An ideal phase-preserving linear amplifier is a deterministic device that adds to an input signal the minimal amount of noise consistent with the constraints imposed by quantum mechanics. A noiseless linear amplifier takes an input coherent state to an amplified coherent state, but only works part of the time. Such a device is actually better than noiseless, since the output has less noise than the amplified noise of the input coherent state; for this reason we refer to such devices as immaculate. Here we bound the working probabilities of probabilistic and approximate immaculate amplifiers and construct theoretical models that achieve some of these bounds. Our chief conclusions are the following: (i) The working probability of any phase-insensitive immaculate amplifier is very small in the phase-plane region where the device works with high fidelity; (ii) phase-sensitive immaculate amplifiers that work only on coherent states sparsely distributed on a phase-plane circle centered at the origin can have a reasonably high working probability.
An ideal phase-preserving linear amplifier is a deterministic device that adds to an input signal the minimal amount of noise consistent with the constraints imposed by quantum mechanics. A noiseless linear amplifier takes an input coherent state to an amplified coherent state, but only works part of the time. Such a device is actually better than noiseless, since the output has less noise than the amplified noise of the input coherent state; for this reason we refer to such devices as immaculate. Here we bound the working probabilities of probabilistic and approximate immaculate amplifiers and construct theoretical models that achieve some of these bounds. Our chief conclusions are the following: (i) The working probability of any phase-insensitive immaculate amplifier is very small in the phase-plane region where the device works with high fidelity; (ii) phase-sensitive immaculate amplifiers that work only on coherent states sparsely distributed on a phase-plane circle centered at the origin can have a reasonably high working probability.
The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, regardless of its phase, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise ratio. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: A high-gain linear amplifier must degrade the signal-to-noise ratio; the noise added by the amplifier, when referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we derive the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: We show that any phase-preserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state for the ancillary mode; the noise added to the amplified field mode is distributed according to the Wigner function of the ancilla state.
The purpose of a phase-preserving linear amplifier is to make a small signal larger, so that it can be perceived by instruments incapable of resolving the original signal, while sacrificing as little as possible in signal-to-noise. Quantum mechanics limits how well this can be done: the noise added by the amplifier, referred to the input, must be at least half a quantum at the operating frequency. This well-known quantum limit only constrains the second moments of the added noise. Here we provide the quantum constraints on the entire distribution of added noise: any phasepreserving linear amplifier is equivalent to a parametric amplifier with a physical state σ for the ancillary mode; σ determines the properties of the added noise.
How much noise does quantum mechanics require a linear amplifier to add to a signal it processes? An analysis of narrow-band amplifiers (single-mode input and output) yields a fundamental theorem for phase-insensitive linear amplifiers; it requires such an amplifier, in the limit of high gain, to add noise which, referred to the input, is at least as large as the half-quantum of zero-point fluctuations. For phase-sensitive linear amplifiers, which can respond differently to the two quadrature phases ("$cos\ensuremath{\omega}t$" and "$sin\ensuremath{\omega}t$"), the single-mode analysis yields an amplifier uncertainty principle---a lower limit on the product of the noises added to the two phases. A multimode treatment of linear amplifiers generalizes the single-mode analysis to amplifiers with nonzero bandwidth. The results for phase-insensitive amplifiers remain the same, but for phase-sensitive amplifiers there emerge bandwidth-dependent corrections to the single-mode results. Specifically, there is a bandwidth-dependent lower limit on the noise carried by one quadrature phase of a signal and a corresponding lower limit on the noise a high-gain linear amplifier must add to one quadrature phase. Particular attention is focused on developing a multimode description of signals with unequal noise in the two quadrature phases.
Amplification of quantum states is inevitably accompanied with the introduction of noise at the output. For protocols that are probabilistic with heralded success, noiseless linear amplification in theory may still be possible. When the protocol is successful, it can lead to an output that is a noiselessly amplified copy of the input. When the protocol is unsuccessful, the output state is degraded and is usually discarded. Probabilistic protocols may improve the performance of some quantum information protocols, but not for metrology if the whole statistics is taken into consideration. We calculate the precision limits on estimating the phase of coherent states using a noiseless linear amplifier by computing its quantum Fisher information and we show that on average, the noiseless linear amplifier does not improve the phase estimate. We also discuss the case where abstention from measurement can reduce the cost for estimation.
The laws of quantum mechanics pose stringent constraints on the amplification of a quantum signal. Deterministic amplification of an unknown quantum state always implies the addition of a minimal amount of noise. In principle, linear and noiseless amplification is allowed provided it works only probabilistically [1,2]. The state comparison amplifier [3] is an approximate probabilistic amplifier that amplifies a coherent state chosen at random from a set of coherent states with known mean photon number. The amplification process works as follows: Alice picks uniformly at random an input state and passes it to Bob. He desires to amplify the state so he mixes it with a guess coherent state at a beam splitter in an attempt to achieve destructive interference in one of the output arms. This output is fed into an APD detector. The lack of trigger at the detector is an imperfect indication that Bob’s guess is right and that the output contains the correct amplified state. On the other hand, if the first detector fires Bob knows that his guess was wrong but he can still correct the output by changing the input state for a second amplification stage via a feed-forward loop. In summary, Bob declares success when both the detectors do not fire or when the first detector does fire and state correction is performed. We generalize this mechanism for an arbitrary number of input states and beam splitters, using an on-line learning strategy based on maximum a posteriori probability. The success probability-fidelity product [2] of the SCAMP is the joint probability of success and of passing a measurement test on the output comparing it to right amplified state. Our figures of merit compare favorably with other schemes. The success probability-fidelity product of the SCAMP is always bigger than that of a USD based amplifier [2] that, when inconclusive, delivers a conveniently chosen random output. The SCAMP can be realized with classical resources (i.e., lasers, linear optics and APD detectors), the ability to switch between input states on the fly requires delay lines and fast switching but it can still be achieved with classical resources and the loss introduced by the delay can be offset at the second stage. Similar systems, with no state correction, proved to achieve high-gain, high fidelity and high repetition rates, e.g. [4, 5]. Due to its simplicity, the system we propose might represent an ideal candidate either as a recovery station to counteract quantum signal degradation due to propagation in a lossy fibre or across the turbulent atmosphere or as a quantum receiver to improve the key-rate of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with discrete modulation. The system is also suitable for on-chip implementation. [1] T.C. Ralph & A.P. Lund, Proceedings of the 9th QCMC Conference 2009. [2] S. Pandey, et al., Phys. Rev. A 88, 033852 (2013). [3] E. Eleftheriadou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 213601 (2013). [4] R. Donaldson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120505 (2015). [5] R. Donaldson et al., in preparation.
Fundamental laws of quantum mechanics impose that arbitrary quantum states cannot be perfectly cloned or amplified without introducing some unavoidable noise in the process. The quantum noise intrinsic to the functioning of a linear phase-insensitive amplifier can however be avoided by relaxing the requirement of a deterministic operation. Non-deterministic noiseless linear amplifiers that do not violate any fundamental quantum law are therefore possible and here we present the first experimental realization of a scheme that allows noiseless amplification of coherent states at the best level of effective gain and final state fidelity ever reached. This scheme, based on a sequence of photon addition and subtraction, and characterized by a significant amplification and low distortions, may become a useful tool for quantum communications and metrology, by enhancing the discrimination between partially overlapping quantum states or by recovering the information transmitted over lossy channels.