We propose and theoretically investigate superconducting spin qubits. Superconducting spin qubit consists of a single spin confined in a Josephson junction. We show that owing to spin-orbit interaction, superconducting phase difference across the junction can polarize this spin. We demonstrate that this enables single-qubit operations and more complicated quantum gates, where spins of different qubits interact via a mutual inductance of the superconducting loop where the junctions are embedded. Recent experimental realizations of Josephson junctions made of semiconductor quantum dots in contact with superconducting leads have shown that the number of electrons in the quantum dot can be tuned by a gate voltage. Superconducting spin qubit is realized when the number of electrons is odd. We discuss the qubit properties at phenomenological level. We present a microscopic theory that enables us to make accurate estimations of the qubit parameters by evaluating the spin-dependent Josephson energy in the framework of fourth-order perturbation theory.
We propose and theoretically investigate superconducting spin qubits. Superconducting spin qubit consists of a single spin confined in a Josephson junction. We show that owing to spin-orbit interaction, superconducting phase difference across the junction can polarize this spin. We demonstrate that this enables single-qubit operations and more complicated quantum gates, where spins of different qubits interact via a mutual inductance of the superconducting loop where the junctions are embedded. Recent experimental realizations of Josephson junctions made of semiconductor quantum dots in contact with superconducting leads have shown that the number of electrons in the quantum dot can be tuned by a gate voltage. Superconducting spin qubit is realized when the number of electrons is odd. We discuss the qubit properties at phenomenological level. We present a microscopic theory that enables us to make accurate estimations of the qubit parameters by evaluating the spin-dependent Josephson energy in the framework of fourth-order perturbation theory.
Superconducting spin qubits, also known as Andreev spin qubits, promise to combine the benefits of superconducting qubits and spin qubits defined in quantum dots. While most approaches to control these qubits rely on controlling the spin degree of freedom via the supercurrent, superconducting spin qubits can also be coupled to each other via the superconductor to implement two-qubit quantum gates. We theoretically investigate the interaction between superconducting spin qubits in the weak tunneling regime and concentrate on the effect of spin-orbit interaction (SOI), which can be large in semiconductor-based quantum dots and thereby offers an additional tuning parameter for quantum gates. We find analytically that the effective interaction between two superconducting spin qubits consists of Ising, Heisenberg, and Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interactions and can be tuned by the superconducting phase difference, the tunnel barrier strength, or the SOI parameters. The Josephson current becomes dependent on SOI and spin orientations. We demonstrate that this interaction can be used for fast controlled phase-flip gates with a fidelity >99.99%. We propose a scalable network of superconducting spin qubits which is suitable for implementing the surface code.
Hybrid devices integrating quantum dots with Josephson junctions are gaining interest because they combine spin-based quantum computing with circuit quantum electrodynamics (circuit QED) methods. In particular, Andreev spin qubits have shown significant experimental progress including strong two-qubit coupling, and are predicted to exhibit all-to-all connectivity. Here we propose superconducting singlet-triplet (SST) qubits that rely on parallel-aligned double quantum dots in Josephson junctions. While Andreev spin qubits require spin-orbit interaction to unlock the spin degree-of-freedom, SST qubits do not require spin-orbit interaction, making the advantages of hybrid devices available to a wider range of materials. Similar to Andreev spin qubits, the qubit states couple to the superconducting phase across the junction, which allows for control and readout using circuit QED, and supports all-to-all connectivity. Only N flux lines are required to perform any single- and two-qubit gate among N qubits, and thus the overhead of control lines is small. Finally, linear protection from charge or flux noise makes these qubits interesting candidates for a future quantum processor.
