Amplification of quantum states is inevitably accompanied with the introduction of noise at the output. For protocols that are probabilistic with heralded success, noiseless linear amplification in theory may still be possible. When the protocol is successful, it can lead to an output that is a noiselessly amplified copy of the input. When the protocol is unsuccessful, the output state is degraded and is usually discarded. Probabilistic protocols may improve the performance of some quantum information protocols, but not for metrology if the whole statistics is taken into consideration. We calculate the precision limits on estimating the phase of coherent states using a noiseless linear amplifier by computing its quantum Fisher information and we show that on average, the noiseless linear amplifier does not improve the phase estimate. We also discuss the case where abstention from measurement can reduce the cost for estimation.
Amplification of quantum states is inevitably accompanied with the introduction of noise at the output. For protocols that are probabilistic with heralded success, noiseless linear amplification in theory may still be possible. When the protocol is successful, it can lead to an output that is a noiselessly amplified copy of the input. When the protocol is unsuccessful, the output state is degraded and is usually discarded. Probabilistic protocols may improve the performance of some quantum information protocols, but not for metrology if the whole statistics is taken into consideration. We calculate the precision limits on estimating the phase of coherent states using a noiseless linear amplifier by computing its quantum Fisher information and we show that on average, the noiseless linear amplifier does not improve the phase estimate. We also discuss the case where abstention from measurement can reduce the cost for estimation.
Most of the schemes for ``noiseless'' amplification of coherent states, which have recently been attracting theoretical and experimental interest, share a common trait: The amplification is not truly noiseless, or perfect, for nonzero success probability. While this must hold true for all phase-independent amplification schemes, in this work we point out that truly noiseless amplification is indeed possible, provided that the states which we wish to amplify come from a finite set. Perfect amplification with unlimited average gain is then possible with finite success probability, for example, using techniques for unambiguously distinguishing between quantum states. Such realizations require only linear optics, no single-photon sources, and no photon counting. We also investigate the optimal success probability of perfect amplification of a symmetric set of coherent states. There are two regimes: low-amplitude amplification, where the target amplitude is below one, and general amplification. For the low-amplitude regime, analytic results for the optimal amplification success probabilities can be obtained. In this case a natural bound imposed by the ratio of success probabilities of optimal unambiguous discrimination of the source and amplified states can always be reached. We also show that for general amplification this bound cannot always be satisfied.
Abstract We address the characterisation of non-deterministic noiseless linear amplifiers (NLAs) and compare the performances of different estimation strategies. In particular, we focus on estimation of the gain, whose value may result from a combination of different experimental effects, as those governing the overall efficiency of the detector or the transmissivity of the involved optical components. At first, we show that, contrary to naive expectations, post-selecting only the amplified states does not offer the most accurate estimate. We then focus on minimal implementations of a NLA, i.e. those obtained by coupling the input state to a two-level system, and show that the maximal amount of information about the gain of the NLA is obtained by measuring the whole composite system. The quantum Fisher information (QFI) of this best-case scenario is analysed in some detail, and compared to the QFI of the post-selected states, both for successful and unsuccessful amplification. Eventually, we show that full extraction of the available information is achieved when the non-deterministic process is implemented by a Lüders instrument. We also analyse the precision attainable by probing NLAs by single-mode pure states and measuring the field or the number of quanta, and discuss in some detail the specific cases of squeezed vacuum and coherent states.
Due to the pervasive nature of decoherence, protection of quantum information during transmission is of critical importance for any quantum network. A linear amplifier that can enhance quantum signals stronger than their associated noise while preserving quantum coherence is therefore of great use. This seemingly unphysical amplifier property is achievable for a class of probabilistic amplifiers that does not work deterministically. Here we present a linear amplification scheme that realises this property for coherent states by combining a heralded measurement-based noiseless linear amplifier and a deterministic linear amplifier. The concatenation of two amplifiers introduces the flexibility that allows one to tune between the regimes of high-gain or high noise-reduction, and control the trade-off of these performances against a finite heralding probability. We demonstrate an amplification signal transfer coefficient of Ts>1 with no statistical distortion of the output state. By partially relaxing the demand of output Gaussianity, we can obtain further improvement to achieve a Ts=2.55±0.08. Our amplification scheme only relies on linear optics and post-selection algorithm. We discuss the potential of using this amplifier as a building block in extending the distance of quantum communication.
