Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1309.0086 · Physical Review Letters

Quantum Phase Diagram of the Triangular-Lattice X X Z Model in a Magnetic Field

Daisuke Yamamoto, Giacomo Marmorini, Ippei Danshita

Published Mar 26, 2014• 207 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The triangular lattice of S=1/2 spins with XXZ anisotropy is a ubiquitous model for various frustrated systems in different contexts. We determine the quantum phase diagram of the model in the plane of the anisotropy parameter and the magnetic field by means of a large-size cluster mean-field method with a scaling scheme. We find that quantum fluctuations break up the nontrivial continuous degeneracy into two first-order phase transitions. In between the two transition boundaries, the degeneracy-lifting results in the emergence of a new coplanar phase not predicted in the classical counterpart of the model. We suggest that the quantum phase transition to the nonclassical coplanar state can be observed in triangular-lattice antiferromagnets with large easy-plane anisotropy or in the corresponding optical-lattice systems.

DOI
10.1103/physrevlett.112.127203

Related papers

Quantum phase transitions in the Heisenberg J1−J2 triangular antiferromagnet in a magnetic field

Mengxing Ye, Andrey V. Chubukov

We present the zero-temperature phase diagram of a Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a frustrated triangular lattice with nearest-neighbor $({J}_{1})$ and next-nearest-neighbor $({J}_{2})$ interactions, in a magnetic field. We show that the classical model has an accidental degeneracy for all ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and all fields, but the degeneracy is lifted by quantum fluctuations. We show that at large spin $S$, for ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<1/8$, quantum fluctuations select the same sequence of three sublattice co-planar states in a field as for ${J}_{2}=0$, and for $1/8<{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<1$, they select the canted stripe state for all nonzero fields. The transition between the two states is first order in all fields, with the hysteresis width set by quantum fluctuations. We study the model with arbitrary $S$, including $S=1/2$, near the saturation field by exploring the fact that near saturation the density of bosons is small for all $S$. We show that for $S>1$, the transition remains first order, with a finite hysteresis width, but for $S=1/2$ and, possibly, $S=1$, there appears a new intermediate phase without a quasiclassical long-range order.

arXiv:1611.06920•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 23, 2017•20 citations

Exact diagonalization and cluster mean-field study of triangular-lattice XXZ antiferromagnets near saturation

Daisuke Yamamoto, Hiroshi Ueda, Ippei Danshita +3 more

Quantum magnetic phases near the magnetic saturation of triangular-lattice antiferromagnets with XXZ anisotropy have been attracting renewed interest since it has been suggested that a nontrivial coplanar phase, called the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}$ phase, could be stabilized by quantum effects in a certain range of anisotropy parameter $J/{J}_{z}$ besides the well-known 0-coplanar (known also as $V)$ and umbrella phases. Recently, Sellmann et al. [Phys. Rev. B 91, 081104(R) (2015)] claimed that the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phase is absent for $S=1/2$ from an exact-diagonalization analysis in the sector of the Hilbert space with only three down-spins (three magnons). We first reconsider and improve this analysis by taking into account several low-lying eigenvalues and the associated eigenstates as a function of $J/{J}_{z}$ and by sensibly increasing the system sizes (up to 1296 spins). A careful identification analysis shows that the lowest eigenstate is a chirally antisymmetric combination of finite-size umbrella states for $J/{J}_{z}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}2.218$ while it corresponds to a coplanar phase for $J/{J}_{z}\ensuremath{\lesssim}2.218$. However, we demonstrate that the distinction between 0-coplanar and $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phases in the latter region is fundamentally impossible from the symmetry-preserving finite-size calculations with fixed magnon number. Therefore, we also perform a cluster mean-field plus scaling analysis for small spins $S\ensuremath{\le}3/2$. The obtained results, together with the previous large-$S$ analysis, indicate that the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phase exists for any $S$ except for the classical limit $(S\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ and the existence range in $J/{J}_{z}$ is largest in the most quantum case of $S=1/2$.

arXiv:1704.04024•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jul 25, 2017•31 citations

Quantum phase transition in the three-dimensional anisotropic frustrated Heisenberg antiferromagnetic model

J. Roberto Viana, J. Ricardo de Sousa, M. A. Contínentino

The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest $({J}_{1})$- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state $(T=0)$ and the finite-$T$ phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.

