Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1008.0283 · Physics Essays

Classical system boundaries cannot be determined within quantum Darwinism

Chris Fields

Published Dec 1, 2011• 19 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Multiple observers who interact with environmental encodings of the states of a macroscopic quantum system S as required by quantum Darwinism cannot demonstrate that they are jointly observing S without a joint a priori assumption of a classical boundary separating S from its environment E. Quantum Darwinism cannot, therefore, be regarded as providing a purely quantum-mechanical explanation of the "emergence" of classicality.

DOI
10.4006/1.3644391

Related papers

Strong Quantum Darwinism and Strong Independence are Equivalent to Spectrum Broadcast Structure

Thao P. Le, Alexandra Olaya-Castro

How the objective everyday world emerges from the underlying quantum behavior of its microscopic constituents is an open question at the heart of the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure are two different frameworks providing key insight into this question. Recent works, however, indicate these two frameworks can lead to conflicting predictions on the objectivity of the state of a system interacting with an environment. Here, we provide a resolution to this issue by defining strong quantum Darwinism and proving that it is equivalent to spectrum broadcast structure when combined with strong independence of the subenvironments. We further show that strong quantum Darwinism is sufficient and necessary to signal state objectivity without the requirement of strong independence. Our Letter unveils the deep connection between strong quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure, thereby making fundamental progress toward understanding and solving the emergence of classicality from the quantum world. Together they provide us a sharper understanding of the transition in terms of state structure, geometry, and quantum and classical information.

arXiv:1803.08936•Physical Review Letters•Jan 8, 2019•65 citations

Quantum Darwinism

Wojciech H [Los Alamos National Laboratory] Zurek

Quantum Darwinism - proliferation, in the environment, of multiple records of selected states of the system (its information-theoretic progeny) - explains how quantum fragility of individual state can lead to classical robustness of their multitude.

•Feb 2, 2024•0 citations

Quantum Darwinism: Environment as a Witness

Wojciech Hubert Zurek

The aim in Chapter 7 is to take into account the role of the means of information transmission on the nature of the states that can be perceived. Our point of departure is the recognition that the information we obtain is acquired by observers who monitor fragments of the same environment that decohered the system, einselecting preferred pointer states in the process. Moreover, we only intercept a fraction of the environment. The only information about the system that can be transmitted by its fraction must have been reproduced in many copies in that environment. This process of amplification limits what can be found out to the states einselected by decoherence. Quantum Darwinism provides a simple and natural explanation of this restriction, and, hence, of the objective existence—the essence of classicality—for the einselected states. This chapter introduces and develops information-theoretic tools and concepts (including, e.g., redundancy) that allow one to explore and characterize correlations and information flows between systems, environments, and observers, and illustrates them on an exactly solvable yet non-trivial model.

Cambridge University Press eBooks•Mar 6, 2025•0 citations

Redundancy Is Not Objectivity: Quantum Darwinism, Branch Objectivity, and Phase Recoverability in The Many-Worlds Interpretation

Oltan Cankat Riordan

This paper examines the role of Quantum Darwinism in explaining the emergence of classical objectivity within The Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics. Decoherence explains why macroscopically distinct alternatives become practically inaccessible to local observers, but it does not by itself explain why multiple observers can independently agree on the same classical state. Quantum Darwinism strengthens this account by describing how information about stable pointer states becomes redundantly encoded in environmental fragments. However, this paper argues that redundancy is necessary for objectivity but not enough to explain objectivity. A simple qubit test model implemented in Qiskit is used to demonstrate redundant environmental coding. The discussion connects this claim to Strong Quantum Darwinism, Spectrum Broadcast Structure, and Quantum Discord, which sharpen the distinction between mere correlation and objective classical records. Finally, this paper proposes phase anti-redundancy as a future direction; While pointer state information becomes locally redundant, cross-branch phase information appears to remain globally encoded and increasingly difficult to recover. This suggests that branch objectivity may require not only redundant classical records, but also the fact that cross-branch phase information is encoded in global correlations rather than in locally accessible environmental fragments.

