arXiv:0906.1714 · AIP conference proceedings

Priors in Quantum Bayesian Inference

Christopher A. Fuchs, Rüdiger Schack, Luigi Accardi, Guillaume Adenier, Christopher A. Fuchs, Gregg S. Jaeger, Andrei Yu. Khrennikov, Jan-Åke Larsson, Stig Stenholm

Published Jan 1, 2009• 18 citations

arXiv HTML PDF

Abstract

In quantum Bayesian inference problems, any conclusions drawn from a finite number of measurements depend not only on the outcomes of the measurements but also on a prior. Here we show that, in general, the prior remains important even in the limit of an infinite number of measurements. We illustrate this point with several examples where two priors lead to very different conclusions given the same measurement data.

DOI: 10.1063/1.3109948

Related papers

Witnessing Quantum Bayesian Inference beyond Classical Learning

Francesco Buscemi

Can an agent's predictions reveal whether its reasoning is based on a classical or a quantum model? Using known results on matrix factorizations, here we show that quantum Bayesian retrodiction can produce one-step-ahead forecasts incompatible with every classical Bayesian explanation based on learning about a fixed but unknown sampling law from conditionally independent observations. The separation has a sharp threshold in the number of outcomes: for any measurement with at most four outcomes, the quantum predictions admit a classical realization, irrespective of the prior state and the finite Hilbert-space dimension, whereas a five-outcome measurement on a single qubit already violates an explicit classical bound. This bound holds for arbitrary classical latent states, prior probabilities, and sampling laws, and involves only the agent's initial and updated predictions. Thus, in this setting, quantum Bayesian retrodiction is strictly more expressive than classical Bayesian learning, and this difference can be witnessed without observing or specifying the agent's internal description.

quant-pharXiv:2610.09293Oct 8, 20260 citations

Bayesian Probability in Quantum Mechanics

Rüdiger Schack

Abstract This paper reviews arguments for the claim that all probabilities arising in quantum mechanics are Bayesian degrees of belief. The starting point is the observation that there is a one-to-one map from quantum states to points on the probability simplex. Bayes’s rule remains valid in quantum theory, provided it is kept in mind that the outcomes of quantum measurements have no preassigned values. The probabilities of quantum measurement outcomes depend explicitly on a quantum prior whose general form will be discussed. Similar to the classical case, the quantum de Finetti theorem simplifies the analysis of repeated quantum trials if the prior is exchangeable. The Bayesian approach to quantum theory described here solves the problem of the ‘collapse of the wave function’. It also provides almost trivial explanations of a number of phenomena in quantum information theory, including the no-cloning theorem and quantum teleportation.

Jul 19, 20072 citations

Quantum Measurement Optimization via Bayesian Inference

Jincheng Zhang

This paper investigates the application of Bayesian inference for optimizing quantum measurement schemes. Traditional quantum measurement strategies often rely on heuristic approaches or specific system constraints, potentially leading to suboptimal outcomes. We propose a framework where the quantum measurement process is modeled as a Bayesian inference problem. This allows us to systematically explore the measurement landscape, incorporating prior knowledge and iteratively refining the measurement strategy based on observed outcomes. The core of this approach lies in formulating the measurement problem as a probabilistic model and utilizing Bayesian updating to determine the optimal measurement basis or parameters. We demonstrate, through theoretical analysis and conceptual design, that Bayesian optimization can lead to improved measurement accuracy and efficiency compared to conventional methods. The key benefits include reduced measurement errors, enhanced signal-to-noise ratios, and potentially the ability to extract more information from quantum systems. This work presents a novel methodology for quantum measurement, bridging the gap between classical Bayesian optimization and the unique properties of quantum mechanics.

Sep 3, 20260 citations

Inferring the Gibbs state of a small quantum system

Jochen Rau

Gibbs states are familiar from statistical mechanics, yet their use is not limited to that domain. For instance, they also feature in the maximum entropy reconstruction of quantum states from incomplete measurement data. Outside the macroscopic realm, however, estimating a Gibbs state is a nontrivial inference task, due to two complicating factors: the proper set of relevant observables might not be evident a priori; and whenever data are gathered from a small sample only, the best estimate for the Lagrange parameters is invariably affected by the experimenter's prior bias. I show how the two issues can be tackled with the help of Bayesian model selection and Bayesian interpolation, respectively, and illustrate the use of these Bayesian techniques with a number of simple examples.

arXiv:1008.3643Physical Review AJul 1, 201110 citations

Bayesian multiparameter quantum metrology with limited data

Jesús Rubio, Jacob Dunningham

A longstanding problem in quantum metrology is how to extract as much information as possible in realistic scenarios with not only multiple unknown parameters, but also limited measurement data and some degree of prior information. Here we present a practical solution to this: We derive a Bayesian multi-parameter quantum bound, construct the optimal measurement when our bound can be saturated for a single shot, and consider experiments involving a repeated sequence of these measurements. Our method properly accounts for the number of measurements and the degree of prior information, and we illustrate our ideas with a qubit sensing network and a model for phase imaging, clarifying the nonasymptotic role of local and global schemes. Crucially, our technique is a powerful way of implementing quantum protocols in a wide range of practical scenarios that tools such as the Helstrom and Holevo Cram\'er-Rao bounds cannot normally access.

arXiv:1906.04123Physical Review AMar 20, 202075 citations

Quantum-Inspired Bayesian Inference for Complex Systems

Jincheng Zhang

Bayesian inference, a cornerstone of statistical modeling, often struggles with the complexities of high-dimensional data and non-Gaussian distributions commonly encountered in complex systems. This paper proposes a novel approach termed Quantum-Inspired Bayesian Inference (QIBI), leveraging concepts from quantum mechanics – specifically superposition and entanglement – to enhance the efficiency and accuracy of Bayesian inference. QIBI represents prior distributions as superposition states and employs entangled quantum-like circuits to perform marginalization and posterior calculation, effectively addressing the computational bottlenecks associated with traditional methods. We demonstrate the potential of this approach to significantly improve inference performance in scenarios where classical Bayesian methods face limitations. The core of this work lies in the conceptual mapping of Bayesian calculations onto a quantum-inspired framework, providing a new perspective on statistical inference. We define key mathematical formulations to illustrate the proposed methodology, including the superposition state representation of prior distributions and the entanglement-based circuit design for posterior calculation. This exploration aims to bridge the gap between statistical inference and quantum computing, opening avenues for tackling previously intractable problems.

Sep 5, 20260 citations