Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0907.5303

How to Complete the Description of Physical Reality by Non-local Hidden Variables?

T. F. Kamalov

Published Jul 30, 2009• 1 citation
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Which non-local hidden variables could complement the description of physical reality? The present model of extended Newtonian dynamics (MEND) is generalize but not alternative to Newtonian Dynamics because its extended Newtonian Dynamics to arbitrary reference frames. It Is Physics of Arbitrary Reference Frames. Generalize and alternative is not the same. MEND describes the dynamics of mechanical systems for arbitrary reference frames and not only for inertial reference frames as Newtonian Dynamics. Newtonian Dynamics can describe non-inertial reference frames as well introducing fiction forces. In MEND we have fiction forces naturally and automatically from new axiomatic and we needn't have inertial reference frame. MEND is differs from Newtonian Dynamics in the case of micro-objects description.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0907.5303

Related papers

Instability states and Ostrogradsky formalism

T. F. Kamalov

Contemporary physics, both Classical and Quantum, requires a notion of inertial reference frames. However, how to find a physical inertial frame in reality where there always exist random weak forces? We suggest a description of the motion in instability frames by means of inclusion of higher time derivatives. They may play a role of non-local hidden variables in a more general description complementing both classical and quantum mechanics.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jul 1, 2018•4 citations

How to Complement the Description of Physical Universe?

T. F. Kamalov

Which non-local hidden variables could complement the description of physical Universe? The model of extended Newtonian dynamics is presented.

arXiv:0906.3539•Jun 18, 2009•1 citation

Physics of Non-Inertial Reference Frames, conclusions and consequences

T. F. Kamalov, Yu. T. Kamalov

Abstract Refusal to use inertial reference frames in favor of non-inertial reference frames means significant changes in the axiomatics of both classical and quantum physics. Taking into account the influences of random small forces and fields makes the equations of classical physics, expanding, subject not only to deterministic laws, but also expands the equations of classical physics with additional variables that have an indeterministic, probabilistic behavior. Extending the scope of consideration of physical systems to non-inertial frames of reference leads to the already well-known new field of study known as quantum correction of Newton’s laws of motion. In this case, not only stable deterministic trajectories are considered, but also unstable, random ones, which usually constitute the measurement error in experiments in cases of applying classical physics and the probability distribution of quantum mechanics. Such a quantum correction can extend the action of Newton’s laws to the microworld by abandoning the basic idea of classical physics that physical systems should be described by differential equations of no higher than second order in favor of supplementing them with higher derivative variables that describe unstable random trajectories.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 1, 2025•1 citation

Classical and Quantum-Mechanical Axioms with the Higher Time Derivative Formalism

T. F. Kamalov

A Newtonian mechanics model is essentially the model of a point body in an inertial reference frame. How to describe extended bodies in non-inertial (vibrational) reference frames with the random initial conditions? One of the most general description (known as the higher derivatives formalism) consists in taking into account the infinite number of the higher order temporal derivatives of the coordinates in the Lagrange function. Such formalism describes physical objects in the infinite dimensional space does not contradict quantum mechanics and infinite dimensional Hilbert space.

•Aug 14, 2016•33 citations

Classical and quantum-mechanical axioms with the higher time derivative formalism

Timur Kamalov

A Newtonian mechanics model is essentially the model of a point body in an inertial reference frame. How to describe extended bodies in non-inertial (vibration) reference frames with the random initial conditions? One of the most generalized ways of descriptions (known as the higher derivatives formalism) consists in taking into account the infinite number of the higher temporal derivatives of the coordinates in the Lagrange function. Such formalism describing physical objects in the infinite dimensions space does not contradict to the quantum mechanics and infinite dimensions Hilbert space.

arXiv:1307.1697•Journal of Physics Conference Series•Jun 10, 2013•31 citations

Non-inertial transformations, fictitious forces and the equivalence principle

W. H. Klink, S. Wickramasekara

Mathjax On | Off Abstract In the preceding chapter, we showed how one-particle quantum states can be obtained from unitary irreducible representations of the Galilei group, the transformation group of Newton relativity. Since the Galilei group defines transformations amongst inertial reference frames, this description of one-particle quantum states is limited to inertial observers. In particular, observers who are accelerating are excluded in this description. This motivates the question of whether it is possible to provide a description of one-particle quantum states that holds for non-inertial observers by expanding the notion of Newton relativity to include non-inertial reference frames.

Morgan & Claypool Publishers eBooks•Mar 1, 2015•0 citations
Which non-local hidden variables could complement the description of physical reality? The present model of extended Newtonian dynamics (MEND) is generalize but not alternative to Newtonian Dynamics because its extended Newtonian Dynamics to arbitrary reference frames. It Is Physics of Arbitrary Reference Frames. Generalize and alternative is not the same. MEND describes the dynamics of mechanical systems for arbitrary reference frames and not only for inertial reference frames as Newtonian Dynamics. Newtonian Dynamics can describe non-inertial reference frames as well introducing fiction forces. In MEND we have fiction forces naturally and automatically from new axiomatic and we needn't have inertial reference frame. MEND is differs from Newtonian Dynamics in the case of micro-objects description.
Abstract Refusal to use inertial reference frames in favor of non-inertial reference frames means significant changes in the axiomatics of both classical and quantum physics. Taking into account the influences of random small forces and fields makes the equations of classical physics, expanding, subject not only to deterministic laws, but also expands the equations of classical physics with additional variables that have an indeterministic, probabilistic behavior. Extending the scope of consideration of physical systems to non-inertial frames of reference leads to the already well-known new field of study known as quantum correction of Newton’s laws of motion. In this case, not only stable deterministic trajectories are considered, but also unstable, random ones, which usually constitute the measurement error in experiments in cases of applying classical physics and the probability distribution of quantum mechanics. Such a quantum correction can extend the action of Newton’s laws to the microworld by abandoning the basic idea of classical physics that physical systems should be described by differential equations of no higher than second order in favor of supplementing them with higher derivative variables that describe unstable random trajectories.
A Newtonian mechanics model is essentially the model of a point body in an inertial reference frame. How to describe extended bodies in non-inertial (vibrational) reference frames with the random initial conditions? One of the most general description (known as the higher derivatives formalism) consists in taking into account the infinite number of the higher order temporal derivatives of the coordinates in the Lagrange function. Such formalism describes physical objects in the infinite dimensional space does not contradict quantum mechanics and infinite dimensional Hilbert space.
A Newtonian mechanics model is essentially the model of a point body in an inertial reference frame. How to describe extended bodies in non-inertial (vibration) reference frames with the random initial conditions? One of the most generalized ways of descriptions (known as the higher derivatives formalism) consists in taking into account the infinite number of the higher temporal derivatives of the coordinates in the Lagrange function. Such formalism describing physical objects in the infinite dimensions space does not contradict to the quantum mechanics and infinite dimensions Hilbert space.
Mathjax On | Off Abstract In the preceding chapter, we showed how one-particle quantum states can be obtained from unitary irreducible representations of the Galilei group, the transformation group of Newton relativity. Since the Galilei group defines transformations amongst inertial reference frames, this description of one-particle quantum states is limited to inertial observers. In particular, observers who are accelerating are excluded in this description. This motivates the question of whether it is possible to provide a description of one-particle quantum states that holds for non-inertial observers by expanding the notion of Newton relativity to include non-inertial reference frames.