Free energy fixes the maximum work of a thermodynamic process once the state and Hamiltonian are specified. A work-extraction task asks a different question: how much average work can a single device realize across several preparations and Hamiltonian settings? A classical work device is one whose Hamiltonian settings are mutually commuting. We place every branch at its best free-energy-limited work envelope and derive the corresponding classical limit on the task average. For pure preparations, the source is specified only by pairwise maximal-energy constraints: for each pair, the intrinsic maximal average energy under one common normalized Hamiltonian is bounded as part of the task data, while the work device is otherwise microscopically unrestricted. The benchmark is optimized over arbitrary-dimensional classical implementations. Incompatible Hamiltonian settings exceed this limit, even though every branch remains bounded by its own free-energy maximum. The advantage therefore does not arise in any single process, but in the average work of the task: incompatible Hamiltonians realize a value that no classical work device can attain. Hamiltonian incompatibility is thus a thermodynamic resource for work extraction.
Free energy fixes the maximum work of a thermodynamic process once the state and Hamiltonian are specified. A work-extraction task asks a different question: how much average work can a single device realize across several preparations and Hamiltonian settings? A classical work device is one whose Hamiltonian settings are mutually commuting. We place every branch at its best free-energy-limited work envelope and derive the corresponding classical limit on the task average. For pure preparations, the source is specified only by pairwise maximal-energy constraints: for each pair, the intrinsic maximal average energy under one common normalized Hamiltonian is bounded as part of the task data, while the work device is otherwise microscopically unrestricted. The benchmark is optimized over arbitrary-dimensional classical implementations. Incompatible Hamiltonian settings exceed this limit, even though every branch remains bounded by its own free-energy maximum. The advantage therefore does not arise in any single process, but in the average work of the task: incompatible Hamiltonians realize a value that no classical work device can attain. Hamiltonian incompatibility is thus a thermodynamic resource for work extraction.
Evaluating the maximum amount of work extractable from a nanoscale quantum system is one of the central problems in quantum thermodynamics. Previous works identified the free energy of the input state as the optimal rate of extractable work under the crucial assumption: experimenters know the description of the given quantum state, which restricts the applicability to significantly limited settings. Here, we show that this optimal extractable work can be achieved without knowing the input states at all, removing the aforementioned fundamental operational restrictions. We achieve this by presenting the construction of a quantum channel whose description does not depend on input states but nevertheless extracts work quantified by the free energy of the unknown input state. Remarkably, our result partially encompasses the case of infinite-dimensional systems, for which optimal extractable work has not been known even for the standard state-aware setting. Our results clarify that, even though whether the description of the given state is provided at the beginning of the protocol generally makes the operational setting fundamentally different in accomplishing information-theoretic tasks, not knowing the input state does not influence the optimal performance of the asymptotic work extraction. The maximum work extracted from independent and identically distributed quantum states is characterised only in the state-aware scenario, and it remains unknown with no prior knowledge of the state. Here, the authors show that optimal work extraction can be achieved by a single operation, referred as universal work extraction.
We investigate and ascertain the ideal inputs to any finite-time physical process. We demonstrate that the expectation values of entropy flow, heat, and work can all be determined via Hermitian observables of the initial state. These Hermitian operators encapsulate the breadth of behavior and the ideal inputs for common thermodynamic objectives. We show how to construct these Hermitian operators from measurements of thermodynamic output from a finite number of effectively arbitrary inputs. The behavior of a small number of test inputs thus determines the full range of thermodynamic behavior from all inputs. For any process, entropy flow, heat, and work can all be extremized by pure input states—eigenstates of the respective operators. In contrast, the input states that minimize entropy production or maximize the change in free energy are nonpure mixed states obtained from the operators as the solution of a convex-optimization problem. To attain these, we provide an easily implementable gradient-descent method on the manifold of density matrices, where an analytic solution yields a valid direction of descent at each iterative step. Ideal inputs within a limited domain, and their associated thermodynamic operators, are obtained with less effort. This allows analysis of ideal thermodynamic inputs within quantum subspaces of infinite-dimensional quantum systems; it also allows analysis of ideal inputs in the classical limit. Our examples illustrate the diversity of “ideal” inputs: distinct initial states minimize entropy production, extremize the change in free energy, and maximize work extraction. Published by the American Physical Society 2024
Extracting work from quantum states is a fundamental task in quantum thermodynamics. Previous studies have primarily focused on determining the best achievable rate of work extraction, and remarkably, this characterization appeared to remain unchanged regardless of the choice of allowed processes: whether one considers the operationally motivated class of energy-conserving thermal operations, or the axiomatic class of Gibbs-preserving operations, the optimal extractable work is given by the Helmholtz free energy. Here, we challenge this perspective, showing that a more refined analysis of the asymptotic performance of work extraction reveals significant differences in the performance for the two different classes of free operations. Precisely, we focus on the trade-off between the extraction rate and its reliability, characterized by the optimal asymptotic speed at which the extraction error can be suppressed. We establish that the reliability of Gibbs-preserving operations and of thermal operations are respectively characterized by the Petz and the sandwiched Rényi relative entropies, demonstrating that the former in general strictly outperforms the latter, and providing new interpretations of several information-theoretic divergences. Our analysis reveals that operational constraints such as energy conservation impose stronger limitations on the achievable precision of quantum tasks than can be inferred from their asymptotic rates, thereby questioning the use of Gibbs-preserving operations as a mathematically convenient substitute for the physically realizable thermal processes.
