Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1312.1245 · Physical Review A

Quantum error correction during 50 gates

Yaakov S. Weinstein

Published Feb 5, 2014• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Fault-tolerant protocol assumes the application of error correction after every quantum gate. However, correcting errors is costly in terms of time and number of qubits. Here we demonstrate that quantum error correction (QEC) can be applied significantly less often with only a minimal loss of fidelity. This is done by simulating the implementation of 50 encoded, single-qubit, quantum gates within the [[7,1,3]] QEC code in a noisy, nonequiprobable Pauli error environment with QEC being applied at different intervals. We find that applying QEC after every gate is rarely optimal and even applying QEC only once after all 50 gates sacrifices only a slight amount of fidelity with the benefit of 50-fold saving of resources. In addition, we find that in cases where bit-flip errors are dominant, it is best not to apply QEC at all.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.89.020301

Related papers

How Often Must Quantum Error Correction be Implemented

Yaakov S. Weinstein

Correcting errors is a vital but expensive component of fault tolerant quantum computation. Standard fault tolerant protocol assumes the implementation of error correction, via syndrome measurements and possible recovery operations, after every quantum gate. In fact, this is not necessary. Here we demonstrate that error correction should be applied more sparingly. We simulate encoded single qubit rotations within the [7,1,3] code and show via fidelity measures that applying error correction after every gate is not desirable. The simulations also shed light on what accuracy can be expected for noisy error correction and thus to what accuracy arbitrary single qubit rotations should be implemented.

•May 13, 2013•0 citations

Quantum-error-correction implementation after multiple gates

Yaakov S. Weinstein

Correcting errors is a vital but expensive component of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Standard fault-tolerant protocol assumes the implementation of error correction, via syndrome measurements and possible recovery operations, after every quantum gate. In fact, this is not necessary. Here we demonstrate that error correction should be applied more sparingly. We simulate encoded single-qubit rotations within the [7,1,3] code and show via fidelity measures that applying error correction after every gate is not desirable.

arXiv:1305.2763•Physical Review A•Jul 23, 2013•11 citations

Density matrix simulation of quantum error correction codes for near-term quantum devices

Chungheon Baek, Tomohiro Ostuka, Seigo Tarucha +1 more

Abstract Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires many qubits with long lifetimes and accurate quantum gate operations. However, external noise limits the computing time and hampers accurate quantum gate operations. Quantum error correction (QEC) codes may extend such limits, but imperfect gate operations during QEC cause errors, which could cancel out QEC. We used density matrix simulations to examine the performance of QEC codes with five qubits. In current quantum devices, less than ten qubits are needed to conduct sufficient gate operations within their lifetime so that it is feasible to implement QEC codes. We analyzed the maximum tolerable error rate and error correction effect of individual QEC codes according to the qubit arrangement and gate accuracy. Assuming a 0.1% gate error probability, a logical ∣ 1 〉 state encoded by a five-qubit QEC code is expected to have a 0.25 higher fidelity than its physical counterpart.

Quantum Science and Technology•Nov 18, 2019•11 citations

Performance Limits of Fault-Tolerant Quantum Error Correction Schemes

Lorenzo Valentini, Diego Forlivesi, Marco Chiani

Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for realizing scalable quantum computation. However, when evaluating its benefits, most analyses assume idealized components, overlooking the imperfections inherent in realistic fault-tolerant (FT) implementations. In this paper, we investigate the performance of QEC schemes taking into account that quantum gates and measurements are themselves error-prone. We derive bounds for the failure probability of Shor-style FT-QEC schemes using limited structural information, such as the number of flag qubits and quantum gates. Our analysis separates and quantifies two key contributors to the failure rate: decoding errors and residual errors arising from circuit-level faults. The derived bounds highlight fundamental limitations in Shor-style FT-QEC performance and quantify how circuit imperfections degrade error correction capabilities, under the assumption of depolarizing noise.

quant-pharXiv:2605.24501•IEEE Journal on Selected Areas in Communications•May 26, 2026•0 citations

Microscopic quantum dynamics study on the noise threshold of fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Yuan‐Chung Cheng, R. Silbey

Quantum circuits implementing fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) for the three-qubit bit-flip code and five-qubit code are studied. To describe the effect of noise, we apply a model based on a generalized effective Hamiltonian where the system-environment interactions are taken into account by including stochastic fluctuating terms in the system Hamiltonian. This noise model enables us to investigate the effect of noise in quantum circuits under realistic device conditions and avoid strong assumptions such as maximal parallelism and weak storage errors. Noise thresholds of the QEC codes are calculated. In addition, the effects of imprecision in projective measurements, collective bath, fault-tolerant repetition protocols, and level of parallelism in circuit constructions on the threshold values are also studied with emphasis on determining the optimal design for the fault-tolerant QEC circuit. These results provide insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process as well as useful information for designing the optimal fault-tolerant QEC circuit for particular physical implementation of quantum computer.

arXiv:quant-ph/0412168•Physical Review A•Jul 19, 2005•11 citations

Achieving the Heisenberg limit using fault-tolerant quantum error correction

Himanshu Sahu, Qian Xu, Sisi Zhou

Quantum effect enables enhanced estimation precision in metrology, with the Heisenberg limit (HL) representing the ultimate limit allowed by quantum mechanics. Although the HL is generally unattainable in the presence of noise, quantum error correction (QEC) can recover the HL in various scenarios. A notable example is estimating a Pauli-$Z$ signal under bit-flip noise using the repetition code, which is both optimal for metrology and robust against noise. However, previous protocols often assume noise affects only the signal accumulation step, while the QEC operations -- including state preparation and measurement -- are noiseless. To overcome this limitation, we study fault-tolerant quantum metrology where all qubit operations are subject to noise. We focus on estimating a Pauli-$Z$ signal under bit-flip noise, together with state preparation and measurement errors in all QEC operations. We propose a fault-tolerant metrological protocol where a repetition code is prepared via repeated syndrome measurements, followed by a fault-tolerant logical measurement. We demonstrate the existence of an error threshold, below which errors are effectively suppressed and the HL is attained.