Physical Review B•May 27, 2008•24 citations

The effect of anisotropy on the ground-state magnetic ordering of the spin-1 quantumJ1XXZ–J2XXZmodel on the square lattice

R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li, R. Darradi +2 more

We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of the J 1 XXZ – J 2 XXZ Heisenberg model for spin-1 particles on an infinite square lattice interacting via nearest-neighbour ( ) and next-nearest-neighbour ( J 2 >0) bonds. The two bonds have the same XXZ -type anisotropy in spin space. The effects on the quasiclassical Néel-ordered and collinear stripe-ordered states of varying the anisotropy parameter Δ are investigated using the coupled cluster method carried out up to high orders. By contrast with the case for spin- particles studied previously, no intermediate disordered phase between the Néel and collinear stripe phases, for any value of the frustration J 2 / J 1 , for either the z -aligned (Δ>1) or xy -planar-aligned (0≤Δ<1) states, is predicted here. The quantum phase transition is determined as first order for all values of J 2 / J 1 and Δ. The position of the phase boundary J 2 c (Δ) is determined accurately. It is observed to deviate most from its classical position (for all values of Δ>0) at the Heisenberg isotropic point (Δ = 1), where J 2 c (1) = 0.55 ± 0.01. By contrast, at the XY isotropic point (Δ = 0), we find J 2 c (0) = 0.50 ± 0.01. In the Ising limit ( ), as expected.

arXiv:0805.4388•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Sep 16, 2008•23 citations

Phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic XXZ model on the triangular lattice

Daniel Sellmann, Xue‐Feng Zhang, Sebastian Eggert

This paper studies studies the spin-1/2 XXZ antiferromagnet on a triangular lattice using a density matrix renormalization group. The authors study the phase diagram of this model as a function of magnetic field and spin anisotropy.

arXiv:1403.0008•Physical Review B•Feb 9, 2015•91 citations

The ground-state magnetic ordering of the spin-1/2 frustratedJ1-J2XXZ model on the square lattice

R Darradi, Johannes Richter, J Schulenburg +2 more

Using the coupled-cluster method for infinite lattices and the exact diagonalization method for finite lattices, we study the influence of an exchange anisotropy Δ on the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 frustrated J 1 - J 2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We find that increasing Δ > 1 (i.e. an Ising type easy-axis anisotropy) as well as decreasing Δ < 1 (i.e. an XY type easy-plane anisotropy) both lead to a monotonic shrinking of the parameter region of the magnetically disordered quantum phase. Finally, at Δ c ≈ 1.9 this quantum phase disappears, whereas in the pure XY limit (Δ = 0) there is still a narrow region around J 2 = 0.5 J 1 where the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase exists.

