Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1210.2210

Interpretation of Feynman formalism of quantum mechanics in terms of probabilities of paths

Emilio Santos

Published Oct 8, 2012• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Feynman path integrals formalism for non-relativistic quantum mechanics is revisited. A comparison is made with the cases of light progagation (Huygens principle) and Brownian motion. The difficulties for a physical model behind Feynman formalism are pointed out. It is proposed a reformulation where the transition probability from one space-time point to another one is the sum of probabilities of the possible paths. The Born approximation for scattering is derived within the formalism, which suggests an interpretation in terms of particles, without the need of Born assumption that the modulus squared of the wavefunction is a probability density.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1210.2210

Related papers

Motion of Quantum Particles in Terms of Probabilities of Paths

Emilio Santos

The Feynman path integral formalism for non-relativistic quantum mechanics is revisited. A comparison is made with cases of light propagation (Huygens' principle) and Brownian motion. The difficulties for a physical model applying Feynman's formalism are pointed out. A reformulation is proposed, where the transition probability of a particle from one space-time point to another one is the sum of probabilities of the possible paths. As an application, Born approximation for scattering is derived within the formalism, which suggests an interpretation involving the stochastic motion of a particle rather than the square of a wavelike amplitude.

Entropy•Jul 6, 2025•2 citations

A review on Feynman–Kac path integrals and their connection to various stochastic processes

Sumita Datta

Abstract Feynman developed the path integral approach to quantum mechanics as an alternative to wave or matrix mechanics that has found fruitful implementation in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and statistical physics. Despite its many successes, the usual Feynman path integral formalism suffers from a lack of mathematical rigor. Questions of mathematical rigor still exist, but Mark Kac provided a rigorous path integral approach to quantum mechanics. The Kac formulation for quantum systems is given in terms of Wiener measure for a path integral and employs the Brownian motion distribution. In this paper, we review the Feynman–Kac approach and other stochastic processes related to Brownian motion. We also give an account of the successes and difficulties we faced during our journey through numerical path integral problems involved in physics.

Monte Carlo Methods and Applications•Oct 23, 2026•0 citations

Path integrals and quantum mechanics

In this thesis we are investigating a different formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics called the path integral formalism.It is a generalization of the classical least action principle.The introduction to this subject begins with the construction of the path integral in terms of the idea of probability amplitudes whose absolute square gives the probability of finding a system in a particular state.Then we show that if the Lagrangian is a quadratic form one needs only to calculate the classical action besides from a time-dependent normalization constant to find the explicit expression of the path integral.We look in to the subject of two kinds of slit-experiments: The square slit, the single-and the double-Gaussian slit.Also, the propagator for constrained paths is calculated and applied to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which shows that the vector potential defined in classical electrodynamics have a physical meaning in quantum mechanics.It is also shown that the path integral formulation is equivalent to the Schrödinger description of quantum mechanics, by deriving the Schrödinger equation from the path integral.Further applications of the path integral are discussed.

World Scientific lecture notes in physics•Feb 18, 2019•0 citations

The Feynman path integral

Belal Ehsan Baaquie

A path , in general, is defined by a determinate trajectory in time, from an initial to a final point. The classical trajectory is only one of the possible trajectories, and in quantum mechanics all the possible paths between the initial and final point come into play. Recall that the probability amplitude is a complex number that is assigned to each determinate path. Indeterminate paths are defined as a collection of determinate paths that are experimentally indistinguishable . In the Dirac–Feynman approach, the inherent indeterminacy of the quantum entity is realized by the degree of freedom – in undergoing time evolution – “taking” indeterminate paths [Baaquie (2013e)]. For a quantum degree of freedom evolving from an observed initial state to the observed final state – and with no other observations made – the Feynman path integral is a mathematical construction that computes the probability amplitudes by summing over all the allowed determinate paths of the degree of freedom – discussed in Feynman and Hibbs (1965), Zinn-Justin (1993), Zinn-Justin (2005) and Baaquie (2013e). Probability amplitude and time evolution Recall that the description of a quantum system, at a particular instant,isgiven by its state vector, namely |ψ>. To avoid confusion with the concept of a state vector, the term probability amplitude is used for describing a quantum entity undergoing transitions in time.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 27, 2014•0 citations

Towards a Realistic Parsing of the Feynman Path Integral

K. B. Wharton

The Feynman path integral does not allow a one real path interpretation, because the quantum amplitudes contribute to probabilities in a non-separable manner. The opposite extreme, all paths happen, is not a useful or informative account. In this paper it is shown that an intermediate parsing of the path integral, into realistic non-interfering possibilities, is always available. Each realistic possibility formally corresponds to numerous particle paths, but is arguably best interpreted as a spacetime-valued field. Notably, one actual field history can always be said to occur, although it will generally not have an extremized action. The most obvious concerns with this approach are addressed, indicating necessary follow-up research. But without obvious showstoppers, it seems plausible that the path integral might be reinterpreted to explain quantum phenomena in terms of Lorentz covariant field histories. Quanta 2016; 5: 1–11.

arXiv:1512.00740•Quanta•Jan 10, 2016•17 citations

The relativistic reason for quantum probability amplitudes

Karol Sajnok, Kacper Dębski, Andrzej Dragan

We show that the quantum-mechanical probability distribution involving complex probability amplitudes can be derived from three natural conditions imposed on a relativistically invariant probability function describing the motion of a particle that can take multiple paths simultaneously. The conditions are: (i) pairwise Kolmogorov additivity, (ii) time symmetry, and (iii) Bayes' rule. The resulting solution, parameterized by a single constant, is the squared modulus of a sum of complex exponentials of the relativistic action, thereby recovering the Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics.

quant-pharXiv:2512.10497•New Journal of Physics•Dec 12, 2025•0 citations
Feynman path integrals formalism for non-relativistic quantum mechanics is revisited. A comparison is made with the cases of light progagation (Huygens principle) and Brownian motion. The difficulties for a physical model behind Feynman formalism are pointed out. It is proposed a reformulation where the transition probability from one space-time point to another one is the sum of probabilities of the possible paths. The Born approximation for scattering is derived within the formalism, which suggests an interpretation in terms of particles, without the need of Born assumption that the modulus squared of the wavefunction is a probability density.
The Feynman path integral formalism for non-relativistic quantum mechanics is revisited. A comparison is made with cases of light propagation (Huygens' principle) and Brownian motion. The difficulties for a physical model applying Feynman's formalism are pointed out. A reformulation is proposed, where the transition probability of a particle from one space-time point to another one is the sum of probabilities of the possible paths. As an application, Born approximation for scattering is derived within the formalism, which suggests an interpretation involving the stochastic motion of a particle rather than the square of a wavelike amplitude.
Abstract Feynman developed the path integral approach to quantum mechanics as an alternative to wave or matrix mechanics that has found fruitful implementation in quantum mechanics, quantum electrodynamics, and statistical physics. Despite its many successes, the usual Feynman path integral formalism suffers from a lack of mathematical rigor. Questions of mathematical rigor still exist, but Mark Kac provided a rigorous path integral approach to quantum mechanics. The Kac formulation for quantum systems is given in terms of Wiener measure for a path integral and employs the Brownian motion distribution. In this paper, we review the Feynman–Kac approach and other stochastic processes related to Brownian motion. We also give an account of the successes and difficulties we faced during our journey through numerical path integral problems involved in physics.
In this thesis we are investigating a different formalism of non-relativistic quantum mechanics called the path integral formalism.It is a generalization of the classical least action principle.The introduction to this subject begins with the construction of the path integral in terms of the idea of probability amplitudes whose absolute square gives the probability of finding a system in a particular state.Then we show that if the Lagrangian is a quadratic form one needs only to calculate the classical action besides from a time-dependent normalization constant to find the explicit expression of the path integral.We look in to the subject of two kinds of slit-experiments: The square slit, the single-and the double-Gaussian slit.Also, the propagator for constrained paths is calculated and applied to the Aharonov-Bohm effect, which shows that the vector potential defined in classical electrodynamics have a physical meaning in quantum mechanics.It is also shown that the path integral formulation is equivalent to the Schrödinger description of quantum mechanics, by deriving the Schrödinger equation from the path integral.Further applications of the path integral are discussed.
A path , in general, is defined by a determinate trajectory in time, from an initial to a final point. The classical trajectory is only one of the possible trajectories, and in quantum mechanics all the possible paths between the initial and final point come into play. Recall that the probability amplitude is a complex number that is assigned to each determinate path. Indeterminate paths are defined as a collection of determinate paths that are experimentally indistinguishable . In the Dirac–Feynman approach, the inherent indeterminacy of the quantum entity is realized by the degree of freedom – in undergoing time evolution – “taking” indeterminate paths [Baaquie (2013e)]. For a quantum degree of freedom evolving from an observed initial state to the observed final state – and with no other observations made – the Feynman path integral is a mathematical construction that computes the probability amplitudes by summing over all the allowed determinate paths of the degree of freedom – discussed in Feynman and Hibbs (1965), Zinn-Justin (1993), Zinn-Justin (2005) and Baaquie (2013e). Probability amplitude and time evolution Recall that the description of a quantum system, at a particular instant,isgiven by its state vector, namely |ψ>. To avoid confusion with the concept of a state vector, the term probability amplitude is used for describing a quantum entity undergoing transitions in time.
The Feynman path integral does not allow a one real path interpretation, because the quantum amplitudes contribute to probabilities in a non-separable manner. The opposite extreme, all paths happen, is not a useful or informative account. In this paper it is shown that an intermediate parsing of the path integral, into realistic non-interfering possibilities, is always available. Each realistic possibility formally corresponds to numerous particle paths, but is arguably best interpreted as a spacetime-valued field. Notably, one actual field history can always be said to occur, although it will generally not have an extremized action. The most obvious concerns with this approach are addressed, indicating necessary follow-up research. But without obvious showstoppers, it seems plausible that the path integral might be reinterpreted to explain quantum phenomena in terms of Lorentz covariant field histories. Quanta 2016; 5: 1–11.
We show that the quantum-mechanical probability distribution involving complex probability amplitudes can be derived from three natural conditions imposed on a relativistically invariant probability function describing the motion of a particle that can take multiple paths simultaneously. The conditions are: (i) pairwise Kolmogorov additivity, (ii) time symmetry, and (iii) Bayes' rule. The resulting solution, parameterized by a single constant, is the squared modulus of a sum of complex exponentials of the relativistic action, thereby recovering the Feynman path-integral formulation of quantum mechanics.