•Aug 14, 2026•0 citations

Quantum physical systems as classical systems

Antonio Cassa

A physical system showing a classical (deterministic) behavior to an observer can appear to be a quantum system to another observer unable to distinguish between some distinct states.

arXiv:quant-ph/0111070•Journal of Mathematical Physics•Nov 1, 2001•3 citations

Quantum Darwinism, classical reality, and the randomness of quantum jumps

Wojciech H. Zurek

The core principles that underlie quantum weirdness also explain why only selected quantum states survive monitoring by the environment and, as a result, why we experience our world as classical.

arXiv:1412.5206•Physics Today•Oct 1, 2014•91 citations
Multiple observers who interact with environmental encodings of the states of a macroscopic quantum system S as required by quantum Darwinism cannot demonstrate that they are jointly observing S without a joint a priori assumption of a classical boundary separating S from its environment E. Quantum Darwinism cannot, therefore, be regarded as providing a purely quantum-mechanical explanation of the "emergence" of classicality.
How the objective everyday world emerges from the underlying quantum behavior of its microscopic constituents is an open question at the heart of the foundations of quantum mechanics. Quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure are two different frameworks providing key insight into this question. Recent works, however, indicate these two frameworks can lead to conflicting predictions on the objectivity of the state of a system interacting with an environment. Here, we provide a resolution to this issue by defining strong quantum Darwinism and proving that it is equivalent to spectrum broadcast structure when combined with strong independence of the subenvironments. We further show that strong quantum Darwinism is sufficient and necessary to signal state objectivity without the requirement of strong independence. Our Letter unveils the deep connection between strong quantum Darwinism and spectrum broadcast structure, thereby making fundamental progress toward understanding and solving the emergence of classicality from the quantum world. Together they provide us a sharper understanding of the transition in terms of state structure, geometry, and quantum and classical information.
The aim in Chapter 7 is to take into account the role of the means of information transmission on the nature of the states that can be perceived. Our point of departure is the recognition that the information we obtain is acquired by observers who monitor fragments of the same environment that decohered the system, einselecting preferred pointer states in the process. Moreover, we only intercept a fraction of the environment. The only information about the system that can be transmitted by its fraction must have been reproduced in many copies in that environment. This process of amplification limits what can be found out to the states einselected by decoherence. Quantum Darwinism provides a simple and natural explanation of this restriction, and, hence, of the objective existence—the essence of classicality—for the einselected states. This chapter introduces and develops information-theoretic tools and concepts (including, e.g., redundancy) that allow one to explore and characterize correlations and information flows between systems, environments, and observers, and illustrates them on an exactly solvable yet non-trivial model.
This paper examines the role of Quantum Darwinism in explaining the emergence of classical objectivity within The Many-Worlds Interpretation of quantum mechanics. Decoherence explains why macroscopically distinct alternatives become practically inaccessible to local observers, but it does not by itself explain why multiple observers can independently agree on the same classical state. Quantum Darwinism strengthens this account by describing how information about stable pointer states becomes redundantly encoded in environmental fragments. However, this paper argues that redundancy is necessary for objectivity but not enough to explain objectivity. A simple qubit test model implemented in Qiskit is used to demonstrate redundant environmental coding. The discussion connects this claim to Strong Quantum Darwinism, Spectrum Broadcast Structure, and Quantum Discord, which sharpen the distinction between mere correlation and objective classical records. Finally, this paper proposes phase anti-redundancy as a future direction; While pointer state information becomes locally redundant, cross-branch phase information appears to remain globally encoded and increasingly difficult to recover. This suggests that branch objectivity may require not only redundant classical records, but also the fact that cross-branch phase information is encoded in global correlations rather than in locally accessible environmental fragments.