Genuine Randomness vis-a-vis Nonlocality: Hardy and Hardy type Relations.

Souradeep Sasmal, Sayan Gangopadhyay, Ashutosh Rai, Dipankar Home, Urbasi Sinha

Published Nov 25, 2020• 1 citation

Abstract

We explore the relationship between randomness and nonlocality based on arguments which demonstrate nonlocality without requiring Bell-type inequalities, such as using Hardy relations and its variant like Cabello-Liang (CL) relations. We first clarify the way these relations enable certification of Genuine Randomness (GR) based on the No-signalling principle. Subsequently, corresponding to a given amount of nonlocality, using the relevant quantifier of GR, we demonstrate the following results: (a) We show that in the 2-2-2 scenario, it is possible to achieve close to the theoretical maximum value of 2 bits amount of GR using CL relations. Importantly, this maximum value is achieved using pure non-maximally entangled states for the measurement settings entailing small amount of nonlocality. Thus, this illustrates quantitative incommensurability between maximum achievable certified randomness, nonlocality and entanglement in the same testable context. (b) We also obtain the device-independent guaranteed amount of GR based on Hardy and CL relations, taking into account the effect of varying preparation procedure which is necessary for ensuring the desired security in this case against adversarial guessing attack. This result is compared with that obtained earlier for the Bell-CHSH case. We find that the monotonicity between such guaranteed randomness and nonlocality persists for the Hardy/CL like for Bell-CHSH inequality, thereby showing commensurability between guaranteed randomness and nonlocality, in contrast to the case of maximum achievable randomness. The results of this combined study of maximum achievable as well as guaranteed amounts of GR, obtained for both fixed and varying preparation procedures, demonstrate that the nature of quantitative relationship between randomness and nonlocality is crucially dependent on which aspect (guaranteed/maximum amount) of GR is considered.

Related papers

Revealing incommensurability between device-independent randomness, nonlocality, and entanglement using Hardy and Hardy-type relations

Souradeep Sasmal, Ashutosh Rai, Sayan Gangopadhyay +2 more

Abstract A comprehensive treatment of the quantification of randomness certified device-independently by using the Hardy and Cabello-Liang-Li (CLL) nonlocality relations is provided in the two parties-two measurements per party-two outcomes per measurement (2-2-2) scenario. For the Hardy nonlocality, it is revealed that for a given amount of nonlocality signified by a particular non-zero value of the Hardy parameter, the amount of Hardy-certifiable randomness is not unique, unlike the way the amount of certifiable randomness is related to the CHSH nonlocality. This is because any specified non-maximal value of Hardy nonlocality parameter characterises a set of quantum extremal distributions. Then this leads to a range of certifiable amounts of randomness corresponding to a given Hardy parameter. On the other hand, for a given amount of CLL-nonlocality, the certifiable randomness is unique, similar to that for the CHSH nonlocality. Furthermore, the tightness of our analytical treatment evaluating the respective guaranteed bounds for the Hardy and CLL relations is demonstrated by their exact agreement with the Semi-Definite-Programming based computed bounds. Interestingly, the analytically evaluated maximum achievable bounds of both Hardy and CLL-certified randomness have been found to be realisable for non-maximal values of the Hardy and CLL nonlocality parameters. In particular, we have shown that even close to the maximum 2 bits of CLL-certified randomness can be realised from non-maximally entangled pure two-qubit states corresponding to small values of the CLL nonlocal parameter. This, therefore, clearly illustrates the quantitative incommensurability between randomness, nonlocality and entanglement.

arXiv:2011.12518Physica ScriptaJan 31, 20243 citations

Self-testing of nonmaximal genuine entangled states using tripartite Hardy relations

Ranendu Adhikary, Souradeep Sasmal, Arup Roy

We demonstrate that, in the tripartite scenario with all parties' local events being space-like separated, Hardy-type nonlocality reveals a stronger nonlocal correlation than those captured by Mermin-type inequalities, an important distinction previously unrecognized. To substantiate this assertion, we develop a general framework for tripartite correlations by extending the notion of Settings Independence and Outcome Independence beyond their bipartite formulation. This framework highlights the pivotal role of Hardy-type reasoning in detecting genuine multipartite nonlocality. Furthermore, we show that the tripartite Hardy-nonlocality enables self-testing of a broad class of pure nonmaximally genuine entangled tripartite states, offering a key advantage over Bell inequality-based methods by allowing certification even under nonmaximal violations. Unlike Bell functionals, which typically self-test only a single extremal point, the Hardy relation self-tests a set of extremal correlations for any nonzero Hardy probability. This, in turn, facilitates the device-independent certification of randomness from Hardy-type correlations. We find that the maximum certifiable randomness is ${log}_{2}7\ensuremath{\approx}2.8073$-bits, highlighting both the practical and foundational significance of Hardy-based techniques for quantum randomness generation.

arXiv:2504.19491Physical Review AJul 8, 20251 citation

Entangled systems are unbounded sources of nonlocal correlations and of certified random numbers

