Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1010.5329 · Open Physics

Time-delay of classical and quantum scattering processes: a conceptual overview and a general definition

Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

Published Dec 12, 2011• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract We present a step by step introduction to the notion of time-delay in classical and quantum mechanics, with the aim of clarifying its foundation at a conceptual level. In doing so, we motivate the introduction of the concepts of “fuzzy” and “free-flight” sojourn times that we use to provide the most general possible definition for the quantum time-delay, valid for simple and multichannel scattering systems, with or without conditions on the observation of the scattering particle, and for incoming wave packets whose energy can be smeared out or sharply peaked (fixed energy). We conclude our conceptual analysis by presenting what we think is the right interpretation of the concepts of sojourn and delay times in quantum mechanics, explaining why, in ultimate analysis, they should not be called “times.”

DOI
10.2478/s11534-011-0105-5

Related papers

Time-delay of classical and quantum scattering processes: a conceptual overview and a general

Massimiliano Sassoli de Bianchi

We present a step by step introduction to the notion of time-delay in classical and quantum mechanics, with the aim of clarifying its foundation at a conceptual level. In doing so, we motivate the introduction of the concepts of “fuzzy” and “free-flight” sojourn times that we use to provide the most general possible definition for the quantum time-delay, valid for simple and multichannel scattering systems, with or without conditions on the observation of the scattering particle, and for incoming wave packets whose energy can be smeared out or sharply peaked (fixed energy). We conclude our conceptual analysis by presenting what we think is the right interpretation of the concepts of sojourn and delay times in quantum mechanics, explaining why, in ultimate analysis, they should not be called “times.”

•Jan 1, 2012•0 citations

Time delay for an abstract quantum scattering process

Serge Richard

In this short review paper, we discuss the concept of time delay for an abstract quantum scattering system. Its definition in terms of sojourn times is explained as well as its identity with the so-called Eisenbud-Wigner time delay. Necessary and natural conditions for such a construction are introduced and thoroughly discussed. Assumptions and statements are precisely formulated but proofs are contained in two companion papers written in collaboration with R. Tiedra de Aldecoa.

arXiv:1103.3901•Mar 20, 2011•0 citations

Time delay in tunneling: Transmission and reflection time delays

Wojciech Jaworski, David M. Wardlaw

The problem of time delay in one-dimensional quantum-mechanical scattering by a potential barrier is studied in the framework of time-dependent scattering theory. It is shown how the concept of sojourn time can be used to define three separate time delays: the time delay for transmission through the barrier, the time delay for reflection, and the total time delay (i.e., averaged over transmission and reflection). In addition to the anticipated dependence on the S matrix and its energy derivative, the time delays depend on certain parameters which can be interpreted as describing positions of detectors in a gedanken-experiment measurement. The problem of defining separate time delays for transmission and reflection appears to be rooted in the foundations of quantum theory and its interpretation.

Physical Review A•Apr 1, 1988•69 citations

Time delay for an abstract quantum scattering process (Spectral and Scattering Theory and Related Topics)

Serge Richard

In this short review paper, we discuss the concept of time delay for an abstract quantum scattering system.Its definition in terms of sojoum times is explained as well as its identity with the so-called Eisenbud-Wigner time delay.Necessary and natural conditions for such a constmction are introduced and thoroughly discussed.Assumptions and statements are pre- cisely formulated but proofs are contained in two companion papers written in collaboration with R. Tiedra de Aldecoa.

数理解析研究所講究録•Sep 1, 2011•0 citations

Time delay in tunneling: Sojourn-time approach versus mean-position approach

Wojciech Jaworski, David M. Wardlaw

Our previous results [Phys. Rev. A 37, 2843 (1988)], based on the concept of sojourn time, for the transmission and reflection time delays in one-dimensional scattering by a potential barrier are compared to the corresponding results of E. H. Hauge, J. P. Falck, and T. A. Fjedly [Phys. Rev. B 36, 4203 (1987)], based on the idea of following the time evolution of the mean position of wave packets. It is shown that the mean-position approach agrees with the more general sojourn-time approach in the limit of well-defined momentum, and that, in general, the two approaches appear to be related in a classical-like manner.

