arXiv:1003.3778

Quantum Entanglement and Geometry

Gabriel, Andreas

Published Mar 19, 2010• 2 citations

Abstract

The phenomenon of quantum entanglement is thoroughly investigated, focussing especially on geometrical aspects and on bipartite systems. After introducing the formalism and discussing general aspects, some of the most important separability criteria and entanglement measures are presented. Finally, the geometry of 2x2- and 3x3-dimensional state spaces is analysed and visualised.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1003.3778

Related papers

Geometry of Quantum Entanglement

Karol Życzkowski

A geometric approach to investigation of quantum entanglement is advocated. Analyzing the space of pure states of a bipartite system we show how an entanglement measure of a gives state can be related to its distance to the closest separable state. We study geometry of the (N2 - 1)-dimensional convex body of mixed quantum states acting on an N-dimensional Hilbert space and demonstrate that it belongs to the class of sets of a constant height. The same property characterizes the set of all separable states of a two-qubit system. These results contribute to our understanding of quantum entanglement and its dynamics.

OSA Workshop on Entanglement and Quantum DecoherenceJan 1, 20080 citations

Mini-Workshop: Geometry of Quantum Entanglement

Andreas Buchleitner, Stanisław J. Szarek, Elisabeth M. Werner +1 more

The workshop aimed at developing interactions between researchers from quantum information theory and from asymptotic geometric analysis. A central notion discussed was the phenomenon of quantum entanglement, which naturally leads to geometric considerations in high-dimensional vector spaces. In these spaces, phenomena such as concentration of measure become prominent and may invalidate our low-dimensional intuition.

Oberwolfach ReportsSep 1, 20103 citations

A geometric Hamiltonian description of composite quantum systems and quantum entanglement

Davide Pastorello

Finite-dimensional Quantum Mechanics can be geometrically formulated as a proper classical-like Hamiltonian theory in a projective Hilbert space. The description of composite quantum systems within the geometric Hamiltonian framework is discussed in this paper. As summarized in the first part of this work, in the Hamiltonian formulation the phase space of a quantum system is the Kähler manifold given by the complex projective space P(H) of the Hilbert space H of the considered quantum theory. However the phase space of a bipartite system must be P(H1 ⊗ H2) and not simply P(H1) × P(H2) as suggested by the analogy with Classical Mechanics. A part of this paper is devoted to manage this problem. In the second part of the work, a definition of quantum entanglement and a proposal of entanglement measure are given in terms of a geometrical point of view (a rather studied topic in recent literature). Finally two known separability criteria are implemented in the Hamiltonian formalism.

arXiv:1408.1839International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern PhysicsMar 29, 201512 citations

Introduction to Quantum Entanglement

Dariusz Kurzyk

This paper contains a characterization of certain aspects of bipartite quantum entanglement. We discuss relationship between entropy and entanglement, as well as qualitative and quantitative aspects of entanglement. Qualitative characterization of entanglement concerns the criteria: reduction criterion, positive partial transpose, positive maps, entanglement witness and majorization criterion. Measures of entanglement have been discussed as the quantitative aspects of entanglement.

Theoretical and Applied InformaticsJan 1, 201210 citations

Geometry of entanglement and separability in Hilbert subspaces of dimension up to three

Rotem Liss, Tal Mor, Andreas Winter

Abstract We present a complete classification of the geometry of the mutually complementary sets of entangled and separable states in three-dimensional Hilbert subspaces of bipartite and multipartite quantum systems. Our analysis begins by finding the geometric structure of the pure product states in a given three-dimensional Hilbert subspace, which determines all the possible separable and entangled mixed states over the same subspace. In bipartite systems, we characterise the 14 possible qualitatively different geometric shapes for the set of separable states in any three-dimensional Hilbert subspace (5 classes which also appear in two-dimensional subspaces and were found and analysed by Boyer et al. (Phys Rev A 95:032308, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.95.032308 ), and 9 novel classes which appear only in three-dimensional subspaces), describe their geometries, and provide figures illustrating them. We also generalise these results to characterise the sets of fully separable states (and hence the complementary sets of somewhat entangled states) in three-dimensional subspaces of multipartite systems. Our results show which geometrical forms quantum entanglement can and cannot take in low-dimensional subspaces.

arXiv:2309.05144Letters in Mathematical PhysicsJun 21, 20243 citations

Geometric Aspects of Quantum Entanglement

Leif Ove Hansen

Summary: \nEntanglement is a strange feature contained in the quantum mechanical framework, first observed theoretically by Erwin Schrödinger and Albert Einstein. An inherent attribute of entanglement is non-locality, and in the continuation of this, several non-reductionist features, which are conceptually challenging and philosophically interesting. \n \nA considerable growth of the interest in quantum entanglement has occurred since the early 1990s, and much of the reason for this is that the tools of quantum optics and modern instrumentation have made it possible to measure and manipulate entangled quantum systems. Today, several applications of entanglement exist, including quantum computers and several areas in quantum communications. \n \nA quantum state is either separable or entangled, it cannot be none or both. A separable state do not exhibit the non-local features found in entangled states, and are in this sense comparable to classic states. An important issue here is the separability problem, which is the problem of determining whether a given state is entangled or not. \n \nWe study these quantum states as Hermitian matrices with positive eigenvalues in convex spaces. The PPT criterion is based on the partial transposition operation, which essentially transposes one of the two subsystems in the quantum system. For some states the result is another quantum (positive) state, and these are PPT (Positive Partial Transpose) states, while others that gain negative eigenvalues are called NPT states. \n \nFor systems of dimensions 2 × 2 and 2 × 3, the PPT states are identical to the separable states, and the NPT states are identical to the entangled states, so the PPT criterion is always conclusive. But for larger dimensions, such as for instance the 3 × 3 system, there always exist PPT states that are entangled, so for this case the PPT criterion can only be used in a contrapositive way. Since entangled PPT states in this sense seem to have great significance, their characteristics are worth studying. \nAs mentioned, the PPT criterion uses the transposition map on one of the two subsystems of a composite quantum system. Transposition is an example of a positive map, in that it maps all quantum states into quantum states. It is possible to use positive maps to formulate a much more general criterion for the separability problem.There is a link (an isomorphism) between positive maps and a subset of Hermitian operators called entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe so-called Horodecki criterion states that a quantum state is separable if and only if the expectation value of all entanglement witnesses in the state are non-negative. If the expectation value of one (or possibly several) entanglement witnesses in a given quantum state is negative, then the state is always entangled. This criterion is both necessary and sufficient, but demands that we can characterize the entire set of entanglement witnesses. \n \nThe approach in this thesis is through geometry. Of fundamental importance is the convex nature of the sets in question. The knowledge and understanding of the extremal points in these sets is very relevant, since they describe the sets completely. Undertaking completely analytic studies of the geometry at hand is in general very hard, especially as the dimension of the systems grow. The development and use of numerical tools is therefore essential.

Jan 1, 20160 citations