Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1205.1484 · Physical Review A

Scattering by an oscillating barrier: Quantum, classical, and semiclassical comparison

Tommy A. Byrd, Megan Ivory, Andrew J. Pyle, S. Aubin, Kevin Mitchell, J. B. Delos, Kunal K. Das

Published Jul 16, 2012• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We present a detailed study of scattering by an amplitude-modulated potential barrier using three distinct physical frameworks: quantum, classical, and semiclassical. Classical physics gives bounds on the energy and momentum of the scattered particle, while also providing the foundation for semiclassical theory. We use the semiclassical approach to selectively add quantum-mechanical effects such as interference and diffraction. We find good agreement between the quantum and semiclassical momentum distributions. Our methods and results can be used to understand quantum and classical aspects of transport mechanisms involving time-varying potentials, such as quantum pumping.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.86.013622

Related papers

The Classical-to-Semiclassical Connection

John Adam

This chapter discusses the connection between the classical and semiclassical domains of scattering. Scattering phenomena may be described via three regimes: the scattering of waves by objects with small, large, or comparable sizes with the wavelength of the incident (plane wave) radiation. All three regions can be related to three domains: the classical domain (geometrical optics, particle and particle/ray-like trajectories); the wave domain (physical optics, acoustic and electromagnetic waves, quantum mechanics); and the semiclassical domain (the vast intermediate region between the first and second domain). The chapter first provides an overview of classical and semiclassical scattering domains before beginning with an analysis of the semiclassical formulation. It also considers the radial equation, scattering by a one-dimensional potential barrier, and the radially symmetric problem. Solutions for phase shifts and the potential well are presented.

Princeton University Press eBooks•May 30, 2017•0 citations

Quantum, classical and semiclassical momentum distributions: I. Theory and elementary examples

H. J. Korsch, B Schellhaaß

We discuss the basic properties of momentum distributions in quantum mechanics for elementary systems as well as their classical analogue. Semiclassical approximations can show a quantitative connection between the classical and quantum cases. We believe that such distributions provide a useful tool to improve the understanding of elementary quantum mechanics. Important differences between distributions in coordinate and momentum space are pointed out. Elementary examples (free and uniformly accelerating particle, harmonic oscillator and square-well potential) are discussed.

European Journal of Physics•Jan 1, 2000•11 citations

Accuracy of the semiclassical approximation for chaotic scattering

Jens H. Jensen

The semiclassical approximation for scattering probabilities is tested for a simple chaotic system consisting of a particle in one dimension scattering from a localized potential that varies periodically in time. Good agreement between semiclassical and exact quantum mechanical results is found even for relatively large de Broglie wavelengths.

Physical review. E, Statistical physics, plasmas, fluids, and related interdisciplinary topics•Feb 1, 1995•7 citations

Speed-up and slow-down of a quantum particle

X. Gutiérrez de la Cal, M. Ll. Pons, D. Sokolovski

We study non-relativistic propagation of Gaussian wave packets in one-dimensional Eckart potential, a barrier, or a well. In the picture used, the transmitted wave packet results from interference between the copies of the freely propagating state with different spatial shifts (delays), [Formula: see text], induced by the scattering potential. The Uncertainty Principle precludes relating the particle's final position to the delay experienced in the potential, except in the classical limit. Beyond this limit, even defining an effective range of the delay is shown to be an impracticable task, owing to the oscillatory nature of the corresponding amplitude distribution. Our examples include the classically allowed case, semiclassical tunnelling, delays induced in the presence of a virtual state, and scattering by a low barrier. The properties of the amplitude distribution of the delays, and its pole representation are studied in detail.

arXiv:2203.04309•Scientific Reports•Mar 9, 2022•9 citations

Semiclassical dynamics with quantum trajectories: Formulation and comparison with the semiclassical initial value representation propagator

Sophya V. Garashchuk, Vitaly A. Rassolov

We present a time-dependent semiclassical method based on quantum trajectories. Quantum-mechanical effects are described via the quantum potential computed from the wave function density approximated as a linear combination of Gaussian fitting functions. The number of the fitting functions determines the accuracy of the approximate quantum potential (AQP). One Gaussian fit reproduces time-evolution of a Gaussian wave packet in a parabolic potential. The limit of the large number of fitting Gaussians and trajectories gives the full quantum-mechanical result. The method is systematically improvable from classical to fully quantum. The fitting procedure is implemented as a gradient minimization. We also compare AQP method to the widely used semiclassical propagator of Herman and Kluk by computing energy-resolved transmission probabilities for the Eckart barrier from the wave packet time-correlation functions. We find the results obtained with the Herman–Kluk propagator to be essentially equivalent to those of AQP method with a one-Gaussian density fit for several barrier widths.

