Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1007.4992 · Journal of Physics A Mathematical and Theoretical

Local randomness in Hardy's correlations: implications from the information causality principle

Md. Rajjak Gazi, Ashutosh Rai, Samir Kunkri, Ramij Rahaman

Published Oct 22, 2010• 8 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Study of non-local correlations in terms of Hardy's argument has been quite popular in quantum mechanics. Hardy's non-locality argument depends on some kind of asymmetry, but a two-qubit maximally entangled state, being symmetric, does not exhibit this kind of non-locality. Here we ask the following question: can this feature be explained by some principle outside quantum mechanics? The no-signaling condition does not provide a solution. But, interestingly, the information causality principle (Pawlowski et al 2009 Nature 461 1101) offers an explanation. It shows that any generalized probability theory which gives completely random results for local dichotomic observable, cannot provide Hardy's non-local correlation if it is restricted by a necessary condition for respecting the information causality principle. In fact, the applied necessary condition imposes even more restrictions on the local randomness of measured observable. Still, there are some restrictions imposed by quantum mechanics that are not reproduced from the considered information causality condition.

DOI
10.1088/1751-8113/43/45/452001

Related papers

Bound on Hardy’s nonlocality from the principle of information causality

Ali Ahanj, Samir Kunkri, Ashutosh Rai +2 more

Recently, the principle of nonviolation of information causality [Nature 461, 1101 (2009)] has been proposed as one of the foundational properties of nature. We explore the Hardy's nonlocality theorem for two-qubit systems, in the context of generalized probability theory, restricted by the principle of nonviolation of information causality. Applying a sufficient condition for information causality violation, we derive an upper bound on the maximum success probability of Hardy's nonlocality argument. We find that the bound achieved here is higher than that allowed by quantum mechanics but still much less than what the no-signaling condition permits. We also study the Cabello type nonlocality argument (a generalization of Hardy's argument) in this context.

arXiv:0912.2232•Physical Review A•Mar 4, 2010•24 citations

Maximally Nonlocal Theories Cannot Be Maximally Random

Gonzalo de la Torre, Matty J. Hoban, Chirag Dhara +2 more

Correlations that violate a Bell inequality are said to be nonlocal; i.e., they do not admit a local and deterministic explanation. Great effort has been devoted to study how the amount of nonlocality (as measured by a Bell inequality violation) serves to quantify the amount of randomness present in observed correlations. In this work we reverse this research program and ask what do the randomness certification capabilities of a theory tell us about the nonlocality of that theory. We find that, contrary to initial intuition, maximal randomness certification cannot occur in maximally nonlocal theories. We go on and show that quantum theory, in contrast, permits certification of maximal randomness in all dichotomic scenarios. We hence pose the question of whether quantum theory is optimal for randomness; i.e., is it the most nonlocal theory that allows maximal randomness certification? We answer this question in the negative by identifying a larger-than-quantum set of correlations capable of this feat. Not only are these results relevant to understanding quantum mechanics' fundamental features, but also put fundamental restrictions on device-independent protocols based on the no-signaling principle.

arXiv:1403.3357•Physical Review Letters•Apr 22, 2015•49 citations

Local orthogonality provides a tight upper bound for Hardy's nonlocality

Subhadipa Das, Manik Banik, Md. Rajjak Gazi +2 more

The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics, viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not very successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that a recently proposed physical principle, namely local orthogonality, does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.

arXiv:1311.3710•Physical Review A•Dec 2, 2013•8 citations

Hardy’s non-locality in four-qubit state

Urjjarani Patel, K. V. S. Shiv Chaitanya

Hardy’s non-locality provides a proof of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and local realism without using Bell inequalities. While this argument has been extensively studied for two- and three-qubit systems, a detailed analysis of the four-qubit case is still lacking. In this work, we investigate Hardy’s non-locality for a four-qubit system within the standard two-setting framework. We explicitly construct the entangled state satisfying the Hardy conditions and determine the measurement settings that maximize the success probability. • We present an explicit analytical construction of a four-qubit Hardy state together with the corresponding projective measurement settings. • The maximum Hardy success probability for four qubits is found to be 0.143, exceeding the values obtained in the two- and three-qubit cases. • The resulting state is non-maximally entangled and exhibits genuine multipartite quantum correlations.

