Based on an analysis of two conventional preparators, the Stern-Gerlach and the hole-in-the-screen ones, it is argued that four entities can be taken as the basic ingredients of a rather general theory of a quantum preparator. These are the composite-system (object plus preparator) state coming about as a result of a suitable interaction between the subsystems, a suitable preparator projector called the triggering event, the conditional quantum state (density operator) of the quantum object coming about as a consequence of the occurrence of the triggering event on the preparator, and, finally, a unitary evolution operator of the object subsystem acting after preparation. The concepts of a general conditional state and of retrospective apparent ideal occurrence (which appears in the theory) are discussed in considerable detail. Ideal occurrence and the selective Lüders formula, which are made use of, are reviewed. Dynamical and geometrical preparators are distinguished in the general theory. They are described by the same entities in the same way, but in terms of different physical mechanisms from the point of view of standard interpretation with collapse.
Based on an analysis of two conventional preparators, the Stern-Gerlach and the hole-in-the-screen ones, it is argued that four entities can be taken as the basic ingredients of a rather general theory of a quantum preparator. These are the composite-system (object plus preparator) state coming about as a result of a suitable interaction between the subsystems, a suitable preparator projector called the triggering event, the conditional quantum state (density operator) of the quantum object coming about as a consequence of the occurrence of the triggering event on the preparator, and, finally, a unitary evolution operator of the object subsystem acting after preparation. The concepts of a general conditional state and of retrospective apparent ideal occurrence (which appears in the theory) are discussed in considerable detail. Ideal occurrence and the selective Lüders formula, which are made use of, are reviewed. Dynamical and geometrical preparators are distinguished in the general theory. They are described by the same entities in the same way, but in terms of different physical mechanisms from the point of view of standard interpretation with collapse.
Analyzing two standard preparators, the Stern-Gerlach and the hole-in-the-screen ones, it is demonstrated that four entities are the basic ingredients of the theory: the composite-system preparator-plus-object state (coming about as a result of a suitable interaction between the subsystems), a suitable preparator observable, one of its characteristic projectors called the triggering event, and, finally, the conditional object state corresponding to the occurrence of the triggering event. The concepts of a conditional state and of retrospective apparent ideal occurrence are discussed in the conventional interpretation of quantum mechanics. In the general theory of a preparator in this interpretation first-kind and second-kind preparators are distinguished. They are described by the same entities in the same way, but in terms of different physical mechanisms. In this article the relative-collapse interpretation is extended to encompass also preparators (besides measuring apparatuses). In this interpretation also the mechanisms become the same and one has only one kind of preparators.
A detailed theory of quantum premeasurement dynamics is presented in which a unitary composite-system operator that contains the relevant object-measuring-instrument interaction brings about the final premeasurement state. It does not include collapse, and it does not consider the environment. It is assumed that a discrete degenerate or non-degenerate observable is measured. Premeasurement is defined by the calibration condition, which requires that every initially statistically sharp value of the measured observable has to be detected with statistical certainty by the measuring instrument. The entire theory is derived as a logical consequence of this definition using the standard quantum formalism. The study has a comprehensive coverage, hence the article is actually a topical review. Connection is made with results of other authors, particularly with basic works on premeasurement. The article is a conceptual review, not a historical one. General exact premeasurement is defined in 7 equivalent ways. Nondemolition premeasurement, defined by requiring preservation of any sharp value of the measured observable, is characterized in 10 equivalent ways. Overmeasurement, i. e., a process in which the observable is measured on account of being a function of a finer observable that is actually measured, is discussed. Disentangled premeasurement, in which, by definition, to each result corresponds only one pointer-observable state in the final composite-system state, is investigated. Ideal premeasurement, a special case of both nondemolition premeasurement and disentangled premeasurement, is defined, and its most important properties are discussed. Finally, disentangled and entangled premeasurements, in conjunction with nondemolition or demolition premeasurements, are used for classification of all premeasurements.
