Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0910.4926 · Physical Review E

Quantum work relations under trial Hamiltonians

Arun Kumar Pati, Mamata Sahoo, Biswajit Pradhan

Published Sep 7, 2010• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

The universal quantum work relation connects a functional of an arbitrary observable averaged over the forward process to the free-energy difference and another functional averaged over the time-reversed process. Here, we ask the question if the system is driven out of equilibrium by a different Hamiltonian rather than the original one during the forward process and similarly during the reversed process then how accurate is the quantum work relation. We present an inequality that must be satisfied when the system is driven out by such a trial Hamiltonian. This also answers the issue of accuracy of the Jarzynski relation with a trial Hamiltonian. We have shown that the correction term can be expressed as the averages of the difference operator between the accurate and trial Hamiltonians. This leads to a generalized version of the Bogoliubov inequality for the free-energy differences.

DOI
10.1103/physreve.82.031112

Related papers

Quantum version of free-energy–irreversible-work relations

Wojciech De Roeck, Christian Maes

We give a quantum version of the Jarzynski relation between the distribution of work done over a certain time-interval on a system and the difference of equilibrium free energies. The main ingredient is the identification of work depending on the quantum history of the system and the proper definition of various quantum ensembles over which the averages should be made. We also discuss a number of different regimes that have been considered by other authors and which are unified in the present set-up. In all cases, quantum or classical, it is a general relation between heat and time-reversal that makes the Jarzynski relation so universally valid.

arXiv:cond-mat/0309498•Physical Review E•Feb 26, 2004•100 citations

Variation on the theme of Jarzynski's inequality

Dani R. Castellanos, Petr Jizba

The Jarzynski equality, which relates equilibrium free-energy difference to an average of non-equilibrium work, plays a central role in modern non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics. In this paper, we study a weaker consequence of this relation, known as Jarzynski's inequality, which can be formally obtained from the Jarzynski equality via Jensen's inequality. We identify and analyze several extensions of Jarzynski's inequality that go beyond its direct derivation from the Jarzynski equality. In particular, we consider chemical systems both in the linear-response regime and away from linear thermodynamics. Furthermore, by employing functional-integral techniques, we extend Jarzynski's inequality to many-body statistical systems described by quantum field theory. Salient issues, such as connections of the Jarzynski inequality with the maximum work theorem and the Landau--Lifshitz theory of fluctuations, are also discussed.

cond-mat.stat-mechCross-listedarXiv:2601.01644•Jan 6, 2026

Operational Work Fluctuation Theorem for Open Quantum Systems

Konstantin Beyer, Walter T. Strunz

The classical Jarzynski equality establishes an exact relation between the stochastic work performed on a system driven out of thermal equilibrium and the free energy difference in a corresponding quasistatic process. This fluctuation theorem bears experimental relevance, as it enables the determination of the free energy difference through the measurement of externally applied work in a nonequilibrium process. In the quantum case, the Jarzynski equality only holds if the measurement procedure of the stochastic work is drastically changed: it is replaced by a so-called two-point measurement scheme that requires the knowledge of the initial and final Hamiltonian and therefore lacks the predictive power for the free energy difference that the classical Jarzynski equation is known for. Here, we propose a quantum fluctuation theorem that is valid for externally measurable quantum work determined during the driving protocol. In contrast to the two-point measurement case, the theorem also applies to open quantum systems and the scenario can be realized without knowing the system Hamiltonian. Our fluctuation theorem comes in the form of an inequality and therefore only yields bounds to the true free energy difference. The inequality is saturated in the quasiclassical case of vanishing energy coherences at the beginning and at the end of the protocol. Thus, there is a clear quantum disadvantage.

arXiv:2408.13417•Physical Review Letters•Apr 9, 2025•2 citations

Fluctuation theorems: Work is not an observable

Peter Talkner A, Eric Lutz, Peter Hänggi A

The characteristic function of the work performed by an external time-dependent force on a Hamiltonian quantum system is identified with the time-ordered correlation function of the exponentiated system's Hamiltonian. A similar expression is obtained for the averaged exponential work which is related to the free energy difference of equilibrium systems by the Jarzynski work theorem.

