Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0808.2743 · Journal of Physics Conference Series

The ground-state magnetic ordering of the spin-1/2 frustratedJ1-J2XXZ model on the square lattice

R Darradi, Johannes Richter, J Schulenburg, R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li

Published Jan 1, 2009• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Using the coupled-cluster method for infinite lattices and the exact diagonalization method for finite lattices, we study the influence of an exchange anisotropy Δ on the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 frustrated J 1 - J 2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We find that increasing Δ > 1 (i.e. an Ising type easy-axis anisotropy) as well as decreasing Δ < 1 (i.e. an XY type easy-plane anisotropy) both lead to a monotonic shrinking of the parameter region of the magnetically disordered quantum phase. Finally, at Δ c ≈ 1.9 this quantum phase disappears, whereas in the pure XY limit (Δ = 0) there is still a narrow region around J 2 = 0.5 J 1 where the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase exists.

DOI
10.1088/1742-6596/145/1/012049

Related papers

The effect of anisotropy on the ground-state magnetic ordering of the spin-1 quantumJ1XXZ–J2XXZmodel on the square lattice

R. F. Bishop, P. H. Y. Li, R. Darradi +2 more

We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of the J 1 XXZ – J 2 XXZ Heisenberg model for spin-1 particles on an infinite square lattice interacting via nearest-neighbour ( ) and next-nearest-neighbour ( J 2 >0) bonds. The two bonds have the same XXZ -type anisotropy in spin space. The effects on the quasiclassical Néel-ordered and collinear stripe-ordered states of varying the anisotropy parameter Δ are investigated using the coupled cluster method carried out up to high orders. By contrast with the case for spin- particles studied previously, no intermediate disordered phase between the Néel and collinear stripe phases, for any value of the frustration J 2 / J 1 , for either the z -aligned (Δ>1) or xy -planar-aligned (0≤Δ<1) states, is predicted here. The quantum phase transition is determined as first order for all values of J 2 / J 1 and Δ. The position of the phase boundary J 2 c (Δ) is determined accurately. It is observed to deviate most from its classical position (for all values of Δ>0) at the Heisenberg isotropic point (Δ = 1), where J 2 c (1) = 0.55 ± 0.01. By contrast, at the XY isotropic point (Δ = 0), we find J 2 c (0) = 0.50 ± 0.01. In the Ising limit ( ), as expected.

arXiv:0805.4388•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Sep 16, 2008•23 citations

The influence of Ising anisotropy on the zero-temperature phase transition in the square lattice spin-½J–J model

R. Darradi, Johannes Richter, Sven E. Krüger

We use a variational mean-field-like approach, the coupled cluster method (CCM), and exact diagonalization to investigate the ground-state order–disorder transition for the square lattice spin-half XXZ model with two different nearest-neighbour couplings J and . On increasing the model shows in the isotropic Heisenberg limit a second-order transition from semi-classical Néel order to a quantum paramagnetic phase with enhanced local dimer correlations on the bonds at about . This transition is driven by the quantum competition between and J . On increasing the anisotropy parameter Δ>1 we diminish the quantum fluctuations and thus the degree of competition. As a result the transition point is shifted to larger values. We find indications for a linear increase of with Δ, i.e. the transition disappears in the Ising limit .

arXiv:cond-mat/0401604•Journal of Physics Condensed Matter•Apr 2, 2004•13 citations

Ground-state phase diagram of the spin- 12 square-lattice J1 - J2 model with plaquette structure

Oliver Götze, Sven E. Krüger, F. Fleck +2 more

Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-$\frac{1}{2}$ ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (${J}_{1}>0$) as well as ferromagnetic (${J}_{1}<0$) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction ${J}_{2}>0$. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform ${J}_{1}$-${J}_{2}$ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic ${J}_{1}$) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case $s=1/2$. For the antiferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}>0$) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large ${J}_{2}/{J}_{1}$ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (${J}_{1}<0$) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small ${J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|$. By increasing ${J}_{2}$ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length $s=2$ are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of ${J}_{2}$ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.

arXiv:1205.0681•Physical Review B•Jun 21, 2012•16 citations

Ordered magnetic phase in a frustrated spin-½ Heisenberg antiferromagnetic stacked square lattice

Zhuo Fan, Quanlin Jie

We use cluster mean-field theory, multiple block-product state, and nested cluster methods to study the ground state of a frustrated spin-\textonehalf{} Heisenberg antiferromagnetically stacked square lattice at zero temperature. By analyzing the magnetic order parameter and the geometric measure of entanglement, we find that the stacked model produces a new ordered magnetic phase because of the competition between the interlayer coupling, ${J}_{c}$, and the frustrated interaction, ${J}_{2}$. The interlayer coupling, ${J}_{c}$, strengthens the long-range N\'eel phase, the new phase, and the collinear phase and destroys the disordered quantum paramagnetic (QP) phase. Increasing ${J}_{c}$ results in the new phase gradually replacing the QP phase. The QP phase disappears at the critical point ${J}_{2}^{*}$ = 0.5 and ${J}_{c}^{*}$ = 0.12.