Formulations of quantum mechanics (QM) can be characterized as realistic, operationalist, or a combination of the two. In this paper a realistic theory is defined as describing a closed system entirely by means of entities and concepts pertaining to the system. An operationalist theory, on the other hand, requires in addition entities external to the system. A realistic formulation comprises an ontology, the set of (mathematical) entities that describe the system, and assertions, the set of correct statements (predictions) the theory makes about the objects in the ontology. Classical mechanics is the prime example of a realistic physical theory. A straightforward generalization of classical mechanics to QM is hampered by the inconsistency of quantum properties with classical logic, a circumstance that was noted many years ago by Birkhoff and von Neumann. The present realistic formulation of the histories approach originally introduced by Griffiths, which we call 'compatible quantum theory (CQT)', consists of a 'microscopic' part (MIQM), which applies to a closed quantum system of any size, and a 'macroscopic' part (MAQM), which requires the participation of a large (ideally, an infinite) system. The first (MIQM) can be fully formulated based solely on the assumption of a Hilbert space ontology and the noncontextuality of probability values, relying in an essential way on Gleason's theorem and on an application to dynamics due in large part to Nistico. Thus, the present formulation, in contrast to earlier ones, derives the Born probability formulas and the consistency (decoherence) conditions for frameworks. The microscopic theory does not, however, possess a unique corpus of assertions, but rather a multiplicity of contextual truths ('c-truths'), each one associated with a different framework. This circumstance leads us to consider the microscopic theory to be physically indeterminate and therefore incomplete, though logically coherent. The completion of the theory requires a macroscopic mechanism for selecting a physical framework, which is part of the macroscopic theory (MAQM). The selection of a physical framework involves the breaking of the microscopic 'framework symmetry', which can proceed either phenomenologically as in the standard quantum measurement theory, or more fundamentally by considering the quantum system under study to be a subsystem of a macroscopic quantum system. The decoherent histories formulation of Gell-Mann and Hartle, as well as that of Omnès, are theories of this fundamental type, where the physical framework is selected by a coarse-graining procedure in which the physical phenomenon of decoherence plays an essential role. Various well-known interpretations of QM are described from the perspective of CQT. Detailed definitions and proofs are presented in the appendices.
To begin with, it is pointed out that the form of the quantum probabil- ity formula originates in the very initial state of the object system as seen when the state is expanded with the eigen-projectors of the measured ob- servable. Making use of the probability reproducibility condition, which is a key concept in unitary measurement theory, one obtains the relevant coher- ent distribution of the complete-measurement results in the final unitary- measurement state in agreement with the mentioned probability formula. Treating the transition from the final unitary, or premeasurement, state, where all possible results are present, to one complete-measurement result sketchily in the usual way, the well-known probability formula is derived. In conclusion it is pointed out that the entire argument is only formal unless one makes it physical assuming that the quantum probability law is valid in the extreme case of probability-one (certain) events (projectors).
This paper continues the discussion of the thermal interpretation of quantum physics. While Part II and Part III of this series of papers explained and justified the reasons for the departure from tradition, the present Part IV summarizes the main features and adds intuitive explanations and new technical developments. It is shown how the spectral features of quantum systems and an approximate classical dynamics arise under appropriate conditions. Evidence is given for how, in the thermal interpretation, the measurement of a qubit by a pointer q-expectation may result in a binary detection event with probabilities given by the diagonal entries of the reduced density matrix of the prepared qubit. Differences in the conventions about measurement errors in the thermal interpretation and in traditional interpretations are discussed in detail. Several standard experiments, the double slit, Stern--Gerlach, and particle decay are described from the perspective of the thermal interpretation.
It is argued (Part A) that quantum mechanics can be derived as a principle-based dynamical framework, the basic equation of which is an alternative form of the Hamilton-Jacobi equation. Schrodinger's equation obtains as a result of linearising that equation, and so-called wave functions can be given no straightforward physical interpretation. It is suggested, partly in relation to a theorem by Gromov, that a finite action quantum would make it practically inevitable, for purposes of prediction, to resort to a probabilistic formulation. The structure of the space of square-integrable solutions of the Schrodinger equation happens to lend itself to the introduction of the appropriate kind of predictive scheme. Investigating the nature and scope of such a scheme is the subject of Part B. It is shown that basic features of the formalism of quantum theory, like composition rules for 'amplitudes' or the 'Born' probability rule, can be derived independently of any physical assumptions. A generalisation of the basic formalism using tensor product composition appears to be required if all correlations are to be extracted from locally accessed data. A detailed discussion of quantum teleportation leads to the conclusion that a 'one-shot' account leads to a distorted picture of what is actually achieved. An analogy with classical cryptography is made and the statistical significance of the 'transfer', which does not require introducing any novel form of 'quantum information', is emphasised. Results obtained over the last decade using the extended formalism of positive operator-valued measures are reviewed and discussed. These lend further support to the idea that the set of basic 'quantum' rules functions as a general kind of probabilistic scheme for prediction, the structural features of which are not constrained in any direct way by the underlying physics. On the other hand, the very existence of such a predictive framework hinges on selecting a particular class of solutions of the Schrodinger equation, which selection has been incorrectly interpreted as reflecting a physical necessity.