Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0912.3570 · Physics Letters A

Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

Published Jul 30, 2009• 11 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1016/j.physleta.2009.07.063

Related papers

Comment on “Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values” [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]

F. De Zela

arXiv:1003.1392•Physics Letters A•Jan 15, 2010•1 citation

Contextuality in Three Types of Quantum-Mechanical Systems

Ehtibar N. Dzhafarov, Janne V. Kujala, Jan-Åke Larsson

arXiv:1411.2244•Foundations of Physics•Mar 14, 2015•59 citations

Reply to “Comment on ‘Contextuality within quantum mechanics manifested in subensemble mean values’ [Phys. Lett. A 373 (2009) 3430]” [Phys. Lett. A 374 (2010) 1397]

A. K. Pan, Dipankar Home

arXiv:1002.3687•Physics Letters A•Jan 7, 2010•0 citations

Contextual Approach to Quantum Theory

Andrei Yu. Khrennikov

Springer eBooks•Jan 1, 2004•3 citations

The Density Matrix Formalism

Bernard d’Espagnat

Along with an elementary description of the well-known density matrix formalism and of its application to the description of quantum-statistical ensembles, this chapter includes the proofs of a few propositions that are especially useful for understanding most of the developments. In the new formulation, ensembles are directly described by density matrices, observables are still described by Hermitean operators, and the rules giving the statistical distribution and the mean values of the predicted measurement results are, respectively, expressions. When stated in this manner, the rules of quantum mechanics apply directly not only to pure states but also to mixtures. This is a distinct advantage. In the case of mixtures defined by their density matrices, the new formulation also has another merit. If two proper mixtures are described by the same density matrix, any state vector representing a subensemble of one of these mixtures can be expressed as a linear combination of the state vectors representing the subensembles of the other mixture.

CRC Press eBooks•Mar 5, 2018•1 citation

Thermodynamics of a subensemble of a canonical ensemble

Maxim F. Gelin, Michael Thoss

Two approaches to describing the thermodynamics of a subsystem that interacts with a thermal bath are considered. Within the first approach, the mean system energy E_{S} is identified with the expectation value of the system Hamiltonian, which is evaluated with respect to the overall (system+bath) equilibrium distribution. Within the second approach, the system partition function Z_{S} is considered as the fundamental quantity, which is postulated to be the ratio of the overall (system+bath) and the bath partition functions, and the standard thermodynamic relation E_{S}=-d(ln Z_{S})/dbeta is used to obtain the mean system energy. Employing both classical and quantum-mechanical treatments, the advantages and shortcomings of the two approaches are analyzed in detail for various different systems. It is shown that already within classical mechanics both approaches predict significantly different results for thermodynamic quantities provided the system-bath interaction is not bilinear or the system of interest consists of more than a single particle. Based on the results, it is concluded that the first approach is superior.

arXiv:0907.1175•Physical Review E•May 20, 2009•75 citations
Along with an elementary description of the well-known density matrix formalism and of its application to the description of quantum-statistical ensembles, this chapter includes the proofs of a few propositions that are especially useful for understanding most of the developments. In the new formulation, ensembles are directly described by density matrices, observables are still described by Hermitean operators, and the rules giving the statistical distribution and the mean values of the predicted measurement results are, respectively, expressions. When stated in this manner, the rules of quantum mechanics apply directly not only to pure states but also to mixtures. This is a distinct advantage. In the case of mixtures defined by their density matrices, the new formulation also has another merit. If two proper mixtures are described by the same density matrix, any state vector representing a subensemble of one of these mixtures can be expressed as a linear combination of the state vectors representing the subensembles of the other mixture.
Two approaches to describing the thermodynamics of a subsystem that interacts with a thermal bath are considered. Within the first approach, the mean system energy E_{S} is identified with the expectation value of the system Hamiltonian, which is evaluated with respect to the overall (system+bath) equilibrium distribution. Within the second approach, the system partition function Z_{S} is considered as the fundamental quantity, which is postulated to be the ratio of the overall (system+bath) and the bath partition functions, and the standard thermodynamic relation E_{S}=-d(ln Z_{S})/dbeta is used to obtain the mean system energy. Employing both classical and quantum-mechanical treatments, the advantages and shortcomings of the two approaches are analyzed in detail for various different systems. It is shown that already within classical mechanics both approaches predict significantly different results for thermodynamic quantities provided the system-bath interaction is not bilinear or the system of interest consists of more than a single particle. Based on the results, it is concluded that the first approach is superior.