Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1009.5436 · Classical and Quantum Gravity

Timeless path integral for relativistic quantum mechanics

Dah-Wei Chiou

Published May 14, 2013• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Starting from the canonical formalism of relativistic (timeless) quantum mechanics, the formulation of a timeless path integral is rigorously derived. The transition amplitude is reformulated as the sum, or functional integral, over all possible paths in the constraint surface specified by the (relativistic) Hamiltonian constraint, and each path contributes with a phase identical to the classical action divided by ℏ. The timeless path integral manifests the timeless feature as it is completely independent of the parametrization for paths. For the special case that the Hamiltonian constraint is a quadratic polynomial in momenta, the transition amplitude admits the timeless Feynman's path integral over the (relativistic) configuration space. Meanwhile, the difference between relativistic quantum mechanics and conventional nonrelativistic (with time) quantum mechanics is elaborated on in light of the timeless path integral.

DOI
10.1088/0264-9381/30/12/125004

Related papers

Path Integral Formulation of Quantum Mechanics

Michael T. Strickland

This chapter introduces the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics as a rigorous and systematic alternative to canonical quantization. It begins by defining the transition probability amplitude (propagator) and deriving the path integral by discretizing time and summing over all possible intermediate paths between initial and final spacetime points. The chapter shows the final form of the propagator as a functional integral over all paths, weighted by the exponential of the action. This formulation provides an intuitive understanding that paths near the classical trajectory (which minimizes the action) interfere constructively, dominating the overall amplitude.

Graduate texts in physics•Nov 1, 2019•1 citation

EXTENDED HAMILTON–LAGRANGE FORMALISM AND ITS APPLICATION TO FEYNMAN'S PATH INTEGRAL FOR RELATIVISTIC QUANTUM PHYSICS

Jürgen Struckmeier

We present a consistent and comprehensive treatise on the foundations of the extended Hamilton–Lagrange formalism — where the dynamical system is parametrized along a general system evolution parameter s, and the time t is treated as a dependent variable t(s) on equal footing with all other configuration space variables qi(s). In the action principle, the conventional classical action L1d t is then replaced by the generalized action L1d s, with L and L1denoting the conventional and the extended Lagrangian, respectively. It is shown that a unique correlation of L1and L exists if we refrain from performing simultaneously a transformation of the dynamical variables. With the appropriate correlation of L1and L in place, the extension of the formalism preserves its canonical form. In the extended formalism, the dynamical system is described as a constrained motion within an extended space. We show that the value of the constraint and the parameter s constitutes an additional pair of canonically conjugate variables. In the corresponding quantum system, we thus encounter an additional uncertainty relation. As a consequence of the formal similarity of conventional and extended Hamilton–Lagrange formalisms, Feynman's nonrelativistic path integral approach can be converted on a general level into a form appropriate for relativistic quantum physics. In the emerging parametrized quantum description, the additional uncertainty relation serves as the means to incorporate the constraint and hence to finally eliminate the parametrization. We derive the extended Lagrangian L1of a classical relativistic point particle in an external electromagnetic field and show that the generalized path integral approach yields the Klein–Gordon equation as the corresponding quantum description. We furthermore derive the space–time propagator for a free relativistic particle from its extended Lagrangian L1. These results can be regarded as the proof of principle of the relativistic generalization of Feynman's path integral approach to quantum physics.

arXiv:0811.0496•International Journal of Modern Physics E•Jan 1, 2009•8 citations

- Path Integral Formulation

S. Rajasekar, R. Velusamy

The conventional approach to quantum mechanics begins with the classical Hamiltonian and changes observables to noncommuting operators. Canonically conjugate observables have to be noncommuting operators in order to satisfy the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The dynamics of a quantum mechanical system is given by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. In the early 1940s Feynman realized that it would be possible to construct a quantum model using the classical Lagrangian approach (a method closely related to the action integral). Dirac had earlier pointed out that eit times the Lagrangian was analogous to a transformation function for the wave function in which the wave function at one instant could be related to the wave function at a next instant in a time interval of t by multiplying with such an exponential function. Feynman found the exponential phase factor to be the action S which is the time integral of the Lagrangian. Further, he noticed that it was necessary to perform integrals over all space variables at every instant of time to find the transition amplitudes. He developed a way for describing and evaluating the integration using the idea of integral over all paths. In Feynman’s approach, the particles are described using amplitudes calculated along the paths they may or may not follow. These amplitudes behave like waves, their phase changes as the quantum system moves along the path and the amplitudes for all paths superpose and interfere. This interference between all paths is called as sum-over-histories and the resulting amplitude is connected in the same way that the amplitude of a wave function is linked to probability as magnitude-squared.