arXiv:0808.2743•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jan 1, 2009•11 citations
The triangular lattice of S=1/2 spins with XXZ anisotropy is a ubiquitous model for various frustrated systems in different contexts. We determine the quantum phase diagram of the model in the plane of the anisotropy parameter and the magnetic field by means of a large-size cluster mean-field method with a scaling scheme. We find that quantum fluctuations break up the nontrivial continuous degeneracy into two first-order phase transitions. In between the two transition boundaries, the degeneracy-lifting results in the emergence of a new coplanar phase not predicted in the classical counterpart of the model. We suggest that the quantum phase transition to the nonclassical coplanar state can be observed in triangular-lattice antiferromagnets with large easy-plane anisotropy or in the corresponding optical-lattice systems.
We present the zero-temperature phase diagram of a Heisenberg antiferromagnet on a frustrated triangular lattice with nearest-neighbor (J1)({J}_{1})(J1​) and next-nearest-neighbor (J2)({J}_{2})(J2​) interactions, in a magnetic field. We show that the classical model has an accidental degeneracy for all J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and all fields, but the degeneracy is lifted by quantum fluctuations. We show that at large spin SSS, for J2/J1<1/8{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<1/8J2​/J1​<1/8, quantum fluctuations select the same sequence of three sublattice co-planar states in a field as for J2=0{J}_{2}=0J2​=0, and for 1/8<J2/J1<11/8<{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}<11/8<J2​/J1​<1, they select the canted stripe state for all nonzero fields. The transition between the two states is first order in all fields, with the hysteresis width set by quantum fluctuations. We study the model with arbitrary SSS, including S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2, near the saturation field by exploring the fact that near saturation the density of bosons is small for all SSS. We show that for S>1S>1S>1, the transition remains first order, with a finite hysteresis width, but for S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 and, possibly, S=1S=1S=1, there appears a new intermediate phase without a quasiclassical long-range order.
Quantum magnetic phases near the magnetic saturation of triangular-lattice antiferromagnets with XXZ anisotropy have been attracting renewed interest since it has been suggested that a nontrivial coplanar phase, called the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar or $\mathrm{\ensuremath{\Psi}}$ phase, could be stabilized by quantum effects in a certain range of anisotropy parameter J/JzJ/{J}_{z}J/Jz​ besides the well-known 0-coplanar (known also as V)V)V) and umbrella phases. Recently, Sellmann et al. [Phys. Rev. B 91, 081104(R) (2015)] claimed that the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phase is absent for S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2 from an exact-diagonalization analysis in the sector of the Hilbert space with only three down-spins (three magnons). We first reconsider and improve this analysis by taking into account several low-lying eigenvalues and the associated eigenstates as a function of J/JzJ/{J}_{z}J/Jz​ and by sensibly increasing the system sizes (up to 1296 spins). A careful identification analysis shows that the lowest eigenstate is a chirally antisymmetric combination of finite-size umbrella states for $J/{J}_{z}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}2.218$ while it corresponds to a coplanar phase for $J/{J}_{z}\ensuremath{\lesssim}2.218$. However, we demonstrate that the distinction between 0-coplanar and $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phases in the latter region is fundamentally impossible from the symmetry-preserving finite-size calculations with fixed magnon number. Therefore, we also perform a cluster mean-field plus scaling analysis for small spins $S\ensuremath{\le}3/2$. The obtained results, together with the previous large-SSS analysis, indicate that the $\ensuremath{\pi}$-coplanar phase exists for any SSS except for the classical limit $(S\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty})$ and the existence range in J/JzJ/{J}_{z}J/Jz​ is largest in the most quantum case of S=1/2S=1/2S=1/2.
The phase diagram of the anisotropic quantum spin-1/2 Heisenberg antiferromagnet in the presence of competitive nearest (J1)({J}_{1})(J1​)- and next-nearest $({J}_{2}=\ensuremath{\alpha}{J}_{1})$-neighbor interactions on a simple cubic lattice is studied within the framework of the differential operator technique. The Hamiltonian is solved by using an effective-field theory in a two-spin cluster. We propose a function for the free energy, which is similar to the Landau expansion, in order to find the ground state (T=0)(T=0)(T=0) and the finite-TTT phase diagram. At zero temperature, we find a first-order quantum phase transition in the point ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ between the antiferromagnetic (AF) and superantiferromagnetic (SAF) phases. This is dependent on the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ ($\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$ and 1 correspond to the isotropic Heisenberg and Ising models, respectively). The quantum critical values of ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\ne}1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are smaller than those of the classical model ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}(\ensuremath{\Delta}=1)={\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{c}=1/4$ (for example, for $\ensuremath{\Delta}=0$, we find ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{c}^{q}(0)=0.21$). The former monotonically increases with the anisotropy parameter $\ensuremath{\Delta}$. The phase diagram in $T\text{\ensuremath{-}}\ensuremath{\alpha}$ plane presents a second-order transition at ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ between the AF and paramagnetic (P) phases. The phase transition between the SAF and P phases is of first-order ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ for all values of $\ensuremath{\Delta}∊[0,1]$. The phase transition lines ${T}_{1}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ and ${T}_{2}(\ensuremath{\alpha})$ merge in a critical end point (CEP) that is dependent on $\ensuremath{\Delta}$ [i.e., ${T}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ and ${\ensuremath{\alpha}}_{\text{CEP}}(\ensuremath{\Delta})$ are the temperature and frustration parameters at the CEP]. The ordered phases (AF and SAF) are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial re-entrant behavior at low temperatures.
We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of the J 1 XXZ – J 2 XXZ Heisenberg model for spin-1 particles on an infinite square lattice interacting via nearest-neighbour ( ) and next-nearest-neighbour ( J 2 >0) bonds. The two bonds have the same XXZ -type anisotropy in spin space. The effects on the quasiclassical Néel-ordered and collinear stripe-ordered states of varying the anisotropy parameter Δ are investigated using the coupled cluster method carried out up to high orders. By contrast with the case for spin- particles studied previously, no intermediate disordered phase between the Néel and collinear stripe phases, for any value of the frustration J 2 / J 1 , for either the z -aligned (Δ>1) or xy -planar-aligned (0≤Δ<1) states, is predicted here. The quantum phase transition is determined as first order for all values of J 2 / J 1 and Δ. The position of the phase boundary J 2 c (Δ) is determined accurately. It is observed to deviate most from its classical position (for all values of Δ>0) at the Heisenberg isotropic point (Δ = 1), where J 2 c (1) = 0.55 ± 0.01. By contrast, at the XY isotropic point (Δ = 0), we find J 2 c (0) = 0.50 ± 0.01. In the Ising limit ( ), as expected.
Using the coupled-cluster method for infinite lattices and the exact diagonalization method for finite lattices, we study the influence of an exchange anisotropy Δ on the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 frustrated J 1 - J 2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We find that increasing Δ > 1 (i.e. an Ising type easy-axis anisotropy) as well as decreasing Δ < 1 (i.e. an XY type easy-plane anisotropy) both lead to a monotonic shrinking of the parameter region of the magnetically disordered quantum phase. Finally, at Δ c ≈ 1.9 this quantum phase disappears, whereas in the pure XY limit (Δ = 0) there is still a narrow region around J 2 = 0.5 J 1 where the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase exists.