Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1004.1219

Verifiable nonlinear quantum evolution implies failure of density matrices to represent proper mixtures

Eric G. Cavalcanti, Nicolas C. Menicucci

Published Apr 8, 2010• 10 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

In a recent Letter, Bennett and coworkers [1] argue that proofs of exotic quantum effects using closed timelike curves (CTC's) based on the work of Deutsch [2], or other nonlinear quantum dynamics, suffer from a fallacy that they call the "linearity trap," by which one cannot assume that a classical mixture of input states will lead to the same mixture of corresponding output states. We show that this prescription is inconsistent with the assumption that one can verify the postulated nonlinear evolution. Specifically, if some agent can empirically verify the deterministic nonlinear action of a physical device for some set of pure-state inputs, then one cannot generally use density matrices to represent the input for a second agent who is ignorant of the actual pure state prepared. Our argument is epistemological and makes no appeal to the detailed physics of CTC's.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.1004.1219

Related papers

Proper and improper density matrices and the consistency of the Deutsch model for Local Closed Timelike Curves

Allen Lobo, Ismael L. Paiva, Pedro R. Dieguez

We discuss the concept of proper and improper density matrixes and we argue that this issue is of fundamental importance for the understanding of the quantum-mechanical CTC model proposed by Deutsch. We arrive at the conclusion that under a realistic interpretation, the distinction between proper and improper density operators is not a relativistically covariant notion and this fact leads to the conclusion that the D-CTC model is physically inconsistent.

arXiv:1110.6361•Oct 28, 2011•0 citations

Ontology, Epistemology, Consciousness; And Closed, Timelike Curves

Fred Wolf

How should we think about subjective states vs. objective states? Is it a question of the meaning associated with a state? Recent work on this question arose in consideration of closed timelike curves (CTCs) and their possible role in quantum computers. The issue of ontic and epistemic states is particularly important when considering CTCs because, as one may argue, the interpretation of quantum states as either ontic or epistemic will naturally lead to different assumptions about how quantum systems behave in the presence of CTCs. For example, David Deutsch studied various time travel scenarios in a classical model and then in a quantum model motivated by a strictly ontic interpretation of quantum states. While in the classical model, CTCs could produce paradoxes, however Deutsch argued that no paradoxes can occur in his parallel universes (modified Everett interpretation) quantum treatment. Although all paradoxes are resolved in this way, the resulting theory is not standard quantum theory, but a new nonlinear theory. Many implications can arise using Deutsch's model and I shall discuss some of them in particular. These assumptions are particularly unconventional in part because they require that mixed quantum states are ontic. Pure quantum states can be interpreted as ontic, however most interpretations view mixed states as epistemic, i.e., reflecting an observer's lack of knowledge. I shall here consider an alternative proposal-pure quantum states, represented by density matrices containing off-diagonal elements, are possibly epistemic (since we never actually see them) while mixed quantum states arising in CTCs are always ontic representing the action of consciousness in observers (we do see them). Paradoxically my argument is based on the well-known experiences of gaining knowledge in classical physics; couching this in quantum physics terms, classical mixed states (represented by diagonal density matrices in quantum physics) are just what arise when an "observation" is said to occur resulting in a so-called reduction of the quantum wave function and the appearance of a classical world. In brief, Deutsch's CTC nonlinear post quantum physics model may represent the action of a conscious mind.

Cosmos and history•Mar 25, 2017•0 citations

Quantum States, Entanglement and Closed Timelike Curves

Arun Kumar Pati, Indranil Chakrabarty, Pankaj Agrawal +3 more

We discuss the nature of quantum states (density operators) and entanglement in quantum theory with closed timelike curves. One of the key concepts in the standard quantum theory is that given any mixed state we can always purify it in an enlarged Hilbert space by bringing an ancillary system. The purified state does not depend on the state of any extraneous system with which the mixed state is going to interact and on the physical interaction. Here, we prove that it is not possible to purify a mixed state that traverses a closed time like curve (CTC) and allowed to interact in a consistent way with a causality‐respecting (CR) quantum system. Thus, in general for arbitrary interactions between the CR and the CTC systems there is no universal ‘Church of the larger Hilbert space’ for mixed states with CTC. This shows that in quantum theory with CTCs there can exist ‘proper’ and ‘improper’ mixtures. Also, we suggest what kind of entangled states are allowed in the presence of CTCs. We argue that the nature of entanglement can be different in the presence of such exotic objects. Towards the end we discuss how the no‐hiding theorem in the presence of CTCs may allow quantum information pop‐up.

