arXiv:1008.3708

On the preferred-basis problem and its possible solutions

Bruno Galvan

Published Aug 22, 2010• 2 citations

Abstract

The preferred basis problem is mentioned in the literature in connection with the measurement problem and with the Many World Interpretation. It is argued that this problem actually corresponds to two inequivalent problems: (i) the preferred-decomposition problem, i.e., what singles out a preferred decomposition of a suitable state vector of a system as the sum of a finite or countable set of vectors?, and (ii) the preferred-representation problem, i.e., what singles out a preferred representation for the Hilbert space of a system? In this paper the preferred-decomposition problem is addressed and two processes, namely decoherence and permanent spatial decomposition (PSD), are examined and compared as possible solutions to this problem. It is shown that, perhaps contrary to common belief, in realistic situations decoherence is not sufficient to solve the preferred-decomposition problem. PSD is the (hypothesized) tendency of the wave function of the universe to decompose into permanently non-overlapping wave packets. Three phases can be roughly identified as composing PSD: Microscopic decomposition, amplification, and interaction with the environment. Decoherence theory considers only the interaction with the environment and ignores the first two phases. For this reason PSD is fundamentally different from decoherence and, unlike decoherence, provides a simple and non-elusive solution to the preferred-decomposition problem.

DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1008.3708

Related papers

Is the Preferred Basis selected by the environment?

Tian Wang, David Hobill

We show that in a quantum measurement, the preferred basis is determined by the interaction between the apparatus and the quantum system, instead of by the environment. This interaction entangles three degrees of freedom, one system degree of freedom we are interested in and preserved by the interaction, one system degree of freedom that carries the change due to the interaction, and the apparatus degree of freedom which is always ignored. Considering all three degrees of freedom the composite state only has one decomposition, and this guarantees that the apparatus would end up in the expected preferred basis of our daily experiences. We also point out some problems with the environment-induced super-selection (Einselection) solution to the preferred basis problem, and clarifies a common misunderstanding of environmental decoherence and the preferred basis problem.

arXiv:1412.2852Dec 9, 20141 citation

The basis problem in many-worlds theories

H P Stapp

It is emphasized that a many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory exists only to the extent that the associated basis problem is solved. The core basis problem is that the robust enduring states specified by environmental decoherence effects are essentially Gaussian wave packets that form continua of non-orthogonal states. Hence they are not a discrete set of orthogonal basis states to which finite probabilities can be assigned by the usual rules. The natural way to get an orthogonal basis without going outside the Schrödinger dynamics is to use the eigenstates of the reduced density matrix, and this idea is the basis of some recent attempts by many-worlds proponents to solve the basis problem. But these eigenstates do not enjoy the locality and quasi-classicality properties of the states defined by environmental decoherence effects, and hence are not satisfactory preferred basis states. This core problem is obscured by approaches that treat the universe as a quantum computer, but it needs to be addressed and resolved before a many-worlds-type interpretation can be said to exist. PACS No.: 03.65Bz

arXiv:quant-ph/0110148Canadian Journal of PhysicsSep 1, 200221 citations

No Quantum Process Can Explain the Existence of the Preferred Basis: Decoherence Is Not Universal

Hitoshi Inamori

Environment induced decoherence, and other quantum processes, have been proposed in the literature to explain the apparent spontaneous selection—out of the many mathematically eligible bases—of a privileged measurement basis that corresponds to what we actually observe. This paper describes such processes, and demonstrates that—contrary to common belief—no such process can actually lead to a preferred basis in general. The key observation is that environment induced decoherence implicitly assumes a prior independence of the observed system, the observer and the environment. However, such independence cannot be guaranteed, and we show that environment induced decoherence does not succeed in establishing a preferred measurement basis in general. We conclude that the existence of the preferred basis must be postulated in quantum mechanics, and that changing the basis for a measurement is, and must be, described as an actual physical process.

