Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1109.1435 · Physical Review A

One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution: Security, feasibility, and the connection with steering

Cyril Branciard, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Stephen Patrick Walborn, Valerio Scarani, Howard M. Wiseman

Published Jan 3, 2012• 763 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

We analyze the security and feasibility of a protocol for quantum key distribution (QKD) in a context where only one of the two parties trusts his measurement apparatus. This scenario lies naturally between standard QKD, where both parties trust their measurement apparatuses, and device-independent QKD (DI-QKD), where neither do, and can be a natural assumption in some practical situations. We show that the requirements for obtaining secure keys are much easier to meet than for DI-QKD, which opens promising experimental opportunities. We clarify the link between the security of this one-sided DI-QKD scenario and the demonstration of quantum steering, in analogy to the link between DI-QKD and the violation of Bell inequalities.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.85.010301

Related papers

One-side Device Independent Quantum Key Distribution: Security and feasability

Cyril Branciard, Eric G. Cavalcanti, Valerio Scarani +1 more

We analyze the security and feasibility of a protocol for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), in a context where only one of the two parties trusts his measurement apparatus. This scenario lies naturally between standard QKD, where both parties trust their measurement apparatuses, and Device-Independent QKD (DI-QKD), where neither does, and can be a natural assumption in some practical situations. We show that the requirements for obtaining secure keys are much easier to meet than for DI-QKD, which opens promising experimental opportunities. We clarify the link between the security of this one-sided DI-QKD scenario and the demonstration of quantum steering, in analogy to the link between DI-QKD and the violation of Bell inequalities.

•Sep 7, 2011•0 citations

One-sided DI-QKD secure against coherent attacks over long distances

Michele Masini, Shubhayan Sarkar

Abstract Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a technique enabling provable secure communication but faces challenges in device characterisation, posing potential security risks. Device-independent (DI) QKD protocols overcome this issue by making minimal device assumptions but are limited in distance because they require high detection efficiencies, which refer to the ability of the experimental setup to detect quantum states. It is thus desirable to find QKD protocols that are based on realistic assumptions on the devices as well as implementable over long distances. In this work, we consider a one-sided DI QKD scheme with two measurements per party and show that it is secure against coherent attacks up to detection efficiencies greater than 50.1% specifically on the untrusted side. This is almost the theoretical limit achievable for protocols with two untrusted measurements. Interestingly, we also show that, by placing the source of states close to the untrusted side, our protocol is secure over distances comparable to standard QKD protocols.

arXiv:2403.11850•New Journal of Physics•May 14, 2026•4 citations

Advances in device-independent quantum key distribution

Víctor Zapatero, Tim van Leent, Rotem Arnon-Friedman +4 more

Abstract Device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD) provides the gold standard for secure key exchange. Not only does it allow for information-theoretic security based on quantum mechanics, but it also relaxes the need to physically model the devices, thereby fundamentally ruling out many quantum hacking threats to which non-DI QKD systems are vulnerable. In practice though, DI-QKD is very challenging. It relies on the loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality, a task that requires high quality entanglement to be distributed between distant parties and close to perfect quantum measurements, which is hardly achievable with current technology. Notwithstanding, recent theoretical and experimental efforts have led to proof-of-principle DI-QKD implementations. In this article, we review the state-of-the-art of DI-QKD by highlighting its main theoretical and experimental achievements, discussing recent proof-of-principle demonstrations, and emphasizing the existing challenges in the field.

arXiv:2208.12842•npj Quantum Information•Feb 18, 2023•165 citations

One-sided device-independent quantum key distribution for two independent parties

Jun Xin, Xiao-Ming Lu, Xingmin Li +1 more

Remote distribution of secret keys is a challenging task in quantum cryptography. A significant step in this direction is the measurement-device independence quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD). For two remote (or independent) parties Alice and Bob who initially no share secret information, the MDI-QKD enables them to share a secret key by the measurement of an untrusted relay. Unfortunately, the MDI-QKD yields the assumption that the devices of both Alice and Bob have to be trusted. Here, we show that QKD between two independent parties can also be realized even if the device of either Alice or Bob is untrusted. We tackle the problem by resorting to the recently developed one-sided device-independent QKD protocol. We derive conditions on the extracted secret key to be unconditionally secure against arbitary attacks in the limit of asymptotic keys. In the presence of Gaussian states and measurements, we theoretically demonstrate our scheme is feasible, which could be an attractive candidate for long distance secret communication.