CRC Press eBooks•Dec 10, 2014•1 citation

Getting path integrals physically and technically right

Steven Kenneth Kauffmann

Feynman's Lagrangian path integral was an outgrowth of Dirac's vague surmise that Lagrangians have a role in quantum mechanics. Lagrangians implicitly incorporate Hamilton's first equation of motion, so their use contravenes the uncertainty principle, but they are relevant to semiclassical approximations and relatedly to the ubiquitous case that the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the canonical momenta, which accounts for the Lagrangian path integral's "success". Feynman also invented the Hamiltonian phase-space path integral, which is fully compatible with the uncertainty principle. We recast this as an ordinary functional integral by changing direct integration over subpaths constrained to all have the same two endpoints into an equivalent integration over those subpaths' unconstrained second derivatives. Function expansion with generalized Legendre polynomials of time then enables the functional integral to be unambiguously evaluated through first order in the elapsed time, yielding the Schroedinger equation with a unique quantization of the classical Hamiltonian. Widespread disbelief in that uniqueness stemmed from the mistaken notion that no subpath can have its two endpoints arbitrarily far separated when its nonzero elapsed time is made arbitrarily short. We also obtain the quantum amplitude for any specified configuration or momentum path, which turns out to be an ordinary functional integral over, respectively, all momentum or all configuration paths. The first of these results is directly compared with Feynman's mistaken Lagrangian-action hypothesis for such a configuration path amplitude, with special heed to the case that the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the canonical momenta.

arXiv:0910.2490•Prespacetime journal•Oct 13, 2009•6 citations

Path Integral Formulation Of Quantum Mechanics

Nelson Enrique Bolivar, Gabriel Abellán

To introduce the formalism of the functional integral in quantum mechanics, this chapter starts from the definition of the temporal evolution operator. It is important to emphasize that in the classical limit is not only the classic trajectory that have the grater contribution, but all the paths close to this also contribute. The chapter shows how integral formulation is perfectly consistent with Schrödinger's time-dependent differential equation. It retrieves this equation from definition of transition amplitude as a path integral. The chapter discusses functional derivative generalized to the case of the ordinary functional derivative. A very useful tool to solve problems related to functional integrals is the Wick rotation or Euclidean rotation. In quantum mechanics there are few problems we can solve exactly, and very often, when possible, we use perturbation theory to find an approximate solution. The chapter follows this approach with formalism of functional integration and construct a perturbation theory from which can be obtained a physical interpretation.

Apple Academic Press eBooks•May 23, 2018•0 citations

The problem of time: a path integral view

Juan Manuel Diaz, Alejandro Perez

We show that the emergence of time evolution in an otherwise timeless nonrelativistic closed quantum system -- viewed as a poor man's model of generally covariant quantum theory -- can be understood from the perspective of the path integral representation. As often happens in the functional integral approach, this viewpoint offers a more intuitive account of features that become cumbersome in the operator/Hilbert-space formulation. We show how Schrödinger evolution emerges once a clock degree of freedom is identified and placed in a suitable semiclassical `good-clock state'. Our analysis has a consequence that extends to path integral formulations of generally covariant systems with action $S$ (including gravity). In such theories certain transition amplitudes take the form $\exp(iS/\hbar)+\exp(-iS/\hbar)$ rather than the expected `forward propagating' $\exp(iS/\hbar)$. This feature, known as the {\em cosine problem}, appears in concrete regularizations of the path integral, for example in the spin foam representation defining the physical inner product between spin network states in loop quantum gravity. Both formally and in explicit regularizations, this apparent difficulty has led some authors to seek modifications of the basic amplitudes to eliminate backward propagation. Our model shows that the cosine problem is instead a natural consequence of time-reversal invariance of the fundamental dynamics together with the time-neutral boundary states commonly used in transition amplitudes. When a suitable clock system is identified and placed in a semiclassical `good-clock state', it introduces a time arrow selecting the `forward propagating' $\exp(iS/\hbar)$, without modifying the fundamental dynamics. The analysis clarifies how time emerges under suitable conditions and emphasizes that, in the canonical formulation, quantum gravity is fundamentally timeless.

