Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1101.5252 · Foundations of Physics

On a Recent Proof of Nonlocality Without Inequalities

G. C. Ghirardi

Published Mar 17, 2011• 4 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1007/s10701-011-9548-1

Related papers

Proofs of nonlocality without inequalities revisited

G. C. Ghirardi, Luca Marinatto

arXiv:0711.0505•Physics Letters A•Nov 21, 2007•57 citations

A General Proof of Nonlocality without Inequalities for Bipartite States

G. C. Ghirardi, Luca Marinatto

The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2009•0 citations

A second look at a recent algebraic proof of nonlocality

Robert K. Clifton, Michael L. G. Redhead, Jeremy Butterfield

Foundations of Physics Letters•Aug 1, 1991•6 citations

Some difficulties for Clifton, Redhead, and Butterfield's recent proof of nonlocality

Martin R. Jones

Foundations of Physics Letters•Aug 1, 1991•3 citations

Comment on "Quantum nonlocality for a three-particle nonmaximally entangled state without inequalities"

Jose Luis Cereceda

In a recent Brief Report, Zheng [S-B. Zheng, PRA 66, 014103 (2002)] has given a proof of nonlocality without using inequalities for three spin-1/2 particles in the nonmaximally entangled state |psi> = cosθ|+++> + i sinθ|-->. Here we show that Zheng's proof is not correct. Indeed it is the case that, for the experiment considered by Zheng, the only state that admits a nonlocality proof without inequalities is the maximally entangled state.

arXiv:quant-ph/0312046•Dec 5, 2003•0 citations

Simple Hardy-Like Proof of Quantum Contextuality

Adán Cabello, Piotr Badziąg, Marcelo Terra Cunha +1 more

Contextuality and nonlocality are two fundamental properties of nature. Hardy's proof is considered the simplest proof of nonlocality and can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest Bell inequality. A fundamental question is: Which is the simplest proof of contextuality? We show that there is a Hardy-like proof of contextuality that can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest noncontextuality inequality. Interestingly, this new proof connects this inequality with the proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem, providing the missing link between these two fundamental results, and can be extended to an arbitrary odd number n of settings, an extension that can be seen as a particular violation of the n-cycle inequality.

arXiv:1310.8330•Physical Review Letters•Oct 30, 2013•60 citations
Contextuality and nonlocality are two fundamental properties of nature. Hardy's proof is considered the simplest proof of nonlocality and can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest Bell inequality. A fundamental question is: Which is the simplest proof of contextuality? We show that there is a Hardy-like proof of contextuality that can also be seen as a particular violation of the simplest noncontextuality inequality. Interestingly, this new proof connects this inequality with the proof of the Kochen-Specker theorem, providing the missing link between these two fundamental results, and can be extended to an arbitrary odd number n of settings, an extension that can be seen as a particular violation of the n-cycle inequality.