Results in Physics•Feb 3, 2026•1 citation

The Cabello Nonlocal Argument is Stronger Control than the Hardy Nonlocal Argument for Detecting Post-Quantum Correlations

Ali Ahanj

In this paper, we study the Hardy nonlocal argument (HNA) and the Cabello nonlocal argument (CNA) under the Information Causality, Macroscopic Locality and Local Orthogonality principles in the context of Local Randomness. We see that, in the context of all the possibilities of local randomness, the gap between the quantum mechanics and the above principles, in the Cabello's nonlocality argument is larger than the Hardy's case. Therefore the CNA is stronger control than the HNA for detecting post-quantum nosignalling correlations.

arXiv:1701.06052•Jan 21, 2017•0 citations

Genuine Randomness vis-a-vis Nonlocality: Hardy and Hardy type Relations.

Souradeep Sasmal, Sayan Gangopadhyay, Ashutosh Rai +2 more

We explore the relationship between randomness and nonlocality based on arguments which demonstrate nonlocality without requiring Bell-type inequalities, such as using Hardy relations and its variant like Cabello-Liang (CL) relations. We first clarify the way these relations enable certification of Genuine Randomness (GR) based on the No-signalling principle. Subsequently, corresponding to a given amount of nonlocality, using the relevant quantifier of GR, we demonstrate the following results: (a) We show that in the 2-2-2 scenario, it is possible to achieve close to the theoretical maximum value of 2 bits amount of GR using CL relations. Importantly, this maximum value is achieved using pure non-maximally entangled states for the measurement settings entailing small amount of nonlocality. Thus, this illustrates quantitative incommensurability between maximum achievable certified randomness, nonlocality and entanglement in the same testable context. (b) We also obtain the device-independent guaranteed amount of GR based on Hardy and CL relations, taking into account the effect of varying preparation procedure which is necessary for ensuring the desired security in this case against adversarial guessing attack. This result is compared with that obtained earlier for the Bell-CHSH case. We find that the monotonicity between such guaranteed randomness and nonlocality persists for the Hardy/CL like for Bell-CHSH inequality, thereby showing commensurability between guaranteed randomness and nonlocality, in contrast to the case of maximum achievable randomness. The results of this combined study of maximum achievable as well as guaranteed amounts of GR, obtained for both fixed and varying preparation procedures, demonstrate that the nature of quantitative relationship between randomness and nonlocality is crucially dependent on which aspect (guaranteed/maximum amount) of GR is considered.