quant-pharXiv:2601.05457•Jan 12, 2026•0 citations
Fault-tolerant protocol assumes the application of error correction after every quantum gate. However, correcting errors is costly in terms of time and number of qubits. Here we demonstrate that quantum error correction (QEC) can be applied significantly less often with only a minimal loss of fidelity. This is done by simulating the implementation of 50 encoded, single-qubit, quantum gates within the [[7,1,3]] QEC code in a noisy, nonequiprobable Pauli error environment with QEC being applied at different intervals. We find that applying QEC after every gate is rarely optimal and even applying QEC only once after all 50 gates sacrifices only a slight amount of fidelity with the benefit of 50-fold saving of resources. In addition, we find that in cases where bit-flip errors are dominant, it is best not to apply QEC at all.
Correcting errors is a vital but expensive component of fault tolerant quantum computation. Standard fault tolerant protocol assumes the implementation of error correction, via syndrome measurements and possible recovery operations, after every quantum gate. In fact, this is not necessary. Here we demonstrate that error correction should be applied more sparingly. We simulate encoded single qubit rotations within the [7,1,3] code and show via fidelity measures that applying error correction after every gate is not desirable. The simulations also shed light on what accuracy can be expected for noisy error correction and thus to what accuracy arbitrary single qubit rotations should be implemented.
Correcting errors is a vital but expensive component of fault-tolerant quantum computation. Standard fault-tolerant protocol assumes the implementation of error correction, via syndrome measurements and possible recovery operations, after every quantum gate. In fact, this is not necessary. Here we demonstrate that error correction should be applied more sparingly. We simulate encoded single-qubit rotations within the [7,1,3] code and show via fidelity measures that applying error correction after every gate is not desirable.
Abstract Fault-tolerant quantum computing requires many qubits with long lifetimes and accurate quantum gate operations. However, external noise limits the computing time and hampers accurate quantum gate operations. Quantum error correction (QEC) codes may extend such limits, but imperfect gate operations during QEC cause errors, which could cancel out QEC. We used density matrix simulations to examine the performance of QEC codes with five qubits. In current quantum devices, less than ten qubits are needed to conduct sufficient gate operations within their lifetime so that it is feasible to implement QEC codes. We analyzed the maximum tolerable error rate and error correction effect of individual QEC codes according to the qubit arrangement and gate accuracy. Assuming a 0.1% gate error probability, a logical ∣ 1 〉 state encoded by a five-qubit QEC code is expected to have a 0.25 higher fidelity than its physical counterpart.
Quantum error correction (QEC) is essential for realizing scalable quantum computation. However, when evaluating its benefits, most analyses assume idealized components, overlooking the imperfections inherent in realistic fault-tolerant (FT) implementations. In this paper, we investigate the performance of QEC schemes taking into account that quantum gates and measurements are themselves error-prone. We derive bounds for the failure probability of Shor-style FT-QEC schemes using limited structural information, such as the number of flag qubits and quantum gates. Our analysis separates and quantifies two key contributors to the failure rate: decoding errors and residual errors arising from circuit-level faults. The derived bounds highlight fundamental limitations in Shor-style FT-QEC performance and quantify how circuit imperfections degrade error correction capabilities, under the assumption of depolarizing noise.
Quantum circuits implementing fault-tolerant quantum error correction (QEC) for the three-qubit bit-flip code and five-qubit code are studied. To describe the effect of noise, we apply a model based on a generalized effective Hamiltonian where the system-environment interactions are taken into account by including stochastic fluctuating terms in the system Hamiltonian. This noise model enables us to investigate the effect of noise in quantum circuits under realistic device conditions and avoid strong assumptions such as maximal parallelism and weak storage errors. Noise thresholds of the QEC codes are calculated. In addition, the effects of imprecision in projective measurements, collective bath, fault-tolerant repetition protocols, and level of parallelism in circuit constructions on the threshold values are also studied with emphasis on determining the optimal design for the fault-tolerant QEC circuit. These results provide insights into the fault-tolerant QEC process as well as useful information for designing the optimal fault-tolerant QEC circuit for particular physical implementation of quantum computer.
Quantum effect enables enhanced estimation precision in metrology, with the Heisenberg limit (HL) representing the ultimate limit allowed by quantum mechanics. Although the HL is generally unattainable in the presence of noise, quantum error correction (QEC) can recover the HL in various scenarios. A notable example is estimating a Pauli-ZZZ signal under bit-flip noise using the repetition code, which is both optimal for metrology and robust against noise. However, previous protocols often assume noise affects only the signal accumulation step, while the QEC operations -- including state preparation and measurement -- are noiseless. To overcome this limitation, we study fault-tolerant quantum metrology where all qubit operations are subject to noise. We focus on estimating a Pauli-ZZZ signal under bit-flip noise, together with state preparation and measurement errors in all QEC operations. We propose a fault-tolerant metrological protocol where a repetition code is prepared via repeated syndrome measurements, followed by a fault-tolerant logical measurement. We demonstrate the existence of an error threshold, below which errors are effectively suppressed and the HL is attained.