Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1010.3064 · Manuscrito

Probabilistic Inequalities and Upper Probabilities in Quantum Mechanical Entanglement

J. Acácio de Barros, Patrick Suppes

Published Oct 15, 2010• 12 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In this paper we analyze the existence of joint probabilities for the Bell-type and GHZ entangled states. We then propose the usage of nonmonotonic upper probabilities as a tool to derive consistent joint upper probabilities for the contextual hidden variables. Finally, we show that for the extreme example of no error, the GHZ state allows for the definition of a joint upper probability that is consistent with the strong correlations.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1010.3064

Related papers

Some conceptual issues involving probability in quantum mechanics

J. Acácio de Barros, Patrick Suppes

We discuss some issues about probability in quantum mechanics, with particular emphasis on the GHZ theorem. We propose the usage of nonmonotonic upper probabilities as a tool to derive consistent joint upper probabilities for systems where only contextual hidden variables are possible.

arXiv:quant-ph/0001017•Jan 8, 2000•3 citations

On the Implication of Bell's Probability Distribution and Proposed Experiments of Quantum Measurement

Hai-Long Zhao

In the derivation of Bell's inequalities, probability distribution is supposed to be a function of only hidden variable. We point out that the true implication of the probability distribution of Bell's correlation function is the distribution of the joint measurement outcomes on the two sides. So it is a function of both hidden variable and settings. In this case, Bell's inequalities fail. Our further analysis shows that Bell's locality holds neither for dependent events nor for independent events. We think that the measurements of EPR pairs are dependent events, thus violation of Bell's inequalities cannot rule out the existence of local hidden variable. In order to explain the results of EPR-type experiments, we suppose that polarization entangled photon pair can be composed of two circularly or linearly polarized photons with correlated hidden variables, and a couple of experiments of quantum measurement are proposed. The first uses delayed measurement on one photon of the EPR pair to demonstrate directly whether measurement on the other could have any non-local influence on it. Then several experiments are suggested to reveal the components of polarization entangled photon pair. The last one uses successive polarization measurements on a pair of EPR photons to show that two photons with a same quantum state will behave in the same way under the same measuring condition.

•Jun 1, 2009•0 citations

Mathematical and physical meaning of the Bell inequalities

Emilio Santos

Abstract It is shown that the Bell inequalities are closely related to the triangle inequalities involving distance functions amongst pairs of random variables with values { 0 , 1 } . A hidden variables model may be defined as a mapping between a set of quantum projection operators and a set of random variables. The model is noncontextual if there is a joint probability distribution. The Bell inequalities are necessary conditions for its existence. The inequalities are most relevant when measurements are performed at space-like separation, thus showing a conflict between quantum mechanics and local realism (Bell's theorem). The relations of the Bell inequalities with contextuality, the Kochen–Specker theorem, and quantum entanglement are briefly discussed.

arXiv:1410.4935•European Journal of Physics•Jun 29, 2016•8 citations

Statistical Link Between Bell Nonlocality and Uncertainty Relations in Quantum Mechanics

Li‐Yi Hsu

Abstract Bell nonlocality refers to the nonlocal correlation strength among quantum systems that cannot be duplicated using local hidden variables, and uncertainty relations set the lower bound on the sum or product of variances for incompatible observables within a quantum system. In this work, the study of linking these two fundamental quantum features in terms of statistical characteristics within Bell tests is initiated. Two statistics determine the state‐dependent quantum upper bounds of the Bell values: the expectation values of local observables, and the joint uncertainty that is the product of local uncertainty. Specifically, it is showed that the joint measurement uncertainty determines the upper bounds of covariant Bell inequalities in the quantum region, with more joint measurement uncertainty required for more covariant correlation strengths. Conversely, the covariant Bell value defines the lower bound of joint uncertainty. In addition, given the maximally entangled states, Tsirelson's bounds of Bell inequalities can be achieved when the joint uncertainty reaches the maximum.

Annalen der Physik•Jul 8, 2025•1 citation

On the implication of Bell’s probability distribution and proposed experiments of quantum measurement

Hai-Long Zhao

In derivating of Bell’s inequalities, the probability distribution is supposed to be a function only of a hidden variable. We point out that the true implication of the probability distribution of Bell’s correlation function is the distribution of joint measurement outcomes on the two sides. It is therefore a function of both the hidden variable and the settings. In this case, Bell’s inequalities fail. Our further analysis shows that Bell’s locality holds neither for dependent events nor for independent events. We think that the measurements of EPR pairs are dependent events, and hence violation of Bell’s inequalities cannot rule out the existence of local hidden variable. To explain the results of EPR-type experiments, we suppose that a polarization-entangled photon pair can be composed of two circularly or linearly polarized photons with correlated hidden variables, and a couple of experiments of quantum measurement are proposed. The first uses delayed measurement on one photon of the EPR pair to demonstrate directly whether measurement on the other could have any nonlocal influence on it. Then several experiments are suggested to reveal the components of the polarization-entangled photon pair. The last one uses successive polarization measurements on a pair of EPR photons to show that two photons with the same quantum state behave the same under the same measuring conditions.

