Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1009.1567 · Nature Communications

Secure device-independent quantum key distribution with causally independent measurement devices

Lluís Masanes, Stefano Pironio, Antonio Acín

Published Mar 15, 2011• 378 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1038/ncomms1244

Related papers

Toward practical measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

최유준, 권오성, 문성욱 +2 more

•Jan 1, 2015•0 citations

No-go theorem for device-independent security in relativistic causal theories

Roberto Salazar, Michał Kamon, Karol Horodecki +4 more

A fundamental question in device-independent quantum cryptography is to determine the minimal physical principle upon which the security of such a cryptographic protocol (such as for key distribution or for randomness generation) may be based. Since the seminal work on device-independent quantum key distribution by J. Barrett, L. Hardy, and A. Kent [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005)], a conjectured candidate for certification of device-independent security has been the principle of relativistic causality, namely the disallowance of causal loops. While this principle has thus far been equated with the no-signaling constraints, it has been shown recently that in multiparty Bell scenarios, the no-signaling constraints are sufficient but not necessary for relativistic causality, and a refined set of constraints has been proposed that more precisely capture the notion of relativistic causality. In this paper, we build upon this finding to show that, in contrast to the no-signaling constraints, the constraints of relativistic causality are not sufficient for certification of device-independent security. More specifically, we show that there exist correlations allowed by the causality principle that allow an adversary to gain complete information about the measurement outcomes of honest parties in any device-independent cryptographic protocol, thereby rendering the protocol completely insecure. As a tool to develop this adversarial attack strategy, we fully characterize the set of correlations allowed by relativistic causality in the tripartite Bell scenario of three parties, each performing two binary measurements, that may be of independent interest. We also demonstrate the difference between the relativistic causal correlations and those allowed by the usual no-signaling constraints by presenting explicit communication tasks wherein the two sets exhibit striking difference in their respective winning probabilities.

arXiv:1712.01030•Physical Review Research•Aug 13, 2021•2 citations

Efficient Device-Independent Quantum Key Distribution

Shih‐Hsuan Chen, Chun-Hao Chang, Chih‐Sung Chuu +1 more

Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) is a key distribution scheme whose security is based on the laws of quantum physics but does not require any assumptions about the devices used in the protocol. The security of the existing entanglement-based DIQKD protocol relies on the Bell test. Here, we propose an efficient device-independent quantum key distribution (EDIQKD) protocol in which one participant prepares states and transmits them to another participant through a quantum channel to measure. In this prepare-and-measure protocol, the transmission process between participants is characterized according to the process tomography for security, ruling out any mimicry using the classical initial, transmission, and final state. Comparing the minimal number of bits of the raw key to guarantee security against collective attacks, the efficiency of the EDIQKD protocol is two orders of magnitude more than that of the DIQKD protocol for the reliable key of which quantum bit error rate is allowed up to 6.5\%. This advantage will enable participants to substantially conserve the entangled pair's demanded resources and the measurement. According to the highest detection efficiency in the recent most advanced photonic experiment, our protocol can be realized with a non-zero key rate and remains more efficient than usual DIQKD. Our protocol and its security analysis may offer helpful insight into identifying the typical prepare-and-measure quantum information tasks with the device-independent scenario.

arXiv:2311.09871•Nov 16, 2023•0 citations

New scheme for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Lian Y. Wang, Yuanyuan Zhou, Xuejun Zhou +2 more

Quantum Information Processing•Jul 27, 2018•2 citations

Stronger attacks on causality-based key agreement

Benno Salwey, Stefan Wolf

Remarkably, it has been shown that in principle, security proofs for quantum key-distribution (QKD) protocols can be independent of assumptions on the devices used and even of the fact that the adversary is limited by quantum theory. All that is required instead is the absence of any hidden information flow between the laboratories, a condition that can be enforced either by shielding or by space-time causality. All known schemes for such Causal Key Distribution (CKD) that offer noise-tolerance (and, hence, must use privacy amplification as a crucial step) require multiple devices carrying out measurements in parallel on each end of the protocol, where the number of devices grows with the desired level of security. We investigate the power of the adversary for more practical schemes, where both parties each use a single device carrying out measurements consecutively. We provide a novel construction of attacks that is strictly more powerful than the best known attacks and has the potential to decide the question whether such practical CKD schemes are possible in the negative.