AIP conference proceedings•Jan 1, 2011•1 citation

Quantum Closed Timelike Curves: Deutsch Model and Temporal Evolution

Mikhail Pavlov

Abstract This study examines closed timelike curves (CTCs) in quantum mechanics, focusing on the Deutsch model, one of the most widely studied frameworks for describing quantum systems in the presence of time loops. In this model, a quantum state ∣ψ⟩|\psi\rangle∣ψ⟩ interacts unitarily with its past version, effectively forming a two-qubit system where the chronologically consistent qubit interacts with a qubit ρCTC\rho_{\text{CTC}}ρCTC trapped in a closed timelike curve. The state ρCTC\rho_{\text{CTC}}ρCTC is determined by the Deutsch consistency condition, ensuring self-consistent evolution along the CTC. This approach allows for rigorous modeling of quantum systems under non-classical temporal structures, providing insights into temporal correlations, causality violations, and the potential computational advantages offered by CTC-assisted quantum operations. While alternative CTC models based on postselection have been proposed, the Deutsch model remains a foundational reference for studying quantum evolution in non-linear temporal frameworks. Its analysis informs research in quantum information, retrocausality, and the theoretical limits of computation in exotic spacetime geometries.

•Mar 4, 2026•0 citations

Can Closed Timelike Curves or Nonlinear Quantum Mechanics Improve Quantum State Discrimination or Help Solve Hard Problems?

Charles H. Bennett, Debbie Leung, Graeme Smith +1 more

We study the power of closed timelike curves (CTCs) and other nonlinear extensions of quantum mechanics for distinguishing nonorthogonal states and speeding up hard computations. If a CTC-assisted computer is presented with a labeled mixture of states to be distinguished--the most natural formulation--we show that the CTC is of no use. The apparent contradiction with recent claims that CTC-assisted computers can perfectly distinguish nonorthogonal states is resolved by noting that CTC-assisted evolution is nonlinear, so the output of such a computer on a mixture of inputs is not a convex combination of its output on the mixture's pure components. Similarly, it is not clear that CTC assistance or nonlinear evolution help solve hard problems if computation is defined as we recommend, as correctly evaluating a function on a labeled mixture of orthogonal inputs.

arXiv:0908.3023•Physical Review Letters•Oct 21, 2009•85 citations

Quantum State Cloning Using Deutschian Closed Timelike Curves

Todd A. Brun, Mark M. Wilde, Andreas Winter

We show that it is possible to clone quantum states to arbitrary accuracy in the presence of a Deutschian closed timelike curve (D-CTC), with a fidelity converging to one in the limit as the dimension of the CTC system becomes large--thus resolving an open conjecture [Brun et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210402 (2009)]. This result follows from a D-CTC-assisted scheme for producing perfect clones of a quantum state prepared in a known eigenbasis, and the fact that one can reconstruct an approximation of a quantum state from empirical estimates of the probabilities of an informationally complete measurement. Our results imply more generally that every continuous, but otherwise arbitrarily nonlinear map from states to states, can be implemented to arbitrary accuracy with D-CTCs. Furthermore, our results show that Deutsch's model for closed timelike curves is in fact a classical model, in the sense that two arbitrary, distinct density operators are perfectly distinguishable (in the limit of a large closed timelike curve system); hence, in this model quantum mechanics becomes a classical theory in which each density operator is a distinct point in a classical phase space.

