Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1006.1313 · Physical Review A

Discrimination strategies for inequivalent classes of multipartite entangled states

Sönke Niekamp, Matthias Kleinmann, Otfried Gühne

Published Aug 19, 2010• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

How can one discriminate different inequivalent classes of multiparticle entanglement experimentally? We present an approach for the discrimination of an experimentally prepared state from the equivalence class of another state. We consider two possible measures for the discrimination strength of an observable. The first measure is based on the difference of expectation values, the second on the relative entropy of the probability distributions of the measurement outcomes. The interpretation of these measures and their usefulness for experiments with limited resources are discussed. In the case of graph states, the stabilizer formalism is employed to compute these quantities and to find sets of observables that result in the most decisive discrimination.

DOI
10.1103/physreva.82.022322

Related papers

Entanglement of multiparty-stabilizer, symmetric, and antisymmetric states

Masahito Hayashi, Damian Markham, Mio Murao +2 more

We study various distancelike entanglement measures of multipartite states under certain symmetries. Using group averaging techniques we provide conditions under which the relative entropy of entanglement, the geometric measure of entanglement, and the logarithmic robustness are equivalent. We consider important classes of multiparty states, and in particular show that these measures are equivalent for all stabilizer states, symmetric basis and antisymmetric basis states. We rigorously prove a conjecture that the closest product state of permutation symmetric states can always be chosen to be permutation symmetric. This allows us to calculate the explicit values of various entanglement measures for symmetric and antisymmetric basis states, observing that antisymmetric states are generally more entangled. We use these results to obtain a variety of interesting ensembles of quantum states for which the optimal local operations and classical communication discrimination probability may be explicitly determined and achieved. We also discuss applications to the construction of optimal entanglement witnesses.

arXiv:0710.1056•Physical Review A•Jan 15, 2008•91 citations

Optimal sequential measurements for bipartite state discrimination

Sarah Croke, Stephen Mark Barnett, Graeme Weir

State discrimination is a useful test problem with which to clarify the power and limitations of different classes of measurement. We consider the problem of discriminating between given states of a bipartite quantum system via sequential measurement of the subsystems, with classical feed-forward of measurement results. Our aim is to understand when sequential measurements, which are relatively easy to implement experimentally, perform as well, or almost as well, as optimal joint measurements, which are in general more technologically challenging. We construct conditions that the optimal sequential measurement must satisfy, analogous to the well-known Helstrom conditions for minimum error discrimination in the unrestricted case. We give several examples and compare the optimal probability of correctly identifying the state via global versus sequential measurement strategies.

arXiv:1704.01409•Physical Review A•May 3, 2017•18 citations

Local State Discrimination and Ordering of Multipartite Entangled States

Sumit Rout, Ananda G. Maity, Amit Mukherjee +2 more

Local operations assisted with classical communication (LOCC) and/or its stochastic generalization induce an ordering relation among bipartite entangled states based on their inter-convertibility. This, in multipartite scenario, leads to different classes of entanglement where states within a class can be inter-converted but conversion among different classes is not possible, and thus results in incomparable multipartite entangled resources. Here we show that a bona-fide ordering relation, under the operational paradigm of LOCC, can be established between two such incomparable states based on their performance in some operational task. Entanglement assisted local state discrimination provides one such platform for resource comparison and the notion of genuinely nonlocal product states becomes quite pertinent in this regard. We provide the detailed framework along with explicit examples exhibiting how incomparable resources can be put into well defined ordered relation.

•Oct 31, 2019•1 citation

Minimal-error quantum state discrimination versus robustness of entanglement: More indistinguishability with less entanglement

Debarupa Saha, Kornikar Sen, Chirag Srivastava +1 more

We relate the the distinguishability of quantum states with their robustness of the entanglement, where the robustness of any resource quantifies how tolerant it is to noise. In particular, we identify upper and lower bounds on the probability of discriminating the states, appearing in an arbitrary multiparty ensemble, in terms of their robustness of entanglement and the probability of discriminating states of the closest separable ensemble. These bounds hold true, irrespective of the dimension of the constituent systems the number of parties involved, the size of the ensemble, and whether the measurement strategies are local or global. Additional lower bounds on the same quantity is determined by considering two special cases of two-state multiparty ensembles, either having equal entanglement or at least one of them being separable. The case of equal entanglement reveals that it is always easier to discriminate the entangled states than the ones in the corresponding closest separable ensemble, a phenomenon which we refer as "More indistinguishability with less entanglement". Furthermore, we numerically explore how tight the bounds are by examining the global discrimination probability of states selected from Haar-uniformly generated ensembles of two two-qubit states. We find that for two-element ensembles of unequal entanglements, the minimum of the two entanglements must possess a threshold value for the ensemble to exhibit "More indistinguishability with less entanglement".

arXiv:2402.05074•Physical Review A•Nov 13, 2025•1 citation

Quantum state discrimination

Anthony Chefles

There are fundamental limits to the accuracy with which one can determine the state of a quantum system. I give an overview of the main approaches to quantum state discrimination. Several strategies exist. In quantum hypothesis testing, a quantum system is prepared in a member of a known, finite set of states, and the aim is to guess which one with the minimum probability of error. Error free discrimination is also sometimes possible, if we allow for the possibility of obtaining inconclusive results. If no prior information about the state is provided, then it is impractical to try to determine it exactly, and it must be estimated instead. In addition to reviewing these various strategies, I describe connections between state discrimination, the manipulation of quantum entanglement and quantum cloning. Recent experimental work is also discussed.

