arXiv:0812.0093

Preferred basis without decoherence

Leonardo Vanni, Roberto Laura

Published Nov 29, 2008• 1 citation

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to argue that the "preferred basis problem" is not a real problem in measurement. We will show that, given an apparatus, among the infinite corrrelations that can be established in the final state by means of a change of basis, one and only one makes physical sense. It is the apparatus, through its interaction Hamiltonian, what selects a single basis and determines the observable to be measured, even without decoherence.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.0812.0093

Related papers

Is the Preferred Basis selected by the environment?

Tian Wang, David Hobill

We show that in a quantum measurement, the preferred basis is determined by the interaction between the apparatus and the quantum system, instead of by the environment. This interaction entangles three degrees of freedom, one system degree of freedom we are interested in and preserved by the interaction, one system degree of freedom that carries the change due to the interaction, and the apparatus degree of freedom which is always ignored. Considering all three degrees of freedom the composite state only has one decomposition, and this guarantees that the apparatus would end up in the expected preferred basis of our daily experiences. We also point out some problems with the environment-induced super-selection (Einselection) solution to the preferred basis problem, and clarifies a common misunderstanding of environmental decoherence and the preferred basis problem.

arXiv:1412.2852Dec 9, 20141 citation

The ‘Decoherence’ Approach to the Measurement Problem in Quantum Mechanics

Andrew Elby

The decoherence approach to the measurement problem invokes dissipative interactions between a measuring apparatus and its environment to explain, within the context of ‘pure’ quantum mechanics (QM), why such devices appear to possess definite pointer readings. By ‘pure’ QM, I mean Schrödinger evolution with no wavefunction collapse. Several classes of interpretations of pure QM can rely on decoherence. One class is the ‘modal’ interpretations of van Fraassen (1979), Dieks (1989), Healey (1989), and others. Another class is the relative-state and many-world interpretations. I will argue that decoherence cannot help these interpretations address the general metaphysical challenges raised against them. But decoherence can help pick out a ‘special’ basis that determines which observables receive definite values. I'll explore to what extent decoherence rescues the modal (biorthogonal) basis-selection rule, and Zurek's (environmental interaction) basis-selection rule, from the basis degeneracy problem and the imperfect measurement problem.

PSA Proceedings of the Biennial Meeting of the Philosophy of Science AssociationJan 1, 199416 citations

On the preferred-basis problem and its possible solutions

Bruno Galvan

The preferred basis problem is mentioned in the literature in connection with the measurement problem and with the Many World Interpretation. It is argued that this problem actually corresponds to two inequivalent problems: (i) the preferred-decomposition problem, i.e., what singles out a preferred decomposition of a suitable state vector of a system as the sum of a finite or countable set of vectors?, and (ii) the preferred-representation problem, i.e., what singles out a preferred representation for the Hilbert space of a system? In this paper the preferred-decomposition problem is addressed and two processes, namely decoherence and permanent spatial decomposition (PSD), are examined and compared as possible solutions to this problem. It is shown that, perhaps contrary to common belief, in realistic situations decoherence is not sufficient to solve the preferred-decomposition problem. PSD is the (hypothesized) tendency of the wave function of the universe to decompose into permanently non-overlapping wave packets. Three phases can be roughly identified as composing PSD: Microscopic decomposition, amplification, and interaction with the environment. Decoherence theory considers only the interaction with the environment and ignores the first two phases. For this reason PSD is fundamentally different from decoherence and, unlike decoherence, provides a simple and non-elusive solution to the preferred-decomposition problem.

arXiv:1008.3708Aug 22, 20102 citations

No Quantum Process Can Explain the Existence of the Preferred Basis: Decoherence Is Not Universal

Hitoshi Inamori

Environment induced decoherence, and other quantum processes, have been proposed in the literature to explain the apparent spontaneous selection—out of the many mathematically eligible bases—of a privileged measurement basis that corresponds to what we actually observe. This paper describes such processes, and demonstrates that—contrary to common belief—no such process can actually lead to a preferred basis in general. The key observation is that environment induced decoherence implicitly assumes a prior independence of the observed system, the observer and the environment. However, such independence cannot be guaranteed, and we show that environment induced decoherence does not succeed in establishing a preferred measurement basis in general. We conclude that the existence of the preferred basis must be postulated in quantum mechanics, and that changing the basis for a measurement is, and must be, described as an actual physical process.

arXiv:1609.07984Journal of Quantum Information ScienceJan 1, 20162 citations

Quantum Measurements

Nelson Enrique Bolivar, Gabriel Abellán

A transition would lead the system from its original superposition state to another state, in which the system and the measuring apparatus acquire definite properties. The problem of measurement is approached from the theory of environment-induced decoherence. This theoretical program, based on the study of the effects of the interaction between a quantum system, is considered as an open system and its environment. In turn, even the measurement problem has been reformulated, expanding its scope. As Schlosshauer points out, the conceptual difficulties of quantum measurement can now be concentrated around two cases: The definite outcome, which consists of the traditional question about quantum measurement. The problem of the preferred basis: since there is a theoretical ambiguity in the definition of the observable measured due to the mathematical possibility of a base change in the expression of the system state.

Apple Academic Press eBooksMay 23, 20180 citations

The Preferred-Basis Problem and the Quantum Mechanics of Everything

Jeffrey Alan Barrett

Jereon Vink ([1993]) argued that there are two options for what he called a realistic solution to the quantum measurement problem: (1) select a preferred set of observables for which definite values are assumed to exist, or (2) attempt to assign definite values to all observables simultaneously (1810–1). While conventional wisdom has it that the second option is ruled out by the Kochen-Specker theorem, Vink nevertheless advocated it. Making every physical quantity determinate in quantum mechanics carries with it significant conceptual costs, but it also provides a way of addressing the preferred basis problem that arises if one chooses to pursue the first option. The potential costs and benefits of a formulation of quantum mechanics where every physical quantity is determinate are herein examined. 1. The preferred-basis problem 2. How to solve the preferred-basis problem 3. Relativistic constraints 4. Conclusion

The British Journal for the Philosophy of ScienceMay 17, 200532 citations