gr-qcCross-listedarXiv:2605.17935•May 19, 2026•0 citations
Starting from the canonical formalism of relativistic (timeless) quantum mechanics, the formulation of a timeless path integral is rigorously derived. The transition amplitude is reformulated as the sum, or functional integral, over all possible paths in the constraint surface specified by the (relativistic) Hamiltonian constraint, and each path contributes with a phase identical to the classical action divided by ℏ. The timeless path integral manifests the timeless feature as it is completely independent of the parametrization for paths. For the special case that the Hamiltonian constraint is a quadratic polynomial in momenta, the transition amplitude admits the timeless Feynman's path integral over the (relativistic) configuration space. Meanwhile, the difference between relativistic quantum mechanics and conventional nonrelativistic (with time) quantum mechanics is elaborated on in light of the timeless path integral.
This chapter introduces the path integral formulation of quantum mechanics as a rigorous and systematic alternative to canonical quantization. It begins by defining the transition probability amplitude (propagator) and deriving the path integral by discretizing time and summing over all possible intermediate paths between initial and final spacetime points. The chapter shows the final form of the propagator as a functional integral over all paths, weighted by the exponential of the action. This formulation provides an intuitive understanding that paths near the classical trajectory (which minimizes the action) interfere constructively, dominating the overall amplitude.
We present a consistent and comprehensive treatise on the foundations of the extended Hamilton–Lagrange formalism — where the dynamical system is parametrized along a general system evolution parameter s, and the time t is treated as a dependent variable t(s) on equal footing with all other configuration space variables qi(s). In the action principle, the conventional classical action L1d t is then replaced by the generalized action L1d s, with L and L1denoting the conventional and the extended Lagrangian, respectively. It is shown that a unique correlation of L1and L exists if we refrain from performing simultaneously a transformation of the dynamical variables. With the appropriate correlation of L1and L in place, the extension of the formalism preserves its canonical form. In the extended formalism, the dynamical system is described as a constrained motion within an extended space. We show that the value of the constraint and the parameter s constitutes an additional pair of canonically conjugate variables. In the corresponding quantum system, we thus encounter an additional uncertainty relation. As a consequence of the formal similarity of conventional and extended Hamilton–Lagrange formalisms, Feynman's nonrelativistic path integral approach can be converted on a general level into a form appropriate for relativistic quantum physics. In the emerging parametrized quantum description, the additional uncertainty relation serves as the means to incorporate the constraint and hence to finally eliminate the parametrization. We derive the extended Lagrangian L1of a classical relativistic point particle in an external electromagnetic field and show that the generalized path integral approach yields the Klein–Gordon equation as the corresponding quantum description. We furthermore derive the space–time propagator for a free relativistic particle from its extended Lagrangian L1. These results can be regarded as the proof of principle of the relativistic generalization of Feynman's path integral approach to quantum physics.
The conventional approach to quantum mechanics begins with the classical Hamiltonian and changes observables to noncommuting operators. Canonically conjugate observables have to be noncommuting operators in order to satisfy the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. The dynamics of a quantum mechanical system is given by the time-dependent Schrödinger equation. In the early 1940s Feynman realized that it would be possible to construct a quantum model using the classical Lagrangian approach (a method closely related to the action integral). Dirac had earlier pointed out that eit times the Lagrangian was analogous to a transformation function for the wave function in which the wave function at one instant could be related to the wave function at a next instant in a time interval of t by multiplying with such an exponential function. Feynman found the exponential phase factor to be the action S which is the time integral of the Lagrangian. Further, he noticed that it was necessary to perform integrals over all space variables at every instant of time to find the transition amplitudes. He developed a way for describing and evaluating the integration using the idea of integral over all paths. In Feynman’s approach, the particles are described using amplitudes calculated along the paths they may or may not follow. These amplitudes behave like waves, their phase changes as the quantum system moves along the path and the amplitudes for all paths superpose and interfere. This interference between all paths is called as sum-over-histories and the resulting amplitude is connected in the same way that the amplitude of a wave function is linked to probability as magnitude-squared.