arXiv:quant-ph/0010114•Contemporary Physics•Nov 1, 2000•485 citations

Experimentally implementable criteria revealing substructures of genuine multipartite entanglement

Marcus Huber, Hans Schimpf, Andreas Gabriel +3 more

We present a general framework that reveals substructures of genuine multipartite entanglement. Via simple inequalities it is possible to discriminate different sets of multipartite qubit states. These inequalities are beneficial regarding experimental examinations as only local measurements are required. Furthermore, the number of observables scales favorably with system size. In exemplary cases we demonstrate the noise resistance and discuss implementations.

arXiv:1011.4087•Physical Review A•Feb 25, 2011•26 citations
How can one discriminate different inequivalent classes of multiparticle entanglement experimentally? We present an approach for the discrimination of an experimentally prepared state from the equivalence class of another state. We consider two possible measures for the discrimination strength of an observable. The first measure is based on the difference of expectation values, the second on the relative entropy of the probability distributions of the measurement outcomes. The interpretation of these measures and their usefulness for experiments with limited resources are discussed. In the case of graph states, the stabilizer formalism is employed to compute these quantities and to find sets of observables that result in the most decisive discrimination.
We study various distancelike entanglement measures of multipartite states under certain symmetries. Using group averaging techniques we provide conditions under which the relative entropy of entanglement, the geometric measure of entanglement, and the logarithmic robustness are equivalent. We consider important classes of multiparty states, and in particular show that these measures are equivalent for all stabilizer states, symmetric basis and antisymmetric basis states. We rigorously prove a conjecture that the closest product state of permutation symmetric states can always be chosen to be permutation symmetric. This allows us to calculate the explicit values of various entanglement measures for symmetric and antisymmetric basis states, observing that antisymmetric states are generally more entangled. We use these results to obtain a variety of interesting ensembles of quantum states for which the optimal local operations and classical communication discrimination probability may be explicitly determined and achieved. We also discuss applications to the construction of optimal entanglement witnesses.
State discrimination is a useful test problem with which to clarify the power and limitations of different classes of measurement. We consider the problem of discriminating between given states of a bipartite quantum system via sequential measurement of the subsystems, with classical feed-forward of measurement results. Our aim is to understand when sequential measurements, which are relatively easy to implement experimentally, perform as well, or almost as well, as optimal joint measurements, which are in general more technologically challenging. We construct conditions that the optimal sequential measurement must satisfy, analogous to the well-known Helstrom conditions for minimum error discrimination in the unrestricted case. We give several examples and compare the optimal probability of correctly identifying the state via global versus sequential measurement strategies.
Local operations assisted with classical communication (LOCC) and/or its stochastic generalization induce an ordering relation among bipartite entangled states based on their inter-convertibility. This, in multipartite scenario, leads to different classes of entanglement where states within a class can be inter-converted but conversion among different classes is not possible, and thus results in incomparable multipartite entangled resources. Here we show that a bona-fide ordering relation, under the operational paradigm of LOCC, can be established between two such incomparable states based on their performance in some operational task. Entanglement assisted local state discrimination provides one such platform for resource comparison and the notion of genuinely nonlocal product states becomes quite pertinent in this regard. We provide the detailed framework along with explicit examples exhibiting how incomparable resources can be put into well defined ordered relation.
We relate the the distinguishability of quantum states with their robustness of the entanglement, where the robustness of any resource quantifies how tolerant it is to noise. In particular, we identify upper and lower bounds on the probability of discriminating the states, appearing in an arbitrary multiparty ensemble, in terms of their robustness of entanglement and the probability of discriminating states of the closest separable ensemble. These bounds hold true, irrespective of the dimension of the constituent systems the number of parties involved, the size of the ensemble, and whether the measurement strategies are local or global. Additional lower bounds on the same quantity is determined by considering two special cases of two-state multiparty ensembles, either having equal entanglement or at least one of them being separable. The case of equal entanglement reveals that it is always easier to discriminate the entangled states than the ones in the corresponding closest separable ensemble, a phenomenon which we refer as "More indistinguishability with less entanglement". Furthermore, we numerically explore how tight the bounds are by examining the global discrimination probability of states selected from Haar-uniformly generated ensembles of two two-qubit states. We find that for two-element ensembles of unequal entanglements, the minimum of the two entanglements must possess a threshold value for the ensemble to exhibit "More indistinguishability with less entanglement".
There are fundamental limits to the accuracy with which one can determine the state of a quantum system. I give an overview of the main approaches to quantum state discrimination. Several strategies exist. In quantum hypothesis testing, a quantum system is prepared in a member of a known, finite set of states, and the aim is to guess which one with the minimum probability of error. Error free discrimination is also sometimes possible, if we allow for the possibility of obtaining inconclusive results. If no prior information about the state is provided, then it is impractical to try to determine it exactly, and it must be estimated instead. In addition to reviewing these various strategies, I describe connections between state discrimination, the manipulation of quantum entanglement and quantum cloning. Recent experimental work is also discussed.