Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1104.3953

Classical vs Quantum Games: Continuous-time Evolutionary Strategy Dynamics

Ming Lam Leung

Published Apr 20, 2011• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

This paper unifies the concepts of evolutionary games and quantum strategies. First, we state the formulation and properties of classical evolutionary strategies, with focus on the destinations of evolution in 2-player 2-strategy games. We then introduce a new formalism of quantum evolutionary dynamics, and give an example where an evolving quantum strategy gives reward if played against its classical counterpart.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1104.3953

Related papers

Evolutionary quantum game

Roland Kay, Neil F. Johnson, Simon C. Benjamin

We present a study of a dynamical quantum game. Each agent has a `memory' of her performance over the previous m timesteps, and her strategy can evolve in time. The game exhibits distinct regimes of optimality. For small m the classical game performs better, while for intermediate m the relative performance depends on whether the source of qubits is `corrupt'. For large m , the quantum players dramatically outperform the classical players by `freezing' the game into high-performing attractors in which evolution ceases.

arXiv:quant-ph/0102008•Journal of Physics A Mathematical and General•Oct 8, 2001•59 citations

Studies in the Theory of Quantum Games

Azhar Iqbal

Theory of quantum games is a new area of investigation that has gone through rapid development during the last few years. Initial motivation for playing games, in the quantum world, comes from the possibility of re-formulating quantum communication protocols, and algorithms, in terms of games between quantum and classical players. The possibility led to the view that quantum games have a potential to provide helpful insight into working of quantum algorithms, and even in finding new ones. This thesis analyzes and compares some interesting games when played classically and quantum mechanically. A large part of the thesis concerns investigations into a refinement notion of the Nash equilibrium concept. The refinement, called an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), was originally introduced in 1970s by mathematical biologists to model an evolving population using techniques borrowed from game theory. Analysis is developed around a situation when quantization changes ESSs without affecting corresponding Nash equilibria. Effects of quantization on solution-concepts other than Nash equilibrium are presented and discussed. For this purpose the notions of value of coalition, backwards-induction outcome, and subgame-perfect outcome are selected. Repeated games are known to have different information structure than one-shot games. Investigation is presented into a possible way where quantization changes the outcome of a repeated game. Lastly, two new suggestions are put forward to play quantum versions of classical matrix games. The first one uses the association of De Broglie's waves, with travelling material objects, as a resource for playing a quantum game. The second suggestion concerns an EPR type setting exploiting directly the correlations in Bell's inequalities to play a bi-matrix game.

arXiv:quant-ph/0503176•Mar 21, 2005•33 citations

A necessary and sufficient condition to play games in quantum mechanical settings

Şahin Kaya Özdemir, Junichi Shimamura, N. Imoto

Quantum game theory is a multidisciplinary field which combines quantum mechanics with game theory by introducing non-classical resources such as entanglement, quantum operations and quantum measurement. By transferring two-player two-strategy (2 × 2) dilemma containing classical games into the quantum realm, dilemmas can be resolved in quantum pure strategies if entanglement is distributed between the players who use quantum operations. Moreover, players receive the highest sum of payoffs available in the game, which are otherwise impossible in classical pure strategies. Encouraged by the observation of rich dynamics of physical systems with many interacting parties and the power of entanglement in quantum versions of 2 × 2 games, it became generally accepted that quantum versions can be easily extended to N -player situations by simply allowing N -partite entangled states. In this article, however, we show that this is not generally true because the reproducibility of classical tasks in the quantum domain imposes limitations on the type of entanglement and quantum operators. We propose a benchmark for the evaluation of quantum and classical versions of games, and derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for a physical realization. We give examples of entangled states that can and cannot be used, and the characteristics of quantum operators used as strategies.

arXiv:quant-ph/0703006•New Journal of Physics•Feb 28, 2007•57 citations

2005), Quantum games with decoherence

Adrian P. Flitney, Derek Abbott

A protocol for considering decoherence in quantum games is presented. Results for two-player, two-strategy quantum games subject to decoherence are derived and some specific examples are given. Decoherence in other types of quantum games is also considered. As expected, the advantage that a quantum player achieves over a player restricted to classical strategies is diminished for increasing decoherence but only vanishes in the limit of maximum decoherence.

•Jan 1, 2004•73 citations

Battle of the Sexes: A Quantum Games Theory Approach

J. R.

Real life situations where there are strategies to be chosen in order to obtain a profit can be reproduced by games, so game theory is a way to describe the evolution of possible scenarios where players can select a scheme of play. Game theory takes importance in many areas, such as people decisions making, where their choices do affect others benefit (Davis, 1970; Myerson, 1991). It is to remark that the principles of game theory were initiated by trying to understand the behavior of economic strategies, however Von Neumann presented the concept of modern game theory in 1944 (Von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947). Quantum mechanics is a tool that creates another point of view for the traditional game theory due to multiple strategies offered for the players, whom possibilities are numerously expanded in contrast of classical ones (Eisert & Wilkens, 2000). There are also games where the player who uses quantum strategies, enhances his payoffs or even always wins against a player who only uses classical moves (Meyer, 1999). It is to remark that there are plenty of applications for quantum game theory such as quantum cryptography and computation, economics and biology (Piotrowski & Sladkowski, 2003; Hanauske et al.,2009). The Battle of the Sexes game is a largely analyzed problem, based on two players: Alice and Bob and their choice about an activity for a Saturday night with each other. It is pretty important to remark that both want the best possible payoff in the decision, so the game can be developed normally, otherwise it would not be our case. Alice, really loves Opera, but wants to be with Bob; Bob likes Football but he wants to have Alice’s company along the activity. This game has a lot of applications in real life scenarios such as the spread of some type of genes from a reproduction between two organisms (Dawkins, 2006); another interesting application is neuroeconomics (Montague & Berns, 2002), where brain studies have been done in order to incite neurons to choose either to “work” for a reward or to “shirk” (Glimcher, 2003).