The Journal of Chemical Physics•Jan 30, 2003•54 citations

Semiclassical superoscillations: interference, evanescence, post-WKB

Michael Berry, Pragya Shukla

The concept of superoscillations is extended beyond bandlimited functions, to include monochromatic waves in space-varying media, such as wavefunctions representing quantum particles in non-constant potentials. 'Semiclassical superoscillations' are defined as places where the phase gradient (local wavevector, or weak momentum) exceeds the classically allowed momentum. The phenomenon is essentially quantum (or, in optics, essentially beyond geometrical optics), and can arise in three different ways: from interference, evanescence (e.g. barrier penetration), and WKB corrections. Illustrations are given, including superpositions of few and many states in a linear potential, angular-momentum circular harmonic-oscillator states, eigenstates of degenerate harmonic-oscillator modes, and above-barrier scattering.

New Journal of Physics•Sep 30, 2021•9 citations
We present a detailed study of scattering by an amplitude-modulated potential barrier using three distinct physical frameworks: quantum, classical, and semiclassical. Classical physics gives bounds on the energy and momentum of the scattered particle, while also providing the foundation for semiclassical theory. We use the semiclassical approach to selectively add quantum-mechanical effects such as interference and diffraction. We find good agreement between the quantum and semiclassical momentum distributions. Our methods and results can be used to understand quantum and classical aspects of transport mechanisms involving time-varying potentials, such as quantum pumping.
This chapter discusses the connection between the classical and semiclassical domains of scattering. Scattering phenomena may be described via three regimes: the scattering of waves by objects with small, large, or comparable sizes with the wavelength of the incident (plane wave) radiation. All three regions can be related to three domains: the classical domain (geometrical optics, particle and particle/ray-like trajectories); the wave domain (physical optics, acoustic and electromagnetic waves, quantum mechanics); and the semiclassical domain (the vast intermediate region between the first and second domain). The chapter first provides an overview of classical and semiclassical scattering domains before beginning with an analysis of the semiclassical formulation. It also considers the radial equation, scattering by a one-dimensional potential barrier, and the radially symmetric problem. Solutions for phase shifts and the potential well are presented.
We discuss the basic properties of momentum distributions in quantum mechanics for elementary systems as well as their classical analogue. Semiclassical approximations can show a quantitative connection between the classical and quantum cases. We believe that such distributions provide a useful tool to improve the understanding of elementary quantum mechanics. Important differences between distributions in coordinate and momentum space are pointed out. Elementary examples (free and uniformly accelerating particle, harmonic oscillator and square-well potential) are discussed.
We study non-relativistic propagation of Gaussian wave packets in one-dimensional Eckart potential, a barrier, or a well. In the picture used, the transmitted wave packet results from interference between the copies of the freely propagating state with different spatial shifts (delays), [Formula: see text], induced by the scattering potential. The Uncertainty Principle precludes relating the particle's final position to the delay experienced in the potential, except in the classical limit. Beyond this limit, even defining an effective range of the delay is shown to be an impracticable task, owing to the oscillatory nature of the corresponding amplitude distribution. Our examples include the classically allowed case, semiclassical tunnelling, delays induced in the presence of a virtual state, and scattering by a low barrier. The properties of the amplitude distribution of the delays, and its pole representation are studied in detail.
We present a time-dependent semiclassical method based on quantum trajectories. Quantum-mechanical effects are described via the quantum potential computed from the wave function density approximated as a linear combination of Gaussian fitting functions. The number of the fitting functions determines the accuracy of the approximate quantum potential (AQP). One Gaussian fit reproduces time-evolution of a Gaussian wave packet in a parabolic potential. The limit of the large number of fitting Gaussians and trajectories gives the full quantum-mechanical result. The method is systematically improvable from classical to fully quantum. The fitting procedure is implemented as a gradient minimization. We also compare AQP method to the widely used semiclassical propagator of Herman and Kluk by computing energy-resolved transmission probabilities for the Eckart barrier from the wave packet time-correlation functions. We find the results obtained with the Herman–Kluk propagator to be essentially equivalent to those of AQP method with a one-Gaussian density fit for several barrier widths.
The concept of superoscillations is extended beyond bandlimited functions, to include monochromatic waves in space-varying media, such as wavefunctions representing quantum particles in non-constant potentials. 'Semiclassical superoscillations' are defined as places where the phase gradient (local wavevector, or weak momentum) exceeds the classically allowed momentum. The phenomenon is essentially quantum (or, in optics, essentially beyond geometrical optics), and can arise in three different ways: from interference, evanescence (e.g. barrier penetration), and WKB corrections. Illustrations are given, including superpositions of few and many states in a linear potential, angular-momentum circular harmonic-oscillator states, eigenstates of degenerate harmonic-oscillator modes, and above-barrier scattering.