Physical Review B•Feb 18, 2014•8 citations

Anisotropy-Induced Ordering in the Quantum J1−J2 Antiferromagnet

Tommaso Roscilde, Adrian E. Feiguin, A. L. Chernyshev +2 more

We study the effect of spin anisotropies on a frustrated quantum antiferromagnet using the ${J}_{1}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}{J}_{2}^{XXZ}$ model on the square lattice. The $T=0$ and finite-$T$ phase diagrams of this model are obtained utilizing spin-wave theory, exact diagonalization, and quantum Monte Carlo calculations. We find that anisotropic frustration tends to stabilize $XY$- and Ising-like ordered phases, while the disordered spin-liquid phase is restricted to a small region of the phase diagram. The ordered phases are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial reentrance phenomenon.

arXiv:cond-mat/0403375•Physical Review Letters•Jul 2, 2004•40 citations

Phase diagram of a frustrated spin- 1 2 J 1 - J 2 X X Z model on the honeycomb lattice

P. H. Y. Li, R. F. Bishop, C. E. Campbell

We study the zero-temperature ($T=0$) ground-state (GS) properties of a frustrated spin-half ${J}_{1}^{\mathit{X}XZ}$--${J}_{2}^{\mathit{X}XZ}$ model on the honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor interactions with exchange couplings ${J}_{1}>0$ and ${J}_{2}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\kappa}{J}_{1}>0$, respectively, using the coupled cluster method. Both interactions are of the anisotropic XXZ type. We present the $T=0$ GS phase diagram of the model in the ranges $0\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\le}1$ of the spin-space anisotropy parameter and $0\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\le}1$ of the frustration parameter. A possible quantum spin-liquid region is identified.

