Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0908.4069

Decoherence, measurement and interpretation of quantum mechanics

Juan Sebastián Ardenghi, Mario Castagnino, Sebastián Fortín, Olímpia Lombardi

Published Aug 27, 2009• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

According to our modal-Hamiltonian interpretation (MHI) of quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian of the closed system defines the set of its definite-valued observables. This definition seems to be incompatible with the pointer basis selected by the environment-induced decoherence (EID) of the open system. In this paper we argue that decoherence can be understood from a closed system perspective which (i) shows that the incompatibility between MHI and EID is only apparent, and (ii) solves certain conceptual challenges that the EID program still has to face.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0908.4069

Related papers

Compatibility between Environment-Induced Decoherence and the Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi, Juan Sebastián Ardenghi, Sebastián Fortín +1 more

Given the impressive success of environment-induced decoherence (EID), nowadays no interpretation of quantum mechanics can ignore its results. The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation (MHI) has proved to be effective for solving several interpretative problems, but since its actualization rule applies to closed systems, it seems to stand at odds with EID. The purpose of this article is to show that this is not the case: the states einselected by the interaction with the environment according to EID (the elements of the “pointer basis”) are the eigenvectors of an actual-valued observable belonging to the preferred context selected by the MHI.

Philosophy of Science•Dec 1, 2011•22 citations

A Top-Down View of Quantum Mechanics

Olímpia Lombardi

Abstract Since Galileo, physics has traditionally adopted a closed-system view, framed in the more generic strategy of describing highly idealized and generally non-existent situations. However, in the field of quantum mechanics—and also in other fields of physics—an open-system view has been gaining strength in recent decades, maybe under the influence of the practical success of the environment-induced decoherence (EID) developments. This trend is at odds with the perspective of the MHI, which openly adopts a closed-system view. The aim of this chapter is to discuss several aspects of quantum mechanics that reveal the difficulties faced by an open-systems approach. On this basis, a case is made for a closed-system approach that leads to a top-down view of quantum mechanics. This top-down view is in agreement with the ontology of properties introduced in Chapter 4, which will be developed in detail in the following Chapters 9, 10, and 11.

•Feb 19, 2026•0 citations

A Top-down View of the Classical Limit of Quantum Mechanics

Sebastián Fortín, Olímpia Lombardi

At present there is a consensus about the fact that the emergence of the classical world from the underlying quantum reality involves the physical phenomenon of decoherence, which is usually studied in the version proposed by Zurek and his collaborators. According to this version, decoherence is a process resulting from the interaction between a quantum system and its environment (environment-induced decoherence, EID); this process singles out the observables that receive definite classical values. The aim of this paper is to propose a top-down approach to decoherence, which takes the perspective of the whole closed system, and considers whether each set of degrees of freedom decoheres or not. This approach is more general than the orthodox open-system perspective and dissolves some of its conceptual problems. Although decoherence becomes relative to the way in which the closed system is decomposed, the quantum-to-classical transition defines unequivocally the realm of classicality by identifying the observables with classical-like behavior.

WORLD SCIENTIFIC (EUROPE) eBooks•Nov 14, 2016•10 citations

The ‘Decoherence’ Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Andrew Elby

The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science Association•Jan 1, 1994•16 citations

The Modal-Hamiltonian Interpretation of Quantum Mechanics as a Kind of “Atomic” Interpretation

Juan Sebastián Ardenghi, Olímpia Lombardi

Modal interpretations are non-collapse interpretations, where the quantum state of a system describes its possible properties rather than the properties that it actually possesses. Among them, the atomic modal interpretation (AMI) assumes the existence of a special set of disjoint systems that fixes the preferred factorization of the Hilbert space. The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the AMI and our recently presented modal-hamiltonian interpretation (MHI), by showing that the MHI can be viewed as a kind of “atomic” interpretation in two different senses. On the one hand, the MHI provides a precise criterion for the preferred factorization of the Hilbert space into factors representing elemental systems. On the other hand, the MHI identifies the atomic systems that represent elemental particles on the basis of the Galilei group. Finally, we will show that the MHI also introduces a decomposition of the Hilbert space of any elemental system, which determines with precision what observables acquire definite actual values.