arXiv:1306.1795•Physical Review Letters•Nov 4, 2013•35 citations
In a recent Letter, Bennett and coworkers [1] argue that proofs of exotic quantum effects using closed timelike curves (CTC's) based on the work of Deutsch [2], or other nonlinear quantum dynamics, suffer from a fallacy that they call the "linearity trap," by which one cannot assume that a classical mixture of input states will lead to the same mixture of corresponding output states. We show that this prescription is inconsistent with the assumption that one can verify the postulated nonlinear evolution. Specifically, if some agent can empirically verify the deterministic nonlinear action of a physical device for some set of pure-state inputs, then one cannot generally use density matrices to represent the input for a second agent who is ignorant of the actual pure state prepared. Our argument is epistemological and makes no appeal to the detailed physics of CTC's.
How should we think about subjective states vs. objective states? Is it a question of the meaning associated with a state? Recent work on this question arose in consideration of closed timelike curves (CTCs) and their possible role in quantum computers. The issue of ontic and epistemic states is particularly important when considering CTCs because, as one may argue, the interpretation of quantum states as either ontic or epistemic will naturally lead to different assumptions about how quantum systems behave in the presence of CTCs. For example, David Deutsch studied various time travel scenarios in a classical model and then in a quantum model motivated by a strictly ontic interpretation of quantum states. While in the classical model, CTCs could produce paradoxes, however Deutsch argued that no paradoxes can occur in his parallel universes (modified Everett interpretation) quantum treatment. Although all paradoxes are resolved in this way, the resulting theory is not standard quantum theory, but a new nonlinear theory. Many implications can arise using Deutsch's model and I shall discuss some of them in particular. These assumptions are particularly unconventional in part because they require that mixed quantum states are ontic. Pure quantum states can be interpreted as ontic, however most interpretations view mixed states as epistemic, i.e., reflecting an observer's lack of knowledge. I shall here consider an alternative proposal-pure quantum states, represented by density matrices containing off-diagonal elements, are possibly epistemic (since we never actually see them) while mixed quantum states arising in CTCs are always ontic representing the action of consciousness in observers (we do see them). Paradoxically my argument is based on the well-known experiences of gaining knowledge in classical physics; couching this in quantum physics terms, classical mixed states (represented by diagonal density matrices in quantum physics) are just what arise when an "observation" is said to occur resulting in a so-called reduction of the quantum wave function and the appearance of a classical world. In brief, Deutsch's CTC nonlinear post quantum physics model may represent the action of a conscious mind.
We discuss the nature of quantum states (density operators) and entanglement in quantum theory with closed timelike curves. One of the key concepts in the standard quantum theory is that given any mixed state we can always purify it in an enlarged Hilbert space by bringing an ancillary system. The purified state does not depend on the state of any extraneous system with which the mixed state is going to interact and on the physical interaction. Here, we prove that it is not possible to purify a mixed state that traverses a closed time like curve (CTC) and allowed to interact in a consistent way with a causality‐respecting (CR) quantum system. Thus, in general for arbitrary interactions between the CR and the CTC systems there is no universal ‘Church of the larger Hilbert space’ for mixed states with CTC. This shows that in quantum theory with CTCs there can exist ‘proper’ and ‘improper’ mixtures. Also, we suggest what kind of entangled states are allowed in the presence of CTCs. We argue that the nature of entanglement can be different in the presence of such exotic objects. Towards the end we discuss how the no‐hiding theorem in the presence of CTCs may allow quantum information pop‐up.
Abstract This study examines closed timelike curves (CTCs) in quantum mechanics, focusing on the Deutsch model, one of the most widely studied frameworks for describing quantum systems in the presence of time loops. In this model, a quantum state ∣ψ⟩|\psi\rangle∣ψ⟩ interacts unitarily with its past version, effectively forming a two-qubit system where the chronologically consistent qubit interacts with a qubit ρCTC\rho_{\text{CTC}}ρCTC trapped in a closed timelike curve. The state ρCTC\rho_{\text{CTC}}ρCTC is determined by the Deutsch consistency condition, ensuring self-consistent evolution along the CTC. This approach allows for rigorous modeling of quantum systems under non-classical temporal structures, providing insights into temporal correlations, causality violations, and the potential computational advantages offered by CTC-assisted quantum operations. While alternative CTC models based on postselection have been proposed, the Deutsch model remains a foundational reference for studying quantum evolution in non-linear temporal frameworks. Its analysis informs research in quantum information, retrocausality, and the theoretical limits of computation in exotic spacetime geometries.
We study the power of closed timelike curves (CTCs) and other nonlinear extensions of quantum mechanics for distinguishing nonorthogonal states and speeding up hard computations. If a CTC-assisted computer is presented with a labeled mixture of states to be distinguished--the most natural formulation--we show that the CTC is of no use. The apparent contradiction with recent claims that CTC-assisted computers can perfectly distinguish nonorthogonal states is resolved by noting that CTC-assisted evolution is nonlinear, so the output of such a computer on a mixture of inputs is not a convex combination of its output on the mixture's pure components. Similarly, it is not clear that CTC assistance or nonlinear evolution help solve hard problems if computation is defined as we recommend, as correctly evaluating a function on a labeled mixture of orthogonal inputs.
We show that it is possible to clone quantum states to arbitrary accuracy in the presence of a Deutschian closed timelike curve (D-CTC), with a fidelity converging to one in the limit as the dimension of the CTC system becomes large--thus resolving an open conjecture [Brun et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 102, 210402 (2009)]. This result follows from a D-CTC-assisted scheme for producing perfect clones of a quantum state prepared in a known eigenbasis, and the fact that one can reconstruct an approximation of a quantum state from empirical estimates of the probabilities of an informationally complete measurement. Our results imply more generally that every continuous, but otherwise arbitrarily nonlinear map from states to states, can be implemented to arbitrary accuracy with D-CTCs. Furthermore, our results show that Deutsch's model for closed timelike curves is in fact a classical model, in the sense that two arbitrary, distinct density operators are perfectly distinguishable (in the limit of a large closed timelike curve system); hence, in this model quantum mechanics becomes a classical theory in which each density operator is a distinct point in a classical phase space.