Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1212.4615

Time evolution and adiabatic approximation in $PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics

Zhihua Guo, Cao, Huaixin

Published Dec 19, 2012• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper, we discuss time evolution and adiabatic approximation in $PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics. we give the time evolving equation for a class of $PT$-symmetric Hamiltonians and some conditions of the adiabatic approximation for the class of $PT$-symmetric Hamiltonians.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1212.4615

Related papers

Adiabatic evolution of quantum-mechanical systems

Jorge Vidal, José Wudka

A description of the adiabatic approximation in terms of the time-evolution operator is presented. Corrections to the approximation are studied, and it is seen that these can be obtained in a simple way in the case of a rapidly oscillating Hamiltonian.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1991•12 citations

$PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics is a Hermitian quantum mechanics

Sungwook Lee

The author discusses a different kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics, called $J$-Hermitian quantum mechanics. He shows that $PT$-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed $J$-Hermitian quantum mechanics, and that time evolution (in the Krein space of states) is unitary if and only if Hamiltonian is $J$-Hermitian (or equivalently $PT$-symmetric). An issue with unitarity comes up when time evolution is considered in the Hilbert space of states rather than in the Krein space of states. The author offers possible scenarios with this issue.

arXiv:1312.7738•Dec 30, 2013•2 citations

Perturbative approach to the adiabatic approximation

R. MacKenzie, Étienne Marcotte, H. Paquette

A new and intuitive perturbative approach to time-dependent quantum mechanics problems is presented, which is useful in situations where the evolution of the Hamiltonian is slow. The state of a system which starts in an instantaneous eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian is written as a power series which has a straightforward diagrammatic representation. Each term of the series corresponds to a sequence of ``adiabatic'' evolutions, during which the system remains in an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, punctuated by transitions from one state to another. The first term of this series is the standard adiabatic evolution, the next is the well known first correction to it, and subsequent terms can be written down essentially by inspection. Although the final result is perhaps not terribly surprising, it seems to not be widely known, and the interpretation is new, as far as we know. Application of the method to the adiabatic approximation is given, and some discussion of the validity of this approximation is presented.

arXiv:quant-ph/0510024•Physical Review A•Apr 14, 2006•44 citations

Improved error bounds for the adiabatic approximation

Donny Cheung, Peter Høyer, Nathan Wiebe

The discovery of adiabatic quantum computing has revealed a need for rigorously proven bounds for the error in the adiabatic approximation. We present in this paper, a rigorous and elementary derivation of upper and lower bounds on the error incurred from using the adiabatic approximation for quantum systems that can be used to assess the runtime of adiabatic algorithms. Our bounds are often asymptotically tight in the limit of slow evolution for fixed Hamiltonians, and are used to provide sufficient conditions for the application of the adiabatic approximation. We show that our sufficiency criteria exclude the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample from the class of Hamiltonians that obey the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of classes of Hamiltonians that resemble the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample Hamiltonian, but also obey the adiabatic approximation.

arXiv:1103.4174•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical•Sep 20, 2011•36 citations

Adiabatic Product Expansion

Alí Mostafazadeh

The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of

•Jan 1, 1996•4 citations

Validity of the adiabatic approximation in quantum mechanics

R. MacKenzie, Alexi Morin-Duchesne, H. Paquette +1 more

We analyze the validity of the adiabatic approximation, and in particular the reliability of what has been called the ``standard criterion'' for validity of this approximation. Recently, this criterion has been found to be insufficient. We will argue that the criterion is sufficient only when it agrees with the intuitive notion of slowness of evolution of the Hamiltonian. However, it can be insufficient in cases where the Hamiltonian varies rapidly but only by a small amount. We also emphasize the distinction between the adiabatic theorem and the adiabatic approximation, two quite different, although closely related, ideas.