arXiv:0906.0279•Journal of Experimental and Theoretical Physics•Dec 1, 2013•4 citations

Upper bounds on violation of Bell-type inequalities by a multipartite quantum state

Elena R. Loubenets

We present the new exact upper bounds on the maximal Bell violation for the generalized N-qubit GHZ state, the N-qudit GHZ state and, in general, for an arbitrary N-partite quantum state, possibly infinite-dimensional. Our results indicate that, for an N-partite quantum state of any Hilbert space dimension, violation of any Bell-type inequality (either on correlation functions or on joint probabilities) with S settings and any number of outcomes at each site cannot exceed (2S-1)^{N-1}.

arXiv:1108.0263•Aug 1, 2011•0 citations
In this paper we analyze the existence of joint probabilities for the Bell-type and GHZ entangled states. We then propose the usage of nonmonotonic upper probabilities as a tool to derive consistent joint upper probabilities for the contextual hidden variables. Finally, we show that for the extreme example of no error, the GHZ state allows for the definition of a joint upper probability that is consistent with the strong correlations.
In the derivation of Bell's inequalities, probability distribution is supposed to be a function of only hidden variable. We point out that the true implication of the probability distribution of Bell's correlation function is the distribution of the joint measurement outcomes on the two sides. So it is a function of both hidden variable and settings. In this case, Bell's inequalities fail. Our further analysis shows that Bell's locality holds neither for dependent events nor for independent events. We think that the measurements of EPR pairs are dependent events, thus violation of Bell's inequalities cannot rule out the existence of local hidden variable. In order to explain the results of EPR-type experiments, we suppose that polarization entangled photon pair can be composed of two circularly or linearly polarized photons with correlated hidden variables, and a couple of experiments of quantum measurement are proposed. The first uses delayed measurement on one photon of the EPR pair to demonstrate directly whether measurement on the other could have any non-local influence on it. Then several experiments are suggested to reveal the components of polarization entangled photon pair. The last one uses successive polarization measurements on a pair of EPR photons to show that two photons with a same quantum state will behave in the same way under the same measuring condition.
Abstract It is shown that the Bell inequalities are closely related to the triangle inequalities involving distance functions amongst pairs of random variables with values { 0 , 1 } . A hidden variables model may be defined as a mapping between a set of quantum projection operators and a set of random variables. The model is noncontextual if there is a joint probability distribution. The Bell inequalities are necessary conditions for its existence. The inequalities are most relevant when measurements are performed at space-like separation, thus showing a conflict between quantum mechanics and local realism (Bell's theorem). The relations of the Bell inequalities with contextuality, the Kochen–Specker theorem, and quantum entanglement are briefly discussed.
Abstract Bell nonlocality refers to the nonlocal correlation strength among quantum systems that cannot be duplicated using local hidden variables, and uncertainty relations set the lower bound on the sum or product of variances for incompatible observables within a quantum system. In this work, the study of linking these two fundamental quantum features in terms of statistical characteristics within Bell tests is initiated. Two statistics determine the state‐dependent quantum upper bounds of the Bell values: the expectation values of local observables, and the joint uncertainty that is the product of local uncertainty. Specifically, it is showed that the joint measurement uncertainty determines the upper bounds of covariant Bell inequalities in the quantum region, with more joint measurement uncertainty required for more covariant correlation strengths. Conversely, the covariant Bell value defines the lower bound of joint uncertainty. In addition, given the maximally entangled states, Tsirelson's bounds of Bell inequalities can be achieved when the joint uncertainty reaches the maximum.
In derivating of Bell’s inequalities, the probability distribution is supposed to be a function only of a hidden variable. We point out that the true implication of the probability distribution of Bell’s correlation function is the distribution of joint measurement outcomes on the two sides. It is therefore a function of both the hidden variable and the settings. In this case, Bell’s inequalities fail. Our further analysis shows that Bell’s locality holds neither for dependent events nor for independent events. We think that the measurements of EPR pairs are dependent events, and hence violation of Bell’s inequalities cannot rule out the existence of local hidden variable. To explain the results of EPR-type experiments, we suppose that a polarization-entangled photon pair can be composed of two circularly or linearly polarized photons with correlated hidden variables, and a couple of experiments of quantum measurement are proposed. The first uses delayed measurement on one photon of the EPR pair to demonstrate directly whether measurement on the other could have any nonlocal influence on it. Then several experiments are suggested to reveal the components of the polarization-entangled photon pair. The last one uses successive polarization measurements on a pair of EPR photons to show that two photons with the same quantum state behave the same under the same measuring conditions.