Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1008.2904 · Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics

The Kantian framework of complementarity

Michael E. Cuffaro

Published Jun 14, 2010• 18 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.shpsb.2010.04.003

Related papers

Old Wine Enriched in New Bottles: Kantian Flavors in Bohr's Viewpoint of Complementarity

Steen Brock

The Western Ontario series in philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2009•4 citations

A Philosophical-Historical Analysis of Complementarity

Makoto Katsumori

Boston studies in the philosophy of science•Jan 1, 2011•0 citations

Complementarity, Bell’s Theorem, and the Framework of Process Metaphysics

Henry J. Folse

Process Studies•Jan 1, 1981•5 citations

Extending the Philosophical Significance of the Idea of Complementarity

Peter beim Graben, Harald Atmanspacher A

Springer eBooks•Sep 19, 2008•26 citations

Grete Hermann’s Transformation of Neo-Kantianism: From Quantum Physics to Ethics

Andrea Reichenberger

Grete Hermann’s philosophical work on the foundations of quantum mechanics has recently received increased attention and appreciation. This includes her critique of John von Neumann’s “no hidden variables” proof and her neo-Kantian considerations on causality. I argue that Hermann, who was a German mathematician, physicist, and philosopher, took a critical view of Leonard Nelson’s interpretation of Kant. Her aim was to challenge Nelson’s dogmatism through her interpretation of quantum physics. Support for this thesis can be found in her interpretation of Bohr’s complementarity principle and her criticism of Heisenberg’s cut and von Neumann’s proof of the impossibility of hidden variables. Over the years, Hermann progressively distanced herself from Nelson, adopting a more liberal and democratic interpretation of Kant, and became a committed advocate of research ethics and responsibility in science and politics.

HOPOS The Journal of the International Society for the History of Philosophy of Science•Oct 24, 2025•0 citations

Complementarity and Philosophy

T. Bergstein

Nature•Jun 1, 1969•3 citations
Grete Hermann’s philosophical work on the foundations of quantum mechanics has recently received increased attention and appreciation. This includes her critique of John von Neumann’s “no hidden variables” proof and her neo-Kantian considerations on causality. I argue that Hermann, who was a German mathematician, physicist, and philosopher, took a critical view of Leonard Nelson’s interpretation of Kant. Her aim was to challenge Nelson’s dogmatism through her interpretation of quantum physics. Support for this thesis can be found in her interpretation of Bohr’s complementarity principle and her criticism of Heisenberg’s cut and von Neumann’s proof of the impossibility of hidden variables. Over the years, Hermann progressively distanced herself from Nelson, adopting a more liberal and democratic interpretation of Kant, and became a committed advocate of research ethics and responsibility in science and politics.