arXiv:0706.0885•Physical Review A•Oct 5, 2007•39 citations
Time evolution and adiabatic approximation in PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics
In this paper, we discuss time evolution and adiabatic approximation in PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics. we give the time evolving equation for a class of PTPTPT-symmetric Hamiltonians and some conditions of the adiabatic approximation for the class of PTPTPT-symmetric Hamiltonians.
PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics is a Hermitian quantum mechanics
The author discusses a different kind of Hermitian quantum mechanics, called JJJ-Hermitian quantum mechanics. He shows that PTPTPT-symmetric quantum mechanics is indeed JJJ-Hermitian quantum mechanics, and that time evolution (in the Krein space of states) is unitary if and only if Hamiltonian is JJJ-Hermitian (or equivalently PTPTPT-symmetric). An issue with unitarity comes up when time evolution is considered in the Hilbert space of states rather than in the Krein space of states. The author offers possible scenarios with this issue.
A new and intuitive perturbative approach to time-dependent quantum mechanics problems is presented, which is useful in situations where the evolution of the Hamiltonian is slow. The state of a system which starts in an instantaneous eigenstate of the initial Hamiltonian is written as a power series which has a straightforward diagrammatic representation. Each term of the series corresponds to a sequence of ``adiabatic'' evolutions, during which the system remains in an instantaneous eigenstate of the Hamiltonian, punctuated by transitions from one state to another. The first term of this series is the standard adiabatic evolution, the next is the well known first correction to it, and subsequent terms can be written down essentially by inspection. Although the final result is perhaps not terribly surprising, it seems to not be widely known, and the interpretation is new, as far as we know. Application of the method to the adiabatic approximation is given, and some discussion of the validity of this approximation is presented.
The discovery of adiabatic quantum computing has revealed a need for rigorously proven bounds for the error in the adiabatic approximation. We present in this paper, a rigorous and elementary derivation of upper and lower bounds on the error incurred from using the adiabatic approximation for quantum systems that can be used to assess the runtime of adiabatic algorithms. Our bounds are often asymptotically tight in the limit of slow evolution for fixed Hamiltonians, and are used to provide sufficient conditions for the application of the adiabatic approximation. We show that our sufficiency criteria exclude the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample from the class of Hamiltonians that obey the adiabatic approximation. Finally, we demonstrate the existence of classes of Hamiltonians that resemble the Marzlin–Sanders counterexample Hamiltonian, but also obey the adiabatic approximation.
The time-evolution operator for an explicitly time-dependent Hamiltonian is expressed as the product of a sequence of unitary operators. These are obtained by successive time-dependent unitary transformations of the Hilbert space followed by the adiabatic approximation at each step. The resulting adiabatic product expansion yields a generalization of the quantum adiabatic approximation. Furthermore, it leads to an infinite class of exactly solvable models. PACS number: 03.65.Bz Consider the dynamics of a quantum mechanical system whose Hamiltonian H = H(τ) is explicitly time-dependent. The evolution of a state vector |ψ(τ) 〉 is governed by the Schrödinger equation: i¯h | ˙ ψ(τ) 〉 = H(τ) |ψ(τ) 〉 , |ψ(0) 〉 = |ψ0 〉 , (1) where a dot means a time-derivative. Alternatively, one has |ψ(τ) 〉 = U(τ)|ψ0〉, where i τ − H(t) dt U(τ) = T e ¯h 0 (2) is the time-evolution operator. Here T denotes the time-ordering operator. The purpose of this article is to express U(τ) as the product of a sequence of unitary operators each of
We analyze the validity of the adiabatic approximation, and in particular the reliability of what has been called the ``standard criterion'' for validity of this approximation. Recently, this criterion has been found to be insufficient. We will argue that the criterion is sufficient only when it agrees with the intuitive notion of slowness of evolution of the Hamiltonian. However, it can be insufficient in cases where the Hamiltonian varies rapidly but only by a small amount. We also emphasize the distinction between the adiabatic theorem and the adiabatic approximation, two quite different, although closely related, ideas.