Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1204.4926

Relating the quantum mechanics of discrete systems to standard canonical quantum mechanics

Gerard ’t Hooft

Published Apr 22, 2012• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Discrete quantum mechanics is here defined to be a quantum theory of wave functions defined on integers P_i and Q_i, while canonical quantum mechanics is assumed to be based on wave functions on the real numbers, R^n. We study reversible mappings from the position operators q_i and their quantum canonical operators p_i of a canonical theory, onto the discrete, commuting operators Q_i and P_i. In this paper we are particularly interested in harmonic oscillators. In the discrete system, these turn into deterministic models, which is our motivation for this study. We regard the procedure worked out here as a "canonical formalism" for discrete dynamics, and as a stepping stone to handling discrete deterministic systems in a quantum formalism.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1204.4926

Related papers

Exact Discrete Analogs of Canonical Commutation and Uncertainty Relations

Vasily Evgenevich Tarasov

An exact discretization of the canonical commutation and corresponding uncertainty relations are suggested. We prove that the canonical commutation relations of discrete quantum mechanics, which is based on standard finite difference, holds for constant wave functions only. In this paper, we use the recently proposed exact discretization of derivatives, which is based on differences that are represented by infinite series. This new mathematical tool allows us to build sensible discrete quantum mechanics based on the suggested differences and includes the correct canonical commutation and uncertainty relations.

Mathematics•Jun 28, 2016•8 citations

PQ PQ\mathit{PQ}PQ Theory

Gerard ’t Hooft

What is badly needed is an elegant mathematical scheme that replaces position and momentum operators $q$ and $p$ by discrete, commuting counterparts, $Q$ and $P$ , in such a way that mappings can be defined between conventional, quantum mechanical systems and deterministic, discrete systems. Here the foundations for such a scheme is suggested. An essential role is played by the Jacobi theta functions.

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

The Discretized Hamiltonian Formalism in PQ $\mathit{PQ}$ Theory

Gerard ’t Hooft

In standard quantum mechanics, the construction of the Schrödinger equation requires a Hamiltonian operator, which must obey some important restrictions. Most of our deterministic models are, to some extent, discrete. How do we carry over the standard Hamiltonian formalism to a discretized world? As in the continuum case, we may assume that conjugate pairs ( $P_{i}; Q_{i}$ ) can be defined, but now $P_{i}$ and $Q_{i}$ are integers. How can a Hamiltonian function $H(\vec{Q}; \vec{P})$ be used to define an evolution law?

Fundamental theories of physics•Jan 1, 2016•0 citations

Harmonic oscillators coupled by springs: Discrete solutions as a Wigner quantum system

Stijn F. Lievens, Nedialka I. Stoilova, Joris Van Der Jeugt

We consider a quantum system consisting of a one-dimensional chain of M identical harmonic oscillators with natural frequency ω, coupled by means of springs. Such systems have been studied before, and appear in various models. In this paper, we approach the system as a Wigner quantum system, not imposing the canonical commutation relations, but using instead weaker relations following from the compatibility of Hamilton’s equations and the Heisenberg equations. In such a setting, the quantum system allows solutions in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, with a discrete spectrum for all physical operators. We show that a class of solutions can be obtained using generators of the Lie superalgebra gl(1∣M). Then we study – from a mathematical point of view – the properties and spectra of the physical operators in a class of unitary representations of gl(1∣M). These properties are both interesting and intriguing. In particular, we can give a complete analysis of the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian and of the position and momentum operators (including multiplicities). We also study probability distributions of position operators when the quantum system is in a stationary state, and the effect of the position of one oscillator on the positions of the remaining oscillators in the chain.

arXiv:hep-th/0606192•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 2006•19 citations

Hamiltonian formalism for integer-valued variables and integer time steps and a possible application in quantum physics

Gerard ’t Hooft

Most classical mechanical systems are based on dynamical variables whose values are real numbers. Energy conservation is then guaranteed if the dynamical equations are phrased in terms of a Hamiltonian function, which then leads to differential equations in the time variable. If these real dynamical variables are instead replaced by integers, and also the time variable is restricted to integers, it appears to be hard to enforce energy conservation unless one can also derive a Hamiltonian formalism for that case. We here show how the Hamiltonian formalism works here, and how it may yield the usual Hamilton equations in the continuum limit. The question was motivated by the author's investigations of special quantum systems that allow for a deterministic interpretation. The 'discrete Hamiltonian formalism' appears to shed new light on these approaches.

arXiv:1312.1229•Dec 4, 2013•2 citations

Non Relativistic Quantum Mechanics and Classical Mechanics as Special Cases of the Same Theory.

Johan Noldus

We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.

