Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1204.5172 · Reviews in Theoretical Science

“Einstein's Dream”—Quantum Mechanics as Theory of Classical Random Fields

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Published Mar 1, 2013• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This is an introductory chapter of the book in progress on quantum foundations and incompleteness of quantum mechanics. Quantum mechanics is represented as statistical mechanics of classical fields.
DOI
10.1166/rits.2013.1003

Related papers

Quantum mechanics as an approximation of statistical mechanics for classical fields

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Reports on Mathematical Physics•Dec 1, 2007•6 citations

Can fluctuations of classical random field produce quantum averages?

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Albert Einstein did not believe in completeness of QM. He dreamed of creation of prequantum classical statistical mechanics such that QM will be reproduced as its approximation. He also dreamed of total exclusion of corpuscules from the future model. Reality of Einstein's dream was pure fields' reality. Recently I made his dream come true in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach quantum systems are described by classical random fields, e.g., electromagnetic field (instead of photon), electron field or neutron field. In this paper we generalize PCSFT to composite quantum system. It is well known that in QM, unlike classical mechanics, the state of a composite system is described by the tensor product of state spaces for its subsystems. In PCSFT one can still use Cartesian product, but state spaces are spaces of classical fields (not particles). In particular, entanglement is nothing else than correlation of classical random fields, cf. again Einstein. Thus entanglement was finally demystified.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•Aug 20, 2009•0 citations

Electrodynamics I: Macroscopic Interaction of Light and Matter

Michael E. Thomas

Thus far, we have developed the properties of the electromagnetic field at optical frequencies, based on Maxwell’s equations. These equations further give a classical macroscopic perspective on the coupling of the propagation media to the field, as presented in Chapter 2. The macroscopic properties of a medium are based on averaged microscopic properties. The microscopic energy structure of matter was presented in Chapter 3, covering gases, solids, and liquids by employing mostly quantum models. We now proceed to the next level of development, the dynamic description of the interaction between the optical field and the propagation medium as a function of the field frequency and propagation media variables (e.g., energy structure, temperature, and pressure). In this chapter, the classical electromagnetic field is coupled to discrete frequency oscillators via Newton’s equation of motion. This approach leads to the popular classical oscillator model, often presented in introductory books on lasers. The classical oscillator model is an incomplete theory and can be only a semiempirical model. In the next chapter, a more detailed and comprehensive approach, which also includes statistical and quantum mechanics, is used leading to robust semiclassical and quantum oscillator models. This chapter and the next are the basis for the applied models presented in Part II of this book. Classical electrodynamics is based on Maxwell’s equations, as given in Chapter 2, and the Lorentz force relation, as given below: . . . F = q[E + (v × B)]. (4.1) . . . These equations cover the classical description of the interaction of light and matter. The first term in Eq. 4.1 represents coupling of the electric field to the medium. As discussed in Chapter 2 (Section 2.2), the leading mechanism for this is the electric dipole moment. To see that this is the coupling mechanism in the first term, consider the potential function driving this force, F = −∇V(r) = −∇(−qr · E). The above expression contains the dipole moment, as defined in Chapter 2. The second term in Eq. 4.1 represents coupling of the magnetic field to the medium.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Sep 28, 2006•1 citation

Quantum Ensembles

Robert H. Swendsen

This chapter begins Part 4 of the text, which is concerned with quantum statistical mechanics. A brief review of quantum mechanics is followed by an extension of statistical mechanics to include averages over microscopic quantum states.

Oxford University Press eBooks•Mar 1, 2012•0 citations

Quantum correlations and dynamics from classical random fields valued in complex Hilbert spaces

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.

Journal of Mathematical Physics•Aug 1, 2010•11 citations

Quantum Mechanics

Sara McMurry, Alex Van Someren

From the Publisher: This book provides an introduction to the theoretical foundations of quantum mechanics for students of experimental physics. It is intended as an intermediate text for those who have already completed an introductory course in quantum physics.

•Nov 1, 1993•19 citations
Albert Einstein did not believe in completeness of QM. He dreamed of creation of prequantum classical statistical mechanics such that QM will be reproduced as its approximation. He also dreamed of total exclusion of corpuscules from the future model. Reality of Einstein's dream was pure fields' reality. Recently I made his dream come true in the form of so called prequantum classical statistical field theory (PCSFT). In this approach quantum systems are described by classical random fields, e.g., electromagnetic field (instead of photon), electron field or neutron field. In this paper we generalize PCSFT to composite quantum system. It is well known that in QM, unlike classical mechanics, the state of a composite system is described by the tensor product of state spaces for its subsystems. In PCSFT one can still use Cartesian product, but state spaces are spaces of classical fields (not particles). In particular, entanglement is nothing else than correlation of classical random fields, cf. again Einstein. Thus entanglement was finally demystified.
Thus far, we have developed the properties of the electromagnetic field at optical frequencies, based on Maxwell’s equations. These equations further give a classical macroscopic perspective on the coupling of the propagation media to the field, as presented in Chapter 2. The macroscopic properties of a medium are based on averaged microscopic properties. The microscopic energy structure of matter was presented in Chapter 3, covering gases, solids, and liquids by employing mostly quantum models. We now proceed to the next level of development, the dynamic description of the interaction between the optical field and the propagation medium as a function of the field frequency and propagation media variables (e.g., energy structure, temperature, and pressure). In this chapter, the classical electromagnetic field is coupled to discrete frequency oscillators via Newton’s equation of motion. This approach leads to the popular classical oscillator model, often presented in introductory books on lasers. The classical oscillator model is an incomplete theory and can be only a semiempirical model. In the next chapter, a more detailed and comprehensive approach, which also includes statistical and quantum mechanics, is used leading to robust semiclassical and quantum oscillator models. This chapter and the next are the basis for the applied models presented in Part II of this book. Classical electrodynamics is based on Maxwell’s equations, as given in Chapter 2, and the Lorentz force relation, as given below: . . . F = q[E + (v × B)]. (4.1) . . . These equations cover the classical description of the interaction of light and matter. The first term in Eq. 4.1 represents coupling of the electric field to the medium. As discussed in Chapter 2 (Section 2.2), the leading mechanism for this is the electric dipole moment. To see that this is the coupling mechanism in the first term, consider the potential function driving this force, F = −∇V(r) = −∇(−qr · E). The above expression contains the dipole moment, as defined in Chapter 2. The second term in Eq. 4.1 represents coupling of the magnetic field to the medium.
One of the crucial differences between mathematical models of classical and quantum mechanics (QM) is the use of the tensor product of the state spaces of subsystems as the state space of the corresponding composite system. (To describe an ensemble of classical composite systems, one uses random variables taking values in the Cartesian product of the state spaces of subsystems.) We show that, nevertheless, it is possible to establish a natural correspondence between the classical and the quantum probabilistic descriptions of composite systems. Quantum averages for composite systems (including entangled) can be represented as averages with respect to classical random fields. It is essentially what Albert Einstein dreamed of. QM is represented as classical statistical mechanics with infinite-dimensional phase space. While the mathematical construction is completely rigorous, its physical interpretation is a complicated problem. We present the basic physical interpretation of prequantum classical statistical field theory in Sec. II. However, this is only the first step toward real physical theory.