arXiv:1609.07984Journal of Quantum Information ScienceJan 1, 20162 citations

The Basis Problem in Many Worlds Theories

Henry P. Stapp

It is emphasized that a many-worlds interpretation of quantum theory exists only to the extent that the associated basis problem is solved. The core basis problem is that the robust enduring states specified by environmental decoherence effects are essentially Gaussian wave packets that form continua of non-orthogonal states. Hence they are not a discrete set of orthogonal basis states to which finite probabilities can be assigned by the usual rules. The natural way to get an orthogonal basis without going outside the Schroedinger dynamics is to use the eigenstates of the reduced density matrix, and this idea is the basis of some recent attempts by many-worlds proponents to solve the basis problem. But these eigenstates do not enjoy the locality and quasi-classicality properties of the states defined by environmental decoherence effects, and hence are not satisfactory preferred basis states. This core problem is obscured by approaches that treat the universe as a quantum computer, but it needs to be addressed and resolved before a many-worlds-type interpretation can be said to exist.

Oct 25, 200136 citations

The preferred basis is causal: The measurement problem in an ontology of actualization

Patrick Jaubert

The "preferred-basis problem" — why does measurement produce definite outcomes in this basis rather than another — is treated in opposite ways by the interpretations of quantum mechanics: posited ab initio (spontaneous collapse), drawn from a contingent environment (decoherence), left to the choice of a framework (decoherent histories), avoided (many-worlds, pilot wave). We show that in the Time–Actualization ontology — where measurement is an instance of the universal process of actualizing quantum potentialities into events — the preferred basis is anchored in the causal past of the event, together with a readiness condition: which events that past has made ready to actualize. TA does not introduce a new selection mechanism: it identifies the environment of einselection with the already-actualized causal past — an environment that is not posited outside the formalism (unlike an external classical apparatus), but is part of the same substrate. The causal location of this environment is foliation-independent; its monitoring content depends on the couplings, not on the bare order alone. Covariance of the associated operations requires the locality hypotheses stated below. The uniqueness of outcomes is posited, not explained. Born's rule remains imported, and empirical equivalence with quantum mechanics on the causal-set substrate is a requirement still to be verified for a complete dynamics. The contribution is ontological and local to the preferred-basis question. A symmetric downstream mechanism — the redundant proliferation of the outcome into the causal future (quantum Darwinism) — in addition accounts for the inter-observer objectivity of the actualized fact, without deriving it.

Aug 8, 20260 citations

Reconstructing Reality: Environment-Induced Decoherence, the Measurement Problem, and the Emergence of Definiteness in Quantum Mechanics

Hanneke Janssen

This work is a critique of the program of "environment-induced decoherence" as advocated by Zurek, Zeh and Joos, among others. In particular, the alleged relevance of decoherence for a solution of the "measurement problem" is subjected to a detailed philosophical analysis. In the first chapter, an attempt is made to unravel what exactly this "measurement problem" amounts to for the decoherence theorists. The second chapter reviews the standard decoherence literature. The third chapter starts with a brief discussion of the philosophical implications of the decoherence program, followed by a non-standard reconstruction of the decoherence argument that aims to uncover some (mostly hidden) assumptions underlying the approach. It is argued that different subsets of these assumptions result in different versions of the decoherence argument. Next, these assumptions are investigated in more detail, and a number of open problems for the decoherence approach is formulated, in addition to the well-known "problem of outcomes". These problems concern the interpretational relevance of the preferred basis, the role and status of the ignorance interpretation of mixed states, imperfect decoherence and the role of the environment and the definition of subsystems. The fourth chapter addresses the question to what extent the embedding of decoherence in an Everett-like interpretational framework, such as Zurek's "existentional interpretation" and Wallace's structural-realistic version of the many-worlds interpretation, helps to resolve these problems. The main conclusions are formulated in the fifth chapter. Namely: 1) decoherence cannot address the "preferred-basis problem" without adding new interpretational axioms to the standard formalism, 2) the the locality principle (that says that the environment is the "irrelevant" part and should therefore be ignored) is not only problematic but also interpretationally superfluous, 3) the decoherence approach, when formulated in terms of the standard interpretation of quantum mechanics, is predicated on a solution of the "problem of outcomes" and thus cannot claim to account (even partially) for the latter, and 4) that the results of the decoherence program do not increase the plausibility of a realist interpretation of the quantum state.

Aug 1, 200813 citations