•Sep 1, 2015•0 citations
Discrete quantum mechanics is here defined to be a quantum theory of wave functions defined on integers P_i and Q_i, while canonical quantum mechanics is assumed to be based on wave functions on the real numbers, R^n. We study reversible mappings from the position operators q_i and their quantum canonical operators p_i of a canonical theory, onto the discrete, commuting operators Q_i and P_i. In this paper we are particularly interested in harmonic oscillators. In the discrete system, these turn into deterministic models, which is our motivation for this study. We regard the procedure worked out here as a "canonical formalism" for discrete dynamics, and as a stepping stone to handling discrete deterministic systems in a quantum formalism.
An exact discretization of the canonical commutation and corresponding uncertainty relations are suggested. We prove that the canonical commutation relations of discrete quantum mechanics, which is based on standard finite difference, holds for constant wave functions only. In this paper, we use the recently proposed exact discretization of derivatives, which is based on differences that are represented by infinite series. This new mathematical tool allows us to build sensible discrete quantum mechanics based on the suggested differences and includes the correct canonical commutation and uncertainty relations.
What is badly needed is an elegant mathematical scheme that replaces position and momentum operators qqq and ppp by discrete, commuting counterparts, QQQ and PPP , in such a way that mappings can be defined between conventional, quantum mechanical systems and deterministic, discrete systems. Here the foundations for such a scheme is suggested. An essential role is played by the Jacobi theta functions.
The Discretized Hamiltonian Formalism in PQ PQ\mathit{PQ}PQ Theory
In standard quantum mechanics, the construction of the Schrödinger equation requires a Hamiltonian operator, which must obey some important restrictions. Most of our deterministic models are, to some extent, discrete. How do we carry over the standard Hamiltonian formalism to a discretized world? As in the continuum case, we may assume that conjugate pairs ( Pi;QiP_{i}; Q_{i}Pi​;Qi​ ) can be defined, but now PiP_{i}Pi​ and QiQ_{i}Qi​ are integers. How can a Hamiltonian function H(Q⃗;P⃗)H(\vec{Q}; \vec{P})H(Q​;P) be used to define an evolution law?
We consider a quantum system consisting of a one-dimensional chain of M identical harmonic oscillators with natural frequency ω, coupled by means of springs. Such systems have been studied before, and appear in various models. In this paper, we approach the system as a Wigner quantum system, not imposing the canonical commutation relations, but using instead weaker relations following from the compatibility of Hamilton’s equations and the Heisenberg equations. In such a setting, the quantum system allows solutions in a finite-dimensional Hilbert space, with a discrete spectrum for all physical operators. We show that a class of solutions can be obtained using generators of the Lie superalgebra gl(1∣M). Then we study – from a mathematical point of view – the properties and spectra of the physical operators in a class of unitary representations of gl(1∣M). These properties are both interesting and intriguing. In particular, we can give a complete analysis of the eigenvalues of the Hamiltonian and of the position and momentum operators (including multiplicities). We also study probability distributions of position operators when the quantum system is in a stationary state, and the effect of the position of one oscillator on the positions of the remaining oscillators in the chain.
Most classical mechanical systems are based on dynamical variables whose values are real numbers. Energy conservation is then guaranteed if the dynamical equations are phrased in terms of a Hamiltonian function, which then leads to differential equations in the time variable. If these real dynamical variables are instead replaced by integers, and also the time variable is restricted to integers, it appears to be hard to enforce energy conservation unless one can also derive a Hamiltonian formalism for that case. We here show how the Hamiltonian formalism works here, and how it may yield the usual Hamilton equations in the continuum limit. The question was motivated by the author's investigations of special quantum systems that allow for a deterministic interpretation. The 'discrete Hamiltonian formalism' appears to shed new light on these approaches.
We start by rewriting classical mechanics in a quantum mechanical fashion and point out that the only difference with quantum theory re- sides at one point. There is a classical analogon of the collapse of the wavefunction and an extension of the usual Born rule is proposed which might solve this problem. We work only with algebra’s over the real (com- plex) numbers, general number fields of finite characteristic allowing for finite dimensional representations of the commutation relations are not considered given that such fields are not well ordered and do not give rise to a well defined probability interpretation. Our theory generalizes however to discrete spacetimes and finite dimensional algebra’s. Looking at physics this way, spacetime itself distinguishes itself algebraically by means of well chosen commutation relations and there is further nothing special about it meaning it has also a particle interpretation just like any other dynamical variable. Likewise, there is no reason for the dynamics to be Hamiltonian and therefore we have a nonconservative formulation of quantum physics at hand. The harmonic oscillator (amongst few oth- ers) distinguishes itself because the algebra forms a finite dimensional Lie algebra; the classical and quantum (discrete) harmonic oscillator are stud- ied in a some more generality and examples are given which are neither classical, nor quantum.