IEEE International Symposium on Information Theory (ISIT)•Jul 1, 2016•2 citations

Finite-key analysis for measurement-device-independent quantum key distribution

Marcos Curty, Feihu Xu, Wei Cui +3 more

arXiv:1307.1081•Nature Communications•Apr 29, 2014•412 citations
A fundamental question in device-independent quantum cryptography is to determine the minimal physical principle upon which the security of such a cryptographic protocol (such as for key distribution or for randomness generation) may be based. Since the seminal work on device-independent quantum key distribution by J. Barrett, L. Hardy, and A. Kent [Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005)], a conjectured candidate for certification of device-independent security has been the principle of relativistic causality, namely the disallowance of causal loops. While this principle has thus far been equated with the no-signaling constraints, it has been shown recently that in multiparty Bell scenarios, the no-signaling constraints are sufficient but not necessary for relativistic causality, and a refined set of constraints has been proposed that more precisely capture the notion of relativistic causality. In this paper, we build upon this finding to show that, in contrast to the no-signaling constraints, the constraints of relativistic causality are not sufficient for certification of device-independent security. More specifically, we show that there exist correlations allowed by the causality principle that allow an adversary to gain complete information about the measurement outcomes of honest parties in any device-independent cryptographic protocol, thereby rendering the protocol completely insecure. As a tool to develop this adversarial attack strategy, we fully characterize the set of correlations allowed by relativistic causality in the tripartite Bell scenario of three parties, each performing two binary measurements, that may be of independent interest. We also demonstrate the difference between the relativistic causal correlations and those allowed by the usual no-signaling constraints by presenting explicit communication tasks wherein the two sets exhibit striking difference in their respective winning probabilities.
Device-independent quantum key distribution (DIQKD) is a key distribution scheme whose security is based on the laws of quantum physics but does not require any assumptions about the devices used in the protocol. The security of the existing entanglement-based DIQKD protocol relies on the Bell test. Here, we propose an efficient device-independent quantum key distribution (EDIQKD) protocol in which one participant prepares states and transmits them to another participant through a quantum channel to measure. In this prepare-and-measure protocol, the transmission process between participants is characterized according to the process tomography for security, ruling out any mimicry using the classical initial, transmission, and final state. Comparing the minimal number of bits of the raw key to guarantee security against collective attacks, the efficiency of the EDIQKD protocol is two orders of magnitude more than that of the DIQKD protocol for the reliable key of which quantum bit error rate is allowed up to 6.5\%. This advantage will enable participants to substantially conserve the entangled pair's demanded resources and the measurement. According to the highest detection efficiency in the recent most advanced photonic experiment, our protocol can be realized with a non-zero key rate and remains more efficient than usual DIQKD. Our protocol and its security analysis may offer helpful insight into identifying the typical prepare-and-measure quantum information tasks with the device-independent scenario.
Remarkably, it has been shown that in principle, security proofs for quantum key-distribution (QKD) protocols can be independent of assumptions on the devices used and even of the fact that the adversary is limited by quantum theory. All that is required instead is the absence of any hidden information flow between the laboratories, a condition that can be enforced either by shielding or by space-time causality. All known schemes for such Causal Key Distribution (CKD) that offer noise-tolerance (and, hence, must use privacy amplification as a crucial step) require multiple devices carrying out measurements in parallel on each end of the protocol, where the number of devices grows with the desired level of security. We investigate the power of the adversary for more practical schemes, where both parties each use a single device carrying out measurements consecutively. We provide a novel construction of attacks that is strictly more powerful than the best known attacks and has the potential to decide the question whether such practical CKD schemes are possible in the negative.