Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Log inSign up
Challenges
Datasets
Workspaces
Papers
Discussions
Leaderboard
Blog
Job Board
Q3AS

© 2026 Aqora Quantum S.A.S.

TermsPrivacyLegal Notice

arXiv:0901.4649 · The European Physical Journal B

Spectral functions in the two-dimensional Hubbard model within a spin-charge rotating frame approach

T. A. Zaleski, T. K. Kopeć

Published Jul 21, 2010• 0 citations
arXivHTMLPDF
DOI
10.1140/epjb/e2010-00230-3

Related papers

Dynamical spin and charge response functions in the doped two-dimensional Hubbard model

Taiichirou Saikawa, A. Ferraz

The European Physical Journal B•Jun 1, 1998•1 citation

Electron Spectral Functions in the Presence of the Antiferromagnetic Order in the Two-Dimensional Hubbard Model

T. A. Zaleski, T. K. Kopeć

We use a recently proposed quantum SU(2) × U(1) rotor approach for the Hubbard model to calculate electronic spectral functions in a presence of an antiferromagnetic state for any value of the Coulomb interaction.We isolate the collective variables for charge and spin in the form of the space-time fluctuating U(1) phase field and SU(2) rotating spin quantization axis, respectively.As a result, the fermion Green function in the space-time domain becomes a product of a CP 1 propagator resulting from the SU(2) gauge fields, U(1) phase propagator and the pseudo-fermion correlation function.In turn, the spectral lines are obtained by performing the convolution of spin, charge and pseudo-fermion Green's functions.We observe an emergence of a sharp peak in the electron spectral functions within the antiferromagnetic phase, whose spectral weight is equal to the antiferromagnetic order parameter.

Acta Physica Polonica A•Aug 1, 2010•0 citations

Spectral functions for the 2D Hubbard model

Marco U. Luchini, David M. Edwards

Journal of Low Temperature Physics•May 1, 1995•3 citations

Spectral function of the 1D Hubbard model

M. Gulácsi, Kevin S. Bedell

Physica B Condensed Matter•Apr 1, 1994•0 citations

Néel order in the Hubbard model within a spin-charge rotating reference frame approach: Crossover from weak to strong coupling

T. A. Zaleski, T. K. Kopeć

The antiferromagnetic phase of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) Hubbard model with nearest neighbor hopping is studied on a bipartite cubic lattice by means of the quantum $\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)$ rotor approach that yields a fully self-consistent treatment of the antiferromagnetic state that respects the symmetry properties of the model and satisfy the Mermin-Wagner theorem. The collective variables for charge and spin are isolated in the form of the space-time fluctuating U(1) phase field and rotating spin-quantization axis governed by the SU(2) symmetry, respectively. As a result interacting electrons appear as composite objects consisting of bare fermions with attached U(1) and SU(2) gauge fields. An effective action consisting of a spin-charge rotor and a fermionic field is derived as a function of the Coulomb repulsion $U$ and hopping parameter $t$. At zero temperature, our theory describes the evolution from a Slater $(U⪡t)$ to a Mott-Heisenberg $(U⪢t)$ antiferromagnet. The results for zero-temperature sublatice magnetization (2D) and finite temperature (3D) phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic Hubbard model as a function of the crossover parameter $U∕t$ are presented and the role of the spin Berry phase in the interaction driven crossover is analyzed.

arXiv:0811.0248•Physical Review B•Mar 14, 2008•14 citations

Electrons interacting with Goldstone modes and the rotating frame

Konstantinos Vasiliou, Yuchi He, Nick Bultinck

We consider electronic systems with a spontaneously broken continuous symmetry. The scattering vertex between electrons and Goldstone modes is calculated over the entire Brillouin zone using the random phase approximation. This calculation reveals two things: (1) electrons always couple to both ϕ and ∂tϕ , where ϕ is the Goldstone field, and (2) quasiparticles in a state with continuous symmetry breaking have to be defined in a rotating frame, which locally follows the fluctuations of the order parameter. The implications of these findings for electron spectral functions in both symmetry-broken and thermally disordered systems are discussed, and the examples of antiferromagnetism in the Hubbard model and spin spiral order in the three-band model are worked out in detail. Published by the American Physical Society 2024

arXiv:2307.05699•Physical review. B./Physical review. B•Jan 31, 2024•5 citations
We use a recently proposed quantum SU(2) × U(1) rotor approach for the Hubbard model to calculate electronic spectral functions in a presence of an antiferromagnetic state for any value of the Coulomb interaction.We isolate the collective variables for charge and spin in the form of the space-time fluctuating U(1) phase field and SU(2) rotating spin quantization axis, respectively.As a result, the fermion Green function in the space-time domain becomes a product of a CP 1 propagator resulting from the SU(2) gauge fields, U(1) phase propagator and the pseudo-fermion correlation function.In turn, the spectral lines are obtained by performing the convolution of spin, charge and pseudo-fermion Green's functions.We observe an emergence of a sharp peak in the electron spectral functions within the antiferromagnetic phase, whose spectral weight is equal to the antiferromagnetic order parameter.
The antiferromagnetic phase of two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) Hubbard model with nearest neighbor hopping is studied on a bipartite cubic lattice by means of the quantum $\mathrm{SU}(2)\ifmmode\times\else\texttimes\fi{}\mathrm{U}(1)$ rotor approach that yields a fully self-consistent treatment of the antiferromagnetic state that respects the symmetry properties of the model and satisfy the Mermin-Wagner theorem. The collective variables for charge and spin are isolated in the form of the space-time fluctuating U(1) phase field and rotating spin-quantization axis governed by the SU(2) symmetry, respectively. As a result interacting electrons appear as composite objects consisting of bare fermions with attached U(1) and SU(2) gauge fields. An effective action consisting of a spin-charge rotor and a fermionic field is derived as a function of the Coulomb repulsion UUU and hopping parameter ttt. At zero temperature, our theory describes the evolution from a Slater (U⪡t)(U⪡t)(U⪡t) to a Mott-Heisenberg (U⪢t)(U⪢t)(U⪢t) antiferromagnet. The results for zero-temperature sublatice magnetization (2D) and finite temperature (3D) phase diagram of the antiferromagnetic Hubbard model as a function of the crossover parameter U∕tU∕tU∕t are presented and the role of the spin Berry phase in the interaction driven crossover is analyzed.
We consider electronic systems with a spontaneously broken continuous symmetry. The scattering vertex between electrons and Goldstone modes is calculated over the entire Brillouin zone using the random phase approximation. This calculation reveals two things: (1) electrons always couple to both ϕ and ∂tϕ , where ϕ is the Goldstone field, and (2) quasiparticles in a state with continuous symmetry breaking have to be defined in a rotating frame, which locally follows the fluctuations of the order parameter. The implications of these findings for electron spectral functions in both symmetry-broken and thermally disordered systems are discussed, and the examples of antiferromagnetism in the Hubbard model and spin spiral order in the three-band model are worked out in detail. Published by the American Physical Society 2024