•Nov 25, 2020•1 citation
Study of non-local correlations in terms of Hardy's argument has been quite popular in quantum mechanics. Hardy's non-locality argument depends on some kind of asymmetry, but a two-qubit maximally entangled state, being symmetric, does not exhibit this kind of non-locality. Here we ask the following question: can this feature be explained by some principle outside quantum mechanics? The no-signaling condition does not provide a solution. But, interestingly, the information causality principle (Pawlowski et al 2009 Nature 461 1101) offers an explanation. It shows that any generalized probability theory which gives completely random results for local dichotomic observable, cannot provide Hardy's non-local correlation if it is restricted by a necessary condition for respecting the information causality principle. In fact, the applied necessary condition imposes even more restrictions on the local randomness of measured observable. Still, there are some restrictions imposed by quantum mechanics that are not reproduced from the considered information causality condition.
Recently, the principle of nonviolation of information causality [Nature 461, 1101 (2009)] has been proposed as one of the foundational properties of nature. We explore the Hardy's nonlocality theorem for two-qubit systems, in the context of generalized probability theory, restricted by the principle of nonviolation of information causality. Applying a sufficient condition for information causality violation, we derive an upper bound on the maximum success probability of Hardy's nonlocality argument. We find that the bound achieved here is higher than that allowed by quantum mechanics but still much less than what the no-signaling condition permits. We also study the Cabello type nonlocality argument (a generalization of Hardy's argument) in this context.
Correlations that violate a Bell inequality are said to be nonlocal; i.e., they do not admit a local and deterministic explanation. Great effort has been devoted to study how the amount of nonlocality (as measured by a Bell inequality violation) serves to quantify the amount of randomness present in observed correlations. In this work we reverse this research program and ask what do the randomness certification capabilities of a theory tell us about the nonlocality of that theory. We find that, contrary to initial intuition, maximal randomness certification cannot occur in maximally nonlocal theories. We go on and show that quantum theory, in contrast, permits certification of maximal randomness in all dichotomic scenarios. We hence pose the question of whether quantum theory is optimal for randomness; i.e., is it the most nonlocal theory that allows maximal randomness certification? We answer this question in the negative by identifying a larger-than-quantum set of correlations capable of this feat. Not only are these results relevant to understanding quantum mechanics' fundamental features, but also put fundamental restrictions on device-independent protocols based on the no-signaling principle.
The amount of nonlocality in quantum theory is limited compared to that allowed in generalized no-signaling theory [S. Popescu and D. Rohrlich, Found. Phys. 24, 379 (1994)]. This feature, for example, gets manifested in the amount of Bell inequality violation as well as in the degree of success probability of Hardy's (Cabello's) nonlocality argument. Physical principles like information causality and macroscopic locality have been proposed for analyzing restricted nonlocality in quantum mechanics, viz. explaining the Cirel'son bound. However, these principles are not very successful in explaining the maximum success probability of Hardy's as well as Cabello's argument in quantum theory. Here we show that a recently proposed physical principle, namely local orthogonality, does better by providing a tighter upper bound on the success probability for Hardy's nonlocality. This bound is relatively closer to the corresponding quantum value compared to the bounds achieved from other principles.
Hardy’s non-locality provides a proof of the incompatibility between quantum mechanics and local realism without using Bell inequalities. While this argument has been extensively studied for two- and three-qubit systems, a detailed analysis of the four-qubit case is still lacking. In this work, we investigate Hardy’s non-locality for a four-qubit system within the standard two-setting framework. We explicitly construct the entangled state satisfying the Hardy conditions and determine the measurement settings that maximize the success probability. • We present an explicit analytical construction of a four-qubit Hardy state together with the corresponding projective measurement settings. • The maximum Hardy success probability for four qubits is found to be 0.143, exceeding the values obtained in the two- and three-qubit cases. • The resulting state is non-maximally entangled and exhibits genuine multipartite quantum correlations.
In this paper, we study the Hardy nonlocal argument (HNA) and the Cabello nonlocal argument (CNA) under the Information Causality, Macroscopic Locality and Local Orthogonality principles in the context of Local Randomness. We see that, in the context of all the possibilities of local randomness, the gap between the quantum mechanics and the above principles, in the Cabello's nonlocality argument is larger than the Hardy's case. Therefore the CNA is stronger control than the HNA for detecting post-quantum nosignalling correlations.
We explore the relationship between randomness and nonlocality based on arguments which demonstrate nonlocality without requiring Bell-type inequalities, such as using Hardy relations and its variant like Cabello-Liang (CL) relations. We first clarify the way these relations enable certification of Genuine Randomness (GR) based on the No-signalling principle. Subsequently, corresponding to a given amount of nonlocality, using the relevant quantifier of GR, we demonstrate the following results: (a) We show that in the 2-2-2 scenario, it is possible to achieve close to the theoretical maximum value of 2 bits amount of GR using CL relations. Importantly, this maximum value is achieved using pure non-maximally entangled states for the measurement settings entailing small amount of nonlocality. Thus, this illustrates quantitative incommensurability between maximum achievable certified randomness, nonlocality and entanglement in the same testable context. (b) We also obtain the device-independent guaranteed amount of GR based on Hardy and CL relations, taking into account the effect of varying preparation procedure which is necessary for ensuring the desired security in this case against adversarial guessing attack. This result is compared with that obtained earlier for the Bell-CHSH case. We find that the monotonicity between such guaranteed randomness and nonlocality persists for the Hardy/CL like for Bell-CHSH inequality, thereby showing commensurability between guaranteed randomness and nonlocality, in contrast to the case of maximum achievable randomness. The results of this combined study of maximum achievable as well as guaranteed amounts of GR, obtained for both fixed and varying preparation procedures, demonstrate that the nature of quantitative relationship between randomness and nonlocality is crucially dependent on which aspect (guaranteed/maximum amount) of GR is considered.