Florian J. Curchod, Markus Johansson, Remigiusz Augusiak +3 more

The outcomes of local measurements made on entangled systems can be certified to be random provided that the generated statistics violate a Bell inequality. This way of producing randomness relies only on a minimal set of assumptions because it is independent of the internal functioning of the devices generating the random outcomes. In this context it is crucial to understand both qualitatively and quantitatively how the three fundamental quantities -- entanglement, non-locality and randomness -- relate to each other. To explore these relationships, we consider the case where repeated (non projective) measurements are made on the physical systems, each measurement being made on the post-measurement state of the previous measurement. In this work, we focus on the following questions: For systems in a given entangled state, how many nonlocal correlations in a sequence can we obtain by measuring them repeatedly? And from this generated sequence of non-local correlations, how many random numbers is it possible to certify? In the standard scenario with a single measurement in the sequence, it is possible to generate non-local correlations between two distant observers only and the amount of random numbers is very limited. Here we show that we can overcome these limitations and obtain any amount of certified random numbers from an entangled pair of qubit in a pure state by making sequences of measurements on it. Moreover, the state can be arbitrarily weakly entangled. In addition, this certification is achieved by near-maximal violation of a particular Bell inequality for each measurement in the sequence. We also present numerical results giving insight on the resistance to imperfections and on the importance of the strength of the measurements in our scheme.

arXiv:1802.07962Feb 22, 20181 citation

Tight Analytic Bound on the Trade-Off between Device-Independent Randomness and Nonlocality

Lewis Wooltorton, Peter J. Brown, Roger Colbeck

Two parties sharing entangled quantum systems can generate correlations that cannot be produced using only shared classical resources. These nonlocal correlations are a fundamental feature of quantum theory but also have practical applications. For instance, they can be used for device-independent random number generation, whose security is certified independently of the operations performed inside the devices. The amount of certifiable randomness that can be generated from some given nonlocal correlations is a key quantity of interest. Here, we derive tight analytic bounds on the maximum certifiable randomness as a function of the nonlocality as expressed using the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) value. We show that for every CHSH value greater than the local value (2) and up to 3sqrt[3]/2≈2.598 there exist quantum correlations with that CHSH value that certify a maximal two bits of global randomness. Beyond this CHSH value the maximum certifiable randomness drops. We give a second family of Bell inequalities for CHSH values above 3sqrt[3]/2, and show that they certify the maximum possible randomness for the given CHSH value. Our work hence provides an achievable upper bound on the amount of randomness that can be certified for any CHSH value. We illustrate the robustness of our results, and how they could be used to improve randomness generation rates in practice, using a Werner state noise model.

arXiv:2205.00124Physical Review LettersOct 5, 202233 citations

A Single Entangled System Is an Unbounded Source of Nonlocal Correlations and of Certified Random Numbers

Florian J. Curchod, Markus Johansson, Remigiusz Augusiak +3 more

The outcomes of local measurements made on entangled systems can be certified to be random provided that the generated statistics violate a Bell inequality. This way of producing randomness relies only on a minimal set of assumptions because it is independent of the internal functioning of the devices generating the random outcomes. In this context it is crucial to understand both qualitatively and quantitatively how the three fundamental quantities – entanglement, non-locality and randomness – relate to each other. To explore these relationships, we consider the case where repeated (non projective) measurements are made on the physical systems, each measurement being made on the post-measurement state of the previous measurement. In this work, we focus on the following questions: Given a single entangled system, how many nonlocal correlations in a sequence can we obtain? And from this single entangled system, how many certified random numbers is it possible to generate? In the standard scenario with a single measurement in the sequence, it is possible to generate non-local correlations between two distant observers only and the amount of random numbers is very limited. Here we show that we can overcome these limitations and obtain any amount of certified random numbers from a single entangled pair of qubit in a pure state by making sequences of measurements on it. Moreover, the state can be arbitrarily weakly entangled. In addition, this certification is achieved by near-maximal violation of a particular Bell inequality for each measurement in the sequence. We also present numerical results giving insight on the resistance to imperfections and on the importance of the strength of the measurements in our scheme.

Leibniz international proceedings in informaticsJan 1, 20181 citation

Randomness versus Nonlocality and Entanglement

Antonio Acín, Serge Massar, Stefano Pironio

The outcomes obtained in Bell tests involving two-outcome measurements on two subsystems can, in principle, generate up to 2 bits of randomness. However, the maximal violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt inequality guarantees the generation of only 1.23 bits of randomness. We prove here that quantum correlations with arbitrarily little nonlocality and states with arbitrarily little entanglement can be used to certify that close to the maximum of 2 bits of randomness are produced. Our results show that nonlocality, entanglement, and randomness are inequivalent quantities. They also imply that device-independent quantum key distribution with an optimal key generation rate is possible by using almost-local correlations and that device-independent randomness generation with an optimal rate is possible with almost-local correlations and with almost-unentangled states.

arXiv:1107.2754Physical Review LettersMar 9, 2012322 citations