Physics Research International•Oct 30, 2011•11 citations

Decoherence according to Environment and Self Induced Decoherences

Mario Castagnino, Roberto Laura

A generalized decoherence formalism that can be used both in open (using Environment Induced Decoherence-EID) and closed (using Self Induced Decoherence-SID) quantum systems is sketched

arXiv:quant-ph/0512131•Dec 16, 2005•3 citations
According to our modal-Hamiltonian interpretation (MHI) of quantum mechanics, the Hamiltonian of the closed system defines the set of its definite-valued observables. This definition seems to be incompatible with the pointer basis selected by the environment-induced decoherence (EID) of the open system. In this paper we argue that decoherence can be understood from a closed system perspective which (i) shows that the incompatibility between MHI and EID is only apparent, and (ii) solves certain conceptual challenges that the EID program still has to face.
Given the impressive success of environment-induced decoherence (EID), nowadays no interpretation of quantum mechanics can ignore its results. The modal-Hamiltonian interpretation (MHI) has proved to be effective for solving several interpretative problems, but since its actualization rule applies to closed systems, it seems to stand at odds with EID. The purpose of this article is to show that this is not the case: the states einselected by the interaction with the environment according to EID (the elements of the “pointer basis”) are the eigenvectors of an actual-valued observable belonging to the preferred context selected by the MHI.
Abstract Since Galileo, physics has traditionally adopted a closed-system view, framed in the more generic strategy of describing highly idealized and generally non-existent situations. However, in the field of quantum mechanics—and also in other fields of physics—an open-system view has been gaining strength in recent decades, maybe under the influence of the practical success of the environment-induced decoherence (EID) developments. This trend is at odds with the perspective of the MHI, which openly adopts a closed-system view. The aim of this chapter is to discuss several aspects of quantum mechanics that reveal the difficulties faced by an open-systems approach. On this basis, a case is made for a closed-system approach that leads to a top-down view of quantum mechanics. This top-down view is in agreement with the ontology of properties introduced in Chapter 4, which will be developed in detail in the following Chapters 9, 10, and 11.
At present there is a consensus about the fact that the emergence of the classical world from the underlying quantum reality involves the physical phenomenon of decoherence, which is usually studied in the version proposed by Zurek and his collaborators. According to this version, decoherence is a process resulting from the interaction between a quantum system and its environment (environment-induced decoherence, EID); this process singles out the observables that receive definite classical values. The aim of this paper is to propose a top-down approach to decoherence, which takes the perspective of the whole closed system, and considers whether each set of degrees of freedom decoheres or not. This approach is more general than the orthodox open-system perspective and dissolves some of its conceptual problems. Although decoherence becomes relative to the way in which the closed system is decomposed, the quantum-to-classical transition defines unequivocally the realm of classicality by identifying the observables with classical-like behavior.
The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.
Modal interpretations are non-collapse interpretations, where the quantum state of a system describes its possible properties rather than the properties that it actually possesses. Among them, the atomic modal interpretation (AMI) assumes the existence of a special set of disjoint systems that fixes the preferred factorization of the Hilbert space. The aim of this paper is to analyze the relationship between the AMI and our recently presented modal-hamiltonian interpretation (MHI), by showing that the MHI can be viewed as a kind of “atomic” interpretation in two different senses. On the one hand, the MHI provides a precise criterion for the preferred factorization of the Hilbert space into factors representing elemental systems. On the other hand, the MHI identifies the atomic systems that represent elemental particles on the basis of the Galilei group. Finally, we will show that the MHI also introduces a decomposition of the Hilbert space of any elemental system, which determines with precision what observables acquire definite actual values.