arXiv:cond-mat/0703189•Physical Review E•May 16, 2007•754 citations

Quantum work beyond classical (commuting) limits

Sumit Rout, Aravinth Balaji Ravichandran, Paweł Horodecki +1 more

Free energy fixes the maximum work of a thermodynamic process once the state and Hamiltonian are specified. A work-extraction task asks a different question: how much average work can a single device realize across several preparations and Hamiltonian settings? A classical work device is one whose Hamiltonian settings are mutually commuting. We place every branch at its best free-energy-limited work envelope and derive the corresponding classical limit on the task average. For pure preparations, the source is specified only by pairwise maximal-energy constraints: for each pair, the intrinsic maximal average energy under one common normalized Hamiltonian is bounded as part of the task data, while the work device is otherwise microscopically unrestricted. The benchmark is optimized over arbitrary-dimensional classical implementations. Incompatible Hamiltonian settings exceed this limit, even though every branch remains bounded by its own free-energy maximum. The advantage therefore does not arise in any single process, but in the average work of the task: incompatible Hamiltonians realize a value that no classical work device can attain. Hamiltonian incompatibility is thus a thermodynamic resource for work extraction.

quant-pharXiv:2605.04021•May 6, 2026•0 citations

Extracting quantum work statistics by single qubit interferometry

Vlatko Vedral

We first derive the Jarzynski relation [1] between the average exponential of the thermodynamical work and the exponential of the difference between the initial and final free energy. We then comment on the information-theoretic underpinning of Jarzynski’s reasoning which helps explain why the Jarzynski relation holds identically both quantumly and classically [2]. We then present a scheme to verify the quantum non-equilibrium fluctuation relations as encapsulated by Jarzynski. We show that the characteristic function of the work distribution of a quantum system (which is basically equal to the Wick rotated average exponential of the thermodynamical work) can be extracted from Ramsey interferometry of a single probe qubit (which need not itself be pure, though it must not be fully depolarized) [3,4].We first derive the Jarzynski relation [1] between the average exponential of the thermodynamical work and the exponential of the difference between the initial and final free energy. We then comment on the information-theoretic underpinning of Jarzynski’s reasoning which helps explain why the Jarzynski relation holds identically both quantumly and classically [2]. We then present a scheme to verify the quantum non-equilibrium fluctuation relations as encapsulated by Jarzynski. We show that the characteristic function of the work distribution of a quantum system (which is basically equal to the Wick rotated average exponential of the thermodynamical work) can be extracted from Ramsey interferometry of a single probe qubit (which need not itself be pure, though it must not be fully depolarized) [3,4]. An interesting fact is that while the quantum version of the Jarzynski equality remains satisfied even in the presence of quantum correlations, the individual thermodynamical work moments in the expansion of the free energy are, in fact, sensitive to the genuine quantum correlations [5]. Whether this is a fortuitous coincidence remains to be seen, but it certainly goes towards explaining why the laws of thermodynamics happen to be so robust as to be independent of the underlying micro-physics.We intend to elucidate the subtle connection between Jarzynski’s relation and the “quantum arrow of time”. Finally we comment on the fact that our scheme for measuring the quantum work characteristic function belongs to the computational class known as DCQ1 [6], namely all computations that can be performed with only one pure qubit (and N maximally mixed ones).

