Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0902.0691 · Open Physics

On some hydrodynamical aspects of quantum mechanics

Mauro Spera

Published May 5, 2009• 5 citations
arXivHTMLPDF

Abstract

Abstract In this note we first set up an analogy between spin and vorticity of a perfect 2d-fluid flow, based on the complex polynomial (i.e. Borel-Weil) realization of the irreducible unitary representations of SU(2), and looking at the Madelung-Bohm velocity attached to the ensuing spin wave functions. We also show that, in the framework of finite dimensional geometric quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger velocity field on projective Hilbert space is divergence-free (being Killing with respect to the Fubini-Study metric) and fulfils the stationary Euler equation, with pressure proportional to the Hamiltonian uncertainty (squared). We explicitly determine the critical points of the pressure of this “Schrödinger fluid”, together with its vorticity, which turns out to depend on the spacings of the energy levels. These results follow from hydrodynamical properties of Killing vector fields valid in any (finite dimensional) Riemannian manifold, of possible independent interest.

DOI
10.2478/s11534-009-0070-4

Related papers

Euler-Schrodinger Transformation

Ahmad Zareei

Here we present a transformation that maps the Schrodinger equation of quantum mechanics to the incompressible Euler equations of fluid mechanics. The transformation provides a wave solution and a potential function based on fluid properties that satisfy the Schrodinger equation given that the fluid velocity potential and pressure satisfy the Euler equations. Interestingly, in our transformation, the equivalent of quantum potential becomes the physical surface tension. This is contrary to the Madelung transformation that maps the Schrodinger equation to the compressible Euler equations where there is no physical counterpart for the quantum potential. Lastly, we show that using this transformation, the Bohm equation can be mapped to a particle's equation of motion moving on the free surface of the fluid.

arXiv:2105.12253•May 25, 2021•0 citations

Emergence of vorticity and viscous stress in finite-scale quantum hydrodynamics

Christopher Triola

The Madelung equations offer a hydrodynamic description of quantum systems, from single particles to quantum fluids. In this formulation, the probability density is mapped onto the fluid density and the phase is treated as a scalar potential generating the velocity field. As examples of potential flows, quantum fluids described in this way are inherently irrotational, but quantum vortices may arise at discrete points where the phase is undefined. In this paper, starting from this irrotational description of a quantum fluid, a coarse-graining procedure is applied to arrive at a macroscopic description of the quantum fluid in terms of a hierarchy of moments in which the role of velocity is played by a Favre average of the microscopic velocity field. This hierarchy is truncated using an explicit closure derived from an expansion in a finite length scale. The resulting coarse-grained fields are shown to allow for finite vorticity at any point in the fluid. Furthermore, it is shown that this vorticity obeys a similar equation to the vorticity equation in classical hydrodynamics and includes a vortex-stretching term. The particular closure employed here also gives rise to a novel stress term in the fluid equations, which in the appropriate limit appears analogous to an artificial viscous stress from computational fluid dynamics.

arXiv:2508.18200•Physical review. E•Mar 12, 2026•1 citation

The symplectic geometrical formulation of quantum hydrodynamics

Andika Kusuma Wijaya, Arief Hermanto, Muhammad Farchani Rosyid

Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.

International Journal of Geometric Methods in Modern Physics•Jul 1, 2022•3 citations

- Symmetries and Conservation Laws in the Lagrangian Picture of Quantum Hydrodynamics

Swapan Kumar Ghosh, Pratim Kumar Chattaraj

The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64

CRC Press eBooks•Apr 19, 2016•2 citations

On the hydrodynamic interpretation of non-relativistic quantum mechanics

James Day

The Madelung equations express the Schrödinger equation as a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation. These equations are equivalent to the Euler equations for a compressible, potential flow, when classical pressure per unit density is replaced by the quantum potential per unit mass. We extend this hydrodynamic interpretation by quantising a single, spinless, non-relativistic particle constrained to a surface wave with small slope. The wave is distinct from the wave function and, in order to reproduce the Schrödinger equation, it must satisfy the kinematic boundary condition for a free surface advected by twice the Madelung velocity field.