We investigate the superconducting Anderson impurity model for interacting quantum dot Josephson junctions with spin-orbit coupling and a term accounting for tunnelling through higher-energy orbitals. These elements establish the conditions required for spin polarization in the absence of external magnetic field at finite superconducting phase bias. This Hamiltonian has been previously used to model the Andreev spin qubit, where quantum information is encoded in spinful odd-parity subgap states. Here we instead analyse the even-parity sector, i.e., the Andreev pair qubit based on Andreev bound states (ABS). The model is solved using the zero-bandwidth approximation and the numerical renormalization group, with further insight from variational calculations. Electron-electron interaction admixes single-occupancy Yu-Shiba-Rusinov (YSR) components into the ABS states, thereby strongly enhancing spin transitions in the presence of spin-orbit coupling. The ABS states can thus become sensitive to local magnetic field fluctuations, which has implications for decoherence in Andreev pair qubits. For strong interaction U U , especially in the cross-over region between the ABS and YSR regimes for U \sim 2\Delta U ∼ 2 Δ , charge, spin, and inductive transitions can all become strong, offering avenues for spin control and quantum transduction.
The interaction of solid-state qubits with environmental degrees of freedom strongly affects the qubit dynamics, and leads to decoherence. In quantum information processing with solid-state qubits, decoherence significantly limits the performances of such devices. Therefore, it is necessary to fully understand the mechanisms that lead to decoherence. In this review, we discuss how decoherence affects two of the most successful realizations of solid-state qubits, namely, spin qubits and superconducting qubits. In the former, the qubit is encoded in the spin 1/2 of the electron, and it is implemented by confining the electron spin in a semiconductor quantum dot. Superconducting devices show quantum behaviour at low temperatures, and the qubit is encoded in the two lowest energy levels of a superconducting circuit. The electron spin in a quantum dot has two main decoherence channels, a (Markovian) phonon-assisted relaxation channel, due to the presence of a spin–orbit interaction, and a (non-Markovian) spin bath constituted by the spins of the nuclei in the quantum dot that interact with the electron spin via the hyperfine interaction. In a superconducting qubit, decoherence takes place as a result of fluctuations in the control parameters, such as bias currents, applied flux and bias voltages, and via losses in the dissipative circuit elements.
Identifying a materials platform for creating qubits that are both tunable and resilient towards environmental noise is one of the main hurdles that need to be overcome to realize quantum computation that is practically useful. One pursued avenue to this end is to use superconducting qubits with intrinsic spin-dependent interactions, such as spin-orbit coupling or magnetism. However, the recently discovered class of materials known as altermagnets remains largely unexplored in this context. We here use microscopic calculations to determine how the properties of superconducting qubits are modified when altermagnetic Josephson junctions are included. The key qubit performance parameters, including splitting, anharmonicity, decoherence, and single/coupled-qubit gate operation times, display rich behavior depending on the characteristic properties of the altermagnetic material, such as the strength of the Néel field and the crystallographic orientation of the altermagnetic relative to the interfaces in the system. We focus in particular on the transmon design and show that the qubit is very well protected against decoherence and simultaneously shows superior anharmonicity both near 0-π transition points and when it is in a φ-state. We propose that by using strain, the altermagnetic qubit can be moved out of its protected regime to enable faster gate operation times, and then moved back to its protected state. We establish the physical mechanism underlying the behavior of all central qubit metrics, clarifying how real devices interpolate between an altermagnetic double-well regime exhibiting barrier-induced protection and a conventional transmon-like single-well regime. We also discuss how the altermagnetic properties influence flux qubits and fluxonium.
A superconducting-phase quantum bit (qubit) involves three or more Josephson junctions combined into a superconducting loop and defines one of the promising solid-state device implementations for quantum computing. Recently, so called $\ensuremath{\pi}$ junctions, Josephson junctions with a ground state characterized by a \ensuremath{\pi}-phase shift across, have attracted much attention. We show how to make use of such $\ensuremath{\pi}$ junctions in the construction of superconducting phase qubits and discuss the advantage over conventional designs based on magnetically frustrated loops. Starting from a basic five-junction loop with one $\ensuremath{\pi}$ junction, we show how to construct effective junctions with degenerate minima characterized by phase shifts 0 and $\ensuremath{\pi}$ and superconducting-phase switches. These elements are then combined into a superconducting-phase qubit which operates exclusively with switches, thus avoiding permanent contact with the environment through external biasing. The resulting superconducting-phase qubits can be understood as the macroscopic analog of the ``quiet'' s-wave--d-wave--s-wave Josephson-junction qubits introduced by Ioffe et al. [Nature (London) 398, 679 (1999)].