Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1303.4291 · Physical Review A

Non-fault-tolerant T gates for the [7,1,3] quantum error-correction code

Yaakov S. Weinstein

Published Mar 18, 2013• 14 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We simulate the implementation of a $T$ gate, or $\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}}{8}$ gate, for a [7,1,3] encoded logical qubit in a nonequiprobable error environment. We demonstrate that the use of certain non-fault-tolerant methods in the implementation may nevertheless enable reliable quantum computation while reducing basic resource consumption. Reliability is determined by calculating gate fidelities for the one-qubit logical gate. Specifically, we show that despite using a non-fault-tolerant procedure in constructing a logical zero ancilla to implement the $T$ gate, the gate fidelity of the logical gate, after perfect error correction, has no first order error terms. Meaning, any errors that may have occurred during implementation are ``correctable'' and fault tolerance may still be achieved.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.87.032320

Related papers

Implementing fault-tolerant non-Clifford gates using the [[8,3,2]] color code

Daniel Honciuc Menendez, Annie Ray, Michael Vasmer

Quantum computers promise to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers, but qubits are vulnerable to many sources of error, limiting the depth of the circuits that can be reliably executed on today's quantum hardware. Quantum error correction has been proposed as a solution to this problem, whereby quantum information is protected by encoding it into a quantum error-correcting code. But protecting quantum information is not enough, we must also process the information using logic gates that are robust to faults that occur during their execution. One method for processing information fault-tolerantly is to use quantum error-correcting codes that have logical gates with a tensor product structure (transversal gates), making them naturally fault-tolerant. Here, we test the performance of a code with such transversal gates, the [[8,3,2]] color code, using trapped-ion and superconducting hardware. We observe improved performance (compared to no encoding) for encoded circuits implementing non-Clifford gates, a class of gates that are essential for achieving universal quantum computing. In particular, we find improved performance for an encoded circuit implementing the controlled-controlled-$Z$ gate, a key gate in Shor's algorithm. Our results illustrate the potential of using codes with transversal gates to implement nontrivial algorithms on near-term quantum hardware.

arXiv:2309.08663•Physical Review A•Jun 28, 2024•12 citations

Surprises in fault tolerance and cluster dynamics for quantum computing

Gerald N. Gilbert, Yaakov S. Weinstein

We explore basic necessary protocols to achieve fault tolerance for quantum computation in the cluster state and circuit models. For the cluster state model we simulate the implementation of an arbitrary rotation via only measurement on a decohered cluster state. Fidelity is used to quantify the accuracy of the initial cluster state and a gate fidelity for the arbitrary rotation is determined. In the circuit model we compare the accuracy of two methods that can be used to construct a logical zero state appropriate for the [7, 1, 3] Steane quantum error correction code in a non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment: a fault tolerant method done by applying error correction on seven qubits all in the state zero, and a non-fault tolerant method done by implementing the encoding gate sequence. We find that the latter construction method, in spite of its lack of "fault tolerance," outputs a seven qubit state with a higher fidelity than the first (fault tolerant) method. However, the fidelity of the single qubit of stored information exhibits almost equivalent values between the two construction methods.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Feb 9, 2012•0 citations

Encoding an Arbitrary State in a [7,1,3] Quantum Error Correction Code

Sidney Buchbinder, Channing L. Huang, Yaakov S. Weinstein

We calculate the fidelity with which an arbitrary state can be encoded into a [7,1,3] CSS quantum error correction code in a non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment with the goal of determining whether this encoding can be used for practical implementations of quantum computation. This determination is accomplished by applying ideal error correction to the encoded state which demonstrates the correctability of errors that occurred during the encoding process. We then apply single-qubit Clifford gates to the encoded state and determine the accuracy with which these gates can be applied. Finally, fault tolerant noisy error correction is applied to the encoded states in the non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment allowing us to compare noisy (realistic) and perfect error correction implementations. We note that this maintains the fidelity of the encoded state for certain error-probability values. These results have implications for when non-fault tolerant procedures may be used in practical quantum computation and whether quantum error correction should be applied at every step in a quantum protocol.