The amount of extractable work from a physical system is fundamentally connected to the information available about its state, as illustrated by Maxwell's demon and the Gibbs paradox. In standard thermodynamic protocols involving system--bath interactions, the maximum work is given by the free-energy difference between the initial state and the corresponding Gibbs state at the bath temperature. This motivates a natural question: does information also limit work extraction in closed quantum systems that do not involve a heat bath and where work is obtained through unitary operations generated by a time-dependent Hamiltonian? While ergotropy quantifies the maximum work extractable via unitary operations, it assumes complete knowledge of the quantum state, typically requiring full state tomography. In realistic scenarios, however, only partial information is accessible. In this case, the relevant figure of merit is observational ergotropy, which depends explicitly on the measurement used to probe the system. We show that observational ergotropy decreases under classical post-processing of measurement outcomes, implying that fine-grained measurements allow greater work extraction than coarse-grained ones. Moreover, maximizing observational ergotropy over all possible measurements recovers standard ergotropy, which decomposes into incoherent (classical) and coherent (quantum) contributions. Our results demonstrate that coherence in the measurement projectors constitutes the key resource, enabling work extraction beyond the incoherent limit and establishing coherence as the origin of quantum advantage in observational ergotropy extraction.
Inspired by the primary goal of quantum thermodynamics-to characterize quantum signatures and leverage their benefits in thermodynamic scenarios-we design a work extraction task within a bipartite framework that exhibits a quantum thermodynamic advantage. The steerability of quantum correlations between the two parties is the key resource enabling such an advantage. In designing the task, we exploit the correspondence between steerability and the incompatibility of observables. Our work extraction protocol involves mutually unbiased bases, which exhibit maximum incompatibility and therefore maximum steerability, showcased in maximally entangled quantum states. The work extraction protocols consist of quenches and thermalization processes, which serve as fundamental building blocks for various thermodynamic protocols, such as heat engines. We derive upper bounds on the extractable work for unsteerable and steerable correlations and devise a protocol that saturates the latter. The ratio between the extractable work in steerable and unsteerable scenarios, which encapsulates the quantum advantage, increases with the dimension of the underlying system (sometimes referred to as an unbounded advantage). This proves a quantum thermodynamic advantage arising from steerable quantum correlations.
Understanding whether uniquely quantum features can provide concrete advantages in thermodynamic processes is a central objective of quantum thermodynamics. A key challenge is quantifying how different forms of non-classicality can be systematically harnessed to enhance thermodynamic tasks. In light of this, we prove that any form of non-classicality can serve as a thermodynamic resource. In particular, any system that possesses quantum magic, coherence, or non-classical correlations can be leveraged to extract higher amounts of work than if the system does not possess such resources. The quantum thermodynamic advantages--quantified by the ratio between work extractable from a resource state and work extractable in its absence--increase with the resource robustness. We show that for any convex quantum resource theory, any resourceful state can yield a work-extraction advantage over all free states via a cyclic quench/thermalization protocol whose Hamiltonian is engineered from an optimal robustness witness. We illustrate concrete examples in which the robustness measures increase with the system's dimension, yielding quantum thermodynamic advantages that scale with it. In contrast, we also show that preparing a resource state (e.g., one with magic, coherence, or non-classical correlations) can be significantly more thermodynamically costly than preparing any state without such a resource. Concretely, there always exists a protocol that can prepare any non-resourceful state at significantly less work than it takes to prepare a resourceful state. Overall, our results provide operational meaning to robustness measures of quantum resources in terms of their thermodynamic costs and advantages.