arXiv:1404.0194•Physical Review B•Jun 24, 2014•24 citations
Using the coupled-cluster method for infinite lattices and the exact diagonalization method for finite lattices, we study the influence of an exchange anisotropy Δ on the ground-state phase diagram of the spin-1/2 frustrated J 1 - J 2 XXZ antiferromagnet on the square lattice. We find that increasing Δ > 1 (i.e. an Ising type easy-axis anisotropy) as well as decreasing Δ < 1 (i.e. an XY type easy-plane anisotropy) both lead to a monotonic shrinking of the parameter region of the magnetically disordered quantum phase. Finally, at Δ c ≈ 1.9 this quantum phase disappears, whereas in the pure XY limit (Δ = 0) there is still a narrow region around J 2 = 0.5 J 1 where the quantum paramagnetic ground-state phase exists.
We study the zero-temperature phase diagram of the J 1 XXZ – J 2 XXZ Heisenberg model for spin-1 particles on an infinite square lattice interacting via nearest-neighbour ( ) and next-nearest-neighbour ( J 2 >0) bonds. The two bonds have the same XXZ -type anisotropy in spin space. The effects on the quasiclassical Néel-ordered and collinear stripe-ordered states of varying the anisotropy parameter Δ are investigated using the coupled cluster method carried out up to high orders. By contrast with the case for spin- particles studied previously, no intermediate disordered phase between the Néel and collinear stripe phases, for any value of the frustration J 2 / J 1 , for either the z -aligned (Δ>1) or xy -planar-aligned (0≤Δ<1) states, is predicted here. The quantum phase transition is determined as first order for all values of J 2 / J 1 and Δ. The position of the phase boundary J 2 c (Δ) is determined accurately. It is observed to deviate most from its classical position (for all values of Δ>0) at the Heisenberg isotropic point (Δ = 1), where J 2 c (1) = 0.55 ± 0.01. By contrast, at the XY isotropic point (Δ = 0), we find J 2 c (0) = 0.50 ± 0.01. In the Ising limit ( ), as expected.
We use a variational mean-field-like approach, the coupled cluster method (CCM), and exact diagonalization to investigate the ground-state order–disorder transition for the square lattice spin-half XXZ model with two different nearest-neighbour couplings J and . On increasing the model shows in the isotropic Heisenberg limit a second-order transition from semi-classical Néel order to a quantum paramagnetic phase with enhanced local dimer correlations on the bonds at about . This transition is driven by the quantum competition between and J . On increasing the anisotropy parameter Δ>1 we diminish the quantum fluctuations and thus the degree of competition. As a result the transition point is shifted to larger values. We find indications for a linear increase of with Δ, i.e. the transition disappears in the Ising limit .
Using the coupled-cluster method for high orders of approximation and Lanczos exact diagonalization we study the ground-state phase diagram of a quantum spin-12\frac{1}{2}21​ J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model on the square lattice with plaquette structure. We consider antiferromagnetic (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) as well as ferromagnetic (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) nearest-neighbor interactions together with frustrating antiferromagnetic next-nearest-neighbor interaction J2>0{J}_{2}>0J2​>0. The strength of interplaquette interaction $\ensuremath{\lambda}$ varies between $\ensuremath{\lambda}=1$ (which corresponds to the uniform J1{J}_{1}J1​-J2{J}_{2}J2​ model) and $\ensuremath{\lambda}=0$ (which corresponds to isolated frustrated 4-spin plaquettes). While on the classical level ($s\ensuremath{\rightarrow}\ensuremath{\infty}$) both versions of models (i.e., with ferro- and antiferromagnetic J1{J}_{1}J1​) exhibit the same ground-state behavior, the ground-state phase diagram differs basically for the quantum case s=1/2s=1/2s=1/2. For the antiferromagnetic case (J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0) N\'eel antiferromagnetic long-range order at small J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.47$ as well as collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order at large J2/J1{J}_{2}/{J}_{1}J2​/J1​ and $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.30$ appear which correspond to their classical counterparts. Both semiclassical magnetic phases are separated by a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase. The parameter region, where this nonmagnetic phase exists, increases with decreasing $\ensuremath{\lambda}$. For the ferromagnetic case (J1<0{J}_{1}<0J1​<0) we have the trivial ferromagnetic ground state at small J2/∣J1∣{J}_{2}/|{J}_{1}|J2​/∣J1​∣. By increasing J2{J}_{2}J2​ this classical phase gives way for a semiclassical plaquette phase, where the plaquette block spins of length s=2s=2s=2 are antiferromagnetically long-range ordered. Further increasing of J2{J}_{2}J2​ then yields collinear striped antiferromagnetic long-range order for $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\gtrsim}0.38$, but a nonmagnetic quantum paramagnetic phase $\ensuremath{\lambda}\ensuremath{\lesssim}0.38$.
We use cluster mean-field theory, multiple block-product state, and nested cluster methods to study the ground state of a frustrated spin-\textonehalf{} Heisenberg antiferromagnetically stacked square lattice at zero temperature. By analyzing the magnetic order parameter and the geometric measure of entanglement, we find that the stacked model produces a new ordered magnetic phase because of the competition between the interlayer coupling, Jc{J}_{c}Jc​, and the frustrated interaction, J2{J}_{2}J2​. The interlayer coupling, Jc{J}_{c}Jc​, strengthens the long-range N\'eel phase, the new phase, and the collinear phase and destroys the disordered quantum paramagnetic (QP) phase. Increasing Jc{J}_{c}Jc​ results in the new phase gradually replacing the QP phase. The QP phase disappears at the critical point J2∗{J}_{2}^{*}J2∗​ = 0.5 and Jc∗{J}_{c}^{*}Jc∗​ = 0.12.
We study the effect of spin anisotropies on a frustrated quantum antiferromagnet using the ${J}_{1}\mathrm{\text{\ensuremath{-}}}{J}_{2}^{XXZ}$ model on the square lattice. The T=0T=0T=0 and finite-TTT phase diagrams of this model are obtained utilizing spin-wave theory, exact diagonalization, and quantum Monte Carlo calculations. We find that anisotropic frustration tends to stabilize XYXYXY- and Ising-like ordered phases, while the disordered spin-liquid phase is restricted to a small region of the phase diagram. The ordered phases are separated by first-order transitions and exhibit a nontrivial reentrance phenomenon.
We study the zero-temperature (T=0T=0T=0) ground-state (GS) properties of a frustrated spin-half J1XXZ{J}_{1}^{\mathit{X}XZ}J1XXZ​--J2XXZ{J}_{2}^{\mathit{X}XZ}J2XXZ​ model on the honeycomb lattice with nearest-neighbor and next-nearest-neighbor interactions with exchange couplings J1>0{J}_{1}>0J1​>0 and ${J}_{2}\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\kappa}{J}_{1}>0$, respectively, using the coupled cluster method. Both interactions are of the anisotropic XXZ type. We present the T=0T=0T=0 GS phase diagram of the model in the ranges $0\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\Delta}\ensuremath{\le}1$ of the spin-space anisotropy parameter and $0\ensuremath{\le}\ensuremath{\kappa}\ensuremath{\le}1$ of the frustration parameter. A possible quantum spin-liquid region is identified.