arXiv:1109.1714•Sep 8, 2011•0 citations

Quantum error correction during 50 gates

Yaakov S. Weinstein

Fault-tolerant protocol assumes the application of error correction after every quantum gate. However, correcting errors is costly in terms of time and number of qubits. Here we demonstrate that quantum error correction (QEC) can be applied significantly less often with only a minimal loss of fidelity. This is done by simulating the implementation of 50 encoded, single-qubit, quantum gates within the [[7,1,3]] QEC code in a noisy, nonequiprobable Pauli error environment with QEC being applied at different intervals. We find that applying QEC after every gate is rarely optimal and even applying QEC only once after all 50 gates sacrifices only a slight amount of fidelity with the benefit of 50-fold saving of resources. In addition, we find that in cases where bit-flip errors are dominant, it is best not to apply QEC at all.

arXiv:1312.1245•Physical Review A•Feb 5, 2014•11 citations

Experimental fault-tolerant code switching

Ivan Pogorelov, Friederike Butt, Lukas Postler +4 more

Quantum error correction is a crucial tool for mitigating hardware errors in quantum computers by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits. However, no single error-correcting code allows for an intrinsically fault-tolerant implementation of all the gates needed for universal quantum computing [1-3]. One way to tackle this problem is to switch between two suitable error-correcting codes, while preserving the encoded logical information, which in combination give access to a fault-tolerant universal gate set [4-6]. In this work, we present the first experimental implementation of fault-tolerant code switching between two codes. One is the seven-qubit color code [7], which features fault-tolerant CNOT and $H$ quantum gates, while the other one, the 10-qubit code [8], allows for a fault-tolerant $T$-gate implementation. Together they form a complementary universal gate set. Building on essential code switching building blocks, we construct logical circuits and prepare 12 different logical states which are not accessible natively in a fault-tolerant way within a single code. Finally, we use code switching to entangle two logical qubits employing the full universal gate set in a single logical quantum circuit. Our results experimentally open up a new route towards deterministic control over logical qubits with low auxiliary qubit overhead, not relying on the probabilistic preparation of resource states.

arXiv:2403.13732•Mar 20, 2024•0 citations

Error rates and resource overheads of encoded three-qubit gates

Ryuji Takagi, Theodore J. Yoder, Isaac L. Chuang

A non-Clifford gate is required for universal quantum computation, and, typically, this is the most error-prone and resource-intensive logical operation on an error-correcting code. Small, single-qubit rotations are popular choices for this non-Clifford gate, but certain three-qubit gates, such as Toffoli or controlled-controlled-$Z$ (ccz), are equivalent options that are also more suited for implementing some quantum algorithms, for instance, those with coherent classical subroutines. Here, we calculate error rates and resource overheads for implementing logical ccz with pieceable fault tolerance, a nontransversal method for implementing logical gates. We provide a comparison with a nonlocal magic-state scheme on a concatenated code and a local magic-state scheme on the surface code. We find the pieceable fault-tolerance scheme particularly advantaged over magic states on concatenated codes and in certain regimes over magic states on the surface code. Our results suggest that pieceable fault tolerance is a promising candidate for fault tolerance in a near-future quantum computer.

