We consider 1-qubit mixed quantum state estimation by adaptively updating measurements according to previously obtained outcomes and measurement settings. Updates are determined by the average-variance--optimality (A-optimality) criterion, known in the classical theory of experimental design and applied here to quantum state estimation. In general, A optimization is a nonlinear minimization problem; however, we find an analytic solution for 1-qubit state estimation using projective measurements, reducing computational effort. We compare numerically the performances of two adaptive and two nonadaptive schemes for finite data sets and show that the A-optimality criterion gives more precise estimates than standard quantum tomography.
We consider 1-qubit mixed quantum state estimation by adaptively updating measurements according to previously obtained outcomes and measurement settings. Updates are determined by the average-variance--optimality (A-optimality) criterion, known in the classical theory of experimental design and applied here to quantum state estimation. In general, A optimization is a nonlinear minimization problem; however, we find an analytic solution for 1-qubit state estimation using projective measurements, reducing computational effort. We compare numerically the performances of two adaptive and two nonadaptive schemes for finite data sets and show that the A-optimality criterion gives more precise estimates than standard quantum tomography.
We introduce a fast and accurate heuristic for adaptive tomography that addresses many of the limitations of prior methods.Previous approaches were either too computationally intensive or tailored to handle special cases such as single qubits or pure states.By contrast, our approach combines the efficiency of online optimization with generally applicable and well-motivated data-processing techniques.We numerically demonstrate these advantages in several scenarios including mixed states, higher-dimensional systems, and restricted measurements.Quantum information processing (QIP) promises advantages in a wide range of different contexts, including machine learning [2-4], chemistry simulation [5][6][7], and number theory [8,9].As such, the experimental effort to build useful QIP devices has exploded in recent years.In the course of this effort, quantum tomography is a valuable tool for diagnosing and debugging small quantum devices, and has subsequently seen a variety of different advances.In particular, Bayesian approaches to tomography which are especially well suited to utilizing prior information and adapting to changing experimental conditions have developed significantly in recent years [10-13], presenting a useful experimental tool [14][15][16].In this paper we demonstrate the efficiency and accuracy of an adaptive tomography protocol that we call PAQT: practical adaptive quantum tomography.PAQT intelligently selects new measurements based on the outcomes of previous ones [10,[17][18][19][20][21].Adaptivity has been experimentally demonstrated [14,15,[22][23][24][25], but is not currently standard practice.Though adaptivity increases accuracy, the computational costs incurred outweigh that of simply repeating standard measurements many times.The PAQT approach employs a simple heuristic that can be efficiently computed between measurements, even with embedded hardware [26][27][28][29].The algorithm we propose is therefore compatible with modern experimental design and avoids an important limitation of previous approaches.We base our algorithm off of self-guided quantum tomography (SGQT), which treats adaptive tomography as a direct optimization problem rather than a new optimization problem between each measurement [30].Though this affords an efficient and easy to implement adaptive heuristic, SGQT is not without its limitations.It requires assuming that the target state is pure, and it does not return rich region estimates for a state.What PAQT achieves is to effectively combine SGQT with conventional and easily-implemented tomographic estimators, such as the Bayesian particle filter or least-squares fit (LSF) estimators.Under this approach, an experimentalist can collect data using SGQT (even if its assumptions are not met), and then post-process this data using particle filtering or LSF.The benefit of PAQT is two-fold.(1) From the point of view of traditional tomography, it gives an adaptive tomography protocol requiring only modest computational resources, as the bulk of the computational cost is offloaded to post-processing.(2) From the point of view of simulation-based optimization tomography (such as SGQT), it effectively augments the output with region estimation providing a statistically robust quantification of uncertainty.Thus, while we do not explicitly demonstrate that the improved scaling of Ferrie [30] remains in the more general case considered here, PAQT does provide a practical and efficient procedure for performing adaptive quantum tomography with rigorous statistical principles.
We report an experimental realization of adaptive Bayesian quantum state tomography for two-qubit states. Our implementation is based on the adaptive experimental design strategy proposed in the work by Husz\'ar and Houlsby [F. Husz\'ar and N. M. T. Houlsby, Phys. Rev. A 85, 052120 (2012).] and provides an optimal measurement approach in terms of the information gain. We address the practical questions which one faces in any experimental application: the influence of technical noise and the behavior of the tomographic algorithm for an easy-to-implement class of factorized measurements. In an experiment with polarization states of entangled photon pairs, we observe a lower instrumental noise floor and superior reconstruction accuracy for nearly pure states of the adaptive protocol compared to a nonadaptive protocol. At the same time, we show that for the mixed states, the restriction to factorized measurements results in no advantage for adaptive measurements, so general measurements have to be used.
Quantum-state tomography plays a pivotal role in quantum computation and information processing. To improve the accuracy in estimating an unknown state, carefully designed measurement schemes, such as adopting an adaptive strategy, are necessarily needed, which have gained great interest recently. In this work, based on the proposal of Sugiyama et al. [Phys. Rev. A 85, 052107 (2012)], we experimentally realize an adaptive quantum-state tomography for one qubit in an optical system. Since this scheme gives an analytical solution to the optimal measurement basis problem, our experiment is updated in real time and the infidelity between the real state and the estimated state is tracked with the detected photons. We observe an almost 1/N scaling rule of averaged infidelity against the overall number of photons, N, in our experiment, which outperforms 1/N of nonadaptive schemes.
Assumption-free reconstruction of quantum states from measurements is essential for benchmarking and certifying quantum devices, but it remains difficult due to the extensive measurement statistics and experimental resources it demands. An approach to alleviating these demands is provided by adaptive measurement strategies, which can yield up to a quadratic improvement in reconstruction accuracy for pure states by dynamically optimizing measurement settings during data acquisition. A key open question is whether these asymptotic advantages remain in realistic experiments, where readout is inevitably noisy. In this work, we analyze the impact of readout noise on adaptive quantum state tomography with readout-error mitigation, focusing on the challenging regime of reconstructing pure states using mixed-state estimators. Using analytical arguments based on Fisher information optimization and extensive numerical simulations using Bayesian inference, we show that any nonzero readout noise eliminates the asymptotic quadratic scaling advantage of adaptive strategies. We numerically investigate the behavior for finite measurement statistics for single- and two-qubit systems with exact readout-error mitigation and find a gradual transition from ideal to sub-optimal scaling. We furthermore investigate realistic scenarios where detector tomography is performed with a limited number of state copies for calibration, showing that insufficient detector characterization leads to estimator bias and limited reconstruction accuracy. Although our result imposes an upper bound on the reconstruction accuracy that can be achieved with adaptive strategies, we nevertheless observe numerically a constant-factor gain in reconstruction accuracy, which becomes larger as the readout noise decreases. This indicates potential practical benefits in using adaptive measurement strategies in well-calibrated experiments.
In this paper we revisit the problem of optimal design of quantum tomographic experiments. In contrast to previous approaches where an optimal set of measurements is decided in advance of the experiment, we allow for measurements to be adaptively and efficiently reoptimized depending on data collected so far. We develop an adaptive statistical framework based on Bayesian inference and Shannon's information, and demonstrate a significant reduction in the total number of measurements required as compared to nonadaptive methods, including mutually unbiased bases.
Given an experimental setup and a fixed number of measurements, how should one take data to optimally reconstruct the state of a quantum system? The problem of optimal experiment design (OED) for quantum state tomography was first broached by Kosut et al. [R. Kosut, I. Walmsley, and H. Rabitz, e-print arXiv:quant-ph/0411093 (2004)]. Here we provide efficient numerical algorithms for finding the optimal design, and analytic results for the case of `minimal tomography'. We also introduce the average OED, which is independent of the state to be reconstructed, and the optimal design for tomography (ODT), which minimizes tomographic bias. Monte Carlo simulations confirm the utility of our results for qubits. Finally, we adapt our approach to deal with constrained techniques such as maximum-likelihood estimation. We find that these are less amenable to optimization than cruder reconstruction methods, such as linear inversion.