Feynman's Lagrangian path integral was an outgrowth of Dirac's vague surmise that Lagrangians have a role in quantum mechanics. Lagrangians implicitly incorporate Hamilton's first equation of motion, so their use contravenes the uncertainty principle, but they are relevant to semiclassical approximations and relatedly to the ubiquitous case that the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the canonical momenta, which accounts for the Lagrangian path integral's "success". Feynman also invented the Hamiltonian phase-space path integral, which is fully compatible with the uncertainty principle. We recast this as an ordinary functional integral by changing direct integration over subpaths constrained to all have the same two endpoints into an equivalent integration over those subpaths' unconstrained second derivatives. Function expansion with generalized Legendre polynomials of time then enables the functional integral to be unambiguously evaluated through first order in the elapsed time, yielding the Schroedinger equation with a unique quantization of the classical Hamiltonian. Widespread disbelief in that uniqueness stemmed from the mistaken notion that no subpath can have its two endpoints arbitrarily far separated when its nonzero elapsed time is made arbitrarily short. We also obtain the quantum amplitude for any specified configuration or momentum path, which turns out to be an ordinary functional integral over, respectively, all momentum or all configuration paths. The first of these results is directly compared with Feynman's mistaken Lagrangian-action hypothesis for such a configuration path amplitude, with special heed to the case that the Hamiltonian is quadratic in the canonical momenta.
To introduce the formalism of the functional integral in quantum mechanics, this chapter starts from the definition of the temporal evolution operator. It is important to emphasize that in the classical limit is not only the classic trajectory that have the grater contribution, but all the paths close to this also contribute. The chapter shows how integral formulation is perfectly consistent with Schrödinger's time-dependent differential equation. It retrieves this equation from definition of transition amplitude as a path integral. The chapter discusses functional derivative generalized to the case of the ordinary functional derivative. A very useful tool to solve problems related to functional integrals is the Wick rotation or Euclidean rotation. In quantum mechanics there are few problems we can solve exactly, and very often, when possible, we use perturbation theory to find an approximate solution. The chapter follows this approach with formalism of functional integration and construct a perturbation theory from which can be obtained a physical interpretation.
We show that the emergence of time evolution in an otherwise timeless nonrelativistic closed quantum system -- viewed as a poor man's model of generally covariant quantum theory -- can be understood from the perspective of the path integral representation. As often happens in the functional integral approach, this viewpoint offers a more intuitive account of features that become cumbersome in the operator/Hilbert-space formulation. We show how Schrödinger evolution emerges once a clock degree of freedom is identified and placed in a suitable semiclassical `good-clock state'. Our analysis has a consequence that extends to path integral formulations of generally covariant systems with action SSS (including gravity). In such theories certain transition amplitudes take the form exp⁡(iS/ℏ)+exp⁡(−iS/ℏ)\exp(iS/\hbar)+\exp(-iS/\hbar)exp(iS/ℏ)+exp(−iS/ℏ) rather than the expected `forward propagating' exp⁡(iS/ℏ)\exp(iS/\hbar)exp(iS/ℏ). This feature, known as the {\em cosine problem}, appears in concrete regularizations of the path integral, for example in the spin foam representation defining the physical inner product between spin network states in loop quantum gravity. Both formally and in explicit regularizations, this apparent difficulty has led some authors to seek modifications of the basic amplitudes to eliminate backward propagation. Our model shows that the cosine problem is instead a natural consequence of time-reversal invariance of the fundamental dynamics together with the time-neutral boundary states commonly used in transition amplitudes. When a suitable clock system is identified and placed in a semiclassical `good-clock state', it introduces a time arrow selecting the `forward propagating' exp⁡(iS/ℏ)\exp(iS/\hbar)exp(iS/ℏ), without modifying the fundamental dynamics. The analysis clarifies how time emerges under suitable conditions and emphasizes that, in the canonical formulation, quantum gravity is fundamentally timeless.