Optics Express•Mar 27, 2020•14 citations

Transmitter-device-independent quantum key distribution

Qiang Zeng, Abhishek Mishra, Haoyang Wang +1 more

Transmitter-side device dependence is a longstanding yet implicit problem in quantum key distribution (QKD), in contrast to the thoroughly addressed measurement-side case. Quantum steering, which intrinsically distinguishes the roles of sender and receiver in entanglement certification, offers a natural route to lifting trust assumptions on the transmitter. Existing one-sided device-independent (1sDI) protocols that exploit quantum steering as the security resource typically operate in a tripartite architecture, whereas adapting them to a transmitter-receiver architecture can introduce a signaling loophole. Here we conceptually formalize the transmitter-device-independence on the basis of faithful quantum steering and propose a practical transmitter-device-independent (TDI) QKD protocol within the 1sDI trust model. The TDI scheme operationalizes the implicit no-signaling condition by enforcing a causal isolation between the input information and the transmitted quantum states, thereby eliminating the associated transmitter-side device vulnerabilities. In a proof-of-principle experiment, we validate the feasibility of the TDI protocol, achieving a key rate in the asymptotic limit of 410~bps over 27~km spool fiber. By delivering TDI security while retaining strong loss tolerance, our approach helps bridge the gap between security and practicality for real-world QKD deployments.

quant-pharXiv:2604.25225•Physical Review Applied•Apr 29, 2026•0 citations

Security of device-independent quantum key distribution protocols: a review

Ignatius William Primaatmaja, Koon Tong Goh, Ernest Y.-Z. Tan +3 more

Device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD) is often seen as the ultimate key exchange protocol in terms of security, as it can be performed securely with uncharacterised black-box devices. The advent of DI-QKD closes several loopholes and side-channels that plague current QKD systems. While implementing DI-QKD protocols is technically challenging, there have been recent proof-of-principle demonstrations, resulting from the progress made in both theory and experiments. In this review, we will provide an introduction to DI-QKD, an overview of the related experiments performed, and the theory and techniques required to analyse its security. We conclude with an outlook on future DI-QKD research.

