Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0907.4751

Do Our Observations Depend upon the Quantum State of the Universe?

Don Nelson Page

Published Jul 27, 2009• 3 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Generically the probabilities of observational results depend upon both the quantum state and the rules for extracting the probabilities from it. It is often argued that inflation may make our observations independent of the quantum state. In a framework in which one considers the state and the rules as logically separate, it is shown how it is possible that the probabilities are indeed independent of the state, but the rules for achieving this seem somewhat implausible.

DOI
10.48550/arxiv.0907.4751

Related papers

Insufficiency of the quantum state for deducing observational probabilities

Don Nelson Page

It is usually assumed that the quantum state is sufficient for deducing all probabilities for a system. This may be true when there is a single observer, but it is not true in a universe large enough that there are many copies of an observer. Then the probability of an observation cannot be deduced simply from the quantum state (say as the expectation value of the projection operator for the observation, as in traditional quantum theory). One needs additional rules to get the probabilities. What these rules are is not logically deducible from the quantum state, so the quantum state itself is insufficient for deducing observational probabilities. This is the measure problem of cosmology.

arXiv:0808.0722•Physics Letters B•Jun 10, 2009•17 citations

Possibilities for probabilities

Don Nelson Page

Abstract In ordinary situations involving a small part of the universe, Born's rule seems to work well for calculating probabilities of observations in quantum theory. However, there are a number of reasons for believing that it is not adequate for many cosmological purposes. Here a number of possible generalizations of Born's rule are discussed, explaining why they are consistent with the present statistical support for Born's rule in ordinary situations but can help solve various cosmological problems.

arXiv:1711.05740•Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics•Oct 1, 2022•6 citations

Why Decoherence Alone Cannot Universally Determine Quantum Probabilities

Atsushi Okamoto

Decoherence theory has played a central role in explaining the suppression of interference and the emergence of classicality in quantum systems. However, it remains unclear whether decoherence alone can universally account for the origin of quantum probabilities themselves. In the present work, we examine the consequences of interpreting decoherence not merely as an interference-suppression mechanism, but as the fundamental generator of probabilistic measurement outcomes. If quantum probabilities are produced through system–apparatus–environment interactions, the resulting probabilities would generally be expected to depend on the detailed structure of those interactions. Such dependence would imply the possibility of interaction-dependent corrections to the Born-rule probabilities. However, the experimentally observed universality and robustness of the Born rule strongly constrain such a possibility. We therefore argue that decoherence successfully explains the effective suppression of interference terms, but does not by itself universally determine quantum probabilities without additional principles ensuring probability invariance. Based on this distinction, we propose that the origin of quantum probabilities should be conceptually separated from decoherence-induced classicality. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this separation arises naturally through structural limitations on observability rather than through environment-generated probability formation. The present analysis suggests a conceptual reorganization of the role of decoherence in the quantum measurement problem.

•Jul 4, 2026•0 citations

The Born rule fails in cosmology

Don Nelson Page

The Born rule may be stated mathematically as the rule that probabilities in quantum theory are expectation values of a complete orthogonal set of projection operators. This rule works for single laboratory settings in which the observer can distinguish all the different possible outcomes corresponding to the projection operators. However, theories of inflation suggest that the universe may be so large that any laboratory, no matter how precisely it is defined by its internal state, may exist in a large number of very distantly separated copies throughout the vast universe. In this case, no observer within the universe can distinguish all possible outcomes for all copies of the laboratory. Then normalized probabilities for the local outcomes that can be locally distinguished cannot be given by the expectation values of any projection operators. Thus the Born rule fails and must be replaced by another rule for observational probabilities in cosmology. The freedom of what this new rule is to be is the measure problem in cosmology. A particular volume-averaged form is proposed.

arXiv:0903.4888•Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics•Jul 3, 2009•44 citations

Quantum Mechanics from Classical Logic

Gerard ’t Hooft

Although quantum mechanics is generally considered to be fundamentally incompatible with classical logic, it is argued here that the gap is not as great as it seems. Any classical, discrete, time reversible system can be naturally described using a quantum Hubert space, operators, and a Schrödinger equation. The quantum states generated this way resemble the ones in the real world so much that one wonders why this could not be used to interpret all of quantum mechanics this way. Indeed, such an interpretation leads to the most natural explanation as to why a wave function appears to "collapse" when a measurement is made, and why probabilities obey the Born rule. Because it is real quantum mechanics that we generate, Bell's inequalities should not be an obstacle.

