Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:1003.1392 · Physics Letters A

Comment on “Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values” [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]

F. De Zela

Published Jan 15, 2010• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2009.12.073

Related papers

Reply to “Comment on ‘Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values’ [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]” [Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1397]

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

arXiv:1002.3687•Physics Letters A•Jan 7, 2010•0 citations

Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

arXiv:0912.3570•Physics Letters A•Jul 30, 2009•11 citations

Reply to Comment on "Contextuality in bosonic bunching"

Paweł Kurzyński, Akihito Soeda, Jayne E. Thompson +1 more

This is a reply to arXiv:1409.7513 [Phys. Rev. Lett. 113, 138901 (2014)].

arXiv:1409.8025•Sep 29, 2014•0 citations

Comment on "Contextuality and quantum discord"

Chellasamy Jebarathinam

In a paper, Al-Qasimi [Physics Letters A 449 (2022) 128347] proposed a criterion for contextuality of two-qubit systems extending Peres' proof of contextuality [Phys. Lett. A 151 (1990) 107]. Using this criterion, Al-Qasimi argued that certain discordant states can be contextual even if they are not entangled. Here I demonstrate that Al-Qasimi's criterion does not, in general, imply contextuality of two-qubit system. However, I point out that Al-Qasimi's criterion is related to a different notion of operational nonclassicality of discordant feature, which is inequivalent to contextuality. This nonclassicality beyond contextuality has been formalized in C. Jebarathinam and R. Srikanth [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 23 (2025) 2550037]. Identifying Al-Qasimi's criterion as demonstration of quantum correlation beyond contextuality, it then follows that Al-Qasimi's main conclusion that one cannot equate quantum correlation and discordant feature is made precise.

quant-pharXiv:2512.11450•Dec 15, 2025•0 citations

Comment on: “Critical assessment of the Schrödinger picture of quantum mechanics”

Hrvoje Nikolić

arXiv:quant-ph/0309136•Physics Letters A•Apr 24, 2004•1 citation

Comment on “Statistical Distribution for Generalized Ideal Gas of Fractional-Statistics Particles”

Dragoş-Victor Anghel

In Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 937 (1991) [1], Haldane introduced the fruitful concept of fractional exclusion statistics (FES). One of the most influential papers in which the thermodynamics of FES systems was deduced is Y.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 922 (1994). Unfortunately, some important, but eventually subtle, properties of the exclusion statistics parameters were overlooked in the original paper [1] and in all the papers after that, including [2]. This omission makes the thermodynamics of FES systems inconsistent when mutual exclusion statistics is manifesting in the system. By this Comment I want to point-out this error--an error that persisted for such a long time--and to give the correct statistical mechanics interpretation of FES.

arXiv:0909.0022•Physical Review Letters•May 14, 2010•10 citations
In a paper, Al-Qasimi [Physics Letters A 449 (2022) 128347] proposed a criterion for contextuality of two-qubit systems extending Peres' proof of contextuality [Phys. Lett. A 151 (1990) 107]. Using this criterion, Al-Qasimi argued that certain discordant states can be contextual even if they are not entangled. Here I demonstrate that Al-Qasimi's criterion does not, in general, imply contextuality of two-qubit system. However, I point out that Al-Qasimi's criterion is related to a different notion of operational nonclassicality of discordant feature, which is inequivalent to contextuality. This nonclassicality beyond contextuality has been formalized in C. Jebarathinam and R. Srikanth [Int. J. Quantum Inf. 23 (2025) 2550037]. Identifying Al-Qasimi's criterion as demonstration of quantum correlation beyond contextuality, it then follows that Al-Qasimi's main conclusion that one cannot equate quantum correlation and discordant feature is made precise.
In Phys. Rev. Lett. 67, 937 (1991) [1], Haldane introduced the fruitful concept of fractional exclusion statistics (FES). One of the most influential papers in which the thermodynamics of FES systems was deduced is Y.-S. Wu, Phys. Rev. Lett. 73, 922 (1994). Unfortunately, some important, but eventually subtle, properties of the exclusion statistics parameters were overlooked in the original paper [1] and in all the papers after that, including [2]. This omission makes the thermodynamics of FES systems inconsistent when mutual exclusion statistics is manifesting in the system. By this Comment I want to point-out this error--an error that persisted for such a long time--and to give the correct statistical mechanics interpretation of FES.