InTech eBooks•Feb 22, 2012•0 citations

Decoherence in quantum games

Adrian P. Flitney, Derek Abbott

A protocol for considering decoherence in quantum games is presented. Results for general two-player, two-strategy quantum games subject to decoherence are derived and some specific examples are given. Decoherence in other types of quantum games is also considered. As expected, the advantage that a quantum player achieves over a player restricted to classical strategies is diminished for increasing decoherence but only vanishes in the limit of maximum decoherence when the results of the game are randomized.

Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIE•May 25, 2004•1 citation
This paper unifies the concepts of evolutionary games and quantum strategies. First, we state the formulation and properties of classical evolutionary strategies, with focus on the destinations of evolution in 2-player 2-strategy games. We then introduce a new formalism of quantum evolutionary dynamics, and give an example where an evolving quantum strategy gives reward if played against its classical counterpart.
We present a study of a dynamical quantum game. Each agent has a `memory' of her performance over the previous m timesteps, and her strategy can evolve in time. The game exhibits distinct regimes of optimality. For small m the classical game performs better, while for intermediate m the relative performance depends on whether the source of qubits is `corrupt'. For large m , the quantum players dramatically outperform the classical players by `freezing' the game into high-performing attractors in which evolution ceases.
Theory of quantum games is a new area of investigation that has gone through rapid development during the last few years. Initial motivation for playing games, in the quantum world, comes from the possibility of re-formulating quantum communication protocols, and algorithms, in terms of games between quantum and classical players. The possibility led to the view that quantum games have a potential to provide helpful insight into working of quantum algorithms, and even in finding new ones. This thesis analyzes and compares some interesting games when played classically and quantum mechanically. A large part of the thesis concerns investigations into a refinement notion of the Nash equilibrium concept. The refinement, called an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS), was originally introduced in 1970s by mathematical biologists to model an evolving population using techniques borrowed from game theory. Analysis is developed around a situation when quantization changes ESSs without affecting corresponding Nash equilibria. Effects of quantization on solution-concepts other than Nash equilibrium are presented and discussed. For this purpose the notions of value of coalition, backwards-induction outcome, and subgame-perfect outcome are selected. Repeated games are known to have different information structure than one-shot games. Investigation is presented into a possible way where quantization changes the outcome of a repeated game. Lastly, two new suggestions are put forward to play quantum versions of classical matrix games. The first one uses the association of De Broglie's waves, with travelling material objects, as a resource for playing a quantum game. The second suggestion concerns an EPR type setting exploiting directly the correlations in Bell's inequalities to play a bi-matrix game.
Quantum game theory is a multidisciplinary field which combines quantum mechanics with game theory by introducing non-classical resources such as entanglement, quantum operations and quantum measurement. By transferring two-player two-strategy (2 × 2) dilemma containing classical games into the quantum realm, dilemmas can be resolved in quantum pure strategies if entanglement is distributed between the players who use quantum operations. Moreover, players receive the highest sum of payoffs available in the game, which are otherwise impossible in classical pure strategies. Encouraged by the observation of rich dynamics of physical systems with many interacting parties and the power of entanglement in quantum versions of 2 × 2 games, it became generally accepted that quantum versions can be easily extended to N -player situations by simply allowing N -partite entangled states. In this article, however, we show that this is not generally true because the reproducibility of classical tasks in the quantum domain imposes limitations on the type of entanglement and quantum operators. We propose a benchmark for the evaluation of quantum and classical versions of games, and derive the necessary and sufficient conditions for a physical realization. We give examples of entangled states that can and cannot be used, and the characteristics of quantum operators used as strategies.
Real life situations where there are strategies to be chosen in order to obtain a profit can be reproduced by games, so game theory is a way to describe the evolution of possible scenarios where players can select a scheme of play. Game theory takes importance in many areas, such as people decisions making, where their choices do affect others benefit (Davis, 1970; Myerson, 1991). It is to remark that the principles of game theory were initiated by trying to understand the behavior of economic strategies, however Von Neumann presented the concept of modern game theory in 1944 (Von Neumann & Morgenstern, 1947). Quantum mechanics is a tool that creates another point of view for the traditional game theory due to multiple strategies offered for the players, whom possibilities are numerously expanded in contrast of classical ones (Eisert & Wilkens, 2000). There are also games where the player who uses quantum strategies, enhances his payoffs or even always wins against a player who only uses classical moves (Meyer, 1999). It is to remark that there are plenty of applications for quantum game theory such as quantum cryptography and computation, economics and biology (Piotrowski & Sladkowski, 2003; Hanauske et al.,2009). The Battle of the Sexes game is a largely analyzed problem, based on two players: Alice and Bob and their choice about an activity for a Saturday night with each other. It is pretty important to remark that both want the best possible payoff in the decision, so the game can be developed normally, otherwise it would not be our case. Alice, really loves Opera, but wants to be with Bob; Bob likes Football but he wants to have Alice’s company along the activity. This game has a lot of applications in real life scenarios such as the spread of some type of genes from a reproduction between two organisms (Dawkins, 2006); another interesting application is neuroeconomics (Montague & Berns, 2002), where brain studies have been done in order to incite neurons to choose either to “work” for a reward or to “shirk” (Glimcher, 2003).
A protocol for considering decoherence in quantum games is presented. Results for general two-player, two-strategy quantum games subject to decoherence are derived and some specific examples are given. Decoherence in other types of quantum games is also considered. As expected, the advantage that a quantum player achieves over a player restricted to classical strategies is diminished for increasing decoherence but only vanishes in the limit of maximum decoherence when the results of the game are randomized.