arXiv:2206.04960•Quantum•Mar 2, 2023•68 citations
We analyze the security and feasibility of a protocol for quantum key distribution (QKD) in a context where only one of the two parties trusts his measurement apparatus. This scenario lies naturally between standard QKD, where both parties trust their measurement apparatuses, and device-independent QKD (DI-QKD), where neither do, and can be a natural assumption in some practical situations. We show that the requirements for obtaining secure keys are much easier to meet than for DI-QKD, which opens promising experimental opportunities. We clarify the link between the security of this one-sided DI-QKD scenario and the demonstration of quantum steering, in analogy to the link between DI-QKD and the violation of Bell inequalities.
We analyze the security and feasibility of a protocol for Quantum Key Distribution (QKD), in a context where only one of the two parties trusts his measurement apparatus. This scenario lies naturally between standard QKD, where both parties trust their measurement apparatuses, and Device-Independent QKD (DI-QKD), where neither does, and can be a natural assumption in some practical situations. We show that the requirements for obtaining secure keys are much easier to meet than for DI-QKD, which opens promising experimental opportunities. We clarify the link between the security of this one-sided DI-QKD scenario and the demonstration of quantum steering, in analogy to the link between DI-QKD and the violation of Bell inequalities.
Abstract Quantum key distribution (QKD) is a technique enabling provable secure communication but faces challenges in device characterisation, posing potential security risks. Device-independent (DI) QKD protocols overcome this issue by making minimal device assumptions but are limited in distance because they require high detection efficiencies, which refer to the ability of the experimental setup to detect quantum states. It is thus desirable to find QKD protocols that are based on realistic assumptions on the devices as well as implementable over long distances. In this work, we consider a one-sided DI QKD scheme with two measurements per party and show that it is secure against coherent attacks up to detection efficiencies greater than 50.1% specifically on the untrusted side. This is almost the theoretical limit achievable for protocols with two untrusted measurements. Interestingly, we also show that, by placing the source of states close to the untrusted side, our protocol is secure over distances comparable to standard QKD protocols.
Abstract Device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD) provides the gold standard for secure key exchange. Not only does it allow for information-theoretic security based on quantum mechanics, but it also relaxes the need to physically model the devices, thereby fundamentally ruling out many quantum hacking threats to which non-DI QKD systems are vulnerable. In practice though, DI-QKD is very challenging. It relies on the loophole-free violation of a Bell inequality, a task that requires high quality entanglement to be distributed between distant parties and close to perfect quantum measurements, which is hardly achievable with current technology. Notwithstanding, recent theoretical and experimental efforts have led to proof-of-principle DI-QKD implementations. In this article, we review the state-of-the-art of DI-QKD by highlighting its main theoretical and experimental achievements, discussing recent proof-of-principle demonstrations, and emphasizing the existing challenges in the field.
Remote distribution of secret keys is a challenging task in quantum cryptography. A significant step in this direction is the measurement-device independence quantum key distribution (MDI-QKD). For two remote (or independent) parties Alice and Bob who initially no share secret information, the MDI-QKD enables them to share a secret key by the measurement of an untrusted relay. Unfortunately, the MDI-QKD yields the assumption that the devices of both Alice and Bob have to be trusted. Here, we show that QKD between two independent parties can also be realized even if the device of either Alice or Bob is untrusted. We tackle the problem by resorting to the recently developed one-sided device-independent QKD protocol. We derive conditions on the extracted secret key to be unconditionally secure against arbitary attacks in the limit of asymptotic keys. In the presence of Gaussian states and measurements, we theoretically demonstrate our scheme is feasible, which could be an attractive candidate for long distance secret communication.
Transmitter-side device dependence is a longstanding yet implicit problem in quantum key distribution (QKD), in contrast to the thoroughly addressed measurement-side case. Quantum steering, which intrinsically distinguishes the roles of sender and receiver in entanglement certification, offers a natural route to lifting trust assumptions on the transmitter. Existing one-sided device-independent (1sDI) protocols that exploit quantum steering as the security resource typically operate in a tripartite architecture, whereas adapting them to a transmitter-receiver architecture can introduce a signaling loophole. Here we conceptually formalize the transmitter-device-independence on the basis of faithful quantum steering and propose a practical transmitter-device-independent (TDI) QKD protocol within the 1sDI trust model. The TDI scheme operationalizes the implicit no-signaling condition by enforcing a causal isolation between the input information and the transmitted quantum states, thereby eliminating the associated transmitter-side device vulnerabilities. In a proof-of-principle experiment, we validate the feasibility of the TDI protocol, achieving a key rate in the asymptotic limit of 410~bps over 27~km spool fiber. By delivering TDI security while retaining strong loss tolerance, our approach helps bridge the gap between security and practicality for real-world QKD deployments.
Device-independent quantum key distribution (DI-QKD) is often seen as the ultimate key exchange protocol in terms of security, as it can be performed securely with uncharacterised black-box devices. The advent of DI-QKD closes several loopholes and side-channels that plague current QKD systems. While implementing DI-QKD protocols is technically challenging, there have been recent proof-of-principle demonstrations, resulting from the progress made in both theory and experiments. In this review, we will provide an introduction to DI-QKD, an overview of the related experiments performed, and the theory and techniques required to analyse its security. We conclude with an outlook on future DI-QKD research.