Comptes Rendus Physique•Apr 2, 2026•1 citation

A fluid description based on the Bernoulli equation of the one-body stationary states of quantum mechanics with real valued wavefunctions

James P. Finley

Abstract A formalism is developed, and applied, that describes a class of one-body quantum mechanical systems as fluids where each stationary state is a steady flow state. The time-independent Schrödinger equation for one-body stationary states with real-valued wavefunctions is shown to be equivalent to a compressible-flow generalization of the Bernoulli equation of fluid dynamics. The mass density, velocity and pressure are taken as functions that are determined by the probability density. The generalized Bernoulli equation describes compressible, irrotational, steady flow with variable mass and a constant specific total energy, i.e, a constant energy per mass for each fluid element. The generalized Bernoulli equation and a generalized continuity equation provide a fluid dynamic interpretation of a class of quantum mechanical stationary states that is an alternative to the unrealistic, static-fluid interpretation provided by the Madelung equations and quantum hydrodynamics. The total kinetic energy from the Bernoulli equation is shown to be equal to the expectation value of the kinetic energy, and the integrand of the expectation value of the kinetic energy is given an interpretation. It is also demonstrated that variable mass is necessary for a satisfactory fluid model of stationary states. However, over all space, the flows conserve mass, because the rate of mass creation from the sources are equal to the rate of mass annihilation from the sinks. The following flows are examined: the ground and first excited-states of a particle in a one-dimensional box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen s states.