A universal deterministic noiseless quantum amplifier has been shown to be impossible. However, probabilistic noiseless amplification of a certain set of states is physically permissible. Regarding quantum state amplification as quantum state transformation, we show that deterministic noiseless amplification of coherent states chosen from a proper set is attainable. The relation between input coherent states and gain of amplification for deterministic noiseless amplification is thus derived. Furthermore, we extend our result to more general situation and show that deterministic noiseless amplification of Gaussian states is also possible. As an example of application, we find that our amplification model can obtain better performance in homodyne detection to measure the phase of state selected from a certain set. Besides, other possible applications are also discussed.
The laws of quantum mechanics pose stringent constraints on the amplification of a quantum signal. Deterministic amplification of an unknown quantum state always implies the addition of a minimal amount of noise. In principle, linear and noiseless amplification is allowed provided it works only probabilistically [1,2]. The state comparison amplifier [3] is an approximate probabilistic amplifier that amplifies a coherent state chosen at random from a set of coherent states with known mean photon number. The amplification process works as follows: Alice picks uniformly at random an input state and passes it to Bob. He desires to amplify the state so he mixes it with a guess coherent state at a beam splitter in an attempt to achieve destructive interference in one of the output arms. This output is fed into an APD detector. The lack of trigger at the detector is an imperfect indication that Bob’s guess is right and that the output contains the correct amplified state. On the other hand, if the first detector fires Bob knows that his guess was wrong but he can still correct the output by changing the input state for a second amplification stage via a feed-forward loop. In summary, Bob declares success when both the detectors do not fire or when the first detector does fire and state correction is performed. We generalize this mechanism for an arbitrary number of input states and beam splitters, using an on-line learning strategy based on maximum a posteriori probability. The success probability-fidelity product [2] of the SCAMP is the joint probability of success and of passing a measurement test on the output comparing it to right amplified state. Our figures of merit compare favorably with other schemes. The success probability-fidelity product of the SCAMP is always bigger than that of a USD based amplifier [2] that, when inconclusive, delivers a conveniently chosen random output. The SCAMP can be realized with classical resources (i.e., lasers, linear optics and APD detectors), the ability to switch between input states on the fly requires delay lines and fast switching but it can still be achieved with classical resources and the loss introduced by the delay can be offset at the second stage. Similar systems, with no state correction, proved to achieve high-gain, high fidelity and high repetition rates, e.g. [4, 5]. Due to its simplicity, the system we propose might represent an ideal candidate either as a recovery station to counteract quantum signal degradation due to propagation in a lossy fibre or across the turbulent atmosphere or as a quantum receiver to improve the key-rate of continuous-variable quantum key distribution with discrete modulation. The system is also suitable for on-chip implementation. [1] T.C. Ralph & A.P. Lund, Proceedings of the 9th QCMC Conference 2009. [2] S. Pandey, et al., Phys. Rev. A 88, 033852 (2013). [3] E. Eleftheriadou et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 111, 213601 (2013). [4] R. Donaldson et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 114, 120505 (2015). [5] R. Donaldson et al., in preparation.
Phase estimation has a wide range of applications. Over the years, several strategies have been studied to improve precision in phase estimation. These strategies include using exotic quantum states to quantum detection schemes. This dissertation summarizes my effort in improving the precision of phase estimation with a linear and nonlinear interferometer. Chapter 1 introduces quantum optics and quantum metrology. I introduce all relevant quantum states of light used. We also look into tools and terminologies of quantum metrology such as Fisher information, shot-noise limit, Heisenberg limit, etc., along with examples of phase estimation with a Mach-Zehnder interferometer. In Chapter 2, I discuss multiple phase estimation using a multimode interferometer. Building upon previous work, our scheme consists of a multimode interferometer with single-photon inputs. By using a quantum Fisher information analysis, we show that our scheme gives a constant improvement over other schemes. We also show that our scheme with photon-number-resolving detection approaches the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. Moreover, we also consider the probabilistic nature of photon emission at the input, and we study its effect on phase sensitivity. I discuss phase estimation with SU(1,1) interferometer in Chapter 3. We look at phase sensitivity in this interferometer with different input states. Namely, we consider two different phase estimation scheme, one using thermal and squeezed states, and others using coherent and displaced squeezed states with parity and on-off as a detection scheme. We also look into the effect of photon loss inside the interferometer. In Chapter 4, we revisit phase estimation in SU(1,1) interferometer from the perspective of quantum Fisher information. I discuss in detail a longstanding confusion regarding the use of quantum Fisher information in SU(1,1) interferometer. We show that phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is needed in general for calculating the phase sensitivity which resolves inconsistencies reported in previously published articles.