Physical Review A•Nov 1, 1988•18 citations

Tunneling times

Partha Ghose

Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Apr 29, 1999•0 citations
Abstract We present a step by step introduction to the notion of time-delay in classical and quantum mechanics, with the aim of clarifying its foundation at a conceptual level. In doing so, we motivate the introduction of the concepts of “fuzzy” and “free-flight” sojourn times that we use to provide the most general possible definition for the quantum time-delay, valid for simple and multichannel scattering systems, with or without conditions on the observation of the scattering particle, and for incoming wave packets whose energy can be smeared out or sharply peaked (fixed energy). We conclude our conceptual analysis by presenting what we think is the right interpretation of the concepts of sojourn and delay times in quantum mechanics, explaining why, in ultimate analysis, they should not be called “times.”
We present a step by step introduction to the notion of time-delay in classical and quantum mechanics, with the aim of clarifying its foundation at a conceptual level. In doing so, we motivate the introduction of the concepts of “fuzzy” and “free-flight” sojourn times that we use to provide the most general possible definition for the quantum time-delay, valid for simple and multichannel scattering systems, with or without conditions on the observation of the scattering particle, and for incoming wave packets whose energy can be smeared out or sharply peaked (fixed energy). We conclude our conceptual analysis by presenting what we think is the right interpretation of the concepts of sojourn and delay times in quantum mechanics, explaining why, in ultimate analysis, they should not be called “times.”
The problem of time delay in one-dimensional quantum-mechanical scattering by a potential barrier is studied in the framework of time-dependent scattering theory. It is shown how the concept of sojourn time can be used to define three separate time delays: the time delay for transmission through the barrier, the time delay for reflection, and the total time delay (i.e., averaged over transmission and reflection). In addition to the anticipated dependence on the S matrix and its energy derivative, the time delays depend on certain parameters which can be interpreted as describing positions of detectors in a gedanken-experiment measurement. The problem of defining separate time delays for transmission and reflection appears to be rooted in the foundations of quantum theory and its interpretation.
Our previous results [Phys. Rev. A 37, 2843 (1988)], based on the concept of sojourn time, for the transmission and reflection time delays in one-dimensional scattering by a potential barrier are compared to the corresponding results of E. H. Hauge, J. P. Falck, and T. A. Fjedly [Phys. Rev. B 36, 4203 (1987)], based on the idea of following the time evolution of the mean position of wave packets. It is shown that the mean-position approach agrees with the more general sojourn-time approach in the limit of well-defined momentum, and that, in general, the two approaches appear to be related in a classical-like manner.
Introduction In classical physics it is meaningful to ask the question, ‘How much time does a particle take to pass through a given region?’ The interesting question in quantum mechanics is: does a particle take a definite time to tunnel through a classically forbidden region? The question has been debated ever since the idea that there was such a time in quantum theory was first put forward by MacColl way back in 1932 [253]. A plethora of times has since then been proposed, and the answer seems to depend on the interpretation of quantum mechanics one uses. A reliable answer is clearly of great importance for the design of high-frequency quantum devices, tunnelling phenomena (as, for example, in scanning tunneling microscopy), nuclear and chemical reactions and, of course, for purely conceptual reasons. Most of the controversies centre around simple and intuitive notions in idealized one-dimensional models in a scattering configuration in which a particle (usually represented by a wave packet) is incident on a potential barrier localized in the interval [ a, b ]. Three kinds of time have been defined in this context. One, called the transmission time τ T ( a, b ), is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually transmitted. Similarly, the reflection time τ R ( a, b ) is the average time spent within the barrier region by the particles that are eventually reflected.