling fails. That, on the reading proposed here, is where the classical world ends and the quantum world begins. The dozen postulates of the physics textbooks are thus compressed to one here, named plainly as a posit, with every claim labeled at its evidential tier and the composition of many systems left as the open edge. It is not a metaphor and not a fit. Quantum Mechanics is the arithmetic of a single number — and, at last, a single thing to be right or wrong about.

•Jun 25, 2026•0 citations

Quantum Information: A Brief Overview and Some Mathematical Aspects

M. Kibler

The aim of the present paper is twofold. First, to give the main ideas behind quantum computing and quantum information, a field based on quantum-mechanical phenomena. Therefore, a short review is devoted to (i) quantum bits or qubits (and more generally qudits), the analogues of the usual bits 0 and 1 of the classical information theory, and to (ii) two characteristics of quantum mechanics, namely, linearity, which manifests itself through the superposition of qubits and the action of unitary operators on qubits, and entanglement of certain multi-qubit states, a resource that is specific to quantum mechanics. A, second, focus is on some mathematical problems related to the so-called mutually unbiased bases used in quantum computing and quantum information processing. In this direction, the construction of mutually unbiased bases is presented via two distinct approaches: one based on the group SU(2) and the other on Galois fields and Galois rings.

arXiv:1811.08499•Mathematics•Nov 22, 2018•4 citations
Quantum Fun{{\mathbb{F}}_{{\rm un}}}Fun​: theq= 1 limit of Galois field quantum mechanics, projective geometry and the field with one element
We argue that the q=1 limit of Galois Field Quantum Mechanics, which was constructed on a vector space over the Galois Field F_q=GF(q), corresponds to its classical limit,' where superposition of states is disallowed. The limit preserves the projective geometry nature of the state space, and can be understood as being constructed on an appropriately defined analogue of a vector' space over the `field with one element' F_1.
We consider in detail an approach (proposed by the author earlier) where quantum states are described by elements of a linear space over a Galois field, and operators of physical quantities - by linear operators in this space. The notion of Galois fields (which is extremely simple and elegant) is discussed in detail and we also discuss the conditions when our description gives the same predictions as the conventional one. In quantum theory based on a Galois field, all operators are well defined and divergencies cannot not exist in principle. A particle and its antiparticle are described by the same modular irreducible representation of the symmetry algebra. This automatically explains the existence of antiparticles and shows that a particle and its antiparticle are the different states of the same object. As a consequence, a new symmetry arises, and the structure of the theory is considerably simplified. In particular, one can work with only creation operators or only annihilation ones since they are no more independent. In our approach the problem arises whether the existence of neutral elementary particles (e.g. the photon) is compatible with the usual relation between spin and statistics, or in other words whether neutral particles can be elementary or only composite.
Geometries over Galois fields (and related finite combinatorial structures/algebras) have recently been recognized to play an ever-increasing role in quantum theory, especially when addressing properties of mutually unbiased bases (MUBs). The purpose of this contribution is to show that completely new vistas open up if we consider a generalized class of finite (projective) geometries, viz. those defined over Galois rings and/or other finite Hjelmslev rings. The case is illustrated by demonstrating that the basic combinatorial properties of a complete set of MUBs of a q-dimensional Hilbert space [Formula: see text], q = prwith p being a prime and r a positive integer, are qualitatively mimicked by the configuration of points lying on a proper conic in a projective Hjelmslev plane defined over a Galois ring of characteristic p2and rank r. The q vectors of a basis of [Formula: see text] correspond to the q points of a (so-called) neighbour class and the q + 1 MUBs answer to the total number of (pairwise disjoint) neighbour classes on the conic. Although this remarkable analogy is still established at the level of cardinalities only, we currently work on constructing an explicit mapping by associating a MUB to each neighbour class of the points of the conic and a state vector of this MUB to a particular point of the class. Further research in this direction may prove to be of great relevance for many areas of quantum information theory, in particular for quantum information processing.
Dirac called the imaginary unit in the Schrödinger equation the deepest thing in quantum mechanics, and admitted he did not understand it. This note offers a candidate: i is the complex place of a single number — Q, the real root of x⁴ − x − 1 — and the strangeness of quantum mechanics is the strangeness of that one number's arithmetic, seen from the inside. For a century quantum theory has been taught as a list of postulates — complex amplitudes, a Born rule, unitary evolution, a dagger — accepted because they work and never because they are understood. Grant a single identification, that the state space of a quantum system is the complex place of Q's field, and those postulates stop being assumptions. They become theorems. The imaginary unit is the field's complex structure; the dagger is Galois conjugation; observables are real because they are Galois-fixed; unitary evolution is the field's unit circle; and the Born rule — the squared modulus, long the least-explained law in physics — is the field's own norm, made unique by Gleason's theorem. Time reversal and charge conjugation appear as named elements of the Galois group S₄, the Weyl group of su(4). And a proved theorem locates the classical/quantum boundary precisely: in the family xⁿ − x − 1 the root is Pisot — its powers settle, its world definite — only through three dimensions, and at the fourth that settling fails. That, on the reading proposed here, is where the classical world ends and the quantum world begins. The dozen postulates of the physics textbooks are thus compressed to one here, named plainly as a posit, with every claim labeled at its evidential tier and the composition of many systems left as the open edge. It is not a metaphor and not a fit. Quantum Mechanics is the arithmetic of a single number — and, at last, a single thing to be right or wrong about.
The aim of the present paper is twofold. First, to give the main ideas behind quantum computing and quantum information, a field based on quantum-mechanical phenomena. Therefore, a short review is devoted to (i) quantum bits or qubits (and more generally qudits), the analogues of the usual bits 0 and 1 of the classical information theory, and to (ii) two characteristics of quantum mechanics, namely, linearity, which manifests itself through the superposition of qubits and the action of unitary operators on qubits, and entanglement of certain multi-qubit states, a resource that is specific to quantum mechanics. A, second, focus is on some mathematical problems related to the so-called mutually unbiased bases used in quantum computing and quantum information processing. In this direction, the construction of mutually unbiased bases is presented via two distinct approaches: one based on the group SU(2) and the other on Galois fields and Galois rings.