The Rochester Conferences on Coherence and Quantum Optics and the Quantum Information and Measurement meeting•Jan 1, 2013•0 citations
The universal quantum work relation connects a functional of an arbitrary observable averaged over the forward process to the free-energy difference and another functional averaged over the time-reversed process. Here, we ask the question if the system is driven out of equilibrium by a different Hamiltonian rather than the original one during the forward process and similarly during the reversed process then how accurate is the quantum work relation. We present an inequality that must be satisfied when the system is driven out by such a trial Hamiltonian. This also answers the issue of accuracy of the Jarzynski relation with a trial Hamiltonian. We have shown that the correction term can be expressed as the averages of the difference operator between the accurate and trial Hamiltonians. This leads to a generalized version of the Bogoliubov inequality for the free-energy differences.
We give a quantum version of the Jarzynski relation between the distribution of work done over a certain time-interval on a system and the difference of equilibrium free energies. The main ingredient is the identification of work depending on the quantum history of the system and the proper definition of various quantum ensembles over which the averages should be made. We also discuss a number of different regimes that have been considered by other authors and which are unified in the present set-up. In all cases, quantum or classical, it is a general relation between heat and time-reversal that makes the Jarzynski relation so universally valid.
The Jarzynski equality, which relates equilibrium free-energy difference to an average of non-equilibrium work, plays a central role in modern non-equilibrium statistical thermodynamics. In this paper, we study a weaker consequence of this relation, known as Jarzynski's inequality, which can be formally obtained from the Jarzynski equality via Jensen's inequality. We identify and analyze several extensions of Jarzynski's inequality that go beyond its direct derivation from the Jarzynski equality. In particular, we consider chemical systems both in the linear-response regime and away from linear thermodynamics. Furthermore, by employing functional-integral techniques, we extend Jarzynski's inequality to many-body statistical systems described by quantum field theory. Salient issues, such as connections of the Jarzynski inequality with the maximum work theorem and the Landau--Lifshitz theory of fluctuations, are also discussed.
The classical Jarzynski equality establishes an exact relation between the stochastic work performed on a system driven out of thermal equilibrium and the free energy difference in a corresponding quasistatic process. This fluctuation theorem bears experimental relevance, as it enables the determination of the free energy difference through the measurement of externally applied work in a nonequilibrium process. In the quantum case, the Jarzynski equality only holds if the measurement procedure of the stochastic work is drastically changed: it is replaced by a so-called two-point measurement scheme that requires the knowledge of the initial and final Hamiltonian and therefore lacks the predictive power for the free energy difference that the classical Jarzynski equation is known for. Here, we propose a quantum fluctuation theorem that is valid for externally measurable quantum work determined during the driving protocol. In contrast to the two-point measurement case, the theorem also applies to open quantum systems and the scenario can be realized without knowing the system Hamiltonian. Our fluctuation theorem comes in the form of an inequality and therefore only yields bounds to the true free energy difference. The inequality is saturated in the quasiclassical case of vanishing energy coherences at the beginning and at the end of the protocol. Thus, there is a clear quantum disadvantage.
Free energy fixes the maximum work of a thermodynamic process once the state and Hamiltonian are specified. A work-extraction task asks a different question: how much average work can a single device realize across several preparations and Hamiltonian settings? A classical work device is one whose Hamiltonian settings are mutually commuting. We place every branch at its best free-energy-limited work envelope and derive the corresponding classical limit on the task average. For pure preparations, the source is specified only by pairwise maximal-energy constraints: for each pair, the intrinsic maximal average energy under one common normalized Hamiltonian is bounded as part of the task data, while the work device is otherwise microscopically unrestricted. The benchmark is optimized over arbitrary-dimensional classical implementations. Incompatible Hamiltonian settings exceed this limit, even though every branch remains bounded by its own free-energy maximum. The advantage therefore does not arise in any single process, but in the average work of the task: incompatible Hamiltonians realize a value that no classical work device can attain. Hamiltonian incompatibility is thus a thermodynamic resource for work extraction.
We first derive the Jarzynski relation [1] between the average exponential of the thermodynamical work and the exponential of the difference between the initial and final free energy. We then comment on the information-theoretic underpinning of Jarzynski’s reasoning which helps explain why the Jarzynski relation holds identically both quantumly and classically [2]. We then present a scheme to verify the quantum non-equilibrium fluctuation relations as encapsulated by Jarzynski. We show that the characteristic function of the work distribution of a quantum system (which is basically equal to the Wick rotated average exponential of the thermodynamical work) can be extracted from Ramsey interferometry of a single probe qubit (which need not itself be pure, though it must not be fully depolarized) [3,4].We first derive the Jarzynski relation [1] between the average exponential of the thermodynamical work and the exponential of the difference between the initial and final free energy. We then comment on the information-theoretic underpinning of Jarzynski’s reasoning which helps explain why the Jarzynski relation holds identically both quantumly and classically [2]. We then present a scheme to verify the quantum non-equilibrium fluctuation relations as encapsulated by Jarzynski. We show that the characteristic function of the work distribution of a quantum system (which is basically equal to the Wick rotated average exponential of the thermodynamical work) can be extracted from Ramsey interferometry of a single probe qubit (which need not itself be pure, though it must not be fully depolarized) [3,4]. An interesting fact is that while the quantum version of the Jarzynski equality remains satisfied even in the presence of quantum correlations, the individual thermodynamical work moments in the expansion of the free energy are, in fact, sensitive to the genuine quantum correlations [5]. Whether this is a fortuitous coincidence remains to be seen, but it certainly goes towards explaining why the laws of thermodynamics happen to be so robust as to be independent of the underlying micro-physics.We intend to elucidate the subtle connection between Jarzynski’s relation and the “quantum arrow of time”. Finally we comment on the fact that our scheme for measuring the quantum work characteristic function belongs to the computational class known as DCQ1 [6], namely all computations that can be performed with only one pure qubit (and N maximally mixed ones).