arXiv:1707.00012•Physical Review A•Oct 4, 2017•16 citations
We simulate the implementation of a TTT gate, or \ensuremathπ8\frac{\ensuremath{\pi}}{8}8\ensuremathπ​ gate, for a [7,1,3] encoded logical qubit in a nonequiprobable error environment. We demonstrate that the use of certain non-fault-tolerant methods in the implementation may nevertheless enable reliable quantum computation while reducing basic resource consumption. Reliability is determined by calculating gate fidelities for the one-qubit logical gate. Specifically, we show that despite using a non-fault-tolerant procedure in constructing a logical zero ancilla to implement the TTT gate, the gate fidelity of the logical gate, after perfect error correction, has no first order error terms. Meaning, any errors that may have occurred during implementation are ``correctable'' and fault tolerance may still be achieved.
Quantum computers promise to solve problems that are intractable for classical computers, but qubits are vulnerable to many sources of error, limiting the depth of the circuits that can be reliably executed on today's quantum hardware. Quantum error correction has been proposed as a solution to this problem, whereby quantum information is protected by encoding it into a quantum error-correcting code. But protecting quantum information is not enough, we must also process the information using logic gates that are robust to faults that occur during their execution. One method for processing information fault-tolerantly is to use quantum error-correcting codes that have logical gates with a tensor product structure (transversal gates), making them naturally fault-tolerant. Here, we test the performance of a code with such transversal gates, the [[8,3,2]] color code, using trapped-ion and superconducting hardware. We observe improved performance (compared to no encoding) for encoded circuits implementing non-Clifford gates, a class of gates that are essential for achieving universal quantum computing. In particular, we find improved performance for an encoded circuit implementing the controlled-controlled-ZZZ gate, a key gate in Shor's algorithm. Our results illustrate the potential of using codes with transversal gates to implement nontrivial algorithms on near-term quantum hardware.
We explore basic necessary protocols to achieve fault tolerance for quantum computation in the cluster state and circuit models. For the cluster state model we simulate the implementation of an arbitrary rotation via only measurement on a decohered cluster state. Fidelity is used to quantify the accuracy of the initial cluster state and a gate fidelity for the arbitrary rotation is determined. In the circuit model we compare the accuracy of two methods that can be used to construct a logical zero state appropriate for the [7, 1, 3] Steane quantum error correction code in a non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment: a fault tolerant method done by applying error correction on seven qubits all in the state zero, and a non-fault tolerant method done by implementing the encoding gate sequence. We find that the latter construction method, in spite of its lack of "fault tolerance," outputs a seven qubit state with a higher fidelity than the first (fault tolerant) method. However, the fidelity of the single qubit of stored information exhibits almost equivalent values between the two construction methods.
We calculate the fidelity with which an arbitrary state can be encoded into a [7,1,3] CSS quantum error correction code in a non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment with the goal of determining whether this encoding can be used for practical implementations of quantum computation. This determination is accomplished by applying ideal error correction to the encoded state which demonstrates the correctability of errors that occurred during the encoding process. We then apply single-qubit Clifford gates to the encoded state and determine the accuracy with which these gates can be applied. Finally, fault tolerant noisy error correction is applied to the encoded states in the non-equiprobable Pauli operator error environment allowing us to compare noisy (realistic) and perfect error correction implementations. We note that this maintains the fidelity of the encoded state for certain error-probability values. These results have implications for when non-fault tolerant procedures may be used in practical quantum computation and whether quantum error correction should be applied at every step in a quantum protocol.
Fault-tolerant protocol assumes the application of error correction after every quantum gate. However, correcting errors is costly in terms of time and number of qubits. Here we demonstrate that quantum error correction (QEC) can be applied significantly less often with only a minimal loss of fidelity. This is done by simulating the implementation of 50 encoded, single-qubit, quantum gates within the [[7,1,3]] QEC code in a noisy, nonequiprobable Pauli error environment with QEC being applied at different intervals. We find that applying QEC after every gate is rarely optimal and even applying QEC only once after all 50 gates sacrifices only a slight amount of fidelity with the benefit of 50-fold saving of resources. In addition, we find that in cases where bit-flip errors are dominant, it is best not to apply QEC at all.
Quantum error correction is a crucial tool for mitigating hardware errors in quantum computers by encoding logical information into multiple physical qubits. However, no single error-correcting code allows for an intrinsically fault-tolerant implementation of all the gates needed for universal quantum computing [1-3]. One way to tackle this problem is to switch between two suitable error-correcting codes, while preserving the encoded logical information, which in combination give access to a fault-tolerant universal gate set [4-6]. In this work, we present the first experimental implementation of fault-tolerant code switching between two codes. One is the seven-qubit color code [7], which features fault-tolerant CNOT and HHH quantum gates, while the other one, the 10-qubit code [8], allows for a fault-tolerant TTT-gate implementation. Together they form a complementary universal gate set. Building on essential code switching building blocks, we construct logical circuits and prepare 12 different logical states which are not accessible natively in a fault-tolerant way within a single code. Finally, we use code switching to entangle two logical qubits employing the full universal gate set in a single logical quantum circuit. Our results experimentally open up a new route towards deterministic control over logical qubits with low auxiliary qubit overhead, not relying on the probabilistic preparation of resource states.
A non-Clifford gate is required for universal quantum computation, and, typically, this is the most error-prone and resource-intensive logical operation on an error-correcting code. Small, single-qubit rotations are popular choices for this non-Clifford gate, but certain three-qubit gates, such as Toffoli or controlled-controlled-ZZZ (ccz), are equivalent options that are also more suited for implementing some quantum algorithms, for instance, those with coherent classical subroutines. Here, we calculate error rates and resource overheads for implementing logical ccz with pieceable fault tolerance, a nontransversal method for implementing logical gates. We provide a comparison with a nonlocal magic-state scheme on a concatenated code and a local magic-state scheme on the surface code. We find the pieceable fault-tolerance scheme particularly advantaged over magic states on concatenated codes and in certain regimes over magic states on the surface code. Our results suggest that pieceable fault tolerance is a promising candidate for fault tolerance in a near-future quantum computer.