Calculation of the expectation values of the spin and the magnetic moment of the gamma photons created as a result of the electron-positron annihilation
We have calculated the expectation values of the spin and the intrinsic magnetic moment of the gamma photons created as a result of the electron-positron annihilation. We show that, depending on its helicity a gamma photon propagating in z direction with an angular frequency carries a magnetic moment of along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (-) signs stand for the right hand and left circular helicity respectively. e argue that in a Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) the magnetic moment is an important property but not the spin of the particles. Because of these two symmetric values of the magnetic moment, we expect a splitting of the gamma photon beam into two symmetric sub beams in a (SGE). We believe that the present result will be helpful for understanding the recent attempts on the (SGE) with slow light and the behavior of the dark polaritons and also the atomic spinor polaritons.
We have calculated the expectation values of the spin and the intrinsic magnetic moment of the gamma photons created as a result of the electron-positron annihilation. We show that, depending on its helicity a gamma photon propagating in z direction with an angular frequency carries a magnetic moment of along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (-) signs stand for the right hand and left circular helicity respectively. e argue that in a Stern-Gerlach experiment (SGE) the magnetic moment is an important property but not the spin of the particles. Because of these two symmetric values of the magnetic moment, we expect a splitting of the gamma photon beam into two symmetric sub beams in a (SGE). We believe that the present result will be helpful for understanding the recent attempts on the (SGE) with slow light and the behavior of the dark polaritons and also the atomic spinor polaritons.
We show that the electron-positron annihilation process resulting with the creation of two gamma photons cannot be fully determined without the conservation of the angular momentum which has two elements, namely, the conservation of the spin angular momentum and the conservation of the quantum flux which work as the conservation of the magnetic moments as well. The conservation of the quantum flux has never been considered so far for any collision process. We show that the missing conservation rule in the above process is the conservation of the total quantum flux which is the hidden variable of that process. By using the quantum entanglement together with the conservation of the quantum flux we show that the initial and the final states of this collision are fully determined. We also show that each of the gamma photons created in the end carries a quantum flux of ±Φ=±hc/e with itself along the propagation direction. Here the (+) and (−) signs correspond to the right hand and left circular helicity, respectively.
Abstract We propose a phenomenological theory of spin behavior in a magnetic field, which explains from the point of view of classical physics the two-valued result of the Stern-Gerlach experiment. The behavior of the spin and intrinsic magnetic moment of an electron wave of an atom in an external magnetic field is considered. We show that in a weak magnetic field, the intrinsic magnetic moment of an electron wave is always oriented parallel to the magnetic field strength vector, while in a strong magnetic field, depending on the initial orientation of the intrinsic magnetic moment, two orientations are realized: either parallel or antiparallel to the magnetic field strength vector. Within the framework of classical electrodynamics, the calculation of the motion of an atomic beam in an inhomogeneous magnetic field is carried out, which reproduces the results of the Stern-Gerlach experiment.
Spin and helicityTraditionally, in textbooks on quantum mechanics, spin is introduced via an idealized Stern-Gerlach experiment in which a non-relativistic beam of silver atoms passes through an inhomogeneous magnetic field.Each atom is treated as a single valence electron of charge -e in an s-state.The subsequent splitting of the beam into two indicates the two-valuedness of Sz, which is related to the value 1/2 for s, and the magnitude of the splitting shows that the magnetic moment /l is related to s by e /l = -~s, me the proportionality factor (the gyromagnetic ratio) being twice as big as the factor that classically gives the magnetic moment due to the orbital angular momentum of a point charge.Historically, however, it seems that the early Stern-Gerlach experiments, begun in 1922, had no influence at all upon the discovery of spin, simply because they were too imprecise.Rather, the concept of spin appeared after a long and tedious battle to understand the splitting patterns and separations in line spectra.Several people had for various reasons discussed classical models of rotating charge distributions but Kronig, in 1924, was the first to show that an electron with spin 1/2 would explain the pattern of what we would today call L • S splitting, as well as anomalies in the Zeeman effect.He realized, though, that the gyromagnetic ratio ( -ejmc) needed for the latter would give L • S splittings twice as big as those observed.It is said that Pauli expressed his negative reaction to Kronig's idea with such vehemence that Kronig never published his work (Mehra and Rechenberg, 1982).Soon thereafter, in 1925, the same idea occurred to Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1925), who proceeded to a detailed analysis of the splittings, concluding at first that everything worked beautifully, but then becoming aware, as a consequence of a comment by Heisenberg, of the factor-of-2 inconsistency mentioned above.
First, the experimental foundations for the existence of a new dynamical variable, the spin of particles, are presented. The Pauli equation is then derived in detail, two applications are given and the energy levels of a particle with spin in a constant magnetic field are studied. This is the analysis of Landau levels, which can be performed by using the known results on the spectrum of harmonic oscillators. In this chapter we also study in detail the addition of orbital angular momentum and spin, as well as the spin–orbit interaction with the resulting Thomas precession. Stern-Gerlach experiment and electron spin The hypothesis that the electron has an intrinsic magnetic moment and an angular momentum, in short a spin , was first suggested in Uhlenbeck and Goudsmit (1926). They noticed, even before the discovery of quantum mechanics, that a complete description of spectra was not possible unless a magnetic moment and a mechanical moment were ascribed to the electron, and hence the concept of an electron as a point charge was insufficient. First, let us therefore try to understand how a magnetic moment can be associated to an atomic system. For this purpose, consider for simplicity the Bohr model of an hydrogen atom, where the electron moves along a circular orbit and rotates with orbital angular momentum L .
The Stern-Gerlach experiment is notoriously counter-intuitive. The official theory is that the spin of a fermion remains always aligned with the magnetic field. Its directions are thus quantized: It can only be spin-up or spin-down. But that theory is based on mathematical errors in the way it (mis)treats spinors and group theory.We present here a mathematically rigorous theory for a fermion in a magnetic field, which is no longer counter-intuitive. It is based on an understanding of spinors in SU(2) which is only Euclidean geometry.Contrary to what Pauli has been reading into the Stern-Gerlach experiment,the spin directions are not quantized. The new corrected paradigm, which solves all conceptual problems, is that the fermions precess around the magnetic-field just as Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured.Surprizingly this leads to only two energy states, which should be qualified as precession-up and precession-down rather thanspin-up and spin down.Indeed, despite the presence of the many different possible angles θ betweenthe spin axis s and the magnetic field B, the fermions can only have two possible energies m0c2±μB. The values ±μB do thus not correspond to the continuum of values −μ⋅B Einstein and Ehrenfest had conjectured. The energy term V=−μ⋅B is a macroscopic quantity. It is a statistical average over a large ensemble of fermions distributed over the two microscopic states with energies ±μB, and as such not valid for individual fermions. The two fermion states with energy ±μB are not potential-energy states. We also explain themathematically rigorous meaning of the up and down spinors. They represent left-handed and right-handed reference frames, such that now everything is intuitively clearand understandable in simple geometrical terms. The paradigm shift does not affect the Pauli principle.
The conflict between Bohr's assertion that the magnetic moment of the electron cannot be measured with experiments based on the concept of classical trajectories, and the measurement of the magnetic moment of electrons in a modified Penning trap by Dehmelt et al. has led us to reevaluate other implications of Bohr's assertion. We show that, contrary to the analysis of Bohr and Pauli, the assumption of classical trajectories in a Stern-Gerlach--like device can result in a high degree of spin separation for an electron beam. This effect may persist within a fully quantum-mechanical analysis. The magnetic fields considered are such that a tabletop Stern-Gerlach electron spin filter is feasible.