We present a very simple model of a spontaneous emission from a two-level atom, interacting with a field of a finite number of states. Such a process is often said to occur because of the large number of equally-probable states of environment. We show that in our model increasing the number of field states may and may not cause a practically permanent emission, depending on the details of the model. We also describe how irreversibility emerges with growing number of states. Mathematical tools are reduced to a necessary minimum and hopefully can be well understood by undergraduate students.
We present a very simple model of a spontaneous emission from a two-level atom, interacting with a field of a finite number of states. Such a process is often said to occur because of the large number of equally-probable states of environment. We show that in our model increasing the number of field states may and may not cause a practically permanent emission, depending on the details of the model. We also describe how irreversibility emerges with growing number of states. Mathematical tools are reduced to a necessary minimum and hopefully can be well understood by undergraduate students.
The problem of the spontaneous emission from a single excited two-level atom in the presence of N unexcited similar atoms is discussed. A formalism is presented for evaluation of the time-development operator (and thus the density matrix) which has certain desirable features for time-dependent problems in the area, e.g. of atom-field interactions, when the off-diagonal elements are large compared to the diagonal elements of the Hamiltonian. By use of this formalism, it is shown that the spontaneous emission from a single atom is often drastically altered in the presence of unexcited atoms with similar resonances. When the number of atoms present becomes very large relative to the number of modes of the electromagnetic field, the excited atom becomes trapped in its excited state.>
Introduction The preceding chapters have focused on atomic transitions induced by applied radiation. That is, there is an optical field illuminating the atoms, and their response is calculated. It is implicitly assumed that an excited atom left alone will spontaneously return to the ground state, and conserve energy by emitting light that satisfies E 2 − E 1 = ħ ω 21 in accordance with the Planck and Bohr pictures. But this spontaneous emission process is not addressed quantitatively in these earlier chapters. Spontaneous emission is one of the most pervasive phenomena of atomic physics, and yet its origins remain among the least well-understood. The number of misconceptions is enormous, and they are to be found in textbooks, journal articles, and lecture notes. Because the natural decay of an excited atom adds energy to what is usually an empty mode of the electromagnetic field, the process is fundamentally quantum mechanical. Classical or even semi-classical descriptions cannot be assured to give correct answers. This is not to say that such discussion is to be avoided, but only that caution is needed in interpreting the results. Toward the end of the nineteenth century, many experimental results made it clear that classical mechanics needed to be supplemented by new theories. The first venture into the new physics was Planck's hypothesis that the energy of classical radiating oscillators like those discussed in Chap. 1 would have to be quantized into integer multiples of ħ ω. This notion led to his famous formula for the spectrum of thermal radiation from a non-reflective object (black body), and this formula describes a radiation field in thermodynamic equilibrium with its environment. The result of Planck's hypothesis in the context of thermal equilibrium plays a vital role in the discussion of spontaneous emission. Einstein A - and B -coefficients Soon after Bohr proposed a model of atomic structure consisting of discrete energy levels, connected by radiation whose energy satisfied Δ E = ħω when atoms made transition between them, Einstein published the first serious attempt to connect the absorption and emission processes. Absorption, he reasoned, could occur only in the presence of applied radiation, whereas spontaneous decay occurred without the application of any field.
The spontaneous emission of a set of N identical two-level atoms interacting with a quantized electromagnetic field is studied. The atoms are assumed to be close together compared to the mean wavelength of the emitted radiation, and their initial state is either a Dicke state or a superposition of the ground and excited state for each atom. Approximate expressions are obtained for transition probabilities, expectation values, and correlations as functions of time. The spontaneous emission for a very large separation of the atoms is also studied. In this case the directional properties of the emitted radiation, as well as the time within which the atoms decay to their ground state, depend on the position of each atom.
In this work we shall study the interaction of matter and light. In so doing we shall rely heavily on the description of such processes provided by quantum mechanics. This appears on a number of levels: firstly, a quantum description of matter is indispensable if one wants to understand on the microscopic scale the different kinds of interaction processes that can occur. Secondly, a quantum description of light often turns out to be useful, sometimes necessary, to better understand these processes. We shall study phenomena such as spontaneous emission, which can only be properly treated by a theory taking into account the quantum nature of both light and matter. In the following chapters we shall address, amongst others, the following question: ‘given an atom prepared at a given time in a particular state and subjected from this time onwards to electromagnetic radiation, what is the state of the atom and radiation at any later moment in time?’ In order to be able to answer this question it will be necessary for us to know how to calculate the evolution of a quantum system in a small number of typical situations. These methods we shall demonstrate in the first chapter. The evolution of the coupled atom–light system depends on the temporal dependence of the applied light field, which could, for example, be applied from a given moment and thereafter remain unchanged in intensity, or, perhaps, be appreciable only for a finite period of time (pulsed excitation).
N two-level "atoms" are considered in interaction with a single-mode resonant electromagnetic field. The exact solution is given nonrelativistically for all times for the case of spontaneous emission, when only one atom is initially excited. The solution is given for the general case of the N atoms in inequivalent mode positions.
Abstract In this paper we present a general theoretical model for the interaction between a number of two-level atoms constituting Bose-Einstein condensate (BEC) and a single-mode quantized field. In addition to the usual interacting terms, we take into account interatom as well as higher-order atom-field interactions. To simplify the Hamiltonian of system, after using the Bogoliubov approximation we proceed to calculate the transformed operators of atoms and field. Then, to quantify the spontaneous emission, we get analytical expressions for the expectation value of J ^ z as the atomic population inversion (API), in the cases of number and coherent states for the atomic subsystem. Our results show that the above-mentioned model interaction leads to the appearance of collapse-revival phenomenon in API. In more detail, the revival time may be tuned by adjusting the interatom interaction constant. Also, the damping process lowers the amplitude of API, but does not change the CR times for weak damping. Moreover, increasing the damping may decrease the number of CRs in a given interval of time such that no revival occurs. Briefly, it may be concluded that in the resonant case the revival times are insensitive to the change of the higher-order atom-field interaction constant and are affected only by the interatom interactions. Finally, we express that, how we can find a practical procedure to measure the quantum states of atoms in BEC .