Journal of Physics Communications•Mar 29, 2022•7 citations
Abstract In this note we first set up an analogy between spin and vorticity of a perfect 2d-fluid flow, based on the complex polynomial (i.e. Borel-Weil) realization of the irreducible unitary representations of SU(2), and looking at the Madelung-Bohm velocity attached to the ensuing spin wave functions. We also show that, in the framework of finite dimensional geometric quantum mechanics, the Schrödinger velocity field on projective Hilbert space is divergence-free (being Killing with respect to the Fubini-Study metric) and fulfils the stationary Euler equation, with pressure proportional to the Hamiltonian uncertainty (squared). We explicitly determine the critical points of the pressure of this “Schrödinger fluid”, together with its vorticity, which turns out to depend on the spacings of the energy levels. These results follow from hydrodynamical properties of Killing vector fields valid in any (finite dimensional) Riemannian manifold, of possible independent interest.
Here we present a transformation that maps the Schrodinger equation of quantum mechanics to the incompressible Euler equations of fluid mechanics. The transformation provides a wave solution and a potential function based on fluid properties that satisfy the Schrodinger equation given that the fluid velocity potential and pressure satisfy the Euler equations. Interestingly, in our transformation, the equivalent of quantum potential becomes the physical surface tension. This is contrary to the Madelung transformation that maps the Schrodinger equation to the compressible Euler equations where there is no physical counterpart for the quantum potential. Lastly, we show that using this transformation, the Bohm equation can be mapped to a particle's equation of motion moving on the free surface of the fluid.
The Madelung equations offer a hydrodynamic description of quantum systems, from single particles to quantum fluids. In this formulation, the probability density is mapped onto the fluid density and the phase is treated as a scalar potential generating the velocity field. As examples of potential flows, quantum fluids described in this way are inherently irrotational, but quantum vortices may arise at discrete points where the phase is undefined. In this paper, starting from this irrotational description of a quantum fluid, a coarse-graining procedure is applied to arrive at a macroscopic description of the quantum fluid in terms of a hierarchy of moments in which the role of velocity is played by a Favre average of the microscopic velocity field. This hierarchy is truncated using an explicit closure derived from an expansion in a finite length scale. The resulting coarse-grained fields are shown to allow for finite vorticity at any point in the fluid. Furthermore, it is shown that this vorticity obeys a similar equation to the vorticity equation in classical hydrodynamics and includes a vortex-stretching term. The particular closure employed here also gives rise to a novel stress term in the fluid equations, which in the appropriate limit appears analogous to an artificial viscous stress from computational fluid dynamics.
Quantum hydrodynamics described by Madelung equations is analyzed in the framework of symplectic geometry i.e. in covariant phase space approach to geometric field theory. The pre-symplectic manifolds providing the phase spaces describing the Hamiltonian dynamics of quantum fluid are constructed from the set of all solutions of Madelung equations and their corresponding Lagrangian densities. The Madelung equations under consideration are the Madelung equations associated to Schroedinger equations (in the nonrelativistic case) and Madelung equations associated to Klein–Gordon equations (in the relativistic case). The cases where the coupling with electromagnetic fields is present are also considered here. Our symplectic formulation is different from that of [M. Spera, Moment map and gauge geometric aspects of the Schrodinger and Pauli equations, Int. J. Geom. Methods Mod. Phys. 13 (2016) 1–36] in the choice of fundamental fields or variables. Here we regard density function [Formula: see text] and phase function [Formula: see text] not as canonical pair but as the fundamental fields of the theory. The Hamiltonian vector fields corresponding to an observable are obtained from the Hamiltonian equation generated by the observable. The Poisson bracket of two observables then is determined by the Hamiltonian vector fields associated to each observable. In general, the Poisson bracket of two observables is not unique due to the fact that every observable has more than one corresponding Hamiltonian vector field. It is pointed out that the Poisson bracket has a unique value over a certain subset of the set of all observables defined on the pre-symplectic manifold of the Madelung equation under consideration.
The similarity in form between the two real equations implied by the single-body spin-0 Schrödinger equation in the position representation (wave mechanics) and the equations of fluid mechanics with potential flow in its Eulerian formulation was first pointed out by Madelung in 1926 [1]. In this analogy, the probability density is proportional to the fluid density, and the phase of the wave function is a velocity potential. A novel feature of the quantum fluid is the appearance of quantum stresses, which are usually represented through the quantum potential. To achieve mathematical equivalence of the models, the hydrodynamic variables have to satisfy 4.1 Introduction .................................................................................................... 55 4.2 Deduction of Schrödinger’s Equation from the Lagrangian Picture Trajectory Theory ........................................................................................... 57 4.2.1 Lagrangian Picture ............................................................................. 57 4.2.2 Eulerian Picture .................................................................................. 62 4.2.3 Equivalence of First-Order and Second-Order Trajectory Laws ........64
The Madelung equations express the Schrödinger equation as a continuity equation and modified Hamilton–Jacobi equation. These equations are equivalent to the Euler equations for a compressible, potential flow, when classical pressure per unit density is replaced by the quantum potential per unit mass. We extend this hydrodynamic interpretation by quantising a single, spinless, non-relativistic particle constrained to a surface wave with small slope. The wave is distinct from the wave function and, in order to reproduce the Schrödinger equation, it must satisfy the kinematic boundary condition for a free surface advected by twice the Madelung velocity field.
Abstract A formalism is developed, and applied, that describes a class of one-body quantum mechanical systems as fluids where each stationary state is a steady flow state. The time-independent Schrödinger equation for one-body stationary states with real-valued wavefunctions is shown to be equivalent to a compressible-flow generalization of the Bernoulli equation of fluid dynamics. The mass density, velocity and pressure are taken as functions that are determined by the probability density. The generalized Bernoulli equation describes compressible, irrotational, steady flow with variable mass and a constant specific total energy, i.e, a constant energy per mass for each fluid element. The generalized Bernoulli equation and a generalized continuity equation provide a fluid dynamic interpretation of a class of quantum mechanical stationary states that is an alternative to the unrealistic, static-fluid interpretation provided by the Madelung equations and quantum hydrodynamics. The total kinetic energy from the Bernoulli equation is shown to be equal to the expectation value of the kinetic energy, and the integrand of the expectation value of the kinetic energy is given an interpretation. It is also demonstrated that variable mass is necessary for a satisfactory fluid model of stationary states. However, over all space, the flows conserve mass, because the rate of mass creation from the sources are equal to the rate of mass annihilation from the sinks. The following flows are examined: the ground and first excited-states of a particle in a one-dimensional box, the harmonic oscillator, and the hydrogen s states.