Journal of Physics Conference Series•May 10, 2012•17 citations

Probability and quantum mechanics

Daniel J. Velleman

We discuss the use of probability theory in quantum mechanics, and suggest that there are some interpretations of quantum mechanics in which probabilities may be used inappropriately.

American Journal of Physics•Nov 1, 1998•4 citations
Generically the probabilities of observational results depend upon both the quantum state and the rules for extracting the probabilities from it. It is often argued that inflation may make our observations independent of the quantum state. In a framework in which one considers the state and the rules as logically separate, it is shown how it is possible that the probabilities are indeed independent of the state, but the rules for achieving this seem somewhat implausible.
It is usually assumed that the quantum state is sufficient for deducing all probabilities for a system. This may be true when there is a single observer, but it is not true in a universe large enough that there are many copies of an observer. Then the probability of an observation cannot be deduced simply from the quantum state (say as the expectation value of the projection operator for the observation, as in traditional quantum theory). One needs additional rules to get the probabilities. What these rules are is not logically deducible from the quantum state, so the quantum state itself is insufficient for deducing observational probabilities. This is the measure problem of cosmology.
Abstract In ordinary situations involving a small part of the universe, Born's rule seems to work well for calculating probabilities of observations in quantum theory. However, there are a number of reasons for believing that it is not adequate for many cosmological purposes. Here a number of possible generalizations of Born's rule are discussed, explaining why they are consistent with the present statistical support for Born's rule in ordinary situations but can help solve various cosmological problems.
Decoherence theory has played a central role in explaining the suppression of interference and the emergence of classicality in quantum systems. However, it remains unclear whether decoherence alone can universally account for the origin of quantum probabilities themselves. In the present work, we examine the consequences of interpreting decoherence not merely as an interference-suppression mechanism, but as the fundamental generator of probabilistic measurement outcomes. If quantum probabilities are produced through system–apparatus–environment interactions, the resulting probabilities would generally be expected to depend on the detailed structure of those interactions. Such dependence would imply the possibility of interaction-dependent corrections to the Born-rule probabilities. However, the experimentally observed universality and robustness of the Born rule strongly constrain such a possibility. We therefore argue that decoherence successfully explains the effective suppression of interference terms, but does not by itself universally determine quantum probabilities without additional principles ensuring probability invariance. Based on this distinction, we propose that the origin of quantum probabilities should be conceptually separated from decoherence-induced classicality. Within the Intrinsic Observability Framework (IOF), this separation arises naturally through structural limitations on observability rather than through environment-generated probability formation. The present analysis suggests a conceptual reorganization of the role of decoherence in the quantum measurement problem.
The Born rule may be stated mathematically as the rule that probabilities in quantum theory are expectation values of a complete orthogonal set of projection operators. This rule works for single laboratory settings in which the observer can distinguish all the different possible outcomes corresponding to the projection operators. However, theories of inflation suggest that the universe may be so large that any laboratory, no matter how precisely it is defined by its internal state, may exist in a large number of very distantly separated copies throughout the vast universe. In this case, no observer within the universe can distinguish all possible outcomes for all copies of the laboratory. Then normalized probabilities for the local outcomes that can be locally distinguished cannot be given by the expectation values of any projection operators. Thus the Born rule fails and must be replaced by another rule for observational probabilities in cosmology. The freedom of what this new rule is to be is the measure problem in cosmology. A particular volume-averaged form is proposed.
Although quantum mechanics is generally considered to be fundamentally incompatible with classical logic, it is argued here that the gap is not as great as it seems. Any classical, discrete, time reversible system can be naturally described using a quantum Hubert space, operators, and a Schrödinger equation. The quantum states generated this way resemble the ones in the real world so much that one wonders why this could not be used to interpret all of quantum mechanics this way. Indeed, such an interpretation leads to the most natural explanation as to why a wave function appears to "collapse" when a measurement is made, and why probabilities obey the Born rule. Because it is real quantum mechanics that we generate, Bell's inequalities should not be an obstacle.