Photon counting measurements are analyzed for obtaining a classical phase parameter in a linear Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) by the use of phase estimation theories. The detailed analysis is made for four cases: (a) coherent states inserted into the interferometer, (b) Fock number state inserted in one input port of the interferometer and the vacuum into the other input port, (c) coherent state inserted into one input port of the interferometer and squeezed-vacuum state into the other input port, and (d) exchanging the first beam splitter of an MZI by a nonlinear system that inserts a NOON (representing a superposition of N particles in the first mode with zero particles in the second mode, and vice versa) state into the interferometer and by using photon counting for parity measurements. The properties of photon counting for obtaining minimal phase uncertainties for the above special cases and for the general case are discussed.
Photon counting measurements are analyzed for obtaining a classical phase parameter in a linear Mach–Zehnder interferometer (MZI) by the use of phase estimation theories. The detailed analysis is made for four cases: (a) coherent states inserted into the interferometer, (b) Fock number state inserted in one input port of the interferometer and the vacuum into the other input port, (c) coherent state inserted into one input port of the interferometer and squeezed-vacuum state into the other input port, and (d) exchanging the first beam splitter of an MZI by a nonlinear system that inserts a NOON (representing a superposition of N particles in the first mode with zero particles in the second mode, and vice versa) state into the interferometer and by using photon counting for parity measurements. The properties of photon counting for obtaining minimal phase uncertainties for the above special cases and for the general case are discussed.
A nonlinear phase shift is introduced to a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), and we present a scheme for enhancing the phase sensitivity. In our scheme, one input port of a standard MZI is injected with a coherent state and the other input port is injected with one mode of a two-mode squeezed-vacuum state. The final interference output of the MZI is detected with the method of active correlation output readout. Based on the optimal splitting ratio of beam splitters, the phase sensitivity can beat the standard quantum limit and approach the quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound. The effects of photon loss on phase sensitivity are discussed. Our scheme can also provide some estimates for units of ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{(3)}$, due to the relation between the nonlinear phase shift and the susceptibility ${\ensuremath{\chi}}^{(3)}$ of the Kerr medium.
For the precision-based measurements, Mach-Zehnder interferometry is a widely used technique. There are various ways to enhance the precision of Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), e.g., having a non-classical input state is one of the ways to enhance the precision of the phase estimation performed by MZI. The phase estimation performed by MZI is investigated here by considering that the input states of MZI are different combinations of photon added and subtracted squeezed coherent states (PASCS and PSSCS). Using quantum Fisher information, it is shown that the use of PASCS in both the input modes of MZI, provides the most precise estimate of the unknown phase. This system is also analyzed in two different measurement scenarios -- single intensity detection (SID) and intensity difference detection (IDD). Systematic analysis has established that the intensity measurement might not be an optimal measurement scheme for phase estimation in MZI as phase and intensity correspond to non-commuting observables. The impact of the photon loss on the MZI-based phase estimation setup is also studied and it is found that PASCS is robust against photon loss, when the loss in MZI is low.
We study a Mach-Zehnder interferometer fed by a coherent state in one input port and vacuum in the other. We explore a Bayesian phase estimation strategy to demonstrate that it is possible to achieve the standard quantum limit independently from the true value of the phase shift and specific assumptions on the noise of the interferometer. We have been able to implement the protocol by using parallel operation of two photon-number-resolving detectors and multiphoton coincidence logic electronics at the output ports of a weakly illuminated Mach-Zehnder interferometer. This protocol is unbiased, saturates the Cramer-Rao phase uncertainty bound, and, therefore, is an optimal phase estimation strategy.
The fundamental precision limit of an interferometer is crucial since it bounds the best possible sensitivity one could achieve using such a device. This thesis will focus on several different interferometers and try to give the ultimate precision bounds by carefully counting all the resources used in the interferometers. The thesis begins with the basics of the quantum state of light. The fundamentals of quantum metrology are also reviewed and discussed. More specifically, the terminology of classical and quantum Cram\'er-Rao bound and classical and quantum Fisher information are introduced. Chapter 3 discusses the conclusive precision bounds in two-mode interferometer such as Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) and SU(1,1) interferometer. I revisit the quantum Fisher information approach of these two interferometers and show the discrepancy of phase sensitivity on the physically same setup. Then I establish fundamental precision estimation bounds for such device, due to the reason that many works of literature fail to accurately count the resources and knowledge of phase-to-be-estimated used in the interferometers. The analysis suggests that for a MZI, one can never do better than SNL in phase sensitivity, when an input to one of the two ports is the vacuum. If one does not allow the detector to use any external phase reference or power resource, then the precision is limited by the SNL. For a SU(1,1) interferometer, firstly, when one of the input states is restricted to be a vacuum state, I showed that by using either the phase-averaging method or the quantum Fisher information matrix method, different phase configurations of the SU(1,1) interferometer result in the same QFI. Secondly, I compared the results of the phase-averaging method and the quantum Fisher information matrix method, and then I argued that for an SU(1,1) interferometer, phase averaging or quantum Fisher information matrix method is generally required, and they are equivalent. Finally, I used the quantum Fisher information matrix method to calculate the precision limit for other common input states, such as two coherent state inputs or coherent state with squeezed vacuum inputs. In chapter 4, I will consider a passive multi-mode interferometer for multiparameter phase estimation. It was suggested that optical networks with relatively inexpensive overhead---single photon Fock states, passive optical elements, and single photon detection---can show significant improvements over classical strategies for single-parameter estimation, when the number of modes in the network is small. In this chapter, I analytically compute the quantum Cramer-Rao bound to show these
We quantitatively investigate phase measurement in a Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI), which is injected with a weak coherent and a squeezed vacuum generated from a spontaneous parametric down-conversion. The measured three-photon coincidence in this system is quantified as a function of a ratio between the amplitude of the coherent state and the squeezed parameter of squeezed vacuum when the photon number is detected at one output of MZI. It shows that the phase sensitivity reaches the Heisenberg limit when an optimal ratio is chosen. This may introduce one approach to quantify phase sensitivity in precision phase measurement.
We study the sensitivity of phase estimation in a lossy Mach-Zehnder interferometer (MZI) using two general, and practical, resources generated by a laser and a nonlinear optical medium with passive optimal elements, which are readily available in the laboratory: One is a two-mode separable coherent and squeezed vacuum state at a beam splitter and the other is a two-mode squeezed vacuum state. In view of the ultimate precision given by quantum Fisher information, we show that the two-mode squeezed vacuum state can achieve a lower bound of estimation error than the coherent and squeezed vacuum state under a photon-loss channel. We further consider practical measurement schemes, homodyne detection and photon number resolving detection (PNRD), to characterize the accuracy of phase estimation in reality and find that the coherent and squeezed vacuum state largely achieves a lower bound than the two-mode squeezed vacuum in the lossy MZI while maintaining quantum enhancement over the shot-noise limit. By comparing homodyne detection and PNRD, we demonstrate that quadrature measurement with homodyne detection is more robust against photon loss than parity measurement with PNRD. We also show that double homodyne detection can provide